Summary:
This patch fixes the indentation of the code pattern `key <...>`and `key {...}` in text protos.
Previously, such line would be alinged depending on the column of the previous
colon, which usually indents too much.
I'm gonna go ahead and commit this since it's a straightforward bugfix.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36143
llvm-svn: 309941
Summary:
This patch tries to avoid binpacking when initializing lists/arrays, to allow things like:
static int types[] = {
registerType1(),
registerType2(),
registerType3(),
};
std::map<int, std::string> x = {
{ 0, "foo fjakfjaklf kljj" },
{ 1, "bar fjakfjaklf kljj" },
{ 2, "stuff fjakfjaklf kljj" },
};
This is similar to how dictionnaries are formatted, and actually corresponds to the same conditions: when initializing a container (and not just 'calling' a constructor).
Such formatting involves 2 things:
* Line breaks around the content of the block. This can be forced by adding a comma or comment after the last element
* Elements should not be binpacked
This patch considers the block is an initializer list if it either ends with a comma, or follows an assignment, which seems to provide a sensible approximation.
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: malcolm.parsons, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34238
llvm-svn: 306868
Summary:
This patch adds support for <>-style proto message fields inside proto options.
Previously these were wrongly treated as binary operators and as such were
working only by chance for a limited number of cases.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34621
llvm-svn: 306406
Summary:
This fixes the missing space before the designated initializer when `Cpp11BracedListStyle=false` :
const struct A a = { .a = 1, .b = 2 };
^
Also, wrapping between opening brace and designated array initializers used to have an excessive penalty (like breaking between an expression and the subscript operator), leading to unexpected wrapping:
const struct Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa =
{[1] = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
[2] = bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb};
instead of:
const struct Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = {
[1] = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
[2] = bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb};
Finally, designated array initializers are not binpacked, just like designated member initializers.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, krasimir, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33491
llvm-svn: 305696
c++1z adds the following constructions to the language:
if constexpr (cond)
statement1;
else if constexpr (cond)
statement2;
else if constexpr (cond)
statement3;
else
statement4;
A first version of this was proposed in reviews.llvm.org/D26953 by
Francis Visoiu Mistrih, but never commited. This patch additionally
fixes the behavior when allowing short if statements on a single line
and was authored by Jacob Bandes-Storch. Thank you to both authors.
llvm-svn: 305666
Nested literals are sometimes only indented by 2 spaces, instead of
respecting the IndentWidth option.
There are existing unit tests (FormatTestJS.ArrayLiterals) that only
pass because the style used to test them uses an IndentWidth of 2.
This change removes the magic 2 and always uses the IndentWidth.
I've added 6 tests. The first 4 of these tests fail before this change,
while the last 2 already pass, but were added just to make sure it the
change works with all types of braces.
Patch originally by Jared Neil, thanks!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33857
llvm-svn: 304791
Summary:
The previous fix to force build style wrapping if the previous token is a closing parenthesis broke a peculiar pattern where users parenthesize the function declaration in a bind call:
fn((function() { ... }).bind(this));
This restores the previous behaviour by reverting that change, but narrowing the special case for unindenting closing parentheses to those followed by semicolons and opening braces, i.e. immediate calls and function declarations.
Reviewers: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33640
llvm-svn: 304135
Summary:
This option replaces the BreakConstructorInitializersBeforeComma option with an enum, thus introducing a mode where the colon stays on the same line as constructor declaration:
// When it fits on line:
Constructor() : initializer1(), initializer2() {}
// When it does not fit:
Constructor() :
initializer1(), initializer2()
{}
// When ConstructorInitializerAllOnOneLineOrOnePerLine = true:
Constructor() :
initializer1(),
initializer2()
{}
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32479
llvm-svn: 303739
The change that enabled wrapping at the previous scope's indentation had
unintended side-effects in that clang-format would prefer to wrap
closing parentheses to the next line if it avoided a wrap on the next
line (assuming very narrow lines):
fooObject
.someCall(barbazbam)
.then(bam);
Would get formatted as:
fooObject.someCall(barbazbam
).then(bam);
Because the ')' is now indented at the parent level (fooObject).
Normally formatting a builder pattern style call sequence like that is
outlawed in clang-format anyway. However for JavaScript this is special
cased to support trailing .bind calls.
This change disallows this special case when following a closing ')' to
avoid the problem.
