Summary: Fix PR43700
The ConstantEmitter in AggExprEmitter::EmitArrayInit was initialized
with the CodeGenFunction set to null, which caused the crash.
Also simplify another call, and make the CGF member a const pointer
since it is public but only assigned in the constructor.
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70302
Summary:
Implicit Conversion Sanitizer is *almost* feature complete.
There aren't *that* much unsanitized things left,
two major ones are increment/decrement (this patch) and bit fields.
As it was discussed in
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39519 | PR39519 ]],
unlike `CompoundAssignOperator` (which is promoted internally),
or `BinaryOperator` (for which we always have promotion/demotion in AST)
or parts of `UnaryOperator` (we have promotion/demotion but only for
certain operations), for inc/dec, clang omits promotion/demotion
altogether, under as-if rule.
This is technically correct: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/zPgD
As it can be seen in `InstCombineCasts.cpp` `canEvaluateTruncated()`,
`add`/`sub`/`mul`/`and`/`or`/`xor` operators can all arbitrarily
be extended or truncated:
901cd3b3f6/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp (L1320-L1334)
But that has serious implications:
1. Since we no longer model implicit casts, do we pessimise
their AST representation and everything that uses it?
2. There is no demotion, so lossy demotion sanitizer does not trigger :]
Now, i'm not going to argue about the first problem here,
but the second one **needs** to be addressed. As it was stated
in the report, this is done intentionally, so changing
this in all modes would be considered a penalization/regression.
Which means, the sanitization-less codegen must not be altered.
It was also suggested to not change the sanitized codegen
to the one with demotion, but i quite strongly believe
that will not be the wise choice here:
1. One will need to re-engineer the check that the inc/dec was lossy
in terms of `@llvm.{u,s}{add,sub}.with.overflow` builtins
2. We will still need to compute the result we would lossily demote.
(i.e. the result of wide `add`ition/`sub`traction)
3. I suspect it would need to be done right here, in sanitization.
Which kinda defeats the point of
using `@llvm.{u,s}{add,sub}.with.overflow` builtins:
we'd have two `add`s with basically the same arguments,
one of which is used for check+error-less codepath and other one
for the error reporting. That seems worse than a single wide op+check.
4. OR, we would need to do that in the compiler-rt handler.
Which means we'll need a whole new handler.
But then what about the `CompoundAssignOperator`,
it would also be applicable for it.
So this also doesn't really seem like the right path to me.
5. At least X86 (but likely others) pessimizes all sub-`i32` operations
(due to partial register stalls), so even if we avoid promotion+demotion,
the computations will //likely// be performed in `i32` anyways.
So i'm not really seeing much benefit of
not doing the straight-forward thing.
While looking into this, i have noticed a few more LLVM middle-end
missed canonicalizations, and filed
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44100 | PR44100 ]],
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44102 | PR44102 ]].
Those are not specific to inc/dec, we also have them for
`CompoundAssignOperator`, and it can happen for normal arithmetics, too.
But if we take some other path in the patch, it will not be applicable
here, and we will have most likely played ourselves.
TLDR: front-end should emit canonical, easy-to-optimize yet
un-optimized code. It is middle-end's job to make it optimal.
I'm really hoping reviewers agree with my personal assessment
of the path this patch should take..
This originally landed in 9872ea4ed1
but got immediately reverted in cbfa237892
because the assertion was faulty. That fault ended up being caused
by the enum - while there will be promotion, both types are unsigned,
with same width. So we still don't need to sanitize non-signed cases.
So far. Maybe the assert will tell us this isn't so.
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44054 | PR44054 ]].
Refs. https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/940
Reviewers: rjmccall, erichkeane, rsmith, vsk
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, #sanitizers, llvm-commits, aaron.ballman, t.p.northover, efriedma, regehr
Tags: #llvm, #clang, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70539
The asssertion that was added does not hold,
breaks on test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/SPASS/analyze.c
Will reduce the testcase and revisit.
This reverts commit 9872ea4ed1, 870f3542d3.
Summary:
Implicit Conversion Sanitizer is *almost* feature complete.
There aren't *that* much unsanitized things left,
two major ones are increment/decrement (this patch) and bit fields.
As it was discussed in
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39519 | PR39519 ]],
unlike `CompoundAssignOperator` (which is promoted internally),
or `BinaryOperator` (for which we always have promotion/demotion in AST)
or parts of `UnaryOperator` (we have promotion/demotion but only for
certain operations), for inc/dec, clang omits promotion/demotion
altogether, under as-if rule.
This is technically correct: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/zPgD
As it can be seen in `InstCombineCasts.cpp` `canEvaluateTruncated()`,
`add`/`sub`/`mul`/`and`/`or`/`xor` operators can all arbitrarily
be extended or truncated:
901cd3b3f6/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp (L1320-L1334)
But that has serious implications:
1. Since we no longer model implicit casts, do we pessimise
their AST representation and everything that uses it?
2. There is no demotion, so lossy demotion sanitizer does not trigger :]
Now, i'm not going to argue about the first problem here,
but the second one **needs** to be addressed. As it was stated
in the report, this is done intentionally, so changing
this in all modes would be considered a penalization/regression.
Which means, the sanitization-less codegen must not be altered.
It was also suggested to not change the sanitized codegen
to the one with demotion, but i quite strongly believe
that will not be the wise choice here:
1. One will need to re-engineer the check that the inc/dec was lossy
in terms of `@llvm.{u,s}{add,sub}.with.overflow` builtins
2. We will still need to compute the result we would lossily demote.
(i.e. the result of wide `add`ition/`sub`traction)
3. I suspect it would need to be done right here, in sanitization.
Which kinda defeats the point of
using `@llvm.{u,s}{add,sub}.with.overflow` builtins:
we'd have two `add`s with basically the same arguments,
one of which is used for check+error-less codepath and other one
for the error reporting. That seems worse than a single wide op+check.
4. OR, we would need to do that in the compiler-rt handler.
Which means we'll need a whole new handler.
But then what about the `CompoundAssignOperator`,
it would also be applicable for it.
So this also doesn't really seem like the right path to me.
5. At least X86 (but likely others) pessimizes all sub-`i32` operations
(due to partial register stalls), so even if we avoid promotion+demotion,
the computations will //likely// be performed in `i32` anyways.
So i'm not really seeing much benefit of
not doing the straight-forward thing.
While looking into this, i have noticed a few more LLVM middle-end
missed canonicalizations, and filed
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44100 | PR44100 ]],
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44102 | PR44102 ]].
Those are not specific to inc/dec, we also have them for
`CompoundAssignOperator`, and it can happen for normal arithmetics, too.
But if we take some other path in the patch, it will not be applicable
here, and we will have most likely played ourselves.
TLDR: front-end should emit canonical, easy-to-optimize yet
un-optimized code. It is middle-end's job to make it optimal.
I'm really hoping reviewers agree with my personal assessment
of the path this patch should take..
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44054 | PR44054 ]].
Reviewers: rjmccall, erichkeane, rsmith, vsk
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, #sanitizers, llvm-commits, aaron.ballman, t.p.northover, efriedma, regehr
Tags: #llvm, #clang, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70539
Atomic compound expressions try to use atomicrmw if possible, but this
path doesn't set the Result variable, leaving it to crash in later code
if anything ever tries to use the result of the expression. This fixes
that issue by recalculating the new value based on the old one
atomically loaded.
