D106720 introduced features that did not work properly as we could add
new queries after a fixpoint was reached and which could not be answered
by the information gathered up to the fixpoint alone.
As an alternative to D110078, which forced eager computation where we
want to continue to be lazy, this patch fixes the problem.
QueryAAs are AAs that allow lazy queries during their lifetime. They are
never fixed if they have no outstanding dependences and always run as
part of the updates in an iteration. To determine if we are done, all
query AAs are asked if they received new queries, if not, we only need
to consider updated AAs, as before. If new queries are present we go for
another iteration.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118669
We missed out on AANoRecurse in the module pass because we had no call
graph. With AAFunctionReachability we can simply ask if the function may
reach itself.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110099
This fixes a conceptual problem with our AAIsDead usage which conflated
call site liveness with call site return value liveness. Without the
fix tests would obviously miscompile as we make genericValueTraversal
more powerful (in a follow up). The effects on the tests are mixed but
mostly marginal. The most prominent one is the lack of `noreturn` for
functions. The reason is that we make entire blocks live at the same
time (for time reasons). Now that we actually look at the block
liveness, which we need to do, the return instructions are live and
will survive. As an example, `noreturn_async.ll` has been modified
to retain the `noreturn` even with block granularity. We could address
this easily but there is little need in practice.
When we simplify at least one operand in the Attributor simplification
we can use the InstSimplify to work on the simplified operands. This
allows us to avoid duplication of the logic.
Depends on D106189
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106190
We should use AAValueSimplify for all value simplification, however
there was some leftover logic that predates AAValueSimplify in
AAReturnedValues. This remove the AAReturnedValues part and provides a
replacement by making AAValueSimplifyReturned strong enough to handle
all previously covered cases. Further, this improve
AAValueSimplifyCallSiteReturned to handle returned arguments.
AAReturnedValues is now much easier and the collected returned
values/instructions are now from the associated function only, making it
much more sane. We also do not have the brittle logic anymore that looks
for unresolved calls. Instead, we use AAValueSimplify to handle
recursion.
Useful code has been split into helper functions, e.g., an Attributor
interface to get a simplified value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103860
Not all attributes are able to handle the interprocedural step and
follow the uses into a call site. Let them be able to combine call site
uses instead. This might result in some unused values/arguments being
leftover but it removes problems where we misused "is dead" even though
it was actually "is simplified/replaced".
We explicitly check for dead values due to constant propagation in
`AAIsDeadValueImpl::areAllUsesAssumedDead` instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103858
Broke check-clang, see https://reviews.llvm.org/D102307#2869065
Ran `git revert -n ebbe149a6f08535ede848a531a601ae6591cfbc5..269416d41908bb670f67af689155d5ab8eea689a`
We should use AAValueSimplify for all value simplification, however
there was some leftover logic that predates AAValueSimplify in
AAReturnedValues. This remove the AAReturnedValues part and provides a
replacement by making AAValueSimplifyReturned strong enough to handle
all previously covered cases. Further, this improve
AAValueSimplifyCallSiteReturned to handle returned arguments.
AAReturnedValues is now much easier and the collected returned
values/instructions are now from the associated function only, making it
much more sane. We also do not have the brittle logic anymore that looks
for unresolved calls. Instead, we use AAValueSimplify to handle
recursion.
Useful code has been split into helper functions, e.g., an Attributor
interface to get a simplified value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103860
Not all attributes are able to handle the interprocedural step and
follow the uses into a call site. Let them be able to combine call site
uses instead. This might result in some unused values/arguments being
leftover but it removes problems where we misused "is dead" even though
it was actually "is simplified/replaced".
We explicitly check for dead values due to constant propagation in
`AAIsDeadValueImpl::areAllUsesAssumedDead` instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103858
When we do simplification via AAPotentialValues or AAValueConstantRange
we need to simplify the operands of an instruction we deconstruct first.
This does not only improve the result, see for example range.ll, but is
required as we allow outside AAs to provide simplification rules via
callbacks. If we do ignore the simplification rules and base other
simplifications on the IR instead we can create an inconsistent state.
To allow outside AAs that simplify values we need to ensure all value
simplification goes through the Attributor, not AAValueSimplify (or any
of the other AAs we have already like AAPotentialValues). This patch
also introduces an interface for the outside AAs to register
simplification callbacks for an IRPosition. To make this work as
expected we have to pass IRPositions instead of Values in
AAValueSimplify, which makes sense by itself.
The update_test_checks script can now check for global symbols and is able
to handle them properly when they differ across prefixes, e.g.,
attribute #0 might be different in different runs.
This patch simply updates all the Attributor tests with the new script.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97906
We don't need a bool and an enum to express the three options we
currently have. This makes the interface nicer and much easier to
use optional dependencies. Also avoids mistakes where the bool is
false and enum ignored.
If the function is not assumed `noreturn` we should not wait for an
update to mark the call site as "may-return".
This has two kinds of consequences:
- We have less iterations in many tests.
- We have less deductions based on "known information" (since we ask
earlier, point 1, and therefore assumed information is not "known"
yet).
The latter is an artifact that we might want to tackle properly at some
point but which is not easily fixable right now.
The CloneFunctionInto has implicit requirements with regards to the
linkage and visibility of the function. We now update these after we did
the CloneFunctionInto on the copy with the same linkage and visibility
as the original.
One run line was different and probably introduced for the manually
added function attribute & name checks. We can do this with the script
and a check prefix used for the other run lines as well.
Even though `noundef` IR attribute might be attached to non-void type values, AANoUndef is mistakenly identified for pointer type values only.
This patch fixes that.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86737
Currently, although we handle `CallBase` case in updateImpl, we give up in initialize in the case.
That is problematic when we propagate a range from call site returned position to floating position.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86196
This patch internalize non-exact functions and replaces of their uses
with the internalized version. Doing this enables the analysis of
non-exact functions.
We can do this because some non-exact functions with the same name
whose linkage is `linkonce_odr` or `weak_odr` should have the same
semantics, so we can safely internalize and replace use of them (the
result of the other version of this function should be the same.).
Note that not all functions can be internalized, e.g., function with
`linkonce` or `weak` linkage.
For now when specified in commandline, we internalize all functions
that meet the requirements without calculating the cost of such
internalzation.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84167
Johannes Doerfert