Address spaces are cast into generic before invoking the constructor.
Added support for a trailing Qualifiers object in FunctionProtoType.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54862
llvm-svn: 348927
Friend function template defined in a class template becomes available if
the enclosing class template is instantiated. Until the function template
is used, it does not have a body, but still is considered a definition for
the purpose of redeclaration checks.
This change modifies redefinition check so that it can find the friend
function template definitions in instantiated classes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21508
llvm-svn: 348473
The addition adds three attributes for communicating ownership,
analogous to existing NS_ and CF_ attributes.
The attributes are meant to be used for communicating ownership of all
objects in XNU (Darwin kernel) and all of the kernel modules.
The ownership model there is very similar, but still different from the
Foundation model, so we think that introducing a new family of
attributes is appropriate.
The addition required a sizeable refactoring of the existing code for
CF_ and NS_ ownership attributes, due to tight coupling and the fact
that differentiating between the types was previously done using a
boolean.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54912
llvm-svn: 347947
Calling it too early might cause dllimport to get inherited onto the
VarDecl before the initializer got attached. See the test case for an
example where this broke things.
llvm-svn: 345709
In the course of D51340, @takuto.ikuta discovered that Clang fails to put
dllexport/import attributes on static locals during template instantiation.
For regular functions, this happens in Sema::FinalizeDeclaration(), however for
template instantiations we need to do something in or around
TemplateDeclInstantiator::VisitVarDecl(). This patch does that, and extracts
the code to a utility function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53870
llvm-svn: 345699
Add support for OMP5.0 requires directive and unified_address clause.
Patches to follow will include support for additional clauses.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52359
llvm-svn: 343063
Summary:
Attributes on member classes of class templates and member class templates
of class templates are not currently instantiated. This was discovered by
Richard Smith here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-September/059291.html
This commit makes sure that attributes are instantiated properly. This
commit does not fix the broken behavior for member partial and explicit
specializations of class templates.
PR38913
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51997
llvm-svn: 342238
declare reduction.
If the declare reduction construct with the non-dependent type is
defined in the template construct, the compiler might crash on the
template instantition. Reworked the whole instantiation scheme for the
declare reduction constructs to fix this problem correctly.
llvm-svn: 342151
hidden definition with a would-be-parsed redefinition.
This permits a bunch of cleanups. In particular, we no longer need to
take merged definitions into account when checking declaration
visibility, only when checking definition visibility, which makes
certain visibility checks take linear instead of quadratic time.
We could also now remove the UPD_DECL_EXPORTED update record and track
on each declaration whether it was demoted from a definition (as we
already do for variables), but I'm not doing that in this patch to keep
the changes here simpler.
llvm-svn: 342018
destructors.
We previously tried to patch up the exception specification after
completing the class, which went wrong when the exception specification
was needed within the class body (in particular, by a friend
redeclaration of the destructor in a nested class). We now mark the
destructor as having a not-yet-computed exception specification
immediately after creating it.
This requires delaying various checks against the exception
specification (where we'd previously have just got the wrong exception
specification, and now find we have an exception specification that we
can't compute yet) when those checks fire while the class is being
defined.
This also exposed an issue that we were missing a CodeSynthesisContext
for computation of exception specifications (otherwise we'd fail to make
the module containing the definition of the class visible when computing
its members' exception specs). Adding that incidentally also gives us a
diagnostic quality improvement.
This has also exposed an pre-existing problem: making the exception
specification evaluation context a non-SFINAE context (as it should be)
results in a bootstrap failure; PR38850 filed for this.
llvm-svn: 341499
Multiversioned member functions inside of a template type were
not properly being emitted. The solution to this is to simply
ensure that their bodies are correctly evaluated/assigned during
template instantiation.
llvm-svn: 339597
Basically, "AttributeList" loses all list-like mechanisms, ParsedAttributes is
switched to use a TinyPtrVector (and a ParsedAttributesView is created to
have a non-allocating attributes list). DeclaratorChunk gets the later kind,
Declarator/DeclSpec keep ParsedAttributes.
Iterators are added to the ParsedAttribute types so that for-loops work.
llvm-svn: 336945
Summary:
This is the second attempt of r333500 (Update NRVO logic to support early return).
