This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the
potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a
drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when
a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance,
__builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the
following function:
void f(size_t alloc) {
char* p = malloc(alloc);
strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0))
}
This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the
object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to
-1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to
__builtin___strcpy_chk.
rdar://32212419
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760
llvm-svn: 352665
Re-enable format string warnings on printf.
The warnings are still incomplete. Apparently it is undefined to use a
vector specifier without a length modifier, which is not currently
warned on. Additionally, type warnings appear to not be working with
the hh modifier, and aren't warning on all of the special restrictions
from c99 printf.
llvm-svn: 352540
As noted in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36651, the specialization for
isPodLike<std::pair<...>> did not match the expectation of
std::is_trivially_copyable which makes the memcpy optimization invalid.
This patch renames the llvm::isPodLike trait into llvm::is_trivially_copyable.
Unfortunately std::is_trivially_copyable is not portable across compiler / STL
versions. So a portable version is provided too.
Note that the following specialization were invalid:
std::pair<T0, T1>
llvm::Optional<T>
Tests have been added to assert that former specialization are respected by the
standard usage of llvm::is_trivially_copyable, and that when a decent version
of std::is_trivially_copyable is available, llvm::is_trivially_copyable is
compared to std::is_trivially_copyable.
As of this patch, llvm::Optional is no longer considered trivially copyable,
even if T is. This is to be fixed in a later patch, as it has impact on a
long-running bug (see r347004)
Note that GCC warns about this UB, but this got silented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D50296.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54472
llvm-svn: 351701
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This patch includes logic for constant expression evaluation of fixed point additions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55868
llvm-svn: 351593
Summary: In the [expr.sub] p1, we can read that for a given E1[E2], E1 is sequenced before E2.
Patch by Mateusz Janek.
Reviewers: rsmith, Rakete1111
Reviewed By: rsmith, Rakete1111
Subscribers: riccibruno, lebedev.ri, Rakete1111, hiraditya, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50766
llvm-svn: 350874
When the type of the base expression after IgnoreParenCasts is incomplete,
it is still possible to diagnose an array access which precedes the array
bounds.
This is a follow-up on D55862 which added an early return when the type of
the base expression after IgnoreParenCasts was incomplete.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56050
Reviewed By: efriedma
llvm-svn: 350622
When checking that the array access is not out-of-bounds in CheckArrayAccess
it is possible that the type of the base expression after IgnoreParenCasts is
incomplete, even though the type of the base expression before IgnoreParenCasts
is complete. In this case we have no information about whether the array access
is out-of-bounds and we should just bail-out instead. This fixes PR39746 which
was caused by trying to obtain the size of an incomplete type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55862
Reviewed By: efriedma
llvm-svn: 349811
Only explicitly look through integer and floating-point promotion where the result type is actually a promotion, which is not always the case for bit-fields in C.
Patch by Bevin Hansson.
llvm-svn: 349497
Summary:
This patch adds `__builtin_launder`, which is required to implement `std::launder`. Additionally GCC provides `__builtin_launder`, so thing brings Clang in-line with GCC.
I'm not exactly sure what magic `__builtin_launder` requires, but based on previous discussions this patch applies a `@llvm.invariant.group.barrier`. As noted in previous discussions, this may not be enough to correctly handle vtables.
Reviewers: rnk, majnemer, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: kristina, Romain-Geissler-1A, erichkeane, amharc, jroelofs, cfe-commits, Prazek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40218
llvm-svn: 349195
Only explicitly look through integer and floating-point promotion where the result type is actually a promotion, which is not always the case for bit-fields in C.
llvm-svn: 348889
We would issue a false-positive diagnostic for parameters in function declarations shadowing fields; we now only issue the diagnostic on a function definition instead.
llvm-svn: 348400
It seems the two failing tests can be simply fixed after r348037
Fix 3 cases in Analysis/builtin-functions.cpp
Delete the bad CodeGen/builtin-constant-p.c for now
llvm-svn: 348053
Kept the "indirect_builtin_constant_p" test case in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx1y.cpp
while we are investigating why the following snippet fails:
extern char extern_var;
struct { int a; } a = {__builtin_constant_p(extern_var)};
llvm-svn: 348039
This was reverted in r347656 due to me thinking it caused a miscompile of
Chromium. Turns out it was the Chromium code that was broken.
llvm-svn: 347756
Summary:
Prior to this patch, OpenCL code such as the following would attempt to create
a BranchInst with a non-bool argument:
if (enqueue_kernel(get_default_queue(), 0, nd, ^(void){})) /* ... */
This patch is a follow up on a similar issue with pipe builtin
operations. See commit r280800 and https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30219.
This change, while being conservative on non-builtin functions,
should set the type of expressions invoking builtins to the
proper type, instead of defaulting to `bool` and requiring
manual overrides in Sema::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall.
In addition to tests for enqueue_kernel, the tests are extended to
check other OpenCL builtins.
