to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Something went wrong with r211426, it is an older version of this code
and should not have been committed. It was reverted with r211434.
Original commit message:
We didn't properly implement support for the sized integer suffixes.
Suffixes like i16 were essentially ignored instead of mapping them to
the appropriately sized integer type.
This fixes PR20008.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4132
llvm-svn: 211441
This reverts commit r211426.
This broke the arm bots. The crash can be reproduced on X86 by running.
./bin/clang -cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -fms-extensions ~/llvm/clang/test/Lexer/ms-extensions.c -triple arm-linux
llvm-svn: 211434
We didn't properly implement support for the sized integer suffixes.
Suffixes like i16 were essentially ignored instead of mapping them to
the appropriately sized integer type.
This fixes PR20008.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4132
llvm-svn: 211426
will never be true in a well-defined context. The checking for null pointers
has been moved into the caller logic so it does not rely on undefined behavior.
llvm-svn: 210498
When clang is built outside of the LLVM tree (against a corresponding version),
there is no definition providing for operator<<(std::ostream &, StringRef) which
is required for the assertion routines in google-test tests. Avoid the
compilation failure by explicitly stringifying the StringRef prior to use.
llvm-svn: 200096
I think "i128", that I conditioned out, could be completely removed.
MS Compiler doesn't accept i128. We can assume no one would use i128.
llvm-svn: 168865
Chandler Carruth