Only the bare name is completed, with no args.
For args to be useful we need arg names. These *are* in the tablegen but
not currently emitted in usable form, so left this as future work.
C++11, C2x, GNU, declspec, MS syntax is supported, with the appropriate
spellings of attributes suggested.
`#pragma clang attribute` is supported but not terribly useful as we
only reach completion if parens are balanced (i.e. the line is not truncated)
There's no filtering of which attributes might make sense in this
grammatical context (e.g. attached to a function). In code-completion context
this is hard to do, and will only work in few cases :-(
There's also no filtering by langopts: this is because currently the
only way of checking is to try to produce diagnostics, which requires a
valid ParsedAttr which is hard to get.
This should be fairly simple to fix but requires some tablegen changes
to expose the logic without the side-effect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107696
This patch implements paper P0692R1 from the C++20 standard. Disable usual access checking rules to template argument names in a declaration of partial specializations, explicit instantiation or explicit specialization (C++20 13.7.5/10, 13.9.1/6).
Fixes: https://llvm.org/PR37424
This patch also implements option *A* from this paper P0692R1 from the C++20 standard.
This patch follows the @rsmith suggestion from D78404.
Reviewed By: krisb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92024
Previously we would show an error, but keep the member, and also the
CXXRrecordDecl, valid. This could lead to crashes when attempting to
access the record layout or size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105478
OpenMP 5.1 added support for writing OpenMP directives using [[]]
syntax in addition to using #pragma and this introduces support for the
new syntax.
In OpenMP, the attributes take one of two forms:
[[omp::directive(...)]] or [[omp::sequence(...)]]. A directive
attribute contains an OpenMP directive clause that is identical to the
analogous #pragma syntax. A sequence attribute can contain either
sequence or directive arguments and is used to ensure that the
attributes are processed sequentially for situations where the order of
the attributes matter (remember:
https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.attr.grammar#4.sentence-4).
The approach taken here is somewhat novel and deserves mention. We
could refactor much of the OpenMP parsing logic to work for either
pragma annotation tokens or for attribute clauses. It would be a fair
amount of effort to share the logic for both, but it's certainly
doable. However, the semantic attribute system is not designed to
handle the arbitrarily complex arguments that OpenMP directives
contain. Adding support to thread the novel parsed information until we
can produce a semantic attribute would be considerably more effort.
What's more, existing OpenMP constructs are not (often) represented as
semantic attributes. So doing this through Attr.td would be a massive
undertaking that would likely only benefit OpenMP and comes with
additional risks. Rather than walk down that path, I am taking
advantage of the fact that the syntax of the directives within the
directive clause is identical to that of the #pragma form. Once the
parser recognizes that we're processing an OpenMP attribute, it caches
all of the directive argument tokens and then replays them as though
the user wrote a pragma. This reuses the same OpenMP parsing and
semantic logic directly, but does come with a risk if the OpenMP
committee decides to purposefully diverge their pragma and attribute
syntaxes. So, despite this being a novel approach that does token
replay, I think it's actually a better approach than trying to do this
through the declarative syntax in Attr.td.
This implements the 'using enum maybe-qualified-enum-tag ;' part of
1099. It introduces a new 'UsingEnumDecl', subclassed from
'BaseUsingDecl'. Much of the diff is the boilerplate needed to get the
new class set up.
There is one case where we accept ill-formed, but I believe this is
merely an extended case of an existing bug, so consider it
orthogonal. AFAICT in class-scope the c++20 rule is that no 2 using
decls can bring in the same target decl ([namespace.udecl]/8). But we
already accept:
struct A { enum { a }; };
struct B : A { using A::a; };
struct C : B { using A::a;
using B::a; }; // same enumerator
this patch permits mixtures of 'using enum Bob;' and 'using Bob::member;' in the same way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102241
This is a re-application of dc67299 which was reverted in f63adf5b because
it broke the build. The issue should now be fixed.
Attribution note: The original author of this patch is Erik Pilkington.
I'm only trying to land it after rebasing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91630
Double square bracket attribute arguments can be arbitrarily complex,
and the attribute argument parsing logic recovers by skipping tokens.
As a fallback recovery mechanism, parse recovery stops before reading a
semicolon. This could lead to an infinite loop in the attribute list
parsing logic.
These proposals make the same changes to both C++ and C and remove a
restriction on standard attributes appearing multiple times in the same
attribute list.
We could warn on the duplicate attributes, but do not. This is for
consistency as we do not warn on attributes duplicated within the
attribute specifier sequence. If we want to warn on duplicated
standard attributes, we should do so both for both situations:
[[foo, foo]] and [[foo]][[foo]].
