Whether an explicit instantiation declaration should be provided is not
a matter of availability markup.
This problem is exemplified by the fact that some tests were incorrectly
marked as XFAIL when they should instead have been using the definition
of streams from the headers, and hence passing, and that, regardless of
whether visibility annotations are enabled.
llvm-svn: 348436
Summary:
Currently std::asinh and std::acosh use std::pow to compute x^2. This
results in a significant error when computing e.g. asinh(i) or
acosh(-1).
This patch expresses x^2 directly via x.real() and x.imag(), like it
is done in libstdc++/glibc, and adds tests that checks the accuracy.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41629
llvm-svn: 325510
Libc++ is used as a system library on macOS and iOS (amongst others). In order
for users to be able to compile a binary that is intended to be deployed to an
older version of the platform, clang provides the
availability attribute <https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#availability>_
that can be placed on declarations to describe the lifecycle of a symbol in the
library.
See docs/DesignDocs/AvailabilityMarkup.rst for more information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31739
llvm-svn: 302172
test/std/input.output/iostream.format/input.streams/istream.unformatted/get.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<char> because basic_istream::get() returns int_type (N4606 27.7.2.3 [istream.unformatted]/4).
test/std/input.output/iostream.format/output.streams/ostream.formatted/ostream.inserters.arithmetic/minus1.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<char> because toupper() returns int (C11 7.4.2.2/1).
test/std/iterators/stream.iterators/ostream.iterator/ostream.iterator.ops/assign_t.pass.cpp
This test is intentionally writing doubles to ostream_iterator<int>.
It's silencing -Wliteral-conversion for Clang, so I'm adding C4244 silencing for MSVC.
test/std/language.support/support.limits/limits/numeric.limits.members/infinity.pass.cpp
Given `extern float zero;`, the expression `1./zero` has type double, which emits a truncation warning
when being passed to test<float>() taking float. The fix is to say `1.f/zero` which has type float.
test/std/numerics/complex.number/cmplx.over/arg.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/complex.number/cmplx.over/norm.pass.cpp
These tests were constructing std::complex<double>(x, 0), emitting truncation warnings when x is long long.
Saying static_cast<double>(x) avoids this.
test/std/numerics/rand/rand.eng/rand.eng.lcong/seed_result_type.pass.cpp
This was using `int s` to construct and seed a linear_congruential_engine<T, stuff>, where T is
unsigned short/unsigned int/unsigned long/unsigned long long. That emits a truncation warning in the
unsigned short case. Because the range [0, 20) is tiny and we aren't doing anything else with the index,
we can just iterate with `T s`.
test/std/re/re.traits/value.pass.cpp
regex_traits<wchar_t>::value()'s first parameter is wchar_t (N4606 28.7 [re.traits]/13). This loop is
using int to iterate through ['g', 0xFFFF), emitting a truncation warning from int to wchar_t
(which is 16-bit for some of us). Because the bound is exclusive, we can just iterate with wchar_t.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.cons/size_char_alloc.pass.cpp
This test is a little strange. It's trying to verify that basic_string's (InIt, InIt) range constructor
isn't confused by "N copies of C" when N and C have the same integral type. To do this, it was
testing (100, 65), but that eventually emits truncation warnings from int to char. There's a simple way
to avoid this - passing (static_cast<char>(100), static_cast<char>(65)) also exercises the disambiguation.
(And 100 is representable even when char has a signed range.)
test/std/strings/string.view/string.view.hash/string_view.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<char_type> because `'0' + i` has type int.
test/std/utilities/function.objects/bind/func.bind/func.bind.bind/nested.pass.cpp
What's more horrible than nested bind()? pow() overloads! This operator()(T a, T b) was assuming that
std::pow(a, b) can be returned as T. (In this case, T is int.) However, N4606 26.9.1 [cmath.syn]/2
says that pow(int, int) returns double, so this was truncating double to int.
Adding static_cast<T> silences this.
test/std/utilities/function.objects/unord.hash/integral.pass.cpp
This was iterating `for (int i = 0; i <= 5; ++i)` and constructing `T t(i);` but that's truncating
when T is short. (And super truncating when T is bool.) Adding static_cast<T> silences this.
test/std/utilities/utility/exchange/exchange.pass.cpp
First, this was exchanging 67.2 into an int, but that's inherently truncating.
