Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Xun Li 31e60b9133 [coroutine] should disable inline before calling coro split
This is a rework of D85812, which didn't land.
When callee coroutine function is inlined into caller coroutine function before coro-split pass, llvm will emits "coroutine should have exactly one defining @llvm.coro.begin". It seems that coro-early pass can not handle this quiet well.
So we believe that unsplited coroutine function should not be inlined.
This patch fix such issue by not inlining function if it has attribute "coroutine.presplit" (it means the function has not been splited) to fix this issue
test plan: check-llvm, check-clang

In D85812, there was suggestions on moving the macros to Attributes.td to avoid circular header dependency issue.
I believe it's not worth doing just to be able to use one constant string in one place.
Today, there are already 3 possible attribute values for "coroutine.presplit": c6543cc6b8/llvm/lib/Transforms/Coroutines/CoroInternal.h (L40-L42)
If we move them into Attributes.td, we would be adding 3 new attributes to EnumAttr, just to support this, which I think is an overkill.

Instead, I think the best way to do this is to add an API in Function class that checks whether this function is a coroutine, by checking the attribute by name directly.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92706
2020-12-08 08:53:08 -08:00
Fangrui Song 44ee9d070a Revert D85812 "[coroutine] should disable inline before calling coro split"
This reverts commit 2e43acfed8.

LLVMCoroutines (the library which contains Coroutines.h) depends on LLVMipo (the
library which contains SampleProfile.cpp). It is inappropriate for
SampleProfile.cpp to depent on Coroutines.h (circular dependency).

The test inverted dependencies as well:
llvm/test/Transforms/Coroutines/coro-inline.ll uses -sample-profile.
2020-08-24 11:41:05 -07:00
dongAxis 2e43acfed8 [coroutine] should disable inline before calling coro split
summary:
When callee coroutine function is inlined into caller coroutine
function before coro-split pass, llvm will emits "coroutine should
have exactly one defining @llvm.coro.begin". It seems that coro-early
pass can not handle this quiet well.
So we believe that unsplited coroutine function should not be inlined.
This patch fix such issue by not inlining function if it has attribute
"coroutine.presplit" (it means the function has not been splited) to
fix this issue

TestPlan: check-llvm

Reviewed By: wenlei

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85812
2020-08-24 22:22:08 +08:00