After two failed attempts last week to make this work I am
going back to a known good method of making this test pass on
macOS...adding the current apple-clang version to the
UNSUPPORTED list.
During a previous patch review (https://reviews.llvm.org/D44103)
it was suggested to just XFAIL libcpp-no-deduction-guides
as was done to iter_alloc_deduction.pass.cpp. However
this caused a an unexpected pass on:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc-tot-latest-std/builds/214
I then attempted to just mark libcpp-no-deduction-guides
as UNSUPPORTED, however this caused an additional bot
failure. So I reverted everything (https://reviews.llvm.org/rCXX327191).
To solve this and get work unblocked I am adding
apple-clang-9 to the original UNSUPPORTED list.
llvm-svn: 327304
Summary: Refactor the previous version method of marking each apple-clang version as UNSUPPORTED and just XFAIL'ing the libcpp-no-deduction-guides instead. This brings this test inline with the same style as iter_alloc_deduction.pass.cpp
Reviewers: EricWF, dexonsmith
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: EricWF, vsapsai, vsk, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44103
llvm-svn: 327178
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/exclusive.scan/exclusive_scan.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/exclusive.scan/exclusive_scan_init_op.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/inclusive.scan/inclusive_scan.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/inclusive.scan/inclusive_scan_op.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/inclusive.scan/inclusive_scan_op_init.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/transform.exclusive.scan/transform_exclusive_scan_init_bop_uop.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/transform.inclusive.scan/transform_inclusive_scan_bop_uop.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/transform.inclusive.scan/transform_inclusive_scan_bop_uop_init.pass.cpp
Fix MSVC x64 truncation warnings.
warning C4267: conversion from 'size_t' to 'int', possible loss of data
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.modifiers/string_append/push_back.pass.cpp
Fix MSVC uninitialized memory warning.
warning C6001: Using uninitialized memory 'vl'.
test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/PR20855_tuple_ref_binding_diagnostics.pass.cpp
Include <cassert> for the assert() macro.
Fixes D43273.
llvm-svn: 326120
This makes them consistent (many comments already used uppercase).
The special REQUIRES, UNSUPPORTED, and XFAIL comments are excluded from this change.
llvm-svn: 309468
In T_size_size.pass, there is an explicit template argument to std::min to ask
for unsigned, to avoid type deduction errors. However, C1XX' warnings still
hate this use, because a 64 bit value (a size_t) is being passed to a function
accepting an unsigned (a 32 bit value).
Instead, change the tests to pass around std::size_t instances, and explicitly
narrow when constructing the string type under test. This also allows
removal of explicit template arguments to std::min.
llvm-svn: 302473
Libc++ is used as a system library on macOS and iOS (amongst others). In order
for users to be able to compile a binary that is intended to be deployed to an
older version of the platform, clang provides the
availability attribute <https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#availability>_
that can be placed on declarations to describe the lifecycle of a symbol in the
library.
See docs/DesignDocs/AvailabilityMarkup.rst for more information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31739
llvm-svn: 302172
The clang assertion causing these tests failing with sanitizer is fixed
in r295794. All the bots running libcxx tests should be upgraded and
running the compiler with the fix.
llvm-svn: 296385
Summary:
This patch fixes http://llvm.org/PR31938. The description below is copy/pasted from the bug:
The standard says:
template<class charT, class traits = char_traits<charT>,
class Allocator = allocator<charT>>
class basic_string {
using value_type = typename traits::char_type;
// ...
basic_string(const charT* s, const Allocator& a = Allocator());
};
libc++ actually chooses to declare the constructor as
basic_string(const value_type* s, const Allocator& a = Allocator());
The implicit deduction guides from class template argument deduction make what was previously an implementation detail visible:
std::basic_string s = "foo"; // error, can't deduce charT.
The constructor in question is in the libc++ DSO, but fortunately it looks like fixing this will not result in an ABI break.
@rsmith How does this look? I did more than just the constructors mentioned in the PR, but IDK how far to take it.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29863
llvm-svn: 295393
Guard typedefs and static_asserts with _LIBCPP_VERSION.
test/std/containers/sequences/vector.bool/move_assign_noexcept.pass.cpp
test/std/containers/sequences/vector.bool/move_noexcept.pass.cpp
test/std/containers/sequences/vector.bool/swap_noexcept.pass.cpp
Additionally deal with conditional compilation.
test/std/containers/associative/map/map.cons/move_noexcept.pass.cpp
test/std/containers/associative/multimap/multimap.cons/move_noexcept.pass.cpp
Additionally deal with typedefs used by other typedefs.
Fixes D29135.
llvm-svn: 294154
Marshall Clow