Clang currently has a bug where it allows you to write [[foo bar]] and
both attributes are silently accepted. This patch corrects the comma
parsing rules for such attributes and handles the test case fallout, as
a few tests were accidentally doing this.
Set the source ranges for parsed GNU-style attributes in
ParseGNUAttributes(), the same way that ParseCXX11Attributes() does it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75844
... instantiations
They are currently not being diagnosed because ProhibitAttributes() does
not handle attribute lists with an invalid source range. But once it
does, we need to allow GNU attributes in this place.
Additionally, start optionally diagnosing empty attr lists in
ProhibitCXX11Attributes(), since ProhibitAttribute() does it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97362
Somewhat surprisingly, signature help is emitted as a side-effect of
computing the expected type of a function argument.
The reason is that both actions require enumerating the possible
function signatures and running partial overload resolution, and doing
this twice would be wasteful and complicated.
Change #1: document this, it's subtle :-)
However, sometimes we need to compute the expected type without having
reached the code completion cursor yet - in particular to allow
completion of designators.
eb4ab3358c did this but introduced a
regression - it emits signature help in the wrong location as a side-effect.
Change #2: only emit signature help if the code completion cursor was reached.
Currently there is PP.isCodeCompletionReached(), but we can't use it
because it's set *after* running code completion.
It'd be nice to set this implicitly when the completion token is lexed,
but ConsumeCodeCompletionToken() makes this complicated.
Change #3: call cutOffParsing() *first* when seeing a completion token.
After this, the fact that the Sema::Produce*SignatureHelp() functions
are even more confusing, as they only sometimes do that.
I don't want to rename them in this patch as it's another large
mechanical change, but we should soon.
Change #4: prepare to rename ProduceSignatureHelp() to GuessArgumentType() etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98488
Previously, the CurFPFeatures state was set to command line settings before
semantic analysis of the nested member functions and initialization
expressions, that's not correct, it should use the pragma state which
is in effect at the lexical position.
Reviewed By: Erich Keane, Aaron Ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98211
Our diagnostics relating to static assertions were a bit confused. For
instance, when in MS compatibility mode in C (where we accept
static_assert even without including <assert.h>), we would fail
to warn the user that they were using the wrong spelling (even in
pedantic mode), we were missing a compatibility warning about using
_Static_assert in earlier standards modes, diagnostics for the optional
message were not reflected in C as they were in C++, etc.
If a static assert has a message as the right side of an and condition, suggest a fix it of replacing the '&&' to ','.
`static_assert(cond && "Failed Cond")` -> `static_assert(cond, "Failed cond")`
This use case comes up when lazily replacing asserts with static asserts.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89065
In Clang today, we parse the different attribute syntaxes
(__attribute__, __declspec, and [[]]) in a fairly rigid order. This
leads to confusion for users when they guess the order incorrectly,
and leads to bug reports like PR24559 or necessitates changes like
D94788.
This patch adds a helper function to allow us to more easily parse
attributes in arbitrary order, and then updates all of the places
where we would parse two or more different syntaxes in a rigid order to
use the helper method. The patch does not attempt to handle Microsoft
attributes ([]) because those are ambiguous with other code constructs
and we don't have any attributes that use the syntax.
Currently, there are many instances where `SourceLocation` objects are
converted to raw representation to be stored in structs that are
used as fields of tagged unions.
This is done to make the corresponding structs trivial.
Triviality allows avoiding undefined behavior when implicitly changing
the active member of the union.
However, in most cases, we can explicitly construct an active member
using placement new. This patch adds the required active member
selections and replaces `SourceLocation`-s represented as
`unsigned int` with proper `SourceLocation`-s.
One notable exception is `DeclarationNameLoc`: the objects of this class
are often not properly initialized (so the code currently relies on
its default constructor which uses memset). This class will be fixed
in a separate patch.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94237
Reviewed by aaron.ballman, rsmith, wchilders
Highlights of review:
- avoid specifying an underlying type (unless such an enum is stored (or part of an abi?))
- avoid using enums as bit-fields, preferring unsigned bit-fields that we static_cast enumerators to. (MS's abi laysout enum bit-fields differently).
- clang-format, clang-format, clang-format.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D91035
Thank you!
Since these are scoped enumerators, they have to be prefixed by DeclaratorContext, so lets remove Context from the name, and return some characters to the multiverse.
Patch was reviewed here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91011
Thank you to aaron, bruno, wyatt and barry for indulging me.
