Take this opportunity to generalize the indirectbr bailout logic for
loop transformations. CFG transformations will never get indirectbr
right, and there's no point trying.
llvm-svn: 154386
LSR can fold three addressing modes into its ICmpZero node:
ICmpZero BaseReg + Offset => ICmp BaseReg, -Offset
ICmpZero -1*ScaleReg + Offset => ICmp ScaleReg, Offset
ICmpZero BaseReg + -1*ScaleReg => ICmp BaseReg, ScaleReg
The first two cases are only used if TLI->isLegalICmpImmediate() likes
the offset.
Make sure the right Offset sign is passed to this method in the second
case. The ARM version is not symmetric.
<rdar://problem/11184260>
llvm-svn: 154079
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12343
We have not trivial way for splitting edges that are goes from indirect branch. We can do it with some tricks, but it should be additionally discussed. And it is still dangerous due to difficulty of indirect branches controlling.
Fix forbids this case for unswitching.
llvm-svn: 153879
CodeGenPrepare sinks compare instructions down to their uses to prevent
live flags and predicate registers across basic blocks.
PRE of a compare instruction prevents that, forcing the i1 compare
result into a general purpose register. That is usually more expensive
than the redundant compare PRE was trying to eliminate in the first
place.
llvm-svn: 153657
bit simpler by handling a common case explicitly.
Also, refactor the implementation to use a worklist based walk of the
recursive users, rather than trying to use value handles to detect and
recover from RAUWs during the recursive descent. This fixes a very
subtle bug in the previous implementation where degenerate control flow
structures could cause mutually recursive instructions (PHI nodes) to
collapse in just such a way that From became equal to To after some
amount of recursion. At that point, we hit the inf-loop that the assert
at the top attempted to guard against. This problem is defined away when
not using value handles in this manner. There are lots of comments
claiming that the WeakVH will protect against just this sort of error,
but they're not accurate about the actual implementation of WeakVHs,
which do still track RAUWs.
I don't have any test case for the bug this fixes because it requires
running the recursive simplification on unreachable phi nodes. I've no
way to either run this or easily write an input that triggers it. It was
found when using instruction simplification inside the inliner when
running over the nightly test-suite.
llvm-svn: 153393
same basic block, and it's not safe to insert code in the successor
blocks if the edges are critical edges. Splitting those edges is
possible, but undesirable, especially on the unwind side. Instead,
make the bottom-up code motion to consider invokes to be part of
their successor blocks, rather than part of their parent blocks, so
that it doesn't push code past them and onto the edges. This fixes
PR12307.
llvm-svn: 153343
dominated by Root, check that B is available throughout the scope. This
is obviously true (famous last words?) given the current logic, but the
check may be helpful if more complicated reasoning is added one day.
llvm-svn: 153323
Only record IVUsers that are dominated by simplified loop
headers. Otherwise SCEVExpander will crash while looking for a
preheader.
I previously tried to work around this in LSR itself, but that was
insufficient. This way, LSR can continue to run if some uses are not
in simple loops, as long as we don't attempt to analyze those users.
Fixes <rdar://problem/11049788> Segmentation fault: 11 in LoopStrengthReduce
llvm-svn: 152892
Renamed methods caseBegin, caseEnd and caseDefault with case_begin, case_end, and case_default.
Added some notes relative to case iterators.
llvm-svn: 152532
traversal, consider nodes for which the only successors are backedges
which the traversal is ignoring to be exit nodes. This fixes a problem
where the bottom-up traversal was failing to visit split blocks along
split loop backedges. This fixes rdar://10989035.
llvm-svn: 152421
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120130/136146.html
Implemented CaseIterator and it solves almost all described issues: we don't need to mix operand/case/successor indexing anymore. Base iterator class is implemented as a template since it may be initialized either from "const SwitchInst*" or from "SwitchInst*".
ConstCaseIt is just a read-only iterator.
CaseIt is read-write iterator; it allows to change case successor and case value.
Usage of iterator allows totally remove resolveXXXX methods. All indexing convertions done automatically inside the iterator's getters.
