Based on the output of include-what-you-use.
This is a big chunk of changes. It is very likely to break downstream code
unless they took a lot of care in avoiding hidden ehader dependencies, something
the LLVM codebase doesn't do that well :-/
I've tried to summarize the biggest change below:
- llvm/include/llvm-c/Core.h: no longer includes llvm-c/ErrorHandling.h
- llvm/IR/DIBuilder.h no longer includes llvm/IR/DebugInfo.h
- llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h no longer includes llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h
- llvm/IR/LLVMRemarkStreamer.h no longer includes llvm/Support/ToolOutputFile.h
- llvm/IR/LegacyPassManager.h no longer include llvm/Pass.h
- llvm/IR/Type.h no longer includes llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h
- llvm/IR/PassManager.h no longer includes llvm/Pass.h nor llvm/Support/Debug.h
And the usual count of preprocessed lines:
$ clang++ -E -Iinclude -I../llvm/include ../llvm/lib/IR/*.cpp -std=c++14 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions | wc -l
before: 6400831
after: 6189948
200k lines less to process is no that bad ;-)
Discourse thread on the topic: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118652
Currently, the clang.arc.attachedcall bundle takes an optional function
argument. Depending on whether the argument is present, calls with this
bundle have the following semantics:
- on x86, with the argument present, the call is lowered to:
call _target
mov rax, rdi
call _objc_retainAutoreleasedReturnValue
- on AArch64, without the argument, the call is lowered to:
bl _target
mov x29, x29
and the objc runtime call is expected to be emitted separately.
That's because, on x86, the objc runtime checks for both the mov and
the call on x86, and treats the combination as the ARC autorelease elision
marker.
But on AArch64, it only checks for the dedicated NOP marker, as that's
historically been sufficiently unique. Thanks to that, the runtime call
wasn't required to be adjacent to the NOP marker, so it wasn't emitted
as part of the bundle sequence.
This patch unifies both architectures: on AArch64, we now emit all
3 instructions for the bundle. This guarantees that the runtime call
is adjacent to the marker in the sequence, and that's information the
runtime can use to further optimize this.
This helps simplify some of the handling, in particular
BundledRetainClaimRVs, which no longer needs to know whether the bundle
is sufficient or not: it now always should be.
Note that this does not include an AutoUpgrade for the nullary bundles,
as they are only produced in ObjCContract as part of the obj/asm emission
pipeline, and are not expected to be in bitcode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118214
Instead use either Type::getPointerElementType() or
Type::getNonOpaquePointerElementType().
This is part of D117885, in preparation for deprecating the API.
The invalid undef value already triggers a verifier failure, but
then the upwards scan from the cleanuppad ends up asserting. Make
sure this is handled gacefully instead.
I've changed the definition of the experimental.vector.splice
instrinsic to reject indices that are known to be or possibly
out-of-bounds. In practice, this means changing the definition so that
the index is now only valid in the range [-VL, VL-1] where VL is the
known minimum vector length. We use the vscale_range attribute to
take the minimum vscale value into account so that we can permit
more indices when the attribute is present.
The splice intrinsic is currently only ever generated by the vectoriser,
which will never attempt to splice vectors with out-of-bounds values.
Changing the definition also makes things simpler for codegen since we
can always assume that the index is valid.
This patch was created in response to review comments on D115863
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115933
This class is solely used as a lightweight and clean way to build a set of
attributes to be removed from an AttrBuilder. Previously AttrBuilder was used
both for building and removing, which introduced odd situation like creation of
Attribute with dummy value because the only relevant part was the attribute
kind.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116110
Indirect inline asm operands may require the materialization of a
memory access according to the pointer element type. As this will
no longer be available with opaque pointers, we require it to be
explicitly annotated using the elementtype attribute, for example:
define void @test(i32* %p, i32 %x) {
call void asm "addl $1, $0", "=*rm,r"(i32* elementtype(i32) %p, i32 %x)
ret void
}
This patch only includes the LangRef change and Verifier updates to
allow adding the elementtype attribute in this position. It does not
yet enforce this, as this will require changes on the clang side
(and test updates) first.
Something I'm a bit unsure about is whether we really need the
elementtype for all indirect constraints, rather than only indirect
register constraints. I think indirect memory constraints might not
strictly need it (though the backend code is written in a way that
does require it). I think it's okay to just make this a general
requirement though, as this means we don't need to carefully deal
with multiple or alternative constraints. In addition, I believe
that MemorySanitizer benefits from having the element type even in
cases where it may not be strictly necessary for normal lowering
(cd2b050fa4/llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/MemorySanitizer.cpp (L4066)).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116531
The recursive implementation can run into stack overflows, e.g. like in PR52844.
The order the users are visited changes, but for the current use case
this only impacts the order error messages are emitted.
Rust allows enums to be scopes, as shown by the previous change. Sadly,
D111770 disallowed enums-as-scopes in the LLVM Verifier, which means
that LLVM HEAD stopped working for Rust compiles. As a result, we back
out the verifier part of D111770 with a modification to the testcase so
we don't break this in the future.
