When Clang encounters `@import M.Private` during implicit build, it precompiles module `M` and looks through its submodules. If the `Private` submodule is not found, Clang assumes `@import M_Private`. In the dependency scanner, we don't capture the dependency on `M`, since it's not imported. It's an affecting module, though: compilation of the import statement will fail when implicit modules are disabled and `M` is not precompiled and explicitly provided. This patch fixes that.
Depends on D132430.
Reviewed By: benlangmuir
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132502
When compiling a module, its semantics and Clang's behavior are affected by other modules. These modules are typically the **imported** ones. However, during implicit build, some modules end up being compiled and read without being actually imported. This patch starts tracking such modules and serializing them into `.pcm` files. This enables the dependency scanner to construct explicit compilations that mimic implicit build.
Reviewed By: benlangmuir
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132430
Move copying compiler arguments to a vector<string> and modifying
common module-related options into CompilerInvocation in preparation for
using some of them in more places and to avoid duplicating this code
accidentally in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132419
Sharing the FileManager between the importer and the module build should
only be an optimization. Add a cc1 option -fno-modules-share-filemanager
to allow us to test this. Fix the path to modulemap files, which
previously depended on the shared FileManager when using path mapped to
an external file in a VFS.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131076
When we recover from a crash in a module compilation thread, we need to
ensure any output streams owned by the ASTConsumer (e.g. in
RawPCHContainerGenerator) are deleted before we call clearOutputFiles().
This has the same theoretical issues with proxy streams that Duncan
discusses in the commit 2d13386783. In practice, this was observed
as a use-after-free crash on a downstream branch that uses such a proxy
stream in this code path. Add an assertion so it won't regress.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129220
rdar://96525032
Previously `#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON` always set dynamic rounding
mode and strict exception handling. It is not correct in the presence
of other pragmas that also modify rounding mode and exception handling.
For example, the effect of previous pragma FENV_ROUND could be
cancelled, which is not conformant with the C standard. Also
`#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS OFF` turned off only FEnvAccess flag, leaving
rounding mode and exception handling unchanged, which is incorrect in
general case.
Concrete rounding and exception mode depend on a combination of several
factors like various pragmas and command-line options. During the review
of this patch an idea was proposed that the semantic actions associated
with such pragmas should only set appropriate flags. Actual rounding
mode and exception handling should be calculated taking into account the
state of all relevant options. In such implementation the pragma
FENV_ACCESS should not override properties set by other pragmas but
should set them if such setting is absent.
To implement this approach the following main changes are made:
- Field `FPRoundingMode` is removed from `LangOptions`. Actually there
are no options that set it to arbitrary rounding mode, the choice was
only `dynamic` or `tonearest`. Instead, a new boolean flag
`RoundingMath` is added, with the same meaning as the corresponding
command-line option.
- Type `FPExceptionModeKind` now has possible value `FPE_Default`. It
does not represent any particular exception mode but indicates that
such mode was not set and default value should be used. It allows to
distinguish the case:
{
#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON
...
}
where the pragma must set FPE_Strict, from the case:
{
#pragma clang fp exceptions(ignore)
#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON
...
}
where exception mode should remain `FPE_Ignore`.
- Class `FPOptions` has now methods `getRoundingMode` and
`getExceptionMode`, which calculates the respective properties from
other specified FP properties.
- Class `LangOptions` has now methods `getDefaultRoundingMode` and
`getDefaultExceptionMode`, which calculates default modes from the
specified options and should be used instead of `getRoundingMode` and
`getFPExceptionMode` of the same class.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126364
This patch removes use of the deprecated `DirectoryEntry::getName()` from `collectIncludePCH` by using `{File,Directory}EntryRef` instead.
Reviewed By: bnbarham
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123769
The Clang frontend sometimes fails on the following assertion when launched with `-serialize-diagnostic-file <x>`:
```
Assertion failed: (BlockScope.empty() && CurAbbrevs.empty() && "Block imbalance"), function ~BitstreamWriter, file BitstreamWriter.h, line 125.
