This patch adds LocationContext to checkRegionChanges and removes
wantsRegionChangeUpdate as it was unused.
A patch by Krzysztof Wiśniewski!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27090
llvm-svn: 291869
The patch also simplifies an assume of a constraint of the form: "(exp comparison_op expr) != 0" to true into an assume of "exp comparison_op expr" to true. (And similarly, an assume of the form "(exp comparison_op expr) == 0" to true as an assume of exp comparison_op expr to false.) which improves precision overall.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22862
llvm-svn: 290505
The patch also simplifies an assume of a constraint of the form: "(exp comparison_op expr) != 0" to true into an assume of "exp comparison_op expr" to true. (And similarly, an assume of the form "(exp comparison_op expr) == 0" to true as an assume of exp comparison_op expr to false.) which improves precision overall.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22862
llvm-svn: 290413
Add a new type of NonLoc SVal for C++ pointer-to-member operations. This SVal
supports both pointers to member functions and pointers to member data.
A patch by Kirill Romanenkov!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25475
llvm-svn: 289873
latter case, a temporary array object is materialized, and can be
lifetime-extended by binding a reference to the member access. Likewise, in an
array-to-pointer decay, an rvalue array is materialized before being converted
into a pointer.
This caused IR generation to stop treating file-scope array compound literals
as having static storage duration in some cases in C++; that has been rectified
by modeling such a compound literal as an lvalue. This also improves clang's
compatibility with GCC for those cases.
llvm-svn: 288654
Dynamic casts are handled relatively well by the static analyzer.
BaseToDerived casts however are treated conservatively. This can cause some
false positives with the NewDeleteLeaks checker.
This patch alters the behavior of BaseToDerived casts. In case a dynamic cast
would succeed use the same semantics. Otherwise fall back to the conservative
approach.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23014
llvm-svn: 277989
Currently Clang use int32 to represent sampler_t, which have been a source of issue for some backends, because in some backends sampler_t cannot be represented by int32. They have to depend on kernel argument metadata and use IPA to find the sampler arguments and global variables and transform them to target specific sampler type.
This patch uses opaque pointer type opencl.sampler_t* for sampler_t. For each use of file-scope sampler variable, it generates a function call of __translate_sampler_initializer. For each initialization of function-scope sampler variable, it generates a function call of __translate_sampler_initializer.
Each builtin library can implement its own __translate_sampler_initializer(). Since the real sampler type tends to be architecture dependent, allowing it to be initialized by a library function simplifies backend design. A typical implementation of __translate_sampler_initializer could be a table lookup of real sampler literal values. Since its argument is always a literal, the returned pointer is known at compile time and easily optimized to finally become some literal values directly put into image read instructions.
This patch is partially based on Alexey Sotkin's work in Khronos Clang (3d4eec6162).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21567
llvm-svn: 277024
In {CG,}ExprConstant.cpp, we weren't treating vector splats properly.
This patch makes us treat splats more properly.
Additionally, this patch adds a new cast kind which allows a bool->int
cast to result in -1 or 0, instead of 1 or 0 (for true and false,
respectively), so we can sanely model OpenCL bool->int casts in the AST.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14877
llvm-svn: 257559
The current workaround for truncations not being modelled is that the evaluation of integer to integer casts are simply bypassed and so the original symbol is used as the new casted symbol (cf SimpleSValBuilder::evalCastFromNonLoc).
This lead to the issue described in PR25078, as the RangeConstraintManager associates ranges with symbols.
The new evalIntegralCast method added by this patch wont bypass the cast if it finds the range of the symbol to be greater than the maximum value of the target type.
The fix to RangeSet::pin mentioned in the initial review will be committed separately.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12901
llvm-svn: 257464
When the analyzer evaluates a CXXConstructExpr, it looks ahead in the CFG for
the current block to detect what region the object should be constructed into.
If the constructor was directly constructed into a local variable or field
region then there is no need to explicitly bind the constructed value to
the local or field when analyzing the DeclStmt or CXXCtorInitializer that
called the constructor.
Unfortunately, there were situations in which the CXXConstructExpr was
constructed into a temporary region but when evaluating the corresponding
DeclStmt or CXXCtorInitializer the analyzer assumed the object was constructed
into the local or field. This led to spurious warnings about uninitialized
values (PR25777).
To avoid these false positives, this commit factors out the logic for
determining when a CXXConstructExpr will be directly constructed into existing
storage, adds the inverse logic to detect when the corresponding later bind can
be safely skipped, and adds assertions to make sure these two checks are in
sync.
rdar://problem/21947725
llvm-svn: 255859
clang converts C++ lambdas to blocks with an implicit user-defined conversion
operator method on the lambda record. This method returns a block that captures a copy
of the lambda. To inline a lambda-converted block, the analyzer now calls the lambda
records's call operator method on the lambda captured by the block.
llvm-svn: 254702
In llvm commit r243581, a reverse range adapter was added which allows
us to change code such as
for (auto I = Fields.rbegin(), E = Fields.rend(); I != E; ++I) {
in to
for (const FieldDecl *I : llvm::reverse(Fields))
This commit changes a few of the places in clang which are eligible to use
this new adapter.
llvm-svn: 243663
While we don't model pointer-to-member operators yet (neither .* nor ->*),
CallAndMessageChecker still checks to make sure the 'this' object is not
null or undefined first. However, it also expects that the object should
always have a valid MemRegion, something that's generally important elsewhere
in the analyzer as well. Ensure this is true ahead of time, just like we do
for member access.