Main way of iterator usage looks like this:
SwitchInst *SI = ... // intialize it somehow
for (SwitchInst::CaseIt i = SI->caseBegin(), e = SI->caseEnd(); i != e; ++i) {
BasicBlock *BB = i.getCaseSuccessor();
ConstantInt *V = i.getCaseValue();
// Do something.
}
If you want to convert case number to TerminatorInst successor index, just use getSuccessorIndex iterator's method.
If you want initialize iterator from TerminatorInst successor index, use CaseIt::fromSuccessorIndex(...) method.
There are also related changes in llvm-clients: klee and clang.
llvm-svn: 152297
This implicitly fixes a nasty bug in the GVN hashing (that thankfully
could only manifest as a performance bug): actually include the opcode
in the hash. The old code started the hash off with the opcode, but then
overwrote it with the type pointer.
Since this is likely to be pretty hot (GVN being already pretty
expensive) I've included a micro-optimization to just not bother with
the varargs hashing if they aren't present. I can't measure any change
in GVN performance due to this, even with a big test case like Duncan's
sqlite one. Everything I see is in the noise floor. That said, this
closes a loop hole for a potential scaling problem due to collisions if
the opcode were the differentiating aspect of the expression.
llvm-svn: 152025
equalities into phi node operands for which the equality is known to
hold in the incoming basic block. That's because replaceAllDominatedUsesWith
wasn't handling phi nodes correctly in general (that this didn't give wrong
results was just luck: the specific way GVN uses replaceAllDominatedUsesWith
precluded wrong changes to phi nodes).
llvm-svn: 152006
Some BBs can become dead after codegen preparation. If we delete them here, it
could help enable tail-call optimizations later on.
<rdar://problem/10256573>
llvm-svn: 152002
value numbers to be assigned when calculating any particular value number.
Enhance the logic that detects new value numbers to take this into account,
for a tiny compile time speedup. Fix a comment typo while there.
llvm-svn: 151522
%cmp (eg: A==B) we already replace %cmp with "true" under the true edge, and
with "false" under the false edge. This change enhances this to replace the
negated compare (A!=B) with "false" under the true edge and "true" under the
false edge. Reported to improve perlbench results by 1%.
llvm-svn: 151517
metadata may still unwind, but only in ways that the ARC
optimizer doesn't need to consider. This permits more
aggressive optimization.
llvm-svn: 150829
This folds a simple loop tail into a loop latch. It covers the common (in fortran) case of postincrement loops. It's a "free" way to expose this type of loop to downstream loop optimizations that bail out on non-canonical loops (getLoopLatch is a heavily used check).
llvm-svn: 150439
- Use unsigned literals when the desired result is unsigned. This mostly allows unsigned/signed mismatch warnings to be less noisy even if they aren't on by default.
- Remove misplaced llvm_unreachable.
- Add static to a declaration of a function on MSVC x86 only.
- Change some instances of calling a static function through a variable to simply calling that function while removing the unused variable.
llvm-svn: 150364
logic by half: isOnlyReachableViaThisEdge was trying to be clever and
handle the case of a branch to a basic block which is contained in a
loop. This costs a domtree lookup and is completely useless due to
GVN's position in the pass pipeline: all loops have preheaders at this
point, which means it is enough for isOnlyReachableViaThisEdge to check
that Dst has only one predecessor. (I checked this theoretical argument
by running over the entire nightly testsuite, and indeed it is so!).
llvm-svn: 149838
but with a critical fix to the SelectionDAG code that optimizes copies
from strings into immediate stores: the previous code was stopping reading
string data at the first nul. Address this by adding a new argument to
llvm::getConstantStringInfo, preserving the behavior before the patch.
llvm-svn: 149800
The purpose of refactoring is to hide operand roles from SwitchInst user (programmer). If you want to play with operands directly, probably you will need lower level methods than SwitchInst ones (TerminatorInst or may be User). After this patch we can reorganize SwitchInst operands and successors as we want.
What was done:
1. Changed semantics of index inside the getCaseValue method:
getCaseValue(0) means "get first case", not a condition. Use getCondition() if you want to resolve the condition. I propose don't mix SwitchInst case indexing with low level indexing (TI successors indexing, User's operands indexing), since it may be dangerous.