Part of C++20 Concepts implementation effort. Added Concept Specialization Expressions that are created when a concept is refe$
D41217 on Phabricator.
(recommit after fixing failing Parser test on windows)
llvm-svn: 374903
Part of C++20 Concepts implementation effort. Added Concept Specialization Expressions that are created when a concept is referenced with arguments, and tests thereof.
llvm-svn: 374882
The behavior from the original patch has changed, since we're no longer
allowing LLVM to just ignore the alignment. Instead, we're just
assuming the maximum possible alignment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68824
llvm-svn: 374562
The test fails on Windows, with
error: 'warning' diagnostics expected but not seen:
File builtin-assume-aligned.c Line 62: requested alignment
must be 268435456 bytes or smaller; assumption ignored
error: 'warning' diagnostics seen but not expected:
File builtin-assume-aligned.c Line 62: requested alignment
must be 8192 bytes or smaller; assumption ignored
llvm-svn: 374456
Code to handle __builtin_assume_aligned was allowing larger values, but
would convert this to unsigned along the way. This patch removes the
EmitAssumeAligned overloads that take unsigned to do away with this
problem.
Additionally, it adds a warning that values greater than 1 <<29 are
ignored by LLVM.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68824
llvm-svn: 374450
Summary:
Quote from http://eel.is/c++draft/expr.add#4:
```
4 When an expression J that has integral type is added to or subtracted
from an expression P of pointer type, the result has the type of P.
(4.1) If P evaluates to a null pointer value and J evaluates to 0,
the result is a null pointer value.
(4.2) Otherwise, if P points to an array element i of an array object x with n
elements ([dcl.array]), the expressions P + J and J + P
(where J has the value j) point to the (possibly-hypothetical) array
element i+j of x if 0≤i+j≤n and the expression P - J points to the
(possibly-hypothetical) array element i−j of x if 0≤i−j≤n.
(4.3) Otherwise, the behavior is undefined.
```
Therefore, as per the standard, applying non-zero offset to `nullptr`
(or making non-`nullptr` a `nullptr`, by subtracting pointer's integral value
from the pointer itself) is undefined behavior. (*if* `nullptr` is not defined,
i.e. e.g. `-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks` was *not* specified.)
To make things more fun, in C (6.5.6p8), applying *any* offset to null pointer
is undefined, although Clang front-end pessimizes the code by not lowering
that info, so this UB is "harmless".
Since rL369789 (D66608 `[InstCombine] icmp eq/ne (gep inbounds P, Idx..), null -> icmp eq/ne P, null`)
LLVM middle-end uses those guarantees for transformations.
If the source contains such UB's, said code may now be miscompiled.
Such miscompilations were already observed:
* https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190826/687838.html
* https://github.com/google/filament/pull/1566
Surprisingly, UBSan does not catch those issues
... until now. This diff teaches UBSan about these UB's.
`getelementpointer inbounds` is a pretty frequent instruction,
so this does have a measurable impact on performance;
I've addressed most of the obvious missing folds (and thus decreased the performance impact by ~5%),
and then re-performed some performance measurements using my [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed ]] benchmark:
(all measurements done with LLVM ToT, the sanitizer never fired.)
* no sanitization vs. existing check: average `+21.62%` slowdown
* existing check vs. check after this patch: average `22.04%` slowdown
* no sanitization vs. this patch: average `48.42%` slowdown
Reviewers: vsk, filcab, rsmith, aaron.ballman, vitalybuka, rjmccall, #sanitizers
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, nickdesaulniers, nikic, ychen, dtzWill, xbolva00, dberris, arphaman, rupprecht, reames, regehr, llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67122
llvm-svn: 374293
The static analyzer is warning about potential null dereferences, but in these cases we should be able to use castAs<RecordType> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 373584
The static analyzer is warning about potential null dereferences, but in these cases we should be able to use castAs<VectorType> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 373478
It shouldn't really be inlined into the EmitCheckedInBoundsGEP().
Refactoring it beforehand will make follow-up changes more obvious.
This was originally part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D67122
llvm-svn: 371207
Summary:
Prior to r329065, we used [-max, max] as the range of representable
values because LLVM's `fptrunc` did not guarantee defined behavior when
truncating from a larger floating-point type to a smaller one. Now that
has been fixed, we can make clang follow normal IEEE 754 semantics in this
regard and take the larger range [-inf, +inf] as the range of representable
values.
In practice, this affects two parts of the frontend:
* the constant evaluator no longer treats floating-point evaluations
that result in +-inf as being undefined (because they no longer leave
the range of representable values of the type)
* UBSan no longer treats conversions to floating-point type that are
outside the [-max, +max] range as being undefined
In passing, also remove the float-divide-by-zero sanitizer from
-fsanitize=undefined, on the basis that while it's undefined per C++
rules (and we disallow it in constant expressions for that reason), it
is defined by Clang / LLVM / IEEE 754.
Reviewers: rnk, BillyONeal
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63793
llvm-svn: 365272
This commit adds a new builtin, __builtin_bit_cast(T, v), which performs a
bit_cast from a value v to a type T. This expression can be evaluated at
compile time under specific circumstances.
The compile time evaluation currently doesn't support bit-fields, but I'm
planning on fixing this in a follow up (some of the logic for figuring this out
is in CodeGen). I'm also planning follow-ups for supporting some more esoteric
types that the constexpr evaluator supports, as well as extending
__builtin_memcpy constexpr evaluation to use the same infrastructure.
rdar://44987528
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62825
llvm-svn: 364954
nullptr_t does not access memory.
We now reuse CK_NullToPointer to represent a conversion from a glvalue
of type nullptr_t to a prvalue of nullptr_t where necessary.
This reinstates r363337, reverted in r363352.
llvm-svn: 363429
Revert 363340 "Remove unused SK_LValueToRValue initialization step."
Revert 363337 "PR23833, DR2140: an lvalue-to-rvalue conversion on a glvalue of type"
Revert 363295 "C++ DR712 and others: handle non-odr-use resulting from an lvalue-to-rvalue conversion applied to a member access or similar not-quite-trivial lvalue expression."
llvm-svn: 363352
nullptr_t does not access memory.
We now reuse CK_NullToPointer to represent a conversion from a glvalue
of type nullptr_t to a prvalue of nullptr_t where necessary.
This reinstates r345562, reverted in r346065, now that CodeGen's
handling of non-odr-used variables has been fixed.
llvm-svn: 363337
Summary:
This patch implements the source location builtins `__builtin_LINE(), `__builtin_FUNCTION()`, `__builtin_FILE()` and `__builtin_COLUMN()`. These builtins are needed to implement [`std::experimental::source_location`](https://rawgit.com/cplusplus/fundamentals-ts/v2/main.html#reflection.src_loc.creation).
With the exception of `__builtin_COLUMN`, GCC also implements these builtins, and Clangs behavior is intended to match as closely as possible.
Reviewers: rsmith, joerg, aaron.ballman, bogner, majnemer, shafik, martong
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rnkovacs, loskutov, riccibruno, mgorny, kunitoki, alexr, majnemer, hfinkel, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37035
llvm-svn: 360937
This patch includes the necessary code for converting between a fixed point type and integer.
