MSVC supports 'property' attribute and allows to apply it to the declaration of an empty array in a class or structure definition.
For example:
```
__declspec(property(get=GetX, put=PutX)) int x[];
```
The above statement indicates that x[] can be used with one or more array indices. In this case, i=p->x[a][b] will be turned into i=p->GetX(a, b), and p->x[a][b] = i will be turned into p->PutX(a, b, i);
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13336
llvm-svn: 254067
Adds parsing/sema analysis/serialization/deserialization for array sections in OpenMP constructs (introduced in OpenMP 4.0).
Currently it is allowed to use array sections only in OpenMP clauses that accepts list of expressions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10732
llvm-svn: 245937
The patch is generated using this command:
$ tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
work/llvm/tools/clang
To reduce churn, not touching namespaces spanning less than 10 lines.
llvm-svn: 240270
Added parsing, sema analysis and codegen for '#pragma omp taskgroup' directive (OpenMP 4.0).
The code for directive is generated the following way:
#pragma omp taskgroup
<body>
void __kmpc_taskgroup(<loc>, thread_id);
<body>
void __kmpc_end_taskgroup(<loc>, thread_id);
llvm-svn: 240011
Based on previous discussion on the mailing list, clang currently lacks support
for C99 partial re-initialization behavior:
Reference: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2013-April/029188.html
Reference: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/dr_253.htm
This patch attempts to fix this problem.
Given the following code snippet,
struct P1 { char x[6]; };
struct LP1 { struct P1 p1; };
struct LP1 l = { .p1 = { "foo" }, .p1.x[2] = 'x' };
// this example is adapted from the example for "struct fred x[]" in DR-253;
// currently clang produces in l: { "\0\0x" },
// whereas gcc 4.8 produces { "fox" };
// with this fix, clang will also produce: { "fox" };
Differential Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5789
llvm-svn: 239446
clang::MacroDefinition now models the currently-defined value of a macro. The
previous MacroDefinition type, which represented a record of a macro definition
directive for a detailed preprocessing record, is now called MacroDefinitionRecord.
llvm-svn: 236400
report the 'init*' invocation as non-dynamic via clang_Cursor_isDynamicCall.
Of course it is dynamic at runtime, but for purposes of indexing we can treat as an invocation to ClassName's init*.
Addresses rdar://18916871.
llvm-svn: 221641
This is a new form of expression of the form:
(expr op ... op expr)
where one of the exprs is a parameter pack. It expands into
(expr1 op (expr2onwards op ... op expr))
(and likewise if the pack is on the right). The non-pack operand can be
omitted; in that case, an empty pack gives a fallback value or an error,
depending on the operator.
llvm-svn: 221573
Includes parsing and semantic analysis for 'omp teams' directive support from OpenMP 4.0. Adds additional analysis to 'omp target' directive with 'omp teams' directive.
llvm-svn: 219385
Includes parsing and semantic analysis for 'omp teams' directive support from OpenMP 4.0. Adds additional analysis to 'omp target' directive with 'omp teams' directive.
llvm-svn: 219197
This reverts commit r211096. Looks like it broke the msvc build:
SemaOpenMP.cpp(140) : error C4519: default template arguments are only allowed on a class template
llvm-svn: 211113
Until now all CUDA-specific attributes were represented with
CXCursor_UnexposedAttr; now they are actually implemented, including the Python
bindings.
llvm-svn: 209767
Remove UnaryTypeTraitExpr and switch all remaining type trait related handling
over to TypeTraitExpr.
The UTT/BTT/TT enum prefix and evaluation code is retained pending further
cleanup.
This is part of the ongoing work to unify type traits following the removal of
BinaryTypeTraitExpr in r197273.
llvm-svn: 198271
There's nothing special about type traits accepting two arguments.
This commit eliminates BinaryTypeTraitExpr and switches all related handling
over to TypeTraitExpr.
Also fixes a CodeGen failure with variadic type traits appearing in a
non-constant expression.