Reviewers: Anastasia, spatel, rsmith
Reviewed By: Anastasia
Subscribers: kristina, cfe-commits, svenvh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52879
llvm-svn: 347658
This caused a miscompile in Chrome (see crbug.com/908372) that's
illustrated by this small reduction:
static bool f(int *a, int *b) {
return !__builtin_constant_p(b - a) || (!(b - a));
}
int arr[] = {1,2,3};
bool g() {
return f(arr, arr + 3);
}
$ clang -O2 -S -emit-llvm a.cc -o -
g() should return true, but after r347417 it became false for some reason.
This also reverts the follow-up commits.
r347417:
> Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures.
>
> Don't try to emit a scalar expression for a non-scalar argument to
> __builtin_constant_p().
>
> Third time's a charm!
r347446:
> The result of is.constant() is unsigned.
r347480:
> A __builtin_constant_p() returns 0 with a function type.
r347512:
> isEvaluatable() implies a constant context.
>
> Assume that we're in a constant context if we're asking if the expression can
> be compiled into a constant initializer. This fixes the issue where a
> __builtin_constant_p() in a compound literal was diagnosed as not being
> constant, even though it's always possible to convert the builtin into a
> constant.
r347531:
> A "constexpr" is evaluated in a constant context. Make sure this is reflected
> if a __builtin_constant_p() is a part of a constexpr.
llvm-svn: 347656
Summary:
GCC already catches these situations so we should handle it too.
GCC warns in C++ mode only (does anybody know why?). I think it is useful in C mode too.
Reviewers: rsmith, erichkeane, aaron.ballman, efriedma, xbolva00
Reviewed By: xbolva00
Subscribers: efriedma, craig.topper, scanon, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52835
llvm-svn: 346865
This patch fixes a minimum divider for offset in intrinsics
msa_[st/ld]_[b/h/w/d], when value is known in compile time.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54038
llvm-svn: 346302
A mask type is a 1 to 8-byte string that follows the "mask." annotation
in the format string. This enables obfuscating data in the event the
provided privacy level isn't enabled.
rdar://problem/36756282
llvm-svn: 346211
The size of an os_log buffer is known at any stage of compilation, so making it
a constant expression means that the common idiom of declaring a buffer for it
won't result in a VLA. That allows the compiler to skip saving and restoring
the stack pointer around such buffers.
This also moves the OSLog and other FormatString helpers from
libclangAnalysis to libclangAST to avoid a circular dependency.
llvm-svn: 345971
We haven't supported compiling ObjC1 for a long time (and never will again), so
there isn't any reason to keep these separate. This patch replaces
LangOpts::ObjC1 and LangOpts::ObjC2 with LangOpts::ObjC.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53547
llvm-svn: 345637
Summary:
- Add `UETT_PreferredAlignOf` to account for the difference between `__alignof` and `alignof`
- `AlignOfType` now returns ABI alignment instead of preferred alignment iff clang-abi-compat > 7, and one uses _Alignof or alignof
Patch by Nicole Mazzuca!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53207
llvm-svn: 345419
Constructing a global std::map requires clang to generate a linear
amount of code to construct the initializer list if the elements are not
constexpr-constructible. std::vector is not constexpr-constructible, so
this code pattern was generating large amounts of code.
Also, because of PR38829, LLVM is pathologically slow on large basic
blocks, and this causes slow compilation. This works around the bug and
reduces code size.
SemaChecking.cpp -debug-info-kind=limited:
time objsize
before: 1m45.023s 9.8M
after: 0m25.205s 6.9M
So, a 42% obj size reduction and 3.2x speedup.
llvm-svn: 345329
Add a warning if a parameter with a named address space is passed
to a to_addr builtin.
For example:
int i;
to_private(&i); // generate warning as conversion from private to private is redundant.
Patch by Alistair Davies.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51411
llvm-svn: 342638
unsigned long long builtin_unpack_vector_int128 (vector int128_t, int);
vector int128_t builtin_pack_vector_int128 (unsigned long long, unsigned long long);
Builtins should behave the same way as in GCC.
Patch By: wuzish (Zixuan Wu)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52074
llvm-svn: 342614
Summary:
_Atomic and __sync_* operations are implicitly sequentially-consistent. Some
codebases want to force explicit usage of memory order instead. This warning
allows them to know where implicit sequentially-consistent memory order is used.
The warning isn't on by default because _Atomic was purposefully designed to
have seq_cst as the default: the idea was that it's the right thing to use most
of the time. This warning allows developers who disagree to enforce explicit
usage instead.
A follow-up patch will take care of C++'s std::atomic. It'll be different enough
from this patch that I think it should be separate: for C++ the atomic
operations all have a memory order parameter (or two), but it's defaulted. I
believe this warning should trigger when the default is used, but not when
seq_cst is used explicitly (or implicitly as the failure order for cmpxchg).
<rdar://problem/28172966>
Reviewers: rjmccall
Subscribers: dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51084
llvm-svn: 341860
Namely, print the likely macro name when it's used, and include the actual
computed sizes in the diagnostic message, which are sometimes not obvious.
rdar://43909200
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51697
llvm-svn: 341566
This adds the following intrinsics:
_kshiftli_mask8
_kshiftli_mask16
_kshiftli_mask32
_kshiftli_mask64
_kshiftri_mask8
_kshiftri_mask16
_kshiftri_mask32
_kshiftri_mask64
llvm-svn: 341234
Erik Pilkington