This also includes constant expression evaluation for conversions with these types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56900
llvm-svn: 355462
I think the author of the function assumed that `GetInsertBlock()`
wouldn't change from where `atomicPHI` was created, but this isn't
true when `-fsanitize=unsigned-integer-overflow` is enabled (we
generate an overflow/continuation label). Fix by keeping track of the
block we want to return to to complete the cmpxchg loop.
rdar://48406558
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58744
llvm-svn: 355054
This patch implements fixed point comparisons with other fixed point types and
integers. This also provides constant expression evaluation for them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57219
llvm-svn: 354621
Emit{Nounwind,}RuntimeCall{,OrInvoke} have been modified to take a
FunctionCallee as an argument, and CreateRuntimeFunction has been
modified to return a FunctionCallee. All callers have been updated.
Additionally, CreateBuiltinFunction is removed, as it was redundant
with CreateRuntimeFunction after some previous changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57668
llvm-svn: 353184
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This patch covers subtraction between fixed point types and other fixed point
types or integers, using the conversion rules described in 4.1.4 of N1169.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55844
llvm-svn: 351371
This patch covers addition between fixed point types and other fixed point
types or integers, using the conversion rules described in 4.1.4 of N1169.
Usual arithmetic rules do not apply to binary operations when one of the
operands is a fixed point type, and the result of the operation must be
calculated with the full precision of the operands, so we should not perform
any casting to a common type.
This patch does not include constant expression evaluation for addition of
fixed point types. That will be addressed in another patch since I think this
one is already big enough.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53738
llvm-svn: 351364
Summary:
UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice.
Having a way to detect it is nice though.
[[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says:
```
We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute.
...
If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour.
```
This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute.
Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes.
The compiler-rt part is D54590.
This is a second commit, the original one was r351105,
which was mass-reverted in r351159 because 2 compiler-rt tests were failing.
Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589
llvm-svn: 351177
Summary:
UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice.
Having a way to detect it is nice though.
[[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says:
```
We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute.
...
If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour.
```
This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute.
Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes.
The compiler-rt part is D54590.
Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589
llvm-svn: 351105
It seems the two failing tests can be simply fixed after r348037
Fix 3 cases in Analysis/builtin-functions.cpp
Delete the bad CodeGen/builtin-constant-p.c for now
llvm-svn: 348053
Kept the "indirect_builtin_constant_p" test case in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx1y.cpp
while we are investigating why the following snippet fails:
extern char extern_var;
struct { int a; } a = {__builtin_constant_p(extern_var)};
llvm-svn: 348039
This was reverted in r347656 due to me thinking it caused a miscompile of
Chromium. Turns out it was the Chromium code that was broken.
llvm-svn: 347756
This caused a miscompile in Chrome (see crbug.com/908372) that's
illustrated by this small reduction:
static bool f(int *a, int *b) {
return !__builtin_constant_p(b - a) || (!(b - a));
}
int arr[] = {1,2,3};
bool g() {
return f(arr, arr + 3);
}
$ clang -O2 -S -emit-llvm a.cc -o -
g() should return true, but after r347417 it became false for some reason.
This also reverts the follow-up commits.
r347417:
> Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures.
>
> Don't try to emit a scalar expression for a non-scalar argument to
> __builtin_constant_p().
>
> Third time's a charm!
r347446:
> The result of is.constant() is unsigned.
r347480:
> A __builtin_constant_p() returns 0 with a function type.
r347512:
> isEvaluatable() implies a constant context.
>
> Assume that we're in a constant context if we're asking if the expression can
> be compiled into a constant initializer. This fixes the issue where a
> __builtin_constant_p() in a compound literal was diagnosed as not being
> constant, even though it's always possible to convert the builtin into a
> constant.
r347531:
> A "constexpr" is evaluated in a constant context. Make sure this is reflected
> if a __builtin_constant_p() is a part of a constexpr.
llvm-svn: 347656
Summary:
As reported by @regehr (thanks!) on twitter (https://twitter.com/johnregehr/status/1057681496255815686),
we (me) has completely forgot about the binary assignment operator.
In AST, it isn't represented as separate `ImplicitCastExpr`'s,
but as a single `CompoundAssignOperator`, that does all the casts internally.
Which means, out of these two, only the first one is diagnosed:
```
auto foo() {
unsigned char c = 255;
c = c + 1;
return c;
}
auto bar() {
unsigned char c = 255;
c += 1;
return c;
}
```
https://godbolt.org/z/JNyVc4
This patch does handle the `CompoundAssignOperator`:
```
int main() {
unsigned char c = 255;
c += 1;
return c;
}
```
```
$ ./bin/clang -g -fsanitize=integer /tmp/test.c && ./a.out
/tmp/test.c:3:5: runtime error: implicit conversion from type 'int' of value 256 (32-bit, signed) to type 'unsigned char' changed the value to 0 (8-bit, unsigned)
#0 0x2392b8 in main /tmp/test.c:3:5
#1 0x7fec4a612b16 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x22b16)
#2 0x214029 in _start (/build/llvm-build-GCC-release/a.out+0x214029)
```
However, the pre/post increment/decrement is still not handled.
Reviewers: rsmith, regehr, vsk, rjmccall, #sanitizers
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: mclow.lists, cfe-commits, regehr
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53949
llvm-svn: 347258
Summary:
Compound literals, enums, file-scoped arrays, etc. require their
initializers and size specifiers to be constant. Wrap the initializer
expressions in a ConstantExpr so that we can easily check for this later
on.
Reviewers: rsmith, shafik
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, jyknight, nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53921
llvm-svn: 346455
This patch breaks Index/opencl-types.cl LIT test:
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 1'; stage1/bin/c-index-test -test-print-type llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl -cl-std=CL2.0 | stage1/bin/FileCheck llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl
--
Command Output (stderr):
--
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:3:26: warning: unsupported OpenCL extension 'cl_khr_fp16' - ignoring [-Wignored-pragmas]
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:4:26: warning: unsupported OpenCL extension 'cl_khr_fp64' - ignoring [-Wignored-pragmas]
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:8:9: error: use of type 'double' requires cl_khr_fp64 extension to be enabled
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:11:8: error: declaring variable of type 'half' is not allowed
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:15:3: error: use of type 'double' requires cl_khr_fp64 extension to be enabled
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:16:3: error: use of type 'double4' (vector of 4 'double' values) requires cl_khr_fp64 extension to be enabled
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:26:26: warning: unsupported OpenCL extension 'cl_khr_gl_msaa_sharing' - ignoring [-Wignored-pragmas]
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:35:44: error: use of type '__read_only image2d_msaa_t' requires cl_khr_gl_msaa_sharing extension to be enabled
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:36:49: error: use of type '__read_only image2d_array_msaa_t' requires cl_khr_gl_msaa_sharing extension to be enabled
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:37:49: error: use of type '__read_only image2d_msaa_depth_t' requires cl_khr_gl_msaa_sharing extension to be enabled
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:38:54: error: use of type '__read_only image2d_array_msaa_depth_t' requires cl_khr_gl_msaa_sharing extension to be enabled
llvm-svn: 346338
This exposes a (known) CodeGen bug: it can't cope with emitting lvalue
expressions that denote non-odr-used but usable-in-constant-expression
variables. See PR39528 for a testcase.
