Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Roman Lebedev 4be8707e64
[SimplifyCFG] Teach FoldTwoEntryPHINode() to preserve DomTree
Still boring, simply drop all edges to successors of DomBlock,
and add an edge to to BB instead.
2020-12-20 00:18:33 +03:00
Roman Lebedev b43b77ff9b
[NFCI][SimlifyCFG] simplifyOnce(): also perform DomTree validation
And that exposes that a number of tests don't *actually* manage to
maintain DomTree validity, which is inline with my observations.

Once again, SimlifyCFG pass currently does not require/preserve DomTree
by default, so this is effectively NFC.
2020-12-20 00:18:32 +03:00
Roman Lebedev 164e0847a5
[SimplifyCFG] DeleteDeadBlock() already knows how to preserve DomTree
... so just ensure that we pass DomTreeUpdater it into it.

Fixes DomTree preservation for a large number of tests,
all of which are marked as such so that they do not regress.
2020-12-18 00:37:21 +03:00
Arthur Eubanks aeb0fdff35 [SimplifyCFG] Respect optforfuzzing in NPM pass
Regression caused by refactoring in
cdd006eec9.

See discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D89917.

Reviewed By: arsenm, morehouse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91473
2020-11-16 09:56:37 -08:00
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Matt Morehouse 236cdaf84c [SimplifyCFG] Create attribute for fuzzing-specific optimizations.
Summary:
When building with libFuzzer, converting control flow to selects or
obscuring the original operands of CMPs reduces the effectiveness of
libFuzzer's heuristics.

This patch provides an attribute to disable or modify certain optimizations
for optimal fuzzing signal.

Provides a less aggressive alternative to https://reviews.llvm.org/D44057.

Reviewers: vitalybuka, davide, arsenm, hfinkel

Reviewed By: vitalybuka

Subscribers: junbuml, mehdi_amini, wdng, javed.absar, hiraditya, llvm-commits, kcc

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44232

llvm-svn: 328214
2018-03-22 17:07:51 +00:00