2. By the same reason findCaseValue(ConstantInt*) returns actual number of case value. 0 means first case, not default. If there is no case with given value, ErrorIndex will returned.
3. Added getCaseSuccessor method. I propose to avoid usage of TerminatorInst::getSuccessor if you want to resolve case successor BB. Use getCaseSuccessor instead, since internal SwitchInst organization of operands/successors is hidden and may be changed in any moment.
4. Added resolveSuccessorIndex and resolveCaseIndex. The main purpose of these methods is to see how case successors are really mapped in TerminatorInst.
4.1 "resolveSuccessorIndex" was created if you need to level down from SwitchInst to TerminatorInst. It returns TerminatorInst's successor index for given case successor.
4.2 "resolveCaseIndex" converts low level successors index to case index that curresponds to the given successor.
Note: There are also related compatability fix patches for dragonegg, klee, llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, safecode, clang.
llvm-svn: 149481
Problem: LLVM needs more function attributes than currently available (32 bits).
One such proposed attribute is "address_safety", which shows that a function is being checked for address safety (by AddressSanitizer, SAFECode, etc).
Solution:
- extend the Attributes from 32 bits to 64-bits
- wrap the object into a class so that unsigned is never erroneously used instead
- change "unsigned" to "Attributes" throughout the code, including one place in clang.
- the class has no "operator uint64 ()", but it has "uint64_t Raw() " to support packing/unpacking.
- the class has "safe operator bool()" to support the common idiom: if (Attributes attr = getAttrs()) useAttrs(attr);
- The CTOR from uint64_t is marked explicit, so I had to add a few explicit CTOR calls
- Add the new attribute "address_safety". Doing it in the same commit to check that attributes beyond first 32 bits actually work.
- Some of the functions from the Attribute namespace are worth moving inside the class, but I'd prefer to have it as a separate commit.
Tested:
"make check" on Linux (32-bit and 64-bit) and Mac (10.6)
built/run spec CPU 2006 on Linux with clang -O2.
This change will break clang build in lib/CodeGen/CGCall.cpp.
The following patch will fix it.
llvm-svn: 148553
LSR has gradually been improved to more aggressively reuse existing code, particularly existing phi cycles. This exposed problems with the SCEVExpander's sloppy treatment of its insertion point. I applied some rigor to the insertion point problem that will hopefully avoid an endless bug cycle in this area. Changes:
- Always used properlyDominates to check safe code hoisting.
- The insertion point provided to SCEV is now considered a lower bound. This is usually a block terminator or the use itself. Under no cirumstance may SCEVExpander insert below this point.
- LSR is reponsible for finding a "canonical" insertion point across expansion of different expressions.
- Robust logic to determine whether IV increments are in "expanded" form and/or can be safely hoisted above some insertion point.
Fixes PR11783: SCEVExpander assert.
llvm-svn: 148535
It's becoming clear that LoopSimplify needs to unconditionally create loop preheaders. But that is a bigger fix. For now, continuing to hack LSR.
Fixes rdar://10701050 "Cannot split an edge from an IndirectBrInst" assert.
llvm-svn: 148288
Message for r148132:
LoopUnswitch: All helper data that is collected during loop-unswitch iterations was moved to separated class (LUAnalysisCache).
llvm-svn: 148215
the optimizer doesn't eliminate objc_retainBlock calls which are needed
for their side effect of copying blocks onto the heap.
This implements rdar://10361249.
llvm-svn: 148076
1. Size heuristics changed. Now we calculate number of unswitching
branches only once per loop.
2. Some checks was moved from UnswitchIfProfitable to
processCurrentLoop, since it is not changed during processCurrentLoop
iteration. It allows decide to skip some loops at an early stage.
Extended statistics:
- Added total number of instructions analyzed.
llvm-svn: 147935
These heuristics are sufficient for enabling IV chains by
default. Performance analysis has been done for i386, x86_64, and
thumbv7. The optimization is rarely important, but can significantly
speed up certain cases by eliminating spill code within the
loop. Unrolled loops are prime candidates for IV chains. In many
cases, the final code could still be improved with more target
specific optimization following LSR. The goal of this feature is for
LSR to make the best choice of induction variables.