Reverted for now until that issue can be fixed.
llvm-svn: 346065
The goal is to use `emitConstant` in more places. Didn't move
`ComplexExprEmitter::emitConstant` because it returns a different type.
Reviewers: rjmccall, ahatanak
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: dexonsmith, erik.pilkington, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53725
llvm-svn: 345897
This patch should not introduce any behavior changes. It consists of
mostly one of two changes:
1. Replacing fall through comments with the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro
2. Inserting 'break' before falling through into a case block consisting
of only 'break'.
We were already using this warning with GCC, but its warning behaves
slightly differently. In this patch, the following differences are
relevant:
1. GCC recognizes comments that say "fall through" as annotations, clang
doesn't
2. GCC doesn't warn on "case N: foo(); default: break;", clang does
3. GCC doesn't warn when the case contains a switch, but falls through
the outer case.
I will enable the warning separately in a follow-up patch so that it can
be cleanly reverted if necessary.
Reviewers: alexfh, rsmith, lattner, rtrieu, EricWF, bollu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53950
llvm-svn: 345882
I fully expected for that to be handled by the canonical type check,
but it clearly wasn't. Sadly, somehow it hide until now.
Reported by Eli Friedman.
llvm-svn: 345816
This is the second half of Implicit Integer Conversion Sanitizer.
It completes the first half, and finally makes the sanitizer
fully functional! Only the bitfield handling is missing.
Summary:
C and C++ are interesting languages. They are statically typed, but weakly.
The implicit conversions are allowed. This is nice, allows to write code
while balancing between getting drowned in everything being convertible,
and nothing being convertible. As usual, this comes with a price:
```
void consume(unsigned int val);
void test(int val) {
consume(val);
// The 'val' is `signed int`, but `consume()` takes `unsigned int`.
// If val is negative, then consume() will be operating on a large
// unsigned value, and you may or may not have a bug.
// But yes, sometimes this is intentional.
// Making the conversion explicit silences the sanitizer.
consume((unsigned int)val);
}
```
Yes, there is a `-Wsign-conversion`` diagnostic group, but first, it is kinda
noisy, since it warns on everything (unlike sanitizers, warning on an
actual issues), and second, likely there are cases where it does **not** warn.
The actual detection is pretty easy. We just need to check each of the values
whether it is negative, and equality-compare the results of those comparisons.
The unsigned value is obviously non-negative. Zero is non-negative too.
https://godbolt.org/g/w93oj2
We do not have to emit the check *always*, there are obvious situations
where we can avoid emitting it, since it would **always** get optimized-out.
But i do think the tautological IR (`icmp ult %x, 0`, which is always false)
should be emitted, and the middle-end should cleanup it.
This sanitizer is in the `-fsanitize=implicit-conversion` group,
and is a logical continuation of D48958 `-fsanitize=implicit-integer-truncation`.
As for the ordering, i'we opted to emit the check **after**
`-fsanitize=implicit-integer-truncation`. At least on these simple 16 test cases,
this results in 1 of the 12 emitted checks being optimized away,
as compared to 0 checks being optimized away if the order is reversed.
This is a clang part.
The compiler-rt part is D50251.
Finishes fixing [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21530 | PR21530 ]], [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37552 | PR37552 ]], [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35409 | PR35409 ]].
Finishes partially fixing [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9821 | PR9821 ]].
Finishes fixing https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/940.
Only the bitfield handling is missing.
Reviewers: vsk, rsmith, rjmccall, #sanitizers, erichkeane
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: chandlerc, filcab, cfe-commits, regehr
Tags: #sanitizers, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50250
llvm-svn: 345660
nullptr_t does not access memory.
We now reuse CK_NullToPointer to represent a conversion from a glvalue
of type nullptr_t to a prvalue of nullptr_t where necessary.
llvm-svn: 345562
Summary:
- Added names for some emitted values (such as "tobool" for
the result of a cast to boolean).
- Replaced explicit IRBuilder request for doing sext/zext/trunc
by using CreateIntCast instead.
- Simplify code for emitting satuation into one if-statement
for clamping to max, and one if-statement for clamping to min.
Reviewers: leonardchan, ebevhan
Reviewed By: leonardchan
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53707
llvm-svn: 345398
This patch is a part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D48456 in an attempt to split
the casting logic up into smaller patches. This contains the code for casting
from fixed point types to boolean types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53308
llvm-svn: 345063
This patch is a part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D48456 in an attempt to
split them up. This contains the code for casting between fixed point types
and other fixed point types.
The method for converting between fixed point types is based off the convert()
method in APFixedPoint.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50616
llvm-svn: 344530
Summary:
As per IRC disscussion, it seems we really want to have more fine-grained `-fsanitize=implicit-integer-truncation`:
* A check when both of the types are unsigned.
* Another check for the other cases (either one of the types is signed, or both of the types is signed).
This is clang part.
Compiler-rt part is D50902.
Reviewers: rsmith, vsk, Sanitizers
Reviewed by: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50901
llvm-svn: 344230
Summary:
C and C++ are interesting languages. They are statically typed, but weakly.
The implicit conversions are allowed. This is nice, allows to write code
while balancing between getting drowned in everything being convertible,
and nothing being convertible. As usual, this comes with a price:
```
unsigned char store = 0;
bool consume(unsigned int val);
void test(unsigned long val) {
if (consume(val)) {
// the 'val' is `unsigned long`, but `consume()` takes `unsigned int`.
// If their bit widths are different on this platform, the implicit
// truncation happens. And if that `unsigned long` had a value bigger
// than UINT_MAX, then you may or may not have a bug.
// Similarly, integer addition happens on `int`s, so `store` will
// be promoted to an `int`, the sum calculated (0+768=768),
// and the result demoted to `unsigned char`, and stored to `store`.
// In this case, the `store` will still be 0. Again, not always intended.
store = store + 768; // before addition, 'store' was promoted to int.
}
// But yes, sometimes this is intentional.
// You can either make the conversion explicit
(void)consume((unsigned int)val);
// or mask the value so no bits will be *implicitly* lost.
(void)consume((~((unsigned int)0)) & val);
}
```
Yes, there is a `-Wconversion`` diagnostic group, but first, it is kinda
noisy, since it warns on everything (unlike sanitizers, warning on an
actual issues), and second, there are cases where it does **not** warn.
So a Sanitizer is needed. I don't have any motivational numbers, but i know
i had this kind of problem 10-20 times, and it was never easy to track down.
The logic to detect whether an truncation has happened is pretty simple
if you think about it - https://godbolt.org/g/NEzXbb - basically, just
extend (using the new, not original!, signedness) the 'truncated' value
back to it's original width, and equality-compare it with the original value.
The most non-trivial thing here is the logic to detect whether this
`ImplicitCastExpr` AST node is **actually** an implicit conversion, //or//
part of an explicit cast. Because the explicit casts are modeled as an outer
`ExplicitCastExpr` with some `ImplicitCastExpr`'s as **direct** children.
https://godbolt.org/g/eE1GkJ
Nowadays, we can just use the new `part_of_explicit_cast` flag, which is set
on all the implicitly-added `ImplicitCastExpr`'s of an `ExplicitCastExpr`.
So if that flag is **not** set, then it is an actual implicit conversion.
As you may have noted, this isn't just named `-fsanitize=implicit-integer-truncation`.
There are potentially some more implicit conversions to be warned about.
Namely, implicit conversions that result in sign change; implicit conversion
between different floating point types, or between fp and an integer,
when again, that conversion is lossy.
One thing i know isn't handled is bitfields.
This is a clang part.
The compiler-rt part is D48959.
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21530 | PR21530 ]], [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37552 | PR37552 ]], [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35409 | PR35409 ]].
Partially fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9821 | PR9821 ]].
Fixes https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/940. (other than sign-changing implicit conversions)
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, samsonov, pcc, vsk, eugenis, efriedma, kcc, erichkeane
Reviewed By: rsmith, vsk, erichkeane
Subscribers: erichkeane, klimek, #sanitizers, aaron.ballman, RKSimon, dtzWill, filcab, danielaustin, ygribov, dvyukov, milianw, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, regehr
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48958
llvm-svn: 338288
Summary:
Emmiting new intrinsic that strips invariant.groups to make
devirtulization sound, as described in RFC: Devirtualization v2.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, amharc, kuhar
Subscribers: llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47299
Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Pszeniczny <krzysztof.pszeniczny@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 336137
Summary:
This test is a strip down version of a function inside the
amalgamated sqlite source. When converted to IR clang produces
a phi instruction without debug location.
This patch fixes the above issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47720
llvm-svn: 335255
This diff includes the logic for setting the precision bits for each primary fixed point type in the target info and logic for initializing a fixed point literal.
Fixed point literals are declared using the suffixes
```
hr: short _Fract
uhr: unsigned short _Fract
r: _Fract
ur: unsigned _Fract
lr: long _Fract
ulr: unsigned long _Fract
hk: short _Accum
uhk: unsigned short _Accum
k: _Accum
uk: unsigned _Accum
```
Errors are also thrown for illegal literal values
```
unsigned short _Accum u_short_accum = 256.0uhk; // expected-error{{the integral part of this literal is too large for this unsigned _Accum type}}
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46915
llvm-svn: 335148
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
Summary:
Clean carriage returns from lib/ and include/. NFC.
(I have to make this change locally in order for `git diff` to show sane output after I edit a file, so I might as well ask for it to be committed. I don't have commit privs myself.)
(Without this patch, `git rebase`ing any change involving SemaDeclCXX.cpp is a real nightmare. :( So while I have no right to ask for this to be committed, geez would it make my workflow easier if it were.)
Here's the command I used to reformat things. (Requires bash and OSX/FreeBSD sed.)
git grep -l $'\r' lib include | xargs sed -i -e $'s/\r//'
find lib include -name '*-e' -delete
Reviewers: malcolm.parsons
Reviewed By: malcolm.parsons
Subscribers: emaste, krytarowski, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45591
Patch by Arthur O'Dwyer.
llvm-svn: 330112
source expressions when iterating over a PseudoObjectExpr's semantic
subexpression list.
Previously the loop in emitPseudoObjectExpr would emit the IR for each
OpaqueValueExpr that was in a PseudoObjectExpr's semantic-form
expression list and use the result when the OpaqueValueExpr later
appeared in other expressions. This caused an assertion failure when
AggExprEmitter tried to copy the result of an OpaqueValueExpr and the
copied type didn't have trivial copy/move constructors or assignment
operators.
This patch adds flag IsUnique to OpaqueValueExpr which indicates it is a
unique reference to its source expression (it is not used in multiple
places). The loop in emitPseudoObjectExpr ignores OpaqueValueExprs that
are unique and CodeGen visitors simply traverse the source expressions
of such OpaqueValueExprs.
rdar://problem/34363596
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39562
llvm-svn: 327939
Summary:
This patch enables debugging of C99 VLA types by generating more precise
LLVM Debug metadata, using the extended DISubrange 'count' field that
takes a DIVariable.
This should implement:
Bug 30553: Debug info generated for arrays is not what GDB expects (not as good as GCC's)
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30553
Reviewers: echristo, aprantl, dexonsmith, clayborg, pcc, kristof.beyls, dblaikie
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: jholewinski, schweitz, davide, fhahn, JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41698
llvm-svn: 323952
Adding the new enumerator forced a bunch more changes into this patch than I
would have liked. The -Wtautological-compare warning was extended to properly
check the new comparison operator, clang-format needed updating because it uses
precedence levels as weights for determining where to break lines (and several
operators increased their precedence levels with this change), thread-safety
analysis needed changes to build its own IL properly for the new operator.
All "real" semantic checking for this operator has been deferred to a future
patch. For now, we use the relational comparison rules and arbitrarily give
the builtin form of the operator a return type of 'void'.
llvm-svn: 320707
This commit fixes a bug in IRGen where it generates completely broken
code for __fp16 vectors on X86. For example when the following code is
compiled:
half4 hv0, hv1, hv2; // these are vectors of __fp16.
void foo221() {
hv0 = hv1 + hv2;
}
clang generates the following IR, in which two i16 vectors are added:
@hv1 = common global <4 x i16> zeroinitializer, align 8
@hv2 = common global <4 x i16> zeroinitializer, align 8
@hv0 = common global <4 x i16> zeroinitializer, align 8
define void @foo221() {
%0 = load <4 x i16>, <4 x i16>* @hv1, align 8
%1 = load <4 x i16>, <4 x i16>* @hv2, align 8
%add = add <4 x i16> %0, %1
store <4 x i16> %add, <4 x i16>* @hv0, align 8
ret void
}
To fix the bug, this commit uses the code committed in r314056, which
modified clang to promote and truncate __fp16 vectors to and from float
vectors in the AST. It also fixes another IRGen bug where a short value
is assigned to an __fp16 variable without any integer-to-floating-point
conversion, as shown in the following example:
__fp16 a;
short b;
void foo1() {
a = b;
}
@b = common global i16 0, align 2
@a = common global i16 0, align 2
define void @foo1() #0 {
%0 = load i16, i16* @b, align 2
store i16 %0, i16* @a, align 2
ret void
}
rdar://problem/20625184
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40112
llvm-svn: 320215
In function GetIntrinsic, not all types are covered. Types double and long long are missed, type long is wrongly treated same as int, it should be same as long long. These problems cause compiler crashes when compiling code in PR31161. This patch fixed the problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38820
llvm-svn: 316179
Usually compare expression should return i1 type, so EmitScalarConversion is called before return
return EmitScalarConversion(Result, CGF.getContext().BoolTy, E->getType(), E->getExprLoc());
But when ppc intrinsic is called to compare vectors, the ppc intrinsic can return i32 even E->getType() is BoolTy, in this case EmitScalarConversion does nothing, an i32 type result is returned and causes crash later.
This patch detects this case and truncates the result before return.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38656
llvm-svn: 315358
This commit fixes a bug in the handling of storage-only __fp16 vectors
where clang didn't promote __fp16 vector operands to float vectors.
Conceptually, it performs the following transformation on the AST in
CreateBuiltinBinOp and CreateBuiltinUnaryOp:
(Before)
typedef __fp16 half4 __attribute__ ((vector_size (8)));
typedef float float4 __attribute__ ((vector_size (16)));
half4 hv0, hv1, hv2, hv3;
hv0 = hv1 + hv2 + hv3;
(After)
float4 t0 = (float4)hv1 + (float4)hv2;
float4 t1 = t0 + (float4)hv3;
hv0 = (half4)t1;
Note that this commit fixes the bug for targets that set
HalfArgsAndReturns to true (ARM and ARM64). Targets using intrinsics
such as llvm.convert.to.fp16 to handle __fp16 are still broken.
rdar://problem/20625184
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32520
llvm-svn: 314056
This is a recommit of r312781; in some build configurations
variable names are omitted, so changed the new regression
test accordingly.
llvm-svn: 312794
This adds _Float16 as a source language type, which is a 16-bit floating point
type defined in C11 extension ISO/IEC TS 18661-3.
In follow up patches documentation and more tests will be added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33719
llvm-svn: 312781
expressions
C++ allows us to reference static variables through member expressions. Prior to
this commit, non-integer static variables that were referenced using a member
expression were always emitted using lvalue loads. The old behaviour introduced
an inconsistency between regular uses of static variables and member expressions
uses. For example, the following program compiled and linked successfully:
struct Foo {
constexpr static const char *name = "foo";
};
int main() {
return Foo::name[0] == 'f';
}
but this program failed to link because "Foo::name" wasn't found:
struct Foo {
constexpr static const char *name = "foo";
};
int main() {
Foo f;
return f.name[0] == 'f';
}
This commit ensures that constant static variables referenced through member
expressions are emitted in the same way as ordinary static variable references.
rdar://33942261
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36876
llvm-svn: 311772
The pointer overflow check gives false negatives when dealing with
expressions in which an unsigned value is subtracted from a pointer.
This is summarized in PR33430 [1]: ubsan permits the result of the
subtraction to be greater than "p", but it should not.
To fix the issue, we should track whether or not the pointer expression
is a subtraction. If it is, and the indices are unsigned, we know to
expect "p - <unsigned> <= p".
I've tested this by running check-{llvm,clang} with a stage2
ubsan-enabled build. I've also added some tests to compiler-rt, which
are in D34122.
[1] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33430
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34121
llvm-svn: 307955
Adding an unsigned offset to a base pointer has undefined behavior if
the result of the expression would precede the base. An example from
@regehr:
int foo(char *p, unsigned offset) {
return p + offset >= p; // This may be optimized to '1'.
}
foo(p, -1); // UB.
This patch extends the pointer overflow check in ubsan to detect invalid
unsigned pointer index expressions. It changes the instrumentation to
only permit non-negative offsets in pointer index expressions when all
of the GEP indices are unsigned.
Testing: check-llvm, check-clang run on a stage2, ubsan-instrumented
build.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33910
llvm-svn: 305216
Check pointer arithmetic for overflow.
For some more background on this check, see:
https://wdtz.org/catching-pointer-overflow-bugs.htmlhttps://reviews.llvm.org/D20322
Patch by Will Dietz and John Regehr!
This version of the patch is different from the original in a few ways:
- It introduces the EmitCheckedInBoundsGEP utility which inserts
checks when the pointer overflow check is enabled.
- It does some constant-folding to reduce instrumentation overhead.
- It does not check some GEPs in CGExprCXX. I'm not sure that
inserting checks here, or in CGClass, would catch many bugs.
Possible future directions for this check:
- Introduce CGF.EmitCheckedStructGEP, to detect overflows when
accessing structures.
Testing: Apart from the added lit test, I ran check-llvm and check-clang
with a stage2, ubsan-instrumented clang. Will and John have also done
extensive testing on numerous open source projects.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33305
llvm-svn: 304459
Alloca always returns a pointer in alloca address space, which may
be different from the type defined by the language. For example,
in C++ the auto variables are in the default address space. Therefore
cast alloca to the expected address space when necessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32248
llvm-svn: 303370
Sanitizer instrumentation generally needs to be marked with !nosanitize,
but we're not doing this properly for ubsan's overflow checks.
r213291 has more information about why this is needed.
llvm-svn: 302598
Currently, ubsan emits overflow checks for arithmetic that is known to
be safe at compile-time, e.g:
1 + 1 => CheckedAdd(1, 1)
This leads to breakage when using the __builtin_prefetch intrinsic. LLVM
expects the arguments to @llvm.prefetch to be constant integers, and
when ubsan inserts unnecessary checks on the operands to the intrinsic,
this contract is broken, leading to verifier failures (see PR32874).
Instead of special-casing __builtin_prefetch for ubsan, this patch fixes
the underlying problem, i.e that clang currently emits unnecessary
overflow checks.
Testing: I ran the check-clang and check-ubsan targets with a stage2,
ubsan-enabled build of clang. I added a regression test for PR32874, and
some extra checking to make sure we don't regress runtime checking for
unsafe arithmetic. The existing ubsan-promoted-arithmetic.cpp test also
provides coverage for this change.
llvm-svn: 301988
With this, FMF(contract) becomes an alternative way to express the request to
contract.
These are currently only propagated for FMul, FAdd and FSub. The rest will be
added as more FMFs are hooked up for this.
This is toward fixing PR25721.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31168
llvm-svn: 299469
FPContractModeKind is the codegen option flag which is already ternary (off,
on, fast). This makes it universally the type for the contractable info
across the front-end:
* In FPOptions (i.e. in the Sema + in the expression nodes).
* In LangOpts::DefaultFPContractMode which is the option that initializes
FPOptions in the Sema.
Another way to look at this change is that before fp-contractable on/off were
the only states handled to the front-end:
* For "on", FMA folding was performed by the front-end
* For "fast", we simply forwarded the flag to TargetOptions to handle it in
LLVM
Now off/on/fast are all exposed because for fast we will generate
fast-math-flags during CodeGen.
This is toward moving fp-contraction=fast from an LLVM TargetOption to a
FastMathFlag in order to fix PR25721.
---
This is a recommit of r299027 with an adjustment to the test
CodeGenCUDA/fp-contract.cu. The test assumed that even
though -ffp-contract=on is passed FE-based folding of FMA won't happen.
This is obviously wrong since the user is asking for this explicitly with the
option. CUDA is different that -ffp-contract=fast is on by default.
The test used to "work" because contract=fast and contract=on were maintained
separately and we didn't fold in the FE because contract=fast was on due to
the target-default. This patch consolidates the contract=on/fast/off state
into a ternary state hence the change in behavior.
---
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31167
llvm-svn: 299033
FPContractModeKind is the codegen option flag which is already ternary (off,
on, fast). This makes it universally the type for the contractable info
across the front-end:
* In FPOptions (i.e. in the Sema + in the expression nodes).
* In LangOpts::DefaultFPContractMode which is the option that initializes
FPOptions in the Sema.
Another way to look at this change is that before fp-contractable on/off were
the only states handled to the front-end:
* For "on", FMA folding was performed by the front-end
* For "fast", we simply forwarded the flag to TargetOptions to handle it in
LLVM
Now off/on/fast are all exposed because for fast we will generate
fast-math-flags during CodeGen.
This is toward moving fp-contraction=fast from an LLVM TargetOption to a
FastMathFlag in order to fix PR25721.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31167
llvm-svn: 299027
Sema holds the current FPOptions which is adjusted by 'pragma STDC
FP_CONTRACT'. This then gets propagated into expression nodes as they are
built.
This encapsulates FPOptions so that this propagation happens opaquely rather
than directly with the fp_contractable on/off bit. This allows controlled
transitioning of fp_contractable to a ternary value (off, on, fast). It will
also allow adding more fast-math flags later.
This is toward moving fp-contraction=fast from an LLVM TargetOption to a
FastMathFlag in order to fix PR25721.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31166
llvm-svn: 298877
Details:
Emit suspend expression which roughly looks like:
auto && x = CommonExpr();
if (!x.await_ready()) {
llvm_coro_save();
x.await_suspend(...); (*)
llvm_coro_suspend(); (**)
}
x.await_resume();
where the result of the entire expression is the result of x.await_resume()
(*) If x.await_suspend return type is bool, it allows to veto a suspend:
if (x.await_suspend(...))
llvm_coro_suspend();
(**) llvm_coro_suspend() encodes three possible continuations as a switch instruction:
%where-to = call i8 @llvm.coro.suspend(...)
switch i8 %where-to, label %coro.ret [ ; jump to epilogue to suspend
i8 0, label %yield.ready ; go here when resumed
i8 1, label %yield.cleanup ; go here when destroyed
]
llvm-svn: 298784
Teach UBSan to detect when a value with the _Nonnull type annotation
assumes a null value. Call expressions, initializers, assignments, and
return statements are all checked.
Because _Nonnull does not affect IRGen, the new checks are disabled by
default. The new driver flags are:
-fsanitize=nullability-arg (_Nonnull violation in call)
-fsanitize=nullability-assign (_Nonnull violation in assignment)
-fsanitize=nullability-return (_Nonnull violation in return stmt)
-fsanitize=nullability (all of the above)
This patch builds on top of UBSan's existing support for detecting
violations of the nonnull attributes ('nonnull' and 'returns_nonnull'),
and relies on the compiler-rt support for those checks. Eventually we
will need to update the diagnostic messages in compiler-rt (there are
FIXME's for this, which will be addressed in a follow-up).
One point of note is that the nullability-return check is only allowed
to kick in if all arguments to the function satisfy their nullability
preconditions. This makes it necessary to emit some null checks in the
function body itself.
Testing: check-clang and check-ubsan. I also built some Apple ObjC
frameworks with an asserts-enabled compiler, and verified that we get
valid reports.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30762
llvm-svn: 297700
Summary:
Because of the existence branches out of GNU statement expressions, it
is possible that emitting cleanups for a full expression may cause the
new insertion point to not be dominated by the result of the inner
expression. Consider this example:
struct Foo { Foo(); ~Foo(); int x; };
int g(Foo, int);
int f(bool cond) {
int n = g(Foo(), ({ if (cond) return 0; 42; }));
return n;
}
Before this change, result of the call to 'g' did not dominate its use
in the store to 'n'. The early return exit from the statement expression
branches to a shared cleanup block, which ends in a switch between the
fallthrough destination (the assignment to 'n') or the function exit
block.
This change solves the problem by spilling and reloading expression
evaluation results when any of the active cleanups have branches.
I audited the other call sites of enterFullExpression, and they don't
appear to keep and Values live across the site of the cleanup, except in
ARC code. I wasn't able to create a test case for ARC that exhibits this
problem, though.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30590
llvm-svn: 297084
2nd attempt: the first was in r296231, but it had a use after lifetime
bug.
Clang has logic to lower certain conditional expressions directly into llvm
select instructions. However, it does not emit the correct profile counter
increment as it does this: it emits an unconditional increment of the counter
for the 'then branch', even if the value selected is from the 'else branch'
(this is PR32019).
That means, given the following snippet, we would report that "0" is selected
twice, and that "1" is never selected:
int f1(int x) {
return x ? 0 : 1;
^2 ^0
}
f1(0);
f1(1);
Fix the problem by using the instrprof_increment_step intrinsic to do the
proper increment.
llvm-svn: 296245
Clang has logic to lower certain conditional expressions directly into
llvm select instructions. However, it does not emit the correct profile
counter increment as it does this: it emits an unconditional increment
of the counter for the 'then branch', even if the value selected is from
the 'else branch' (this is PR32019).
That means, given the following snippet, we would report that "0" is
selected twice, and that "1" is never selected:
int f1(int x) {
return x ? 0 : 1;
^2 ^0
}
f1(0);
f1(1);
Fix the problem by using the instrprof_increment_step intrinsic to do
the proper increment.
llvm-svn: 296231
Teach ubsan to diagnose remainder operations which have undefined
behavior due to signed overflow (e.g INT_MIN % -1).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29437
llvm-svn: 296214
C requires the operands of arithmetic expressions to be promoted if
their types are smaller than an int. Ubsan emits overflow checks when
this sort of type promotion occurs, even if there is no way to actually
get an overflow with the promoted type.
This patch teaches clang how to omit the superflous overflow checks
(addressing PR20193).
Testing: check-clang and check-ubsan.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29369
llvm-svn: 296213
This re-applies r293343 (reverts commit r293475) with a fix for an
assertion failure caused by a missing integer cast. I tested this patch
by using the built compiler to compile X86FastISel.cpp.o with ubsan.
Original commit message:
Ubsan does not report UB shifts in some cases where the shift exponent
needs to be truncated to match the type of the shift base. We perform a
range check on the truncated shift amount, leading to false negatives.
Fix the issue (PR27271) by performing the range check on the original
shift amount.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29234
llvm-svn: 293572
Ubsan does not report UB shifts in some cases where the shift exponent
needs to be truncated to match the type of the shift base. We perform a
range check on the truncated shift amount, leading to false negatives.
Fix the issue (PR27271) by performing the range check on the original
shift amount.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29234
llvm-svn: 293343
This reverts commit r290171. It triggers a bunch of warnings, because
the new enumerator isn't handled in all switches. We want a warning-free
build.
Replied on the commit with more details.
llvm-svn: 290173
Summary: Enabling the compression of CLK_NULL_QUEUE to variable of type queue_t.
Reviewers: Anastasia
Subscribers: cfe-commits, yaxunl, bader
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27569
llvm-svn: 290171
This adds a way for us to version any UBSan handler by itself.
The patch overrides D21289 for a better implementation (we're able to
rev up a single handler).
After this, then we can land a slight modification of D19667+D19668.
We probably don't want to keep all the versions in compiler-rt (maybe we
want to deprecate on one release and remove the old handler on the next
one?), but with this patch we will loudly fail to compile when mixing
incompatible handler calls, instead of silently compiling and then
providing bad error messages.
Reviewers: kcc, samsonov, rsmith, vsk
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21695
llvm-svn: 289444
initialization of each array element:
* ArrayInitLoopExpr is a prvalue of array type with two subexpressions:
a common expression (an OpaqueValueExpr) that represents the up-front
computation of the source of the initialization, and a subexpression
representing a per-element initializer
* ArrayInitIndexExpr is a prvalue of type size_t representing the current
position in the loop
This will be used to replace the creation of explicit index variables in lambda
capture of arrays and copy/move construction of classes with array elements,
and also C++17 structured bindings of arrays by value (which inexplicably allow
copying an array by value, unlike all of C++'s other array declarations).
No uses of these nodes are introduced by this change, however.
llvm-svn: 289413
In amdgcn target, null pointers in global, constant, and generic address space take value 0 but null pointers in private and local address space take value -1. Currently LLVM assumes all null pointers take value 0, which results in incorrectly translated IR. To workaround this issue, instead of emit null pointers in local and private address space, a null pointer in generic address space is emitted and casted to local and private address space.
Tentative definition of global variables with non-zero initializer will have weak linkage instead of common linkage since common linkage requires zero initializer and does not have explicit section to hold the non-zero value.
Virtual member functions getNullPointer and performAddrSpaceCast are added to TargetCodeGenInfo which by default returns ConstantPointerNull and emitting addrspacecast instruction. A virtual member function getNullPointerValue is added to TargetInfo which by default returns 0. Each target can override these virtual functions to get target specific null pointer and the null pointer value for specific address space, and perform specific translations for addrspacecast.
Wrapper functions getNullPointer is added to CodegenModule and getTargetNullPointerValue is added to ASTContext to facilitate getting the target specific null pointers and their values.
This change has no effect on other targets except amdgcn target. Other targets can provide support of non-zero null pointer in a similar way.
This change only provides support for non-zero null pointer for C and OpenCL. Supporting for other languages will be added later incrementally.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26196
llvm-svn: 289252
__builtin_astype is used to cast OpenCL opaque types to other types, as such, it needs to be able to handle casting from and to pointer types correctly.
Current it cannot handle 1) casting between pointers of different addr spaces 2) casting between pointer type and non-pointer types.
This patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25123
llvm-svn: 283114
Pointers of certain GPUs in AMDGCN target in private address space is 32 bit but pointers in other address spaces are 64 bit. size_t type should be defined as 64 bit for these GPUs so that it could hold pointers in all address spaces. Also fixed issues in pointer arithmetic codegen by using pointer specific intptr type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23361
llvm-svn: 279121
Use BB.getNextNode(), which returns nullptr on end(), instead of
&*BB.getIterator(), which is UB on end().
CodeGenFunction::createBasicBlock expects nullptr in this case already.
llvm-svn: 278898
Let the driver pass the option to frontend. Do not set precision metadata for division instructions when this option is set. Set function attribute "correctly-rounded-divide-sqrt-fp-math" based on this option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22940
llvm-svn: 278155
Currently Clang use int32 to represent sampler_t, which have been a source of issue for some backends, because in some backends sampler_t cannot be represented by int32. They have to depend on kernel argument metadata and use IPA to find the sampler arguments and global variables and transform them to target specific sampler type.
This patch uses opaque pointer type opencl.sampler_t* for sampler_t. For each use of file-scope sampler variable, it generates a function call of __translate_sampler_initializer. For each initialization of function-scope sampler variable, it generates a function call of __translate_sampler_initializer.
Each builtin library can implement its own __translate_sampler_initializer(). Since the real sampler type tends to be architecture dependent, allowing it to be initialized by a library function simplifies backend design. A typical implementation of __translate_sampler_initializer could be a table lookup of real sampler literal values. Since its argument is always a literal, the returned pointer is known at compile time and easily optimized to finally become some literal values directly put into image read instructions.
This patch is partially based on Alexey Sotkin's work in Khronos Clang (3d4eec6162).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21567
llvm-svn: 277024
__builtin_astype does not generate correct LLVM IR for vec3 types. This patch inserts bitcasts to/from vec4 when necessary in addition to generating vector shuffle. Sema and codegen tests are added.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20133
llvm-svn: 272153
I couldn't find any documentation that this form existed either. Nor is there documentation for one of the remaining two forms, but there is a testcase that uses it.
llvm-svn: 269879
This patch corresponds to reviews:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15120http://reviews.llvm.org/D19125
It adds support for the __float128 keyword, literals and target feature to
enable it. Based on the latter of the two aforementioned reviews, this feature
is enabled on Linux on i386/X86 as well as SystemZ.
This is also the second attempt in commiting this feature. The first attempt
did not enable it on required platforms which caused failures when compiling
type_traits with -std=gnu++11.
If you see failures with compiling this header on your platform after this
commit, it is likely that your platform needs to have this feature enabled.
llvm-svn: 268898
Since this patch provided support for the __float128 type but disabled it
on all platforms by default, some platforms can't compile type_traits with
-std=gnu++11 since there is a specialization with __float128.
This reverts the patch until D19125 is approved (i.e. we know which platforms
need this support enabled).
llvm-svn: 266460
This patch corresponds to review:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15120
It adds support for the __float128 keyword, literals and a target feature to
enable it. This support is disabled by default on all targets and any target
that has support for this type is free to add it.
Based on feedback that I've received from target maintainers, this appears to
be the right thing for most targets. I have not heard from the maintainers of
X86 which I believe supports this type. I will subsequently investigate the
impact of enabling this on X86.
llvm-svn: 266186
In codegen different address spaces may be mapped to the same address
space for a target, e.g. in x86/x86-64 all address spaces are mapped
to 0. Therefore AddressSpaceConversion should be translated by
CreatePointerBitCastOrAddrSpaceCast instead of CreateAddrSpaceCast.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18713
llvm-svn: 266107
Revert the two changes to thread CodeGenOptions into the TargetInfo allocation
and to fix the layering violation by moving CodeGenOptions into Basic.
Code Generation is arguably not particularly "basic". This addresses Richard's
post-commit review comments. This change purely does the mechanical revert and
will be followed up with an alternate approach to thread the desired information
into TargetInfo.
llvm-svn: 265806
This is a mechanical move of CodeGenOptions from libFrontend to libBasic. This
fixes the layering violation introduced earlier by threading CodeGenOptions into
TargetInfo. It should also fix the modules based self-hosting builds. NFC.
llvm-svn: 265702
Summary: See LLVM change D18775 for details, this change depends on it.
Reviewers: jyknight, reames
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18776
llvm-svn: 265569
Fixes PR11517 for SPARC.
On most targets, clang lowers va_arg itself, eschewing the use of the
llvm vaarg instruction. This is necessary (at least for now) as the type
argument to the vaarg instruction cannot represent all the ABI
information that is needed to support complex calling conventions.
However, on targets with a simpler varrags ABIs, the LLVM instruction
can work just fine, and clang can simply lower to it. Unfortunately,
even on such targets, vaarg with a struct argument would fail, because
the default lowering to vaarg was naive: it didn't take into account the
ABI attribute computed by classifyArgumentType. In particular, for the
DefaultABIInfo, structs are supposed to be passed indirectly and so
llvm's vaarg instruction should be emitted with a pointer argument.
Now, vaarg instruction emission is able to use computed ABIArgInfo for
the provided argument type, which allows the default ABI support to work
for structs too.
I haven't touched the EmitVAArg implementation for PPC32_SVR4 or XCore,
although I believe both are now redundant, and could be switched over to
use the default implementation as well.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16154
llvm-svn: 261717
reclaiming a call result in order to ignore it or assign it
to an __unsafe_unretained variable. This avoids adding
an unwanted retain/release pair when the return value is
not actually returned autoreleased (e.g. when it is returned
from a nonatomic getter or a typical collection accessor).
This runtime function is only available on the latest Apple
OS releases; the backwards-compatibility story is that you
don't get the optimization unless your deployment target is
recent enough. Sorry.
rdar://20530049
llvm-svn: 258962
In {CG,}ExprConstant.cpp, we weren't treating vector splats properly.
This patch makes us treat splats more properly.
Additionally, this patch adds a new cast kind which allows a bool->int
cast to result in -1 or 0, instead of 1 or 0 (for true and false,
respectively), so we can sanely model OpenCL bool->int casts in the AST.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14877
llvm-svn: 257559
Akira Hatanaka