Quentin points out that r298358 would cause us to emit different code
with debug info. That's a big no-no; also erase the instructions that
only live thanks to DBG_VALUE users.
Adrian explained how this is an existing problem and an OK thing to do:
clang has allocas for all variables so shouldn't be affected at -O0, but
swift uses a bit of inlineasm to explicitly keep values live for the
purpose of debug info quality. I'm not sure there is a better scheme.
llvm-svn: 298460
Having more fine-grained information on the specific construct that
caused us to fallback is valuable for large-scale data collection.
We still have the fallback warning, that's also used for FastISel.
We still need to remove the fallback warning, and teach FastISel to also
emit remarks (it currently has a combination of the warning, stats, and
debug prints: the remarks could unify all three).
The abort-on-fallback path could also be better handled using remarks:
one could imagine a "-Rpass-error", analoguous to "-Werror", which would
promote missed/failed remarks to errors. It's not clear whether that
would be useful for other remarks though, so we're not there yet.
llvm-svn: 296013
Move the logic to constraint register from InstructionSelector to a
utility function. It will be required by other passes in the GlobalISel
pipeline.
llvm-svn: 290374
Aditya Nandakumar