Previously when trying to support CoroSplit's function splitting, we
added in a hack that simply added the new function's node into the
original function's SCC (https://reviews.llvm.org/D87798). This is
incorrect since it might be in its own SCC.
Now, more similar to the previous design, we have callers explicitly
notify the LazyCallGraph that a function has been split out from another
one.
In order to properly support CoroSplit, there are two ways functions can
be split out.
One is the normal expected "outlining" of one function into a new one.
The new function may only contain references to other functions that the
original did. The original function must reference the new function. The
new function may reference the original function, which can result in
the new function being in the same SCC as the original function. The
weird case is when the original function indirectly references the new
function, but the new function directly calls the original function,
resulting in the new SCC being a parent of the original function's SCC.
This form of function splitting works with CoroSplit's Switch ABI.
The second way of splitting is more specific to CoroSplit. CoroSplit's
Retcon and Async ABIs split the original function into multiple
functions that all reference each other and are referenced by the
original function. In order to keep the LazyCallGraph in a valid state,
all new functions must be processed together, else some nodes won't be
populated. To keep things simple, this only supports the case where all
new edges are ref edges, and every new function references every other
new function. There can be a reference back from any new function to the
original function, putting all functions in the same RefSCC.
This also adds asserts that all nodes in a (Ref)SCC can reach all other
nodes to prevent future incorrect hacks.
The original hacks in https://reviews.llvm.org/D87798 are no longer
necessary since all new functions should have been registered before
calling updateCGAndAnalysisManagerForPass.
This fixes all coroutine tests when opt's -enable-new-pm is true by
default. This also fixes PR48190, which was likely due to the previous
hack breaking SCC invariants.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93828
This seems to fit the CGSCC updates model better than calling
addNewFunctionInto{Ref,}SCC() on newly created/outlined functions.
Now addNewFunctionInto{Ref,}SCC() are no longer necessary.
However, this doesn't work on newly outlined functions that aren't
referenced by the original function. e.g. if a() was outlined into b()
and c(), but c() is only referenced by b() and not by a(), this will
trigger an assert.
This also fixes an issue I was seeing with newly created functions not
having passes run on them.
Ran check-llvm with expensive checks.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87798
Summary:
This patch changes call graph analysis to recognize callback call sites
and add an artificial 'reference' call record from the broker function
caller to the callback function in the call graph. A presence of such
reference enforces bottom-up traversal order for callback functions in
CG SCC pass manager because callback function logically becomes a callee
of the broker function caller.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, hfinkel, sstefan1, baziotis
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, kuter, sstefan1, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82572
Summary:
Analyses that are statefull should not be retrieved through a proxy from
an outer IR unit, as these analyses are only invalidated at the end of
the inner IR unit manager.
This patch disallows getting the outer manager and provides an API to
get a cached analysis through the proxy. If the analysis is not
stateless, the call to getCachedResult will assert.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, eraman, hiraditya, zzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72893
I uploaded the old version accidentally instead of the one with these
minor adjustments requested by the reviewers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77855
Summary:
We can and should remove deleted nodes from their respective SCCs. We
did not do this before and this was a potential problem even though I
couldn't locally trigger an issue. Since the `DeleteNode` would assert
if the node was not in the SCC, we know we only remove nodes from their
SCC and only once (when run on all the Attributor tests).
Reviewers: lebedev.ri, hfinkel, fhahn, probinson, wristow, loladiro, sstefan1, uenoku
Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, uenoku, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77855
Summary:
While it is uncommon that the ExternalCallingNode needs to be updated,
it can happen. It is uncommon because most functions listed as callees
have external linkage, modifying them is usually not allowed. That said,
there are also internal functions that have, or better had, their
"address taken" at construction time. We conservatively assume various
uses cause the address "to be taken". Furthermore, the user might have
become dead at some point. As a consequence, transformations, e.g., the
Attributor, might be able to replace a function that is listed
as callee of the ExternalCallingNode.
Since there is no function corresponding to the ExternalCallingNode, we
did just remove the node from the callee list if we replaced it (so
far). Now it would be preferable to replace it if needed and remove it
otherwise. However, removing the node has implications on the CGSCC
iteration. Locally, that caused some other nodes to be never visited
but it is for sure possible other (bad) side effects can occur. As it
seems conservatively safe to keep the new node in the callee list we
will do that for now.
Reviewers: lebedev.ri, hfinkel, fhahn, probinson, wristow, loladiro, sstefan1, uenoku
Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, uenoku, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77854
Summary:
The old code did eliminate references from and to functions that were
about to be deleted only just before we deleted them. This can cause
references from other functions that are supposed to be deleted to still
exist, depending on the order. If the functions form a strongly
connected component the problem manifests regardless of the order in
which we try to actually delete the functions.
This patch introduces a two step deletion. First we remove all
references and then we delete the function. Note that this only affects
the old call graph. There should not be any functional changes if no old
style call graph was given.
To test this we delete two strongly connected functions instead of one
in an existing test.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77975
Dead constants might be left when a function is replaced, we can
gracefully handle this case and avoid complexity for the users who would
see an assertion otherwise.
In addition to memory behavior attributes (readonly/writeonly) we now
derive memory location attributes (argmemonly/inaccessiblememonly/...).
The former is part of AAMemoryBehavior and the latter part of
AAMemoryLocation. While they are similar in nature it got messy when
they were put in a single AA. Location attributes for arguments and
floating values will follow later.
Note that both memory attributes kinds can derive readnone. If there are
no accesses AAMemoryBehavior will derive readnone. If there are accesses
but only to stack (=local) locations AAMemoryLocation will derive
readnone.
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73426
The CallGraphUpdater is a helper that simplifies the process of updating
the call graph, both old and new style, while running an CGSCC pass.
The uses are contained in different commits, e.g. D70767.
More functionality is added as we need it.
Reviewed By: modocache, hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70927
Arthur Eubanks