```
This was first noticed when passing an unknown command-line argument to `-cc1`.
It turns out the `DiagnosticConsumer::finish()` function should be called as soon as processing of all source files ends, but there are some code paths where that doesn't happen:
1. when command line parsing fails in `cc1_main()`,
2. when `!Act.PrepareToExecute(*this)` or `!createTarget()` evaluate to `true` in `CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction` and the function returns early.
This patch ensures `finish()` is called in all those code paths.
Reviewed By: Bigcheese
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118150
When using explicit Clang modules, some declarations might unexpectedly become invisible.
This is caused by the mechanism that loads PCM files passed via `-fmodule-file=<path>` and creates an `IdentifierInfo` for the module name. The `IdentifierInfo` creation takes place when the `ASTReader` is in a weird state, with modules that are loaded but not yet set up properly. This patch delays the creation of `IdentifierInfo` until the `ASTReader` is done with reading the PCM.
Note that the `-fmodule-file=<name>=<path>` form of the argument doesn't suffer from this issue, since it doesn't create `IdentifierInfo` for the module name.
Reviewed By: dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111543
During explicit modular build, PCM files are typically specified via the `-fmodule-file=<path>` command-line option. Early during the compilation, Clang uses the `ASTReader` to read their contents and caches the result so that the module isn't loaded implicitly later on. A listener is attached to the `ASTReader` to collect names of the modules read from the PCM files. However, if the PCM has already been loaded previously via PCH:
1. the `ASTReader` doesn't do anything for the second time,
2. the listener is not invoked at all,
3. the module load result is not cached,
4. the compilation fails when attempting to load the module implicitly later on.
This patch solves this problem by attaching the listener to the `ASTReader` for PCH reading as well.
Reviewed By: dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111560
This patch propagates the import `SourceLocation` into `HeaderSearch::lookupModule`. This enables remarks on search path usage (implemented in D102923) to point to the source code that initiated header search.
Reviewed By: dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111557
Add -cc1 flags `-fmodules-uses-lock` and `-fno-modules-uses-lock` to
allow the lock manager to be turned off when building implicit modules.
Add `-Rmodule-lock` so that we can see when it's being used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95583
This renames `compileModuleAndReadAST`, adding a `BehindLock` suffix,
and refactors it to significantly reduce nesting.
- Split out helpers `compileModuleAndReadASTImpl` and
`readASTAfterCompileModule` which have straight-line code that doesn't
worry about locks.
- Use `break` in the interesting cases of `switch` statements to reduce
nesting.
- Use early `return`s to reduce nesting.
Detangling the compile-and-read logic from the check-for-locks logic
should be a net win for readability, although I also have a side
motivation of making the locks optional in a follow-up.
No functionality change here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95581
It was possible to re-add a module to a shared in-memory module cache
when search paths are changed. This can eventually cause a crash if the
original module is referenced after this occurs.
1. Module A depends on B
2. B exists in two paths C and D
3. First run only has C on the search path, finds A and B and loads
them
4. Second run adds D to the front of the search path. A is loaded and
contains a reference to the already compiled module from C. But
searching finds the module from D instead, causing a mismatch
5. B and the modules that depend on it are considered out of date and
thus rebuilt
6. The recompiled module A is added to the in-memory cache, freeing
the previously inserted one
This can never occur from a regular clang process, but is very easy to
do through the API - whether through the use of a shared case or just
running multiple compilations from a single `CompilerInstance`. Update
the compilation to return early if a module is already finalized so that
the pre-condition in the in-memory module cache holds.
Resolves rdar://78180255
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105328
Original commit message:
[clang-repl] Implement partial translation units and error recovery.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033 contained a discussion regarding efficient
modeling of error recovery. @rjmccall has outlined the key ideas:
Conceptually, we can split the translation unit into a sequence of partial
translation units (PTUs). Every declaration will be associated with a unique PTU
that owns it.
