Having both rename-at and rename-all both seems confusing and introduces
unneeded difficulties. Allowing to use both -qualified-name and -offset at once
while performing efficient renamings seems like a feature, too. Maintaining main
function wrappers and custom help becomes redundant while CLI becomes less
confusing.
Reviewers: alexfh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24224
llvm-svn: 281456
The only difference between some tests is -offset passed to clang-rename. It
makes sense to merge them into a single file and add multiple tool invocations.
Reviewers: alexfh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23158
llvm-svn: 278221
- rename-at is meant to be integrated with editors and works mainly off
of a location in a file, and this is the default
- rename-all is optimized for one or more oldname->newname renames, and
works with clang-apply-replacements
Reviewers: bkramer, klimek
Subscribers: omtcyfz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21814
llvm-svn: 277438
Rather than copying the file and then doing an in-place edit, perform the
replacements to stdout and pass the output to FileCheck directly. Avoids
unnecessary copying and seds.
llvm-svn: 276836
Kirill Bobyrev