Rotate with explicit immediate is a single uop from Haswell on. An immediate of 1 has a dependency on the previous writer of flags, but the other immediate values do not.
The implicit rotate by 1 instruction is 2 uops. But the flags are merged after the rotate uop so the data result does not see the flag dependency. But I don't think we have any way of modeling that.
RORX is 1 uop without the load. 2 uops with the load. We currently model these with WriteShift/WriteShiftLd.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59077
llvm-svn: 355636
Haswell and possibly Sandybridge have an optimization for ADC/SBB with immediate 0 to use a single uop flow. This only applies GR16/GR32/GR64 with an 8-bit immediate. It does not apply to GR8. It also does not apply to the implicit AX/EAX/RAX forms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59058
llvm-svn: 355635
All of these instructions consume one encoded register and the other register is %st. They either write the result to %st or the encoded register. Previously we printed both arguments when the encoded register was written. And we printed one argument when the result was written to %st. For the stack popping forms the encoded register is always the destination and we didn't print both operands. This was inconsistent with gcc and objdump and just makes the output assembly code harder to read.
This patch changes things to always print both operands making us consistent with gcc and objdump. The parser should still be able to handle the single register forms just as it did before. This also matches the GNU assembler behavior.
llvm-svn: 353061
Looking into gcc and objdump behavior more this was overly aggressive. If the register is encoded in the instruction we should print %st(0), if its implicit we should print %st.
I'll be making a more directed change in a future patch.
llvm-svn: 353013
Summary:
When calculating clobbers for MS style inline assembly we fail if the asm clobbers stack top because we print st(0) and try to pass it through the gcc register name check. This was found with when I attempted to make a emms/femms clobber all ST registers. If you use emms/femms in MS inline asm we would try to use st(0) as the clobber name but clang would think that wasn't a valid clobber name.
This also matches what objdump disassembly prints. It's also what is printed by gcc -S.
Reviewers: RKSimon, rnk, efriedma, spatel, andreadb, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: eraman, gbedwell, lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57621
llvm-svn: 352985
We're getting pretty close to matching/exceeding test coverage of the test\CodeGen\X86\*-schedule.ll files, which should allow us to get rid of -print-schedule and fix PR37160
llvm-svn: 351836
Summary:
While looking at PR35606, I found out that the scheduling info is incorrect.
One can check that it's really a P5+P6 and not a 2*P56 with:
echo -e 'vzeroall\nvandps %xmm1, %xmm2, %xmm3' | ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=uops -snippets-file=-
(vandps executes on P5 only)
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52541
llvm-svn: 343447
Split WriteIMul by size and also by IMUL multiply-by-imm and multiply-by-reg cases.
This removes all the scheduler overrides for gpr multiplies and stops WriteMULH being ignored for BMI2 MULX instructions.
llvm-svn: 342892
Confirmed with Craig Topper - fix a typo that was missing a Port4 uop for ROR*mCL instructions on some Intel models.
Yet another step on the scheduler model cleanup marathon......
llvm-svn: 342846
This patch introduces the following changes to the DispatchStatistics view:
* DispatchStatistics now reports the number of dispatched opcodes instead of
the number of dispatched instructions.
* The "Dynamic Dispatch Stall Cycles" table now also reports the percentage of
stall cycles against the total simulated cycles.
This change allows users to easily compare dispatch group sizes with the
processor DispatchWidth.
Before this change, it was difficult to correlate the two numbers, since
DispatchStatistics view reported numbers of instructions (instead of opcodes).
DispatchWidth defines the maximum size of a dispatch group in terms of number of
micro opcodes.
The other change introduced by this patch is related to how DispatchStage
generates "instruction dispatch" events.
In particular:
* There can be multiple dispatch events associated with a same instruction
* Each dispatch event now encapsulates the number of dispatched micro opcodes.
The number of micro opcodes declared by an instruction may exceed the processor
DispatchWidth. Therefore, we cannot assume that instructions are always fully
dispatched in a single cycle.
DispatchStage knows already how to handle instructions declaring a number of
opcodes bigger that DispatchWidth. However, DispatchStage always emitted a
single instruction dispatch event (during the first simulated dispatch cycle)
for instructions dispatched.