The first key insight here is that the owning PTU isn't always the "active"
(most recent) PTU, and it isn't always the PTU that the declaration
"comes from". A new declaration (that isn't a redeclaration or specialization of
anything) does belong to the active PTU. A template specialization, however,
belongs to the most recent PTU of all the declarations in its signature - mostly
that means that it can be pulled into a more recent PTU by its template
arguments.
The second key insight is that processing a PTU might extend an earlier PTU.
Rolling back the later PTU shouldn't throw that extension away. For example, if
the second PTU defines a template, and the third PTU requires that template to
be instantiated at float, that template specialization is still part of the
second PTU. Similarly, if the fifth PTU uses an inline function belonging to the
fourth, that definition still belongs to the fourth. When we go to emit code in
a new PTU, we map each declaration we have to emit back to its owning PTU and
emit it in a new module for just the extensions to that PTU. We keep track of
all the modules we've emitted for a PTU so that we can unload them all if we
decide to roll it back.
Most declarations/definitions will only refer to entities from the same or
earlier PTUs. However, it is possible (primarily by defining a
previously-declared entity, but also through templates or ADL) for an entity
that belongs to one PTU to refer to something from a later PTU. We will have to
keep track of this and prevent unwinding to later PTU when we recognize it.
Fortunately, this should be very rare; and crucially, we don't have to do the
bookkeeping for this if we've only got one PTU, e.g. in normal compilation.
Otherwise, PTUs after the first just need to record enough metadata to be able
to revert any changes they've made to declarations belonging to earlier PTUs,
e.g. to redeclaration chains or template specialization lists.
It should even eventually be possible for PTUs to provide their own slab
allocators which can be thrown away as part of rolling back the PTU. We can
maintain a notion of the active allocator and allocate things like Stmt/Expr
nodes in it, temporarily changing it to the appropriate PTU whenever we go to do
something like instantiate a function template. More care will be required when
allocating declarations and types, though.
We would want the PTU to be efficiently recoverable from a Decl; I'm not sure
how best to do that. An easy option that would cover most declarations would be
to make multiple TranslationUnitDecls and parent the declarations appropriately,
but I don't think that's good enough for things like member function templates,
since an instantiation of that would still be parented by its original class.
Maybe we can work this into the DC chain somehow, like how lexical DCs are.
We add a different kind of translation unit `TU_Incremental` which is a
complete translation unit that we might nonetheless incrementally extend later.
Because it is complete (and we might want to generate code for it), we do
perform template instantiation, but because it might be extended later, we don't
warn if it declares or uses undefined internal-linkage symbols.
This patch teaches clang-repl how to recover from errors by disconnecting the
most recent PTU and update the primary PTU lookup tables. For instance:
```./clang-repl
clang-repl> int i = 12; error;
In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1:
input_line_0:1:13: error: C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations
int i = 12; error;
^
error: Parsing failed.
clang-repl> int i = 13; extern "C" int printf(const char*,...);
clang-repl> auto r1 = printf("i=%d\n", i);
i=13
clang-repl> quit
```
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104918
This reverts commit 6775fc6ffa.
It also reverts "[lldb] Fix compilation by adjusting to the new ASTContext signature."
This reverts commit 03a3f86071.
We see some failures on the lldb infrastructure, these changes might play a role
in it. Let's revert it now and see if the bots will become green.
Ref: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104918
https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033 contained a discussion regarding efficient
modeling of error recovery. @rjmccall has outlined the key ideas:
Conceptually, we can split the translation unit into a sequence of partial
translation units (PTUs). Every declaration will be associated with a unique PTU
that owns it.
The first key insight here is that the owning PTU isn't always the "active"
(most recent) PTU, and it isn't always the PTU that the declaration
"comes from". A new declaration (that isn't a redeclaration or specialization of
anything) does belong to the active PTU. A template specialization, however,
belongs to the most recent PTU of all the declarations in its signature - mostly
that means that it can be pulled into a more recent PTU by its template
arguments.