The previous one was reverted for a miscompilation for an incorrect NRVO set up on templates such as:
```
struct Foo {};
template <typename T>
T bar() {
T t;
if (false)
return T();
return t;
}
```
Where, `t` is marked as non-NRVO variable before its instantiation. However, while its instantiation, it's left an NRVO candidate, turned into an NRVO variable later.
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47586
llvm-svn: 335019
We were already performing checks on non-template variables,
but the checks on templated ones were missing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45231
llvm-svn: 334143
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
This patch is a tweak of changyu's patch: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40381. It differs in that the recognition of the 'concept' token is moved into the machinery that recognizes declaration-specifiers - this allows us to leverage the attribute handling machinery more seamlessly.
See the test file to get a sense of the basic parsing that this patch supports.
There is much more work to be done before concepts are usable...
Thanks Changyu!
llvm-svn: 330794
We were already performing checks on non-template variables,
but the checks on templated ones were missing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45231
llvm-svn: 329127
The AST for the fragment
```
@interface I
@end
template <typename>
void decode(I *p) {
for (I *k in p) {}
}
void decode(I *p) {
decode<int>(p);
}
```
differs heavily when templatized and non-templatized:
```
|-FunctionTemplateDecl 0x7fbfe0863940 <line:4:1, line:7:1> line:5:6 decode
| |-TemplateTypeParmDecl 0x7fbfe0863690 <line:4:11> col:11 typename depth 0 index 0
| |-FunctionDecl 0x7fbfe08638a0 <line:5:1, line:7:1> line:5:6 decode 'void (I *__strong)'
| | |-ParmVarDecl 0x7fbfe08637a0 <col:13, col:16> col:16 referenced p 'I *__strong'
| | `-CompoundStmt 0x7fbfe0863b88 <col:19, line:7:1>
| | `-ObjCForCollectionStmt 0x7fbfe0863b50 <line:6:3, col:20>
| | |-DeclStmt 0x7fbfe0863a50 <col:8, col:13>
| | | `-VarDecl 0x7fbfe08639f0 <col:8, col:11> col:11 k 'I *const __strong'
| | |-ImplicitCastExpr 0x7fbfe0863a90 <col:16> 'I *' <LValueToRValue>
| | | `-DeclRefExpr 0x7fbfe0863a68 <col:16> 'I *__strong' lvalue ParmVar 0x7fbfe08637a0 'p' 'I *__strong'
| | `-CompoundStmt 0x7fbfe0863b78 <col:19, col:20>
| `-FunctionDecl 0x7fbfe0863f80 <line:5:1, line:7:1> line:5:6 used decode 'void (I *__strong)'
| |-TemplateArgument type 'int'
| |-ParmVarDecl 0x7fbfe0863ef8 <col:13, col:16> col:16 used p 'I *__strong'
| `-CompoundStmt 0x7fbfe0890cf0 <col:19, line:7:1>
| `-ObjCForCollectionStmt 0x7fbfe0890cc8 <line:6:3, col:20>
| |-DeclStmt 0x7fbfe0890c70 <col:8, col:13>
| | `-VarDecl 0x7fbfe0890c00 <col:8, col:11> col:11 k 'I *__strong' callinit
| | `-ImplicitValueInitExpr 0x7fbfe0890c60 <<invalid sloc>> 'I *__strong'
| |-ImplicitCastExpr 0x7fbfe0890cb0 <col:16> 'I *' <LValueToRValue>
| | `-DeclRefExpr 0x7fbfe0890c88 <col:16> 'I *__strong' lvalue ParmVar 0x7fbfe0863ef8 'p' 'I *__strong'
| `-CompoundStmt 0x7fbfe0863b78 <col:19, col:20>
```
Note how in the instantiated version ImplicitValueInitExpr unexpectedly appears.
While objects are auto-initialized under ARC, it does not make sense to
have an initializer for a for-loop variable, and it makes even less
sense to have such a different AST for instantiated and non-instantiated
version.
Digging deeper, I have found that there are two separate Sema* files for
dealing with templates and for dealing with non-templatized code.
