If we assume SPMD-mode during the fixpoint iteration we have to execute
the kernel in SPMD-mode. If we change our mind during manifest there is
the chance of a mismatch between the simplification, e.g., of
`__kmpc_is_spmd_exec_mode` calls, and the execution mode. This problem
was introduced in D109438.
This patch is compromise to resolve the problem purely in OpenMP-opt
while trying to keep the benefits of D109438 around. This might not
always work, see `get_hardware_num_threads_in_block_fold` but it often
does. At the same time we do keep value specialization and execution
mode in sync.
Proper solutions to this problem should be considered. I believe a new
execution mode is the easiest way forward (Singleton-SPMD).
Alternatively, SPMD-mode execution can be used with a way to provide a
new thread_limit (here 1) to the runtime. This is more general and could
be useful if we see `num_threads` clauses or workshared loops with small
trip counts in the kernel. In either proposal we need to disable the
guarding for the kernel (which was the motivation for D109438).
Reviewed By: jhuber6
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112894
This is a follow-up of D110029, which uses bitset to indicate execution mode. This patches makes the changes in the function call.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110279
This patch changes SPMDization to not trigger for regions with no
parallelism. Otherwise, this will introduce unnecessary barriers that
will slow the single-threaded region down.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109438
Performance on GPU targets can be highly variable, sometimes inlining
everything hurts performance and sometimes it greatly improves it. Add
an option to toggle this behaviour to better investigate it.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109014
Johannes Doerfert