The second key insight is that processing a PTU might extend an earlier PTU.
Rolling back the later PTU shouldn't throw that extension away. For example, if
the second PTU defines a template, and the third PTU requires that template to
be instantiated at float, that template specialization is still part of the
second PTU. Similarly, if the fifth PTU uses an inline function belonging to the
fourth, that definition still belongs to the fourth. When we go to emit code in
a new PTU, we map each declaration we have to emit back to its owning PTU and
emit it in a new module for just the extensions to that PTU. We keep track of
all the modules we've emitted for a PTU so that we can unload them all if we
decide to roll it back.
Most declarations/definitions will only refer to entities from the same or
earlier PTUs. However, it is possible (primarily by defining a
previously-declared entity, but also through templates or ADL) for an entity
that belongs to one PTU to refer to something from a later PTU. We will have to
keep track of this and prevent unwinding to later PTU when we recognize it.
Fortunately, this should be very rare; and crucially, we don't have to do the
bookkeeping for this if we've only got one PTU, e.g. in normal compilation.
Otherwise, PTUs after the first just need to record enough metadata to be able
to revert any changes they've made to declarations belonging to earlier PTUs,
e.g. to redeclaration chains or template specialization lists.
It should even eventually be possible for PTUs to provide their own slab
allocators which can be thrown away as part of rolling back the PTU. We can
maintain a notion of the active allocator and allocate things like Stmt/Expr
nodes in it, temporarily changing it to the appropriate PTU whenever we go to do
something like instantiate a function template. More care will be required when
allocating declarations and types, though.
We would want the PTU to be efficiently recoverable from a Decl; I'm not sure
how best to do that. An easy option that would cover most declarations would be
to make multiple TranslationUnitDecls and parent the declarations appropriately,
but I don't think that's good enough for things like member function templates,
since an instantiation of that would still be parented by its original class.
Maybe we can work this into the DC chain somehow, like how lexical DCs are.
We add a different kind of translation unit `TU_Incremental` which is a
complete translation unit that we might nonetheless incrementally extend later.
Because it is complete (and we might want to generate code for it), we do
perform template instantiation, but because it might be extended later, we don't
warn if it declares or uses undefined internal-linkage symbols.
This patch teaches clang-repl how to recover from errors by disconnecting the
most recent PTU and update the primary PTU lookup tables. For instance:
```./clang-repl
clang-repl> int i = 12; error;
In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1:
input_line_0:1:13: error: C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations
int i = 12; error;
^
error: Parsing failed.
clang-repl> int i = 13; extern "C" int printf(const char*,...);
clang-repl> auto r1 = printf("i=%d\n", i);
i=13
clang-repl> quit
```
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104918
When creating a PCH file the use of a temp file will be dictated by the
presence or absence of the -fno-temp-file flag. Creating a module file
will always use a temp file via the new ForceUseTemporary flag.
This fixes bug 50033.
This patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D102876 caused some lit regressions on z/OS because tmp files were no longer being opened based on binary/text mode. This patch passes OpenFlags when creating tmp files so we can open files in different modes.
Reviewed By: amccarth
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103806
incorrect std::string use. (Also remove redundant call to
RemoveFileOnSignal.)
Clang writes object files by first writing to a .tmp file and then
renaming to the final .obj name. On Windows, if a compile is killed
partway through the .tmp files don't get deleted.
Currently it seems like RemoveFileOnSignal takes care of deleting the
tmp files on Linux, but on Windows we need to call
setDeleteDisposition on tmp files so that they are deleted when
closed.
This patch switches to using TempFile to create the .tmp files we write
when creating object files, since it uses setDeleteDisposition on Windows.
This change applies to both Linux and Windows for consistency.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102876
This reverts commit 20797b129f.
Clang writes object files by first writing to a .tmp file and then
renaming to the final .obj name. On Windows, if a compile is killed
partway through the .tmp files don't get deleted.