In a non-templatized version, an initialization was performed only for
variables which are not loop variables for an Objective-C loop and not
variables for a C++ for-in loop:
```
if (FRI && (Tok.is(tok::colon) || isTokIdentifier_in())) {
bool IsForRangeLoop = false;
if (TryConsumeToken(tok::colon, FRI->ColonLoc)) {
IsForRangeLoop = true;
if (Tok.is(tok::l_brace))
FRI->RangeExpr = ParseBraceInitializer();
else
FRI->RangeExpr = ParseExpression();
}
Decl *ThisDecl = Actions.ActOnDeclarator(getCurScope(), D);
if (IsForRangeLoop)
Actions.ActOnCXXForRangeDecl(ThisDecl);
Actions.FinalizeDeclaration(ThisDecl);
D.complete(ThisDecl);
return Actions.FinalizeDeclaratorGroup(getCurScope(), DS, ThisDecl);
}
SmallVector<Decl *, 8> DeclsInGroup;
Decl *FirstDecl = ParseDeclarationAfterDeclaratorAndAttributes(
D, ParsedTemplateInfo(), FRI);
```
However the code in SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl was inconsistent,
guarding only against C++ for-in loops.
rdar://38391075
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44989
llvm-svn: 328749
Summary:
This fixes PR33561 and PR34185.
Don't store pending template instantiations for late-parsed templates in
the normal PendingInstantiations queue. Instead, use a separate list
that will only be parsed and instantiated at end of TU when late
template parsing actually works and doesn't infinite loop.
Reviewers: rsmith, thakis, hans
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44846
llvm-svn: 328567
Digging through commit logs, it appears the checks in this block predate
`inline` class variables. With them, we fail to emit dynamic
initializers for members that don't have an explicit initializer, and we
won't go out of our way to instantiate the class denoted by
`Var->getType()`.
Fixes PR35599.
llvm-svn: 327945
More generally, this permits a template to be specialized in any scope in which
it could be defined, so this also supersedes DR44 and DR374 (the latter of
which we previously only implemented in C++11 mode onwards due to unclarity as
to whether it was a DR).
llvm-svn: 327705
Use an enum parameter instead of a bool for more control on how the copy elision
functions work. Extract the move initialization code from the move or copy
initialization block.
Patch by: Arthur O'Dwyer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43898
llvm-svn: 327598
Summary:
By calling ActOnFinishFunctionBody(). Previously we were only calling
ActOnSkippedFunctionBody, which didn't pop the function scope.
This causes a crash when running on our internal code. No test-case,
though, since I couldn't come up with a small example in reasonable
time.
The bug was introduced in r321174.
Reviewers: bkramer, sammccall, sepavloff, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: sammccall, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44439
llvm-svn: 327504
template parameter that is an expanded parameter pack, only substitute into the
current slice, not the entire pack.
This reduces the checking of N template template arguments for an expanded
parameter pack containing N parameters from quadratic time to linear time in
the length of the pack. This is important because one (and possibly the only?)
general technique for splitting a template parameter pack in linear time
depends on doing this.
llvm-svn: 326973
The patch fixes a number of bugs related to parameter indexing in
attributes:
* Parameter indices in some attributes (argument_with_type_tag,
pointer_with_type_tag, nonnull, ownership_takes, ownership_holds,
and ownership_returns) are specified in source as one-origin
including any C++ implicit this parameter, were stored as
zero-origin excluding any this parameter, and were erroneously
printing (-ast-print) and confusingly dumping (-ast-dump) as the
stored values.
* For alloc_size, the C++ implicit this parameter was not subtracted
correctly in Sema, leading to assert failures or to silent failures
of __builtin_object_size to compute a value.
* For argument_with_type_tag, pointer_with_type_tag, and
ownership_returns, the C++ implicit this parameter was not added
back to parameter indices in some diagnostics.
