Fixes https://llvm.org/PR51520. The problem is that `uniform_int_distribution`
currently uses an unsigned integer with at most 64 bits internally, which
is then casted to the desired result type. If the result type is `int64_t`,
this will produce a negative number if the most significant bit is set,
but if the result type is `__int128_t`, the value remains non-negative
and will be out of bounds for the example in PR#51520. (The reason why
it also seems to work if the upper or lower bound is changed is
because the branch at [1] will then no longer be taken, and proper
rejection sampling takes place.)
The bigger issue here is probably that `uniform_int_distribution` can be
instantiated with `__int128_t` but will silently produce incorrect results
(only the lowest 64 bits can ever be set). libstdc++ also supports `__int128_t`
as a result type, so I have simply extended the maximum width of the
internal intermediate result type.
[1]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/6d28dffb6/libcxx/include/__random/uniform_int_distribution.h#L266-L267
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114129
Actually there's one functional change here, which is that users can
no longer depend on <random> to include all of C++20 <concepts>. That
inclusion is so new that we believe nobody should be depending on it
yet, even in the presence of Hyrum's Law. We keep the includes of <vector>,
<algorithm>, etc., so as not to break pre-C++20 Hyrum's Law users.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114281
This is a fairly mechanical change, it just moves each algorithm into
its own header. This is intended to be a NFC.
This commit re-applies 7ed7d4ccb8, which was reverted in 692d7166f7
because the Modules build got broken. The modules build has now been
fixed, so we're re-committing this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103583
Attribution note
----------------
I'm only committing this. This commit is a mix of D103583, D103330 and
D104171 authored by:
Co-authored-by: Christopher Di Bella <cjdb@google.com>
Co-authored-by: zoecarver <z.zoelec2@gmail.com>
Arthur O'Dwyer