PR19531
llvm-svn: 207561
With the introduction of explicit address space casts into LLVM, there's
a need to provide a new cast kind the front-end can create for C/OpenCL/CUDA
and code to produce address space casts from those kinds when appropriate.
Patch by Michele Scandale!
llvm-svn: 197036
This reverts commit r189090.
The original patch introduced regressions (see the added live-variables.* tests). The patch depends on the correctness of live variable analyses, which are not computed correctly. I've opened PR18159 to track the proper resolution to this problem.
The patch was a stepping block to r189746. This is why part of the patch reverts temporary destructor tests that started crashing. The temporary destructors feature is disabled by default.
llvm-svn: 196593
Summary:
Instead of digging through the ExplodedGraph, to figure out which edge brought
us here, I compute the value of conditional expression by looking at the
sub-expression values.
To do this, I needed to change the liveness algorithm a bit -- now, the full
conditional expression also depends on all atomic sub-expressions, not only the
outermost ones.
Reviewers: jordan_rose
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1340
llvm-svn: 189090
Summary:
ExprEngine had code which specificaly disabled using CXXTempObjectRegions in
InitListExprs. This was a hack put in r168757 to silence a false positive.
The underlying problem seems to have been fixed in the mean time, as removing
this code doesn't seem to break anything. Therefore I propose to remove it and
solve PR16629 in the process.
Reviewers: jordan_rose
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1325
llvm-svn: 188059
While we don't model pointers-to-members besides "null" and "non-null",
we were using Loc symbols for valid pointers and NonLoc integers for the
null case. This hit the assert committed in r185401.
Fixed by using a true (Loc) null for null member pointers.
llvm-svn: 185444
It’s important for us to reason about the cast as it is used in std::addressof. The reason we did not
handle the cast previously was a crash on a test case (see commit r157478). The crash was in
processing array to pointer decay when the region type was not an array. Address the issue, by
just returning an unknown in that case.
llvm-svn: 182808
This occurs because in C++11 the compound literal syntax can trigger a
constructor call via list-initialization. That is, "Point{x, y}" and
"(Point){x, y}" end up being equivalent. If this occurs, the inner
CXXConstructExpr will have already handled the object construction; the
CompoundLiteralExpr just needs to propagate that value forwards.
<rdar://problem/13804098>
llvm-svn: 181213
When computing the value of ?: expression, we rely on the last expression in
the previous basic block to be the resulting value of the expression. This is
not the case for binary "?:" operator (GNU extension) in C++. As the last
basic block has the expression for the condition subexpression, which is an
R-value, whereas the true subexpression is the L-value.
Note the operator evaluation just happens to work in C since the true
subexpression is an R-value (like the condition subexpression). CFG is the
same in C and C++ case, but the AST nodes are different, which the LValue to
Rvalue conversion happening after the BinaryConditionalOperator evaluation.
Changed the logic to only use the last expression from the predecessor only
if it matches either true or false subexpression. Note, the logic needed
fortification anyway: L and R were passed but not even used by the function.
Also, change the conjureSymbolVal to correctly compute the type, when the
expression is an LG-value.
llvm-svn: 179574
Previously, the analyzer used isIntegerType() everywhere, which uses the C
definition of "integer". The C++ predicate with the same behavior is
isIntegerOrUnscopedEnumerationType().
However, the analyzer is /really/ using this to ask if it's some sort of
"integrally representable" type, i.e. it should include C++11 scoped
enumerations as well. hasIntegerRepresentation() sounds like the right
predicate, but that includes vectors, which the analyzer represents by its
elements.
This commit audits all uses of isIntegerType() and replaces them with the
general isIntegerOrEnumerationType(), except in some specific cases where
it makes sense to exclude scoped enumerations, or any enumerations. These
cases now use isIntegerOrUnscopedEnumerationType() and getAs<BuiltinType>()
plus BuiltinType::isInteger().
isIntegerType() is hereby banned in the analyzer - lib/StaticAnalysis and
include/clang/StaticAnalysis. :-)
Fixes real assertion failures. PR15703 / <rdar://problem/12350701>
llvm-svn: 179081
Use Optional<CFG*> where invalid states were needed previously. In the one case
where that's not possible (beginAutomaticObjDtorsInsert) just use a dummy
CFGAutomaticObjDtor.
Thanks for the help from Jordan Rose & discussion/feedback from Ted Kremenek
and Doug Gregor.
Post commit code review feedback on r175796 by Ted Kremenek.
llvm-svn: 175938
This patch makes sure that we do not reinitialize static globals when
the function is called more than once along a path. The motivation is
code with initialization patterns that rely on 2 static variables, where
one of them has an initializer while the other does not. Currently, we
reset the static variables with initializers on every visit to the
function along a path.
llvm-svn: 174676
The stop-gap here is to just drop such objects when processing the InitListExpr.
We still need a better solution.
Fixes <rdar://problem/12755044>.
llvm-svn: 168757
The current logic would actually create a float- or double-sized signed
integer value of 1, which is not at all the same.
No test because the value would be swallowed by an Unknown as soon as it
gets added or subtracted to the original value, but it enables the cleanup
in the next patch.
llvm-svn: 163068
Anna Zaks