This patch fixes the above bugs and aims to prevent similar bugs in
the future by introducing careful mechanisms for handling parameter
indices in attributes. ParamIdx stores a parameter index and is
designed to hide the stored encoding while providing accessors that
require each use (such as printing) to make explicit the encoding that
is needed. Attribute declarations declare parameter index arguments
as [Variadic]ParamIdxArgument, which are exposed as ParamIdx[*]. This
patch rewrites all attribute arguments that are processed by
checkFunctionOrMethodParameterIndex in SemaDeclAttr.cpp to be declared
as [Variadic]ParamIdxArgument. The only exception is xray_log_args's
argument, which is encoded as a count not an index.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43248
llvm-svn: 326602
Current implementation of `FunctionDecl::isDefined` does not take into
account redeclarations that do not have bodies, but the bodies can be
instantiated from corresponding templated definition. This behavior does
not allow to detect function redefinition in the cases where friend
functions is defined in class templates. For instance, the code:
```
template<typename T> struct X { friend void f() {} };
X<int> xi;
void f() {}
```
compiles successfully but must fail due to redefinition of `f`. The
declaration of the friend `f` is created when the containing template
`X` is instantiated, but it does not have a body as per 14.5.4p4
because `f` is not odr-used.
With this change the function `Sema::CheckForFunctionRedefinition`
considers functions with uninstantiated bodies as definitions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30170
llvm-svn: 326419
So I wrote a clang-tidy check to lint out redundant `isa`, `cast`, and
`dyn_cast`s for fun. This is a portion of what it found for clang; I
plan to do similar cleanups in LLVM and other subprojects when I find
time.
Because of the volume of changes, I explicitly avoided making any change
that wasn't highly local and obviously correct to me (e.g. we still have
a number of foo(cast<Bar>(baz)) that I didn't touch, since overloading
is a thing and the cast<Bar> did actually change the type -- just up the
class hierarchy).
I also tried to leave the types we were cast<>ing to somewhere nearby,
in cases where it wasn't locally obvious what we were dealing with
before.
llvm-svn: 326416
Summary:
This fixes a flaw in our AST: PR27098
MSVC always gives plain enums the underlying type 'int'. Clang does this
as well, but we claim the enum is "fixed", as if the user actually wrote
': int'. It means we end up emitting spurious -Wsign-compare warnings on
code like this:
enum Vals { E1, E2, E3 };
bool f(unsigned v1, Vals v2) {
return v1 == v2;
}
We think 'v2' can take on negative values because we think 'Vals' is
fixed. This fixes that.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43110
llvm-svn: 324913
This patch adds a base-class called TemplateInstantiationObserver which gets
notified whenever a template instantiation is entered or exited during
semantic analysis. This is a base class used to implement the template
profiling and debugging tool called
Templight (https://github.com/mikael-s-persson/templight).
The patch also makes a few more changes:
* ActiveTemplateInstantiation class is moved out of the Sema class (so it can be used with inclusion of Sema.h).
* CreateFrontendAction function in front-end utilities is given external linkage (not longer a hidden static function).
* TemplateInstObserverChain data member added to Sema class to hold the list of template-inst observers.
* Notifications to the template-inst observer are added at the key places where templates are instantiated.
Patch by: Abel Sinkovics!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D5767
llvm-svn: 324808
each kind.
Attribute instantiation would previously default to instantiating each kind of
attribute only once. This was overridden by a flag whose intended purpose was
to permit attributes from a prior declaration to be inherited onto a new
declaration even if that new declaration had its own copy of the attribute.
This is the wrong behavior: when instantiating attributes from a template, we
should always instantiate all the attributes that were written on that
template.
This patch renames the flag in the Attr class (and TableGen sources) to more
clearly identify what it's actually for, and removes the usage of the flag from
template instantiation. I also removed the flag from AlignedAttr, which was
only added to work around the incorrect suppression of duplicate attribute
instantiation.
llvm-svn: 321834
Previously, we would:
* compute the type of the conversion function and static invoker as a
side-effect of template argument deduction for a conversion
* re-compute the type as part of deduced return type deduction when building
the conversion function itself
Neither of these turns out to be quite correct. There are other ways to reach a
declaration of the conversion function than in a conversion (such as an
explicit call or friend declaration), and performing auto deduction causes the
function type to be rebuilt in the context of the lambda closure type (which is
different from the context in which it originally appeared, resulting in
spurious substitution failures for constructs that are valid in one context but
not the other, such as the use of an enclosing class's "this" pointer).