With this patch, DispatchStage now correctly notifies multiple dispatch events
for instructions that cannot be dispatched in a single cycle.
A few views had to be modified. Views can no longer assume that there can only
be one dispatch event per instruction.
Tests (and docs) have been updated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51430
llvm-svn: 341055
I've put CMPXCHG8B/CMPXCHG16B in the same file, even though technically they are under separate CPUID bits all targets seem to support both (or neither).
llvm-svn: 338595
These aren't exhaustive, but cover some instructions that are only available in 32-bit mode (where would we be without good BCD math performance?).
llvm-svn: 338404
Before revision 336728, the "mayLoad" flag for instruction (V)MOVLPSrm was
inferred directly from the "default" pattern associated with the instruction
definition.
r336728 removed special node X86Movlps, and all the patterns associated to it.
Now instruction (V)MOVLPSrm doesn't have a pattern associated to it, and the
'mayLoad/hasSideEffects' flags are left unset.
When the instruction info is emitted by tablegen, method
CodeGenDAGPatterns::InferInstructionFlags() sees that (V)MOVLPSrm doesn't have a
pattern, and flags are undefined. So, it conservatively sets the
"hasSideEffects" flag for it.
As a consequence, we were losing the 'mayLoad' flag, and we were gaining a
'hasSideEffect' flag in its place.
This patch fixes the issue (originally reported by Michael Holmen).
The mca tests show the differences in the instruction info flags. Instructions
that were affected by this problem were: MOVLPSrm/VMOVLPSrm/VMOVLPSZ128rm.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49182
llvm-svn: 336818
This makes easier to identify changes in the instruction info flags. It also
helps spotting potential regressions similar to the one recently introduced at
r336728.
Using the same character to mark MayLoad/MayStore/HasSideEffects is problematic
for llvm-lit. When pattern matching substrings, llvm-lit consumes tabs and
spaces. A change in position of the flag marker may not trigger a test failure.
This patch only changes the character used for flag `hasSideEffects`. The reason
why I didn't touch other flags is because I want to avoid spamming the mailing
because of the massive diff due to the numerous tests affected by this change.
In future, each instruction flag should be associated with a different character
in the Instruction Info View.
llvm-svn: 336797
Summary:
I ran llvm-exegesis on SKX, SKL, BDW, HSW, SNB.
Atom is from Agner and SLM is a guess.
I've left AMD processors alone.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48079
llvm-svn: 335097
I noticed while working on zero-idiom + dependency-breaking support (PR36671) that most of our binary instruction tests were reusing the same src registers, which would cause the tests to fail once we enable scalar zero-idiom support on btver2. Fixed in all targets to keep them in sync.
llvm-svn: 334110
This is a fix for the problem arising in D47374 (PR37678):
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37678
We may not have throughput info because it's not specified in the model
or it's not available with variant scheduling, so assume that those
instructions can execute/complete at max-issue-width.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47723
llvm-svn: 334055
Summary:
It's super irritating.
[properly configured] git client then complains about that double-newline,
and you have to use `--force` to ignore the warning, since even if you
fix it manually, it will be reintroduced the very next runtime :/
Reviewers: RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, craig.topper, javed.absar, gbedwell
Reviewed By: gbedwell
Subscribers: javed.absar, tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47697
llvm-svn: 333887
Summary:
{FLDL2E, FLDL2T, FLDLG2, FLDLN2, FLDPI} were using WriteMicrocoded.
- I've measured the values for Broadwell, Haswell, SandyBridge, Skylake.
- For ZnVer1 and Atom, values were transferred form InstRWs.
- For SLM and BtVer2, I've guessed some values :(
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, andreadb
Subscribers: gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47585
llvm-svn: 333656
Summary:
- I've measured the values for Broadwell, Haswell, SandyBridge, Skylake.
- For ZnVer1 and Atom, values were transferred form `InstRW`s.
- For SLM and BtVer2, values are from Agner.
This is split off from https://reviews.llvm.org/D47377
Reviewers: RKSimon, andreadb
Subscribers: gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47523
llvm-svn: 333642
Simon Pilgrim