Currently it seems like RemoveFileOnSignal takes care of deleting the
tmp files on Linux, but on Windows we need to call
setDeleteDisposition on tmp files so that they are deleted when
closed.
This patch switches to using TempFile to create the .tmp files we write
when creating object files, since it uses setDeleteDisposition on Windows.
This change applies to both Linux and Windows for consistency.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102876
There already exists cl_khr_fp64 extension. So OpenCL C 3.0
and higher should use the feature, earlier versions still
use the extension. OpenCL C 3.0 API spec states that extension
will be not described in the option string if corresponding
optional functionality is not supported (see 4.2. Querying Devices).
Due to that fact the usage of features for OpenCL C 3.0 must
be as follows:
```
$ clang -Xclang -cl-ext=+cl_khr_fp64,+__opencl_c_fp64 ...
$ clang -Xclang -cl-ext=-cl_khr_fp64,-__opencl_c_fp64 ...
```
e.g. the feature and the equivalent extension (if exists)
must be set to the same values
Reviewed By: Anastasia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96524
DisableGeneratingGlobalModuleIndex was being set by
CompilerInstance::findOrCompileModuleAndReadAST most of (but not all of)
the times it returned `nullptr` as a "normal" failure. Pull that up to
the caller, CompilerInstance::loadModule, to simplify the code. This
resolves a number of FIXMEs added during the refactoring in
5cca622310.
The extra cases where this is set are all some version of a fatal error,
and the only client of the field, shouldBuildGlobalModuleIndex, seems
to be unreachable in that case. Even if there is some corner case where
this has an effect, it seems like the right/consistent behaviour.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101672
Rename CompilerInstance's ModuleBuildFailed field to
DisableGeneratingGlobalModuleIndex, which more precisely describes its
role. Otherwise, it's hard to suss out how it's different from
ModuleLoader::HadFatalFailure, and what sort of code simplifications are
safe.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101670
5cca622310 refactored
CompilerInstance::loadModule, splitting out
findOrCompileModuleAndReadAST, but was careful to avoid making any
functional changes. It added ModuleLoader::OtherUncachedFailure to
facilitate this and left behind FIXMEs asking why certain failures
weren't cached.
After a closer look, I think we can just remove this and simplify the
code. This changes the behaviour of the following (simplified) code from
CompilerInstance::loadModule, causing a failure to be cached more often:
```
if (auto MaybeModule = MM.getCachedModuleLoad(*Path[0].first))
return *MaybeModule;
if (ModuleName == getLangOpts().CurrentModule)
return MM.cacheModuleLoad(PP.lookupModule(...));
ModuleLoadResult Result = findOrCompileModuleAndReadAST(...);
if (Result.isNormal()) // This will be 'true' more often.
return MM.cacheModuleLoad(..., Module);
return Result;
```
`MM` here is a ModuleMap owned by the Preprocessor. Here are the cases
where `findOrCompileModuleAndReadAST` starts returning a "normal" failed
result:
- Emitted `diag::err_module_not_found`, where there's no module map
found.
- Emitted `diag::err_module_build_disabled`, where implicitly building
modules is disabled.
- Emitted `diag::err_module_cycle`, which detects module cycles in the
implicit modules build system.
- Emitted `diag::err_module_not_built`, which avoids building a module
in this CompilerInstance if another one tried and failed already.
- `compileModuleAndReadAST()` was called and failed to build.
The four errors are all fatal, and last item also reports a fatal error,
so it this extra caching has no functionality change... but even if it
did, it seems fine to cache these failed results within a ModuleMap
instance (note that each CompilerInstance has its own Preprocessor and
ModuleMap).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101667
Remove an early return from an `else` block that's immediately followed
by an equivalent early return after the `else` block.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101671
Language options are not available when a target is being created,
thus, a new method is introduced. Also, some refactoring is done,
such as removing OpenCL feature macros setting from TargetInfo.
Reviewed By: Anastasia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101087
Jan Svoboda