This patch switches us to use a different strategy: as before, we use the
declared type of the operator() to form the type of the conversion function and
invoker, but we now populate that type as part of return type deduction for the
conversion function. And the invoker is now treated as simply being an
implementation detail of building the conversion function, and isn't given
special treatment by template argument deduction for the conversion function
any more.
llvm-svn: 321683
The way to fix an undefined-template warning is to add lines to the header file that defines the template pattern. We should suppress the warnings when the template pattern is in a system header because we don't expect users to edit those.
llvm-svn: 321665
Summary:
Previsouly clang tried instantiating member initializers even if ctor
body was skipped, this caused spurious errors (see the test).
Reviewers: sepavloff, klimek
Reviewed By: sepavloff
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41492
llvm-svn: 321520
Summary:
- Fixed an assert in Sema::InstantiateFunctionDefinition and added
support for instantiating a function template with skipped body.
- Properly call setHasSkippedBody for FunctionTemplateDecl passed to
Sema::ActOnSkippedFunctionBody.
Reviewers: sepavloff, bkramer
Reviewed By: sepavloff
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41237
llvm-svn: 321174
whether they have an initializer.
We cannot distinguish between a declaration of a variable template
specialization and a definition of one that lacks an initializer without this,
and would previously mistake the latter for the former.
llvm-svn: 319605
In order to identify the copy deduction candidate, I considered two approaches:
- attempt to determine whether an implicit guide is a copy deduction candidate by checking certain properties of its subsituted parameter during overload-resolution.
- using one of the many bits (WillHaveBody) from FunctionDecl (that CXXDeductionGuideDecl inherits from) that are otherwise irrelevant for deduction guides
After some brittle gymnastics w the first strategy, I settled on the second, although to avoid confusion and to give that bit a better name, i turned it into a member of an anonymous union.
Given this identification 'bit', the tweak to overload resolution was a simple reordering of the deduction guide checks (in SemaOverload.cpp::isBetterOverloadCandidate), in-line with Jason Merrill's p0620r0 drafting which made it into the working paper. Concordant with that, I made sure the copy deduction candidate is always added.
References:
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34970
See http://wg21.link/p0620r0
llvm-svn: 316292
instantiation declarations if they are usable from constant expressions.
We are permitted to instantiate in these cases, and required to do so in order
to have an initializer available for use within constant evaluation.
llvm-svn: 316136
When declaring an entity in the "purview" of a module, it's never a
redeclaration of an entity in the purview of a default module or in no module
("in the global module"). Don't consider those other declarations as possible
redeclaration targets if they're not visible, and reject any cases where we
pick a prior visible declaration that violates this rule.
This reinstates r315251 and r315256, reverted in r315309 and r315308
respectively, tweaked to avoid triggering a linkage calculation when declaring
implicit special members (this exposed our pre-existing issue with typedef
names for linkage changing the linkage of types whose linkage has already been
computed and cached in more cases). A testcase for that regression has been
added in r315366.
llvm-svn: 315379
When declaring an entity in the "purview" of a module, it's never a
redeclaration of an entity in the purview of a default module or in no module
("in the global module"). Don't consider those other declarations as possible
redeclaration targets if they're not visible, and reject any cases where we
pick a prior visible declaration that violates this rule.
llvm-svn: 315251
This implements the proposed approach in https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/33
This reinstates r313827, reverted in r313856, with a fix for the 'out-of-bounds
enumeration value' ubsan error in that change.
llvm-svn: 313955
move constructor.
Previously user-defined reduction initializer was considered as an
assignment expression, not as initializer. Fixed this by treating the
initializer expression as an initializer.
llvm-svn: 312638
the class becoming complete and its inline methods being parsed.
This replaces the hack of using the "late parsed template" flag to track member
functions with bodies we've not parsed yet; instead we now use the "will have
body" flag, which carries the desired implication that the function declaration
*is* a definition, and that we've just not parsed its body yet.
llvm-svn: 310776
declarations that are owned but unconditionally visible.
This allows us to set declarations as visible even if they have a local owning
module, without losing information. