This intrinsic blocks floating point transformations by the optimizer.
Author: Pengfei
Reviewed By: LuoYuanke, Andy Kaylor, Craig Topper, kpn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99675
This ports the AArch64 SABD and USBD over to DAG Combine, where they can be
used by more backends (notably MVE in a follow-up patch). The matching code
has changed very little, just to handle legal operations and types
differently. It selects from (ABS (SUB (EXTEND a), (EXTEND b))), producing
a ubds/abdu which is zexted to the original type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91937
This add as a fold of sub(0, splat(sub(0, x))) -> splat(x). This can
come up in the lowering of right shifts under AArch64, where we generate
a shift left of a negated number.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103755
This is a mechanical change. This actually also renames the
similarly named methods in the SmallString class, however these
methods don't seem to be used outside of the llvm subproject, so
this doesn't break building of the rest of the monorepo.
We don't constant fold based on demanded bits elsewhere in
SimplifyDemandedBits, so I don't think we should shrink them either.
The affected ARM test changes because a constant become non-opaque
and eventually enabled some constant folding. This no longer happens.
I checked and InstCombine is able to simplify this test. I'm not sure exactly
what it was trying to test.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri, dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104832
This is a partial reapply of the original commit and the followup commit
that were previously reverted; this reapply also includes a small fix
for a potential source of non-determinism, but also has a small change
to turn off variadic debug value salvaging, to ensure that any future
revert/reapply steps to disable and renable this feature do not risk
causing conflicts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91722
This reverts commit 386b66b2fc.
The is from discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D104247#inline-993387
The contract and reassoc flags shouldn't imply each other .
All the aggressive fsub fusion reassociate operations,
we should guard them with reassoc flag check.
Reviewed By: mcberg2017
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104723
According to IR LangRef, the FMF flag:
contract
Allow floating-point contraction (e.g. fusing a multiply followed by an
addition into a fused multiply-and-add).
reassoc
Allow reassociation transformations for floating-point instructions.
This may dramatically change results in floating-point.
My understanding is that these two flags shouldn't imply each other,
as we might have a SDNode that can be reassociated with others, but
not contractble.
eg: We may want following fmul/fad/fsub to freely reassoc, but don't
want fma being generated here.
%F = fmul reassoc double %A, %B ; <double> [#uses=1]
%G = fmul reassoc double %C, %D ; <double> [#uses=1]
%H = fadd reassoc double %F, %G ; <double> [#uses=1]
%I = fsub reassoc double %H, %E ; <double> [#uses=1]
Before https://reviews.llvm.org/D45710, `reassoc` flag actually
did not imply isContratable either.
The current implementation also only check the flag in fadd node,
ignoring fmul node, this patch update that as well.
Reviewed By: spatel, qiucf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104247
This can be seen as a follow up to commit 0ee439b705,
that changed the second argument of __powidf2, __powisf2 and
__powitf2 in compiler-rt from si_int to int. That was to align with
how those runtimes are defined in libgcc.
One thing that seem to have been missing in that patch was to make
sure that the rest of LLVM also handle that the argument now depends
on the size of int (not using the si_int machine mode for 32-bit).
When using __builtin_powi for a target with 16-bit int clang crashed.
And when emitting libcalls to those rtlib functions, typically when
lowering @llvm.powi), the backend would always prepare the exponent
argument as an i32 which caused miscompiles when the rtlib was
compiled with 16-bit int.
The solution used here is to use an overloaded type for the second
argument in @llvm.powi. This way clang can use the "correct" type
when lowering __builtin_powi, and then later when emitting the libcall
it is assumed that the type used in @llvm.powi matches the rtlib
function.
One thing that needed some extra attention was that when vectorizing
calls several passes did not support that several arguments could
be overloaded in the intrinsics. This patch allows overload of a
scalar operand by adding hasVectorInstrinsicOverloadedScalarOpd, with
an entry for powi.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99439
This only applies to FastIsel. GlobalIsel seems to sidestep
the issue.
This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46996
One of the things we do in llvm is decide if a type needs
consecutive registers. Previously, we just checked if it
was an array or not.
(plus an SVE specific check that is not changing here)
This causes some confusion when you arbitrary IR like:
```
%T1 = type { double, i1 };
define [ 1 x %T1 ] @foo() {
entry:
ret [ 1 x %T1 ] zeroinitializer
}
```
We see it is an array so we call CC_AArch64_Custom_Block
which bails out when it sees the i1, a type we don't want
to put into a block.
This leaves the location of the double in some kind of
intermediate state and leads to odd codegen. Which then crashes
the backend because it doesn't know how to implement
what it's been asked for.
You get this:
```
renamable $d0 = FMOVD0
$w0 = COPY killed renamable $d0
```
Rather than this:
```
$d0 = FMOVD0
$w0 = COPY $wzr
```
The backend knows how to copy 64 bit to 64 bit registers,
but not 64 to 32. It can certainly be taught how but the real
issue seems to be us even trying to assign a register block
in the first place.
This change makes the logic of
AArch64TargetLowering::functionArgumentNeedsConsecutiveRegisters
a bit more in depth. If we find an array, also check that all the
nested aggregates in that array have a single member type.
Then CC_AArch64_Custom_Block's assumption of a type that looks
like [ N x type ] will be valid and we get the expected codegen.
New tests have been added to exercise these situations. Note that
some of the output is not ABI compliant. The aim of this change is
to simply handle these situations and not to make our processing
of arbitrary IR ABI compliant.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104123
Iff we have `SCALAR_TO_VECTOR` (and we demand it's only defined 0'th element),
and said scalar was produced by `EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT` from the 0'th element
of some vector, then we can just continue traversal into said source vector.
This comes up in X86 vector uniform shift lowering.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104250
6e5628354e regressed the Windows build as
the return type no longer matched in both branches for the return value
type deduction. This uses a bit more compiler magic to deal with that.
The sorting, obviously, must be stable, else we will have random assembly fluctuations.
Apparently there was no test coverage that would benefit from that,
so i've added one test.
The sorting consists of two parts - just sort the input vectors,
and recompute the shuffle mask -> input vector mapping.
I don't believe we need to do anything else.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104187
Ensure that we provide a `Module` when checking if a rename of an intrinsic is necessary.
This fixes the issue that was detected by https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=32288
(as mentioned by @fhahn), after committing D91250.
Note that the `LLVMIntrinsicCopyOverloadedName` is being deprecated in favor of `LLVMIntrinsicCopyOverloadedName2`.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99173
When reducing vector builds to shuffles it possible that
the DAG combiner may try to extract invalid subvectors.
This happens as the existing code assumes vectors will be power
of 2 sizes, which is already untrue, but becomes more noticable
with v6 and v7 types.
Specifically the existing code assumes that half PowerOf2Ceil of
a given vector index will fit twice into a given vector.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103880
This change implements new DAG notes GLOBAL_GET/GLOBAL_SET, and
lowering methods for load and stores of reference types from IR
globals. Once the lowering creates the new nodes, tablegen pattern
matches those and converts them to Wasm global.get/set.
Reviewed By: tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95425
As shown in:
https://llvm.org/PR50623
...and the similar tests here, we were not accounting for
store merging of different sizes that do not cover the
entire range of the wide value to be stored.
This is the easy fix: just make sure that all of the
original stores are the same size, so when we calculate
the wide width, it's a simple N * M check.
This still allows all of the motivating optimizations from:
D86420 / 54a5dd485c
D87112 / 7a06b166b1
We could enhance this code to track individual bytes and
allow merging multiple sizes.
shuffle(concat(x,undef),concat(y,undef)) -> concat(shuffle(x,y),shuffle(x,y))
If the original shuffle references any of the upper (undef) subvector elements, ensure the split shuffle masks uses undef instead of an out-of-bounds value.
Fixes PR50609
> This reapplies c0f3dfb9, which was reverted following the discovery of
> crashes on linux kernel and chromium builds - these issues have since
> been fixed, allowing this patch to re-land.
This reverts commit 36ec97f76a.
The change caused non-determinism in the compiler, see comments on the code
review at https://reviews.llvm.org/D91722.
Reverting to unbreak people's builds until that can be addressed.
This also reverts the follow-up "[DebugInfo] Limit the number of values
that may be referenced by a dbg.value" in
a0bd6105d8.
This sets the AllowTruncation flag on isConstOrConstSplat in
isNullOrNullSplat, allowing it to see truncated constant zeroes on
architectures such as AArch64, where only a i32.i64 are legal. As a
truncation of 0 is always 0, this should always be valid, allowing some
extra folding to happen including some of the cases from D103755.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103756
Needs to be discussed more.
This reverts commit 255a5c1baa6020c009934b4fa342f9f6dbbcc46
This reverts commit df2056ff3730316f376f29d9986c9913b95ceb1
This reverts commit faff79b7ca144e505da6bc74aa2b2f7cffbbf23
This reverts commit d2a9020785c6e02afebc876aa2778fa64c5cafd
This patch extends the SelectionDAG's ability to constant-fold vector
arithmetic to include support for SPLAT_VECTOR. This is not only for
scalable-vector types but also for fixed-length vector types, which
helps Hexagon in a couple of cases.
The original RISC-V test case was in fact an infinite DAGCombine loop.
The pattern `and (truncate v1), (truncate v2)` can be combined to
`truncate (and v1, v2)` but the truncate can similarly be combined back
to `truncate (and v1, v2)` (but, crucially, only when one of `v1` or
`v2` is a constant vector).
It wasn't exposed in on fixed-length types because a TRUNCATE of a
constant BUILD_VECTOR was folded into the BUILD_VECTOR itself, whereas
this did not happen for the equivalent (scalable-vector) SPLAT_VECTOR.
Reviewed By: RKSimon, craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103246
The `DAGTypeLegalizer::WidenVSELECTMask` function is not (yet) ready for
scalable vector types, and has numerous places in which it tries to grab
either the fixed size or number of elements of its types.
I believe that it should be possible to update this method to properly
account for scalable-vector types, but we don't have test cases for
that; RISC-V bails out early on as it has legal i1 vector masks. As
such, this patch just prevents it from crashing.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103536
This extends 434c8e013a and ede3982792 to handle signed
predicates by sign-extending the setcc operands.
This is not shown directly in https://llvm.org/PR50055 ,
but the pattern is visible by changing the unsigned convert
to signed in the source code.
This is a follow-up to D103280 that eases the use restrictions,
so we can handle the motivating case from:
https://llvm.org/PR50055
The loop code is adapted from similar use checks in
ExtendUsesToFormExtLoad() and SliceUpLoad(). I did not see an
easier way to filter out non-chain uses of load values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103462
Use RuntimeLibcalls to get a common way to pick correct RTLIB::POWI_*
libcall for a given value type.
This includes a small refactoring of ExpandFPLibCall and
ExpandArgFPLibCall in SelectionDAGLegalize to share a bit of code,
plus adding an ExpandFPLibCall version that can be called directly
when expanding FPOWI/STRICT_FPOWI to ensure that we actually use
the same RTLIB::Libcall when expanding the libcall as we used when
checking the legality of such a call by doing a getLibcallName check.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103050
The FPOWI DAG node is normally lowered to a libcall to one of the
RTLIB::POWI* runtime functions and the exponent should normally
have a type matching sizeof(int) when making the call. Thus,
type promotion of the exponent could lead to an FPOWI with a type
for the second operand that would be incorrect when doing the
libcall (a situation which would be hard to detect post-legalization
if we allow such FPOWI nodes).
This patch is changing DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntOp_FPOWI to
do the rewrite into a libcall directly instead of promoting the
operand. This way we can check that the exponent is smaller than
sizeof(int) and we can let TargetLowering handle promotion as
part of making the libcall. It could be noticed here that makeLibCall
has some knowledge about targets such as 64-bit RISCV, for which the
libcall argument should be extended to a type larger than sizeof(int).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102950
I accidentaly pushed a draft of D103280 that was discussed
during the review, but it was not supposed to be the final
version.
Rather than revert and recommit, I'm updating the existing
code. This way we have a record of the codegen diff that
would result if we decide to remove this predicate in the
future.
sext (vsetcc X, Y) --> vsetcc (zext X), (zext Y) --
(when the zexts are free and a bunch of other conditions)
We have a couple of similar folds to this already for vector selects,
but this pattern slips through because it is only a setcc.
The tests are based on the motivating case from:
https://llvm.org/PR50055
...but we need extra logic to get that example, so I've left that as
a TODO for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103280
extractelement is poison if the index is out-of-bounds, so just
scalarizing the load may introduce an out-of-bounds load, which is UB.
To avoid introducing new UB, we can mask the index so it only contains
valid indices.
Fixes PR50382.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103077
If a cmpxchg specifies acquire or seq_cst on failure, make sure we
generate code consistent with that ordering even if the success ordering
is not acquire/seq_cst.