The BTT/TT prefix and evaluation code is retained as-is for now but will soon
be further cleaned up.
This is part of the ongoing work to unify type traits.
llvm-svn: 197273
LLVM supports applying conversion instructions to vectors of the same number of
elements (fptrunc, fptosi, etc.) but there had been no way for a Clang user to
cause such instructions to be generated when using builtin vector types.
C-style casting on vectors is already defined in terms of bitcasts, and so
cannot be used for these conversions as well (without leading to a very
confusing set of semantics). As a result, this adds a __builtin_convertvector
intrinsic (patterned after the OpenCL __builtin_astype intrinsic). This is
intended to aid the creation of vector intrinsic headers that create generic IR
instead of target-dependent intrinsics (in other words, this is a generic
_mm_cvtepi32_ps). As noted in the documentation, the action of
__builtin_convertvector is defined in terms of the action of a C-style cast on
each vector element.
llvm-svn: 190915
Let me tell you a tale...
Within some twisted maze of debug info I've ended up implementing an
insane man's Include What You Use device. When the debugger emits debug
info it really shouldn't, I find out why & then realize the code could
be improved too.
In this instance CIndexDiagnostics.cpp had a lot more debug info with
Clang than GCC. Upon inspection a major culprit was all the debug info
describing clang::Sema. This was emitted because clang::Sema is
befriended by DiagnosticEngine which was rightly required, but GCC
doesn't emit debug info for friends so it never emitted anything for
Clang. Clang does emit debug info for friends (will be fixed/changed to
reduce debug info size).
But why didn't Clang just emit a declaration of Sema if this entire TU
didn't require a definition?
1) Diagnostic.h did the right thing, only using a declaration of Sema
and not including Sema.h at all.
2) Some other dependency of CIndexDiagnostics.cpp didn't do the right
thing. ASTUnit.h, only needing a declaration, still included Sema.h
(hence this commit which removes that include and adds the necessary
includes to the cpp files that were relying on this)
3) -flimit-debug-info didn't save us because of
EnterExpressionEvaluationContext, defined inline in Sema.h which fires
the "requiresCompleteType" check/flag (since it uses nested types from
Sema and calls Sema member functions) and thus, if debug info is ever
emitted for the type, the whole type is emitted and not just a
declaration.
Improving -flimit-debug-info to account for this would be... hard.
Modifying the code so that's not 'required to be complete' might be
possible, but probably only by moving EnterExpressionEvaluationContext
either into Sema, or out of Sema.h. That might be a bit too much of a
contortion to be bothered with.
Also, this is only one of the cases where emitting debug info for
friends caused us to emit a lot more debug info (this change reduces
Clang's DWO size by 0.93%, dropping friends entirely reduces debug info
by 3.2%) - I haven't hunted down the other cases, but I assume they
might be similar (Sema or something like it). IWYU or a similar tool
might help us reduce build times a bit, but analyzing debug info to find
these differences isn't worthwhile. I'll take the 3.2% win, provide this
small improvement to the code itself, and move on.
llvm-svn: 190715
Introduce CXXStdInitializerListExpr node, representing the implicit
construction of a std::initializer_list<T> object from its underlying array.
The AST representation of such an expression goes from an InitListExpr with a
flag set, to a CXXStdInitializerListExpr containing a MaterializeTemporaryExpr
containing an InitListExpr (possibly wrapped in a CXXBindTemporaryExpr).
This more detailed representation has several advantages, the most important of
which is that the new MaterializeTemporaryExpr allows us to directly model
lifetime extension of the underlying temporary array. Using that, this patch
*drastically* simplifies the IR generation of this construct, provides IR
generation support for nested global initializer_list objects, fixes several
bugs where the destructors for the underlying array would accidentally not get
invoked, and provides constant expression evaluation support for
std::initializer_list objects.
llvm-svn: 183872
Add a CXXDefaultInitExpr, analogous to CXXDefaultArgExpr, and use it both in
CXXCtorInitializers and in InitListExprs to represent a default initializer.