We collect the source location of a trailing return type in the parser,
improving the location for regular functions and providing a location
for lambdas, where previously there was none.
Fixes PR47732.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90129
The current C++ grammar allows an anonymous bit-field with an attribute,
but this is ambiguous (the attribute in that case could appertain to the
type instead of the bit-field). The current thinking in the Core Working
Group is that it's better to disallow attributes in that position at the
grammar level so that the ambiguity resolves in favor of applying to the
type.
During discussions about the behavior of the attribute, the Core Working
Group also felt it was better to disallow anonymous bit-fields from
specifying a default member initializer.
This implements both sets of related grammar changes.
This is the initial part of the implementation of the C++20 likelihood
attributes. It handles the attributes in an if statement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85091
For example:
#define FOO(x) (x)
FOO({});
... forms a statement-expression after macro expansion. This warning
applies to '({' and '})' delimiting statement-expressions, '[[' and ']]'
delimiting attributes, and '::*' introducing a pointer-to-member.
The warning for forming these compound tokens across macro expansions
(or across files!) is enabled by default; the warning for whitespace
within the tokens is not, but is included in -Wall.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86751
Summary:
Provide `default` and `delete` completion after the function equals.
Reviewers: kadircet, sammccall
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82548
This reverts commit defd43a5b3.
with correction to solve msan report
To solve https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46166 where the
floating point settings in PCH files aren't compatible, rewrite
FPFeatures to use a delta in the settings rather than absolute settings.
With this patch, these floating point options can be benign.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81869
This reverts commit b55d723ed6.
Reapply Modify FPFeatures to use delta not absolute settings
To solve https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46166 where the
floating point settings in PCH files aren't compatible, rewrite
FPFeatures to use a delta in the settings rather than absolute settings.
With this patch, these floating point options can be benign.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81869
C++ unqualified name lookup searches template parameter scopes
immediately after finishing searching the entity the parameters belong
to. (Eg, for a class template, you search the template parameter scope
after looking in that class template and its base classes and before
looking in the scope containing the class template.) This is complicated
by the fact that scope lookup within a template parameter scope looks in
a different sequence of places prior to reaching the end of the
declarator-id in the template declaration.
We used to approximate the proper lookup rule with a hack in the scope /
decl context walk inside name lookup. Now we instead compute the lookup
parent for each template parameter scope.
In order to get this right, we now make sure to enter a distinct Scope
for each template parameter scope, and make sure to re-enter the
enclosing class scopes properly when handling delay-parsed regions
within a class.
Summary:
Compiler may erroneously treat current context in OpenMP pragmas as the
context where new type declaration/definition is allowed. But the
declartation/definition of the new types in OpenMP pragmas should not be
allowed.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: yaxunl, guansong, sstefan1, cfe-commits, caomhin
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82019
The ParseStructUnionBody function was separately keeping track of the
field decls for historical reasons, however the "ActOn" functions add
the field to the RecordDecl anyway.
The "ParseStructDeclaration" function, which handles parsing fields
didn't have a way of handling what happens on an anonymous field, and
changing it would alter a large amount of objc code, so I chose instead
to implement this by just filling the FieldDecls vector with the actual
FieldDecls that were successfully added to the recorddecl .
Previously we implemented non-standard disambiguation rules to
distinguish an enum-base from a bit-field but otherwise treated a :
after an elaborated-enum-specifier as introducing an enum-base. That
misparses various examples (anywhere an elaborated-type-specifier can
appear followed by a colon, such as within a ternary operator or
_Generic).
We now implement the C++11 rules, with the old cases accepted as
extensions where that seemed reasonable. These amount to:
* an enum-base must always be accompanied by an enum definition (except
in a standalone declaration of the form 'enum E : T;')
* in a member-declaration, 'enum E :' always introduces an enum-base,
never a bit-field
* in a type-specifier (or similar context), 'enum E :' is not
permitted; the colon means whatever else it would mean in that
context.
Fixed underlying types for enums are also permitted in Objective-C and
under MS extensions, plus as a language extension in all other modes.
The behavior in ObjC and MS extensions modes is unchanged (but the
bit-field disambiguation is a bit better); remaining language modes
follow the C++11 rules.
Fixes PR45726, PR39979, PR19810, PR44941, and most of PR24297, plus C++
core issues 1514 and 1966.
test cases
Add support for #pragma float_control
Reviewers: rjmccall, erichkeane, sepavloff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72841
This reverts commit 85dc033cac, and makes
corrections to the test cases that failed on buildbots.
Sam McCall