At one point, it was ambiguous whether this sort of construct was valid,
but the C++ standad and LLVM now accept arbitrary combinations of
success/failure orderings.
This doesn't address the corresponding issue in AtomicExpand. (This was
reported as https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33332 .)
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50512.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103284
Parameter positions seem like they should be unsigned.
While there, make function names lowercase per coding standards.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103224
SwiftTailCC has a different set of requirements than the C calling convention
for a tail call. The exact argument sequence doesn't have to match, but fewer
ABI-affecting attributes are allowed.
Also make sure the musttail diagnostic triggers if a musttail call isn't
actually a tail call.
This patch adds a way for the target to configure the type it uses for
the explicit vector length operands of VP SDNodes. The type must be a
legal integer type (there is still no target-independent legalization of
this operand) and must currently be at least as big as i32, the type
used by the IR intrinsics. An implicit zero-extension takes place on
targets which choose a larger type. All VP nodes should be created with
this type used for the EVL operand.
This allows 64-bit RISC-V to avoid custom legalization of all VP nodes,
keeping them in their target-independent form for that bit longer.
Reviewed By: simoll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103027
DAGCombine's `mergeStoresOfConstantsOrVecElts` optimization is told
whether it's to use vector types and also whether it's to issue a
truncating store. However, the truncating store code path assumes a
scalar integer `ConstantSDNode`, and when using vector types it creates
either a `BUILD_VECTOR` or `CONCAT_VECTORS` to store: neither of which
is a constant.
The `riscv64` target is able to expose a crash here because it switches
on both code paths at the same time. The `f32` is stored as `i32` which
must be promoted to `i64`, necessitating a truncating store.
It also decides later that it prefers a vector store of `v2f32`.
While vector truncating stores are legal, this combine is not able to
emit them. We also don't have a test case. This patch adds an assert to
catch this case more gracefully, and updates one of the caller functions
to the function to turn off the use of truncating stores when preferring
vectors.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103173
This patch extends the cases in which the legalizer is able to express
VSELECT in terms of XOR/AND/OR. When dealing with a VSELECT between
boolean vector types, the mask itself is an all-ones or all-ones value
of the operand type, so a 0/1 boolean type behaves identically to a 0/-1
type.
This greatly helps RISC-V which relies on expansion for these nodes. It
also allows scalable-vector bool VSELECTs to use the default expansion,
where before it would crash in SelectionDAG::UnrollVectorOp.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103147
Support virtual, physical and tied i128 register operands in inline assembly.
i128 is on SystemZ not really supported and is not a legal type and generally
such a value will be split into two i64 parts. There are however some
instructions that require a pair of two GPR64 registers contained in the GR128
bit reg class, which is untyped.
For inline assmebly operands, it proved to be very cumbersome to first follow
the general behavior of splitting an i128 operand into two parts and then
later rebuild the INLINEASM MI to have one GR128 register. Instead, some
minor common code changes were made to SelectionDAGBUilder to only create one
GR128 register part to begin with. In particular:
- getNumRegisters() now has an optional parameter "RegisterVT" which is
passed by AddInlineAsmOperands() and GetRegistersForValue().
- The bitcasting in GetRegistersForValue is not performed if RegVT is
Untyped.
- The RC for a tied use in AddInlineAsmOperands() is now computed either from
the tied def (virtual register), or by getMinimalPhysRegClass() (physical
register).
- InstrEmitter.cpp:EmitCopyFromReg() has been fixed so that the register
class (DstRC) can also be computed for an illegal type.
In the SystemZ backend getNumRegisters(), splitValueIntoRegisterParts() and
joinRegisterPartsIntoValue() have been implemented to handle i128 operands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100788
Review: Ulrich Weigand
- When memory intrinsics, such as memcpy, the attached scoped AA
metadata is not passed down to the backend. As a result, the backend
cannot schedule relevant memory operations around them following that
hint. In this patch, SelectionDAG is enhanced to propagate that
metadata (scoped AA only) when they are lowered into loads and stores.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102215
D29668 enabled to avoid a useless copy of the argument value into an alloca if the caller places it in memory (as it often happens on x86) by directly forwarding the pointer to it. This optimization is illegal if the type contains padding bytes: if a truncating store into the alloca is replaced the upper bits are filled with garbage and produce code misbehaving at runtime.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102153
Melanie Blower