There's an additional complication here: because the default initializer can
refer to the initialized object via its 'this' pointer, we need to make sure
that 'this' points to the right thing within the evaluation.
llvm-svn: 179958
The TypeLoc hierarchy used the llvm::cast machinery to perform undefined
behavior by casting pointers/references to TypeLoc objects to derived types
and then using the derived copy constructors (or even returning pointers to
derived types that actually point to the original TypeLoc object).
Some context is in this thread:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2012-December/056804.html
Though it's spread over a few months which can be hard to read in the mail
archive.
llvm-svn: 175462
this was ever a macro name and return a specific CXCursor_MacroExpansion cursor in such a case,
instead of the generic CXCursor_MacroDefinition.
Checking for macro name makes sure the identifier is not part of the identifier list in a
function macro.
While, in general, resolving identifiers in macro definitions to other macros may not be completely accurate,
it greatly improves functionality such as give-me-the-definition-of-this, which was not working at all
inside macro definitions.
llvm-svn: 171773
given a cursor pointing to a C++ method call or an ObjC message,
returns non-zero if the method/message is "dynamic", meaning:
For a C++ method: the call is virtual.
For an ObjC message: the receiver is an object instance, not 'super' or a
specific class.
rdar://11779185
llvm-svn: 159627
attached to a declaration in the completion string.
Since extracting comments isn't free, a new code completion option is
introduced.
A new code completion option that enables including brief comments
into CodeCompletionString should be a, err, code completion option.
But because ASTUnit caches global declarations during parsing before
even completion consumer is created, the option is duplicated as a
translation unit option (in both libclang and ASTUnit, like the option
to cache code completion results).
llvm-svn: 159539
in ObjCMethodDecl to indicate whether the method does not override any other method,
which is the majority of cases.
That way we can avoid unnecessary work doing lookups, especially when PCH is involved.
rdar://11360082
llvm-svn: 156476
attached. Since we do not support any attributes which appertain to a statement
(yet), testing of this is necessarily quite minimal.
Patch by Alexander Kornienko!
llvm-svn: 154723
to get at the parameters (and their types) of a function or objc method cursor.
int clang_Cursor_getNumArguments(CXCursor C);
CXCursor clang_Cursor_getArgument(CXCursor C, unsigned i);
rdar://11201527
llvm-svn: 154523
code-completion related strings specific to a translation unit (ASTContext and related data)
CodeCompletionAllocator does such limited caching, by caching the name assigned
to a DeclContext*, but that is not the appropriate place since that object has
a lifetime that can extend beyond that of an ASTContext.
Introduce CodeCompletionTUInfo which will be always tied to a translation unit
to do this kind of caching and move the caching of CodeCompletionAllocator into this
object, and propagate it to all the places where it will be needed.
The plan is to extend the caching where appropriate, using CodeCompletionTUInfo,
to avoid re-calculating code-completion strings.
Part of rdar://10796159.
llvm-svn: 154408
track whether the referenced declaration comes from an enclosing
local context. I'm amenable to suggestions about the exact meaning
of this bit.
llvm-svn: 152491
Basically the current design is:
-for an implementation method, show as overridden the interface method.
This is not useful, and is inconsistent with the C++ side
-for an interface method, show as overridden the protocols methods (this is desirable)
and the methods from the categories; methods from categories are not useful
since they are considered the same method (same USR).
-If there is a protocol method or category method reported, it does not check the
super class for overridden methods. This is really problematic since
overridden methods from super class is what we want to give back.
Change clang_getOverriddenCursors to show as overridden any method in the class's
base class, its protocols, or its categories' protocols, that has the same
selector and is of the same kind (class or instance).
If no such method exists, the search continues to the class's superclass,
its protocols, and its categories, and so on. A method from an Objective-C
implementation is considered to override the same methods as its
corresponding method in the interface.
rdar://10967206
llvm-svn: 152270
Alexey Bataev