This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
This allows toolchain drivers to add multiple libc++ include paths akin
to libstdc++. This is useful in multiarch setup when some headers might
be in target specific include directory. There should be no functional
change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45422
llvm-svn: 329748
Summary:
1. Find GCC's LDPATH from the actual GCC config file.
2. Avoid picking libraries from a similar named tuple if the exact
tuple is installed.
Reviewers: mgorny, chandlerc, thakis, rnk
Reviewed By: mgorny, rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45233
llvm-svn: 329512
Summary:
General idea is to utilize generic (mostly Generic_GCC) code
and get rid of Solaris-specific handling as much as possible.
In particular:
- scanLibDirForGCCTripleSolaris was removed, relying on generic
CollectLibDirsAndTriples
- findBiarchMultilibs is now properly utilized to switch between
m32 and m64 include & lib paths on Solaris
- C system include handling copied from Linux (bar multilib hacks)
Fixes PR24606.
Reviewers: dlj, rafael, jyknight, theraven, tstellar
Reviewed By: jyknight
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, mgorny, krytarowski, ro, joerg, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35755
llvm-svn: 323193
This commit fixes a bug where clang/llvm doesn't emit an unwind table
for a function when it is marked noexcept. Without this patch, the
following code terminates with an uncaught exception on ARM64:
int foo1() noexcept {
try {
throw 0;
} catch (int i) {
return 0;
}
return 1;
}
int main() {
return foo1();
}
rdar://problem/32411865
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35693
llvm-svn: 310006
Summary: Pass the type of the device offloading when building the tool chain for a particular target architecture. This is required when supporting multiple tool chains that target a single device type. In our particular use case, the OpenMP and CUDA tool chains will use the same ```addClangTargetOptions ``` method. This enables the reuse of common options and ensures control over options only supported by a particular tool chain.
Reviewers: arpith-jacob, caomhin, carlo.bertolli, ABataev, jlebar, hfinkel, tstellar, Hahnfeld
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: jgravelle-google, aheejin, rengolin, jfb, dschuff, sbc100, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29647
llvm-svn: 307272
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
Adrian Prantl