The tensorflow AOT compiler can cross-target, but it can't run on (for
example) arm64. We added earlier support where the AOT-ed header and object
would be built on a separate builder and then passed at build time to
a build host where the AOT compiler can't run, but clang can be otherwise
built.
To simplify such scenarios given we now support more than one AOT-able
case (regalloc and inliner), we make the AOT scenario centered on whether
files are generated, case by case (this includes the "passed from a
different builder" scenario).
This means we shouldn't need an 'umbrella' LLVM_HAVE_TF_AOT, in favor of
case by case control. A builder can opt out of an AOT case by passing that case's
model path as `none`. Note that the overrides still take precedence.
This patch controls conditional compilation with case-specific flags,
which can be enabled locally, for the component where those are
available. We still keep an overall flag for some tests.
The 'development/training' mode is unchanged, because there the model is
passed from the command line and interpreted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117752
The tests that exercise the 'release' mode, where the model is AOT-ed,
check the output has certain properties, to validate that, indeed, a
different policy from the default one was exercised. For determinism, we
can't reliably check that output for an arbitrary learned policy, since
it could be that policy happens to mimic the default one in that
particular case.
This patch adds a requirement that those tests run only when the model
is autogenerated (e.g. on build bots).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111747
Enable performing mandatory inlinings upfront, by reusing the same logic
as the full inliner, instead of the AlwaysInliner. This has the
following benefits:
- reduce code duplication - one inliner codebase
- open the opportunity to help the full inliner by performing additional
function passes after the mandatory inlinings, but before th full
inliner. Performing the mandatory inlinings first simplifies the problem
the full inliner needs to solve: less call sites, more contextualization, and,
depending on the additional function optimization passes run between the
2 inliners, higher accuracy of cost models / decision policies.
Note that this patch does not yet enable much in terms of post-always
inline function optimization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91567
Mircea Trofin