Instruction selection may not completely take advantage of this
feature yet. As a result, there could be cases of slight code size
increase.
Code size can be worse on x86 because it doesn't support postincrement
addressing. In fact, when chains are formed, you may see redundant
address plus stride addition in the addressing mode. GenerateIVChains
tries to compensate for the common cases.
On ARM, code size increase can be mitigated by using postincrement
addressing, but downstream codegen currently misses some opportunities.
llvm-svn: 147826
After collecting chains, check if any should be materialized. If so,
hide the chained IV users from the LSR solver. LSR will only solve for
the head of the chain. GenerateIVChains will then materialize the
chained IV users by computing the IV relative to its previous value in
the chain.
In theory, chained IV users could be exposed to LSR's solver. This
would be considerably complicated to implement and I'm not aware of a
case where we need it. In practice it's more important to
intelligently prune the search space of nontrivial loops before
running the solver, otherwise the solver is often forced to prune the
most optimal solutions. Hiding the chained users does this well, so
that LSR is more likely to find the best IV for the chain as a whole.
llvm-svn: 147801
This collects a set of IV uses within the loop whose values can be
computed relative to each other in a sequence. Following checkins will
make use of this information.
llvm-svn: 147797
This will be more important as we extend the LSR pass in ways that don't rely on the formula solver. In particular, we need it for constructing IV chains.
llvm-svn: 147724
LoopSimplify may not run on some outer loops, e.g. because of indirect
branches. SCEVExpander simply cannot handle outer loops with no preheaders.
Fixes rdar://10655343 SCEVExpander segfault.
llvm-svn: 147718
performance regressions (both execution-time and compile-time) on our
nightly testers.
Original commit message:
Fix for bug #11429: Wrong behaviour for switches. Small improvement for code
size heuristics.
llvm-svn: 147131
into Analysis as a standalone function, since there's no need for
it to be in VMCore. Also, update it to use isKnownNonZero and
other goodies available in Analysis, making it more precise,
enabling more aggressive optimization.
llvm-svn: 146610
This should always be done as a matter of principal. I don't have a
case that exposes the problem. I just noticed this recently while
scanning the code and realized I meant to fix it long ago.
llvm-svn: 146438
detected in the forward-CFG DFS. This prevents the reverse-CFG from
visiting blocks inside loops after blocks that dominate them in the
case where loops have multiple exits.
No testcase, because this fixes a bug which in practice only shows
up in a full optimizer run, due to the use-list order.
This fixes rdar://10422791 and others.
llvm-svn: 146408
indicates whether the intrinsic has a defined result for a first
argument equal to zero. This will eventually allow these intrinsics to
accurately model the semantics of GCC's __builtin_ctz and __builtin_clz
and the X86 instructions (prior to AVX) which implement them.
This patch merely sets the stage by extending the signature of these
intrinsics and establishing auto-upgrade logic so that the old spelling
still works both in IR and in bitcode. The upgrade logic preserves the
existing (inefficient) semantics. This patch should not change any
behavior. CodeGen isn't updated because it can use the existing
semantics regardless of the flag's value.
Note that this will be followed by API updates to Clang and DragonEgg.
Reviewed by Nick Lewycky!
llvm-svn: 146357
Since we're not rewriting IVs in other loops, there's not much reason
to consider their stride when generating formulae.
This should reduce the number of useless formulas considered by LSR.
llvm-svn: 146302
Patch by Brendon Cahoon!
This extends the existing LoopUnroll and LoopUnrollPass. Brendon
measured no regressions in the llvm test suite with -unroll-runtime
enabled. This implementation works by using the existing loop
unrolling code to unroll the loop by a power-of-two (default 8). It
generates an if-then-else sequence of code prior to the loop to
execute the extra iterations before entering the unrolled loop.
llvm-svn: 146245
It's always good to prune early, but formulae that are unsatisfactory
in their own right need to be removed before running any other pruning
heuristics. We easily avoid generating such formulae, but we need them
as an intermediate basis for forming other good formulae.
llvm-svn: 145906
Dan Gohman