The testcase is now actual IR from rustc at commit 8f8092cc3, which is
the nightly as of 2021-09-28. I would expect rustc 1.57 to produce
similar or identical IR if someone wants to reproduce this IR in the
future with minimal changes. A recipe for reproducing the IR using rustc
is included in the test file.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115353
The default for min is changed to 1. The behaviour of -mvscale-{min,max}
in Clang is also changed such that 16 is the max vscale when targeting
SVE and no max is specified.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen, paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113294
These `M` parameters shadow the `M` member in `VerifierSupport`, and
both always refer to the same module. Eliminate the redundant parameters
and always use the member.
Reviewed By: dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106474
The patch in D112349 added a previously nonexistant restriction on ifunc
resolvers that they MUST be defintions. However, the function
multiversioning depends on being able to resolve these resolvers at
link-time, so this additional restriction was breaking.
Verify that the resolver exists, that it is a defined
Function, and that its return type matches the ifunc's
type. Add corresponding check to BitcodeReader, change
clang to emit the correct type, and fix tests to comply.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112349
Otherwise, ODRUniquing would map some member method/variable MDNodes
to have enum type DIScope, resulting in invalid debug info and bad
DWARF.
- Add a Verifier check that when a 'scope:' operand is an ODR type that is not an enum.
- Makes ODRUniquing apply to only ODR types with the same tag so that the debuginfo/DWARF is well-formed.
Reviewed By: probinson, aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111770
Stop using APInt constructors and methods that were soft-deprecated in
D109483. This fixes all the uses I found in llvm, except for the APInt
unit tests which should still test the deprecated methods.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110807
ParameterABIAttributes functions work with unsigned integers as the index, so having the getter be signed makes no sense. Additionally, for this reason, the loop vars that were signed were changed to unsigned too.
Reviewed By: jeroen.dobbelaere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110344
This patch emits DW_TAG_namelist and DW_TAG_namelist_item for fortran
namelist variables. DICompositeType is extended to support this fortran
feature.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108553
Some buildbots fail with:
> C:\a\llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win\llvm-project\llvm\lib\IR\Verifier.cpp(4352): error C2678: binary '==': no operator found which takes a left-hand operand of type 'const llvm::MDOperand' (or there is no acceptable conversion)
Possibly the explicit MDOperand to Metadata* conversion will help?
integer 0/1 for the operand of bundle "clang.arc.attachedcall"
https://reviews.llvm.org/D102996 changes the operand of bundle
"clang.arc.attachedcall". This patch makes changes to llvm that are
needed to handle the new IR.
This should make it easier to understand what the IR is doing and also
simplify some of the passes as they no longer have to translate the
integer values to the runtime functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103000
This patch emits DW_TAG_namelist and DW_TAG_namelist_item for fortran
namelist variables. DICompositeType is extended to support this fortran
feature.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108553
The COFF specific `DataReferencedByCode` complexity (D103372 D103717) is due to
a link.exe limitation: an external symbol in IMAGE_COMDAT_SELECT_ASSOCIATIVE is
not really dropped, so it can cause duplicate definition error.
SwitchInst should have a void result type.
Add a check to the verifier to catch this error.
Reviewed By: samparker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108084
For musttail calls, ABI attributes between the function and the
musttail call must match. The current check discards the type of
type attributes like byval, which means that it will consider
byval(i32) and byval(i64) (or similar) as compatible.
I assume this is a leftover from before these attributes had a
type argument. Ran into this while trying to tighten an assertion
in AttrBuilder.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105841
Use the elementtype attribute introduced in D105407 for the
llvm.preserve.array/struct.index intrinsics. It carries the
element type of the GEP these intrinsics effectively encode.
This patch:
* Adds a verifier check that the attribute is required.
* Adds it in the IRBuilder methods for these intrinsics.
* Autoupgrades old bitcode without the attribute.
* Updates the lowering code to use the attribute rather than
the pointer element type.
* Updates lots of tests to specify the attribute.
* Adds -force-opaque-pointers to the intrinsic-array.ll test
to demonstrate they work now.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D106184
As suggested on D105733, this adds a verifier rule that calls to
intrinsics must match the signature of the intrinsic.
Without opaque pointers this is automatically enforced for all
calls, because the pointer types need to match. If the signatures
don't match, a pointer bitcast has to be inserted. For intrinsics
in particular, such bitcasts are not legal, because the address of
intrinsics cannot be taken.
With opaque pointers, there are no more pointer bitcasts, so it's
generally possible for the call and the callee signature to differ.
However, for intrinsics we still want to enforce that the signatures
must match, the same as was done before through the address taken
check.
We can't enforce this more generally for non-intrinsics, because
calls with mismatched signatures at the very least can legally
occur in unreachable code, and might also be valid in some other
cases, depending on how exactly the signatures differ.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106013
Nikita Popov