Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Philip Reames 9549f7560f [AtomicExpand] Allow libcall expansion for non-zero address spaces (try 2)
Restore a reverted commit, with the silly mistake fixed.  Sorry for the previous breakage.  

Be consistent about how we treat atomics in non-zero address spaces.  If we get to the backend, we tend to lower them as if in address space 0.  Do the same if we need to insert a libcall instead.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58760

llvm-svn: 355540
2019-03-06 19:27:13 +00:00
Mitch Phillips f0c21e2ff5 Revert "[AtomicExpand] Allow libcall expansion for non-zero address spaces" for buildbot failures.
llvm-svn: 355461
2019-03-06 00:25:40 +00:00
Philip Reames 1e4c5d3611 [AtomicExpand] Allow libcall expansion for non-zero address spaces
Be consistent about how we treat atomics in non-zero address spaces.  If we get to the backend, we tend to lower them as if in address space 0.  Do the same if we need to insert a libcall instead.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58760

llvm-svn: 355453
2019-03-05 23:00:14 +00:00
Matt Arsenault a5840c3c39 Codegen support for atomicrmw fadd/fsub
llvm-svn: 351851
2019-01-22 18:36:06 +00:00
Matt Arsenault 0cb08e448a Allow FP types for atomicrmw xchg
llvm-svn: 351427
2019-01-17 10:49:01 +00:00
Philip Reames 1960cfd323 [IR] Extend cmpxchg to allow pointer type operands
Today, we do not allow cmpxchg operations with pointer arguments. We require the frontend to insert ptrtoint casts and do the cmpxchg in integers. While correct, this is problematic from a couple of perspectives:
1) It makes the IR harder to analyse (for instance, it make capture tracking overly conservative)
2) It pushes work onto the frontend authors for no real gain

This patch implements the simplest form of IR support. As we did with floating point loads and stores, we teach AtomicExpand to convert back to the old representation. This prevents us needing to change all backends in a single lock step change. Over time, we can migrate each backend to natively selecting the pointer type. In the meantime, we get the advantages of a cleaner IR representation without waiting for the backend changes.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17413

llvm-svn: 261281
2016-02-19 00:06:41 +00:00
Philip Reames 61a24ab6cc [IR] Add support for floating pointer atomic loads and stores
This patch allows atomic loads and stores of floating point to be specified in the IR and adds an adapter to allow them to be lowered via existing backend support for bitcast-to-equivalent-integer idiom.

Previously, the only way to specify a atomic float operation was to bitcast the pointer to a i32, load the value as an i32, then bitcast to a float. At it's most basic, this patch simply moves this expansion step to the point we start lowering to the backend.

This patch does not add canonicalization rules to convert the bitcast idioms to the appropriate atomic loads. I plan to do that in the future, but for now, let's simply add the support. I'd like to get instruction selection working through at least one backend (x86-64) without the bitcast conversion before canonicalizing into this form.

Similarly, I haven't yet added the target hooks to opt out of the lowering step I added to AtomicExpand. I figured it would more sense to add those once at least one backend (x86) was ready to actually opt out.

As you can see from the included tests, the generated code quality is not great. I plan on submitting some patches to fix this, but help from others along that line would be very welcome. I'm not super familiar with the backend and my ramp up time may be material.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15471

llvm-svn: 255737
2015-12-16 00:49:36 +00:00
Richard Diamond bd753c9315 Fix an alignment error in `llvm::expandAtomicRMWToCmpXchg` without breaking the build where X86 isn't enabled.
Summary: Divide the primitive size in bits by eight so the initial load's alignment is in bytes as expected. Tested with the included unit test.

Reviewers: rengolin, jfb

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11804

llvm-svn: 244229
2015-08-06 16:55:03 +00:00