Included are some random comment fixes.
Reviewers: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33399
llvm-svn: 303557
Summary:
This patch updates the handling of multiline trailing comment sections in
import statement lines to make it more consistent with the case in general.
This includes updating the parsing logic to collect the trailing comment
sections and the formatting logic to not insert escaped newlines at the end of
comment lines in import statement lines.
Specifically, before this patch this code:
```
#include <a> // line 1
// line 2
```
will be turned into two unwrapped lines, whereas this code:
```
int i; // line 1
// line 2
```
is turned into a single unwrapped line, enabling reflowing across comments.
An example where the old behaviour is bad is when partially formatting the lines
3 to 4 of this code:
```
#include <a> // line 1
// line 2
int i;
```
which gets turned into:
```
#include <a> // line 1
// line 2
int i;
```
because the two comment lines were independent and the indent was copied.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33351
llvm-svn: 303415
myFunction(param1, param2,);
For symmetry with other parenthesized lists ([...], {...}), clang-format should
wrap parenthesized lists one-per-line if they contain a trailing comma:
myFunction(
param1,
param2,
);
This is particularly useful in function declarations or calls with many
arguments, e.g. commonly in constructors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33023
llvm-svn: 303049
Before:
std::function<
LoooooooooooongTemplatedType<SomeType>*(
LooooooooooooooooooooongType
type)>
function;
After:
std::function<
LoooooooooooongTemplatedType<
SomeType>*(
LooooooooooooooooongType type)>
function;
clang-format generally avoids having lines like "SomeType>*(" as they
lead to parameter lists that don't belong together to be aligned. However, in
case it is better than the alternative, which can even be violating the column
limit.
llvm-svn: 301182
Summary:
This patch makes ContinuationIndenter call breakProtrudingToken only if
NoLineBreak and NoLineBreakInOperand is false.
Previously, clang-format required two runs to converge on the following example with 24 columns:
Note that the second operand shouldn't be splitted according to NoLineBreakInOperand, but the
token breaker doesn't take that into account:
```
func(a, "long long long long", c);
```
After first run:
```
func(a, "long long "
"long long",
c);
```
After second run, where NoLineBreakInOperand is taken into account:
```
func(a,
"long long "
"long long",
c);
```
With the patch, clang-format now obtains in one run:
```
func(a,
"long long long"
"long",
c);
```
which is a better token split overall.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30575
llvm-svn: 297274
Summary:
This patch enables comment reflowing of lines not matching the comment pragma regex
in multiline comments containing comment pragma lines. Previously, these comments
were dumped without being reindented to the result.
Reviewers: djasper, mprobst
Reviewed By: mprobst
Subscribers: klimek, mprobst, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30697
llvm-svn: 297261
r289428 added a separate language kind for Objective-C, but kept many
"Language == LK_Cpp" checks untouched. This introduced a "IsCpp()"
method that returns true for both C++ and Objective-C++, and replaces
all comparisons of Language with LK_Cpp with calls to this new method.
Also add a lot more test coverge for formatting things in LK_ObjC mode,
by having FormatTest's verifyFormat() test for LK_ObjC everything that's
being tested for LK_Cpp at the moment.
Fixes PR32060 and many other things.
llvm-svn: 296160
Specifically, similar to other blocks, clang-format now wraps both
after "${" and before the corresponding "}", if the contained
expression spans multiple lines.
llvm-svn: 295663
Summary:
The comment reflower wasn't taking comment pragmas as reflow stoppers. This patch fixes that.
source:
```
// long long long long
// IWYU pragma:
```
format with column limit = 20 before:
```
// long long long
// long IWYU pragma:
```
format with column limit = 20 after:
```
// long long long
// long
// IWYU pragma:
```
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29450
llvm-svn: 293898
Without alignment, there is no clean separation between the arguments, even if
there are only two.
Before:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa +
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa +
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
llvm-svn: 293875
This rows back on r288120, r291801 and r292110. I apologize in advance
for the churn. All of those revisions where meant to make the wrapping
of RHS expressions more consistent. However, now that they are
consistent, we seem to be a bit too eager.
The reasoning here is that I think it is generally correct that we want
to line-wrap before multiline RHS expressions (or multiline arguments to
a function call). However, if there are only two of such operands or
arguments, there is always a clear vertical separation between them and
the additional line break seems much less desirable.