Changing this to static_cast<short>(67) avoids the truncation while preserving the
"what if T and U are different" test coverage.
Second, this was exchanging {} with the explicit type float into an int, and that's also
inherently truncating. Specifying short is just as good.
test/std/utilities/utility/pairs/pairs.spec/make_pair.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<short>. Note that this affects template argument deduction for make_pair(),
better fulfilling the test's intent. For example, this was saying
`typedef std::pair<int, short> P1; P1 p1 = std::make_pair(3, 4);` but that was asking
make_pair() to return pair<int, int>, which was then being converted to pair<int, short>.
(pair's converting constructors are tested elsewhere.)
Now, std::make_pair(3, static_cast<short>(4)) actually returns pair<int, short>.
(There's still a conversion from pair<nullptr_t, short> to pair<unique_ptr<int>, short>.)
Fixes D27544.
llvm-svn: 289111
This replaces every occurrence of _LIBCPP_STD_VER in the tests with
TEST_STD_VER. Additionally, for every affected
file, #include "test_macros.h" is being added explicitly if it wasn't
already there.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26294
llvm-svn: 286007
The functions arg, conj, imag, norm, proj, and real have additional overloads
for arguments of integral or floating point types. However these overloads should
not allow conversions to the integral/floating point types, only exact matches.
This patch constrains these functions so they no longer allow conversions.
llvm-svn: 276067
Quite a few libcxx tests seem to follow the format:
#if _LIBCPP_STD_VER > X
// Do test.
#else
// Empty test.
#endif
We should instead use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive to exclude the test on
earlier C++ standards. This gives us a more accurate number of test passes
for those standards and avoids unnecessary conflicts with other lit
directives on the same tests.
Reviewers: bcraig, ericwf, mclow.lists
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20730
llvm-svn: 271108
The initial buildbot run found a few missing bits in the initial XFAIL list
for the no-exceptions libc++ variant. These discrepancies are as follows:
[1] Following two tests need XFAILs on the no-exceptions library variant.
My local runs had these two disabled for other reasons (unsupported):
- localization/locales/locale/locale.cons/char_pointer.pass.cpp
- numerics/complex.number/complex.ops/complex_divide_complex.pass.cpp
[2] These three does not need XFAILs, they were failing on my local runs for
other reasons:
- depr/depr.c.headers/uchar_h.pass.cpp
- input.output/iostreams.base/ios/basic.ios.members/copyfmt.pass.cpp
- .../category.collate/locale.collate.byname/transform.pass.cpp
(these are failing on my box for the default build as well)
The current patch fixes both the cases above. Additionally, I've run the
following scan to make sure I've covered all the cases:
> grep ' catch \| try \| throw ' -R . | perl -pe 's|(.*?):.*|\1|' | sort | \
uniq > 1.txt
> grep 'libcpp-no-exceptions' -R . | perl -pe 's|(.*?):.*|\1|' | sort | \
uniq > 2.txt
> diff 1.txt 2.txt
This showed up a few extra interesting cases:
[3] These two tests do not use try/catch/throw statements, but they fail at
runtime. Need to be investigated, I've left the XFAILs in.
- std/thread/futures/futures.shared_future/dtor.pass.cpp
- std/thread/futures/futures.unique_future/dtor.pass.cpp
[4] These tests use a macro named TEST_HAS_NO_EXCEPTIONS to conditionally
exclude try/catch/throw statements when running without exceptions. I'm not
entirely sure why this was needed (AFAIK, we didn't have a no-exceptions
library build before). The macro's defintion is quite similar to that of
_LIBCPP_NO_EXCEPTIONS. I will investigate if this can be reused for my test
fixes or if it should be replaced with _LIBCPP_NO_EXCEPTIONS.
- std/experimental/any/*
Change-Id: I9ad1e0edd78f305406eaa0ab148b1ab693f7e26a
llvm-svn: 252870
Fixes a small omission in libcxx that prevents libcxx being built when
-DLIBCXX_ENABLE_EXCEPTIONS=0 is specified.
This patch adds XFAILS to all those tests that are currently failing
on the new -fno-exceptions library variant. Follow-up patches will
update the tests (progressively) to cope with the new library variant.
Change-Id: I4b801bd8d8e4fe7193df9e55f39f1f393a8ba81a
llvm-svn: 252598
Louis Dionne