Somewhat good examples are expressions like:
EXPECT_EQ(2, someLongExpression(
orCall));
llvm-svn: 293752
This only affects expressions inside ${} scopes of template strings.
Here, we want to indent relative to the surrounding template string and
not the surrounding expression. Otherwise, this can create quite a mess.
Before:
var f = `
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa: ${someFunction(
aaaaa + //
bbbb)}`;
After:
var f = `
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa: ${someFunction(
aaaaa + //
bbbb)}`;
llvm-svn: 293636
The main motivation behind this is to cleanup the WhitespaceManager and
make it more extensible for future alignment etc. features.
Specifically, WhitespaceManager has started to copy more and more code
that is already present in FormatToken. Instead, I think it makes more
sense to actually store a reference to each FormatToken for each change.
This has as a consequence led to a change in the calculation of indent
levels. Now, we actually compute them for each Token ahead of time,
which should be more efficient as it removes an unsigned value for the
ParenState, which is used during the combinatorial exploration of the
solution space.
No functional changes intended.
Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29300
llvm-svn: 293616
This had significant negative consequences and I don't have a good
solution for it yet.
Before:
var string =
[
'aaaaaa',
'bbbbbb',
]
.join('+');
After:
var string = [
'aaaaaa',
'bbbbbb',
].join('+');
llvm-svn: 293465
Summary:
This presents a version of the comment reflowing with less mutable state inside
the comment breakable token subclasses. The state has been pushed into the
driving breakProtrudingToken method. For this, the API of BreakableToken is enriched
by the methods getSplitBefore and getLineLengthAfterSplitBefore.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: djasper, klimek, mgorny, cfe-commits, ioeric
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28764
llvm-svn: 293055
Before:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa::
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa::
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
No new test cases, as the existing ones cover this fairly well.
llvm-svn: 292110
Here, the optimization to not line wrap when it would not lead to a
reduction in columns was overwriting and enforced break that we want to
do no matter what.
Before:
int i = someFunction(
aaaaaaa,
0).aaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaa) *
aaaaaaa +
aaaaaaa;
After:
int i = someFunction(aaaaaaa, 0)
.aaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaa) *
aaaaaaa +
aaaaaaa;
llvm-svn: 291974
Specifically, wrap before them if they are multi-line so that we don't
create long hanging indents. This prevents having a lot of code
indented a lot in some cases.
Before:
someFunction(Param, {List1, List2,
List3});
After:
someFunction(Param,
{List1, List2,
List3});
llvm-svn: 291801
Before:
SomeLongLoggingStatementOrMacro() << "Some long text "
<< some_variable << "\n";
Before:
SomeLongLoggingStatementOrMacro()
<< "Some long text " << some_variable << "\n";
Short logging statements are already special cased in a different part
of the code.
llvm-svn: 290094
While C(++) and ObjC are generally formatted the same way and can be
mixed, people might want to choose different styles based on the
language. This patch recognizes .m and .mm files as ObjC and also
implements a very crude detection of whether or not a .h file contains
ObjC code. This can be improved over time.
Also move most of the ObjC tests into their own test file to keep file
size maintainable.
llvm-svn: 289428
Specifically, if the RHS of a comma is a complex binary expression and
spans multiple lines, insert a line break before it. This usually is
often more readable compared to producing a hanging indent. See changes
in FormatTest.cpp for examples.
llvm-svn: 288120
If a call takes a single argument, using AlwaysBreak can lead to lots
of wasted lines and additional indentation without improving the
readability in a significant way.
Before:
caaaaaaaaaaaall(
caaaaaaaaaaaall(
caaaaaaaaaaaall(
caaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaall(aaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaa))));
After:
caaaaaaaaaaaall(caaaaaaaaaaaall(caaaaaaaaaaaall(
caaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaall(aaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaa))));
llvm-svn: 263709
Before:
int i = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ?
/*bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb=*/bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb :
ccccccccccccccccccccccccccc;
After:
int i = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ?
/*bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb=*/bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb :
ccccccccccccccccccccccccccc;
llvm-svn: 259670
After reading the style guides again, they don't actually say how to
pack or not pack array literals. Based on some user reports, array
initializers can unnecessarily get quite long if they contain many
small elements. Array literals with trailing commas are still formatted
one per line so that users have a way to opt out of the packing.
Before:
var array = [
aaaaaa,
aaaaaa,
aaaaaa,
aaaaaa,
aaaaaa,
aaaaaa,
aaaaaa,
aaaaaa,
aaaaaa,
aaaaaa
];
After:
var array = [
aaaaaa, aaaaaa, aaaaaa, aaaaaa, aaaaaa, aaaaaa, aaaaaa, aaaaaa, aaaaaa,
aaaaaa, aaaaaa
];
llvm-svn: 257615
r257257 change the way clang-format enforces line breaks after a
templated type has been line-wrapped. This was to fix an incorrect line
break if BinPackParameters is set to false. However, it also leads to
an unwanted line break in a different case. Thus, for now, only do this
when BinPackParameters is false. This isn't ideal yet, but helps us
until we have a better solution.
With BinPackParameters:
Before:
void fffffffffff(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa<aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaa> aaaaaaaaaa);
After:
void fffffffffff(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa<aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaa>
aaaaaaaaaa);
llvm-svn: 257325
Before (example is JS, but also applies to C++):
return [
aaaa()
.bbbbbbbb('A'),
aaaa().bbbbbbbb('B'),
aaaa().bbbbbbbb('C'),
];
After:
return [
aaaa().bbbbbbbb('A'),
aaaa().bbbbbbbb('B'),
aaaa().bbbbbbbb('C'),
];
llvm-svn: 257079
r256750 has been leading to an undesired behavior:
aaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
This change increases penalty for wrapping before member accesses that aren't
calls. Thus, this is again formatted as (as it has been before r256750):
aaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
llvm-svn: 256830
This changes the behavior of AlwaysBreakAfterDeclarationReturnType
so that it supports breaking after declarations, definitions, or
both.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10370
Reviewed By: Daniel Jasper
llvm-svn: 256046
Specifically, don't wrap between the {} of an empty constructor if the
"}" falls on column 81 and ConstructorInitializerAllOnOneLineOrOnePerLine
is set.
llvm-svn: 251406
Summary:
If this option is set, clang-format will always insert a line wrap, e.g.
before the first parameter of a function call unless all parameters fit
on the same line. This obviates the need to make a decision on the
alignment itself.
Use this style for Google's JavaScript style and add some minor tweaks
to correctly handle nested blocks etc. with it. Don't use this option
for for/while loops.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14104
llvm-svn: 251405
This is a bit of a step back of what we did in r222531, as there are
some corner cases in C++, where this kind of formatting is really bad.
Example:
Before:
virtual aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(std::function<bool()> IsKindWeWant = [&]() {
return true;
}, aaaaa aaaaaaaaa);
After:
virtual aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(std::function<bool()> IsKindWeWant =
[&]() { return true; },
aaaaa aaaaaaaaa);
The block formatting logic in JavaScript will probably go some other changes,
too, and we'll potentially be able to make the rules more consistent again. For
now, this seems to be the best approach for C++.
llvm-svn: 245694
conservative.
In particular, this fixes an unwanted corner case.
Before:
string s =
someFunction("aaaa"
"bbbb");
After:
string s = someFunction(
"aaaa"
"bbbb");
llvm-svn: 240129
It was a bit too aggressive.
With this patch, we keep on breaking here:
aaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaa,
"aaaaaaa"
"bbbbbbb");
But don't break in:
aaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaa, aaaaaaaa("aaaaaaa"
"bbbbbbb"));
llvm-svn: 240024
Before:
var func =
function() {
doSomething();
};
After:
var func =
function() {
doSomething();
};
This is a very narrow special case which fixes most of the discrepency
with what our users do. In the long run, we should try to come up with
a more generic fix for indenting these.
llvm-svn: 240014
In essence this is meant to consistently indent multiline strings by a
fixed amount of spaces from the start of the line. Don't do this in
cases where it wouldn't help anyway.
Before:
someFunction(aaaaa,
"aaaaa"
"bbbbb");
After:
someFunction(aaaaa, "aaaaa"
"bbbbb");
llvm-svn: 240004
Before:
template <typename T>
auto aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(T t) -> decltype(eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa<T>(t.a)
.aaaaaaaa());
After:
template <typename T>
auto aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(T t)
-> decltype(eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa<T>(t.a).aaaaaaaa());
Also add a test case for a difficult template parsing case I stumbled accross.
Needs fixing.
llvm-svn: 239149
Before:
someFunction(() =>
{
doSomething(); // break
})
.doSomethingElse( // break
);
After:
someFunction(() => {
doSomething(); // break
})
.doSomethingElse( // break
);
This is still bad, but at least it is consistent with what we do for other
function literals. Added corresponding tests.
llvm-svn: 238736
A definintion like this could not be formatted at all:
constructor({aa}: {
aa?: string,
aaaaaaaa?: string,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa?: boolean,
aaaaaa?: List<string>
}) {
}
llvm-svn: 238291
instead of BinPackParameters. Braced lists are used as constructor
calls in many places and so the bin-packing should follow what is done
for other calls and not what is done for function declarations.
llvm-svn: 238184
Before:
ASSERT("aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa")
<< aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
<< bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb;
After:
ASSERT("aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa") << aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
<< bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb;
Also cleanup implementation a bit and only mark closing parenthesis of
these annotations.
llvm-svn: 237567
before binary/ternary operators.
Basically, it doesn't seem right to indent a nested block aligned to a
binary or ternary operator.
Before:
int i = aaaaaa ? 1 //
: [] {
return 2; //
}();
llvm::errs() << "number of twos is "
<< std::count_if(v.begin(), v.end(), [](int x) {
return x == 2; // force break
});
After:
int i = aaaaaa ? 1 //
: [] {
return 2; //
}();
llvm::errs() << "number of twos is "
<< std::count_if(v.begin(), v.end(), [](int x) {
return x == 2; // force break
});
llvm-svn: 237263
Before:
[aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:
aaaaaaaa aaa:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa];
After:
[aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:aaaaaaaa
aaa:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa];
Note that this might now violate the column limit and we probably need an
alternative way of indenting these then. However, that is still strictly better
than the messy formatting that clang-format did before.
llvm-svn: 236598
There was already a TODO to double-check whether the extra indenation
makes sense. A slightly different case reveals that it is actively harmful:
for (int i = 0; i < aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ||
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb < ccccccccccccccc;
++i) {
}
Here (and it is probably not a totally infrequent case, it just works out that
"i < " is four spaces and so the four space extra indentation makes the
operator precedence confusing. So, this will now instead be formatted
as:
for (int i = 0; i < aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ||
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb < ccccccccccccccc;
++i) {
}
llvm-svn: 231461
Before:
Aaaa aaaaaaaaaaa{
{
a, // +1 indent weird.
b, // trailing comma signals one per line.
}, // trailing comma signals one per line.
};
After:
Aaaa aaaaaaaaaaa{
{
a, // better!?
b, // trailing comma signals one per line.
}, // trailing comma signals one per line.
};
Interesting that this apparently was entirely untested :-(.
llvm-svn: 230627
The proper way to break string literals in these languages is by inserting a "+"
between parts which we don't support yet. So we disable string literal breaking
until then.
llvm-svn: 224120
This only applies when not aligning after the return itself (which is
commonly done for C++.
Before:
return aaaaaaaaaa
? bbbbbbbbbb(
bbbbbb) // This is indented relative to aaaaaaaaaa.
: b;
After:
return aaaaaaaaaa
? bbbbbbbbbb(
bbbbbb)
: b;
llvm-svn: 223694
With alignment:
int aaaaaa = aa
+ bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
* cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc;
Without alignment:
int aaaaaa = aa
+ bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
* cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc;
This fixes llvm.org/PR21666.
llvm-svn: 223117
Previously this was only used for JavaScript.
Before:
functionCall({
int i;
int j;
},
aaaa, bbbb, cccc);
After:
functionCall({
int i;
int j;
}, aaaa, bbbb, cccc);
llvm-svn: 222531
Doesn't seem to be common practice in Java.
Before:
return aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
&& bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
&& ccccccccccccccccccc;
After:
return aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
&& bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
&& ccccccccccccccccccc;
Patch by Harry Terkelsen.
llvm-svn: 222424
Apparently, people are very much divided on what the "correct"
indentation is. So, best to give them a choice.
The new flag is called ObjCBlockIndentWidth and the default is now set
to the same value as IndentWidth for the pre-defined styles.
llvm-svn: 220784
Before:
void
SomeFunction(int parameter);
After:
void SomeFunction(
int parameter);
(Unless AlwaysBreakAfterDefinitionReturnType after type is set).
llvm-svn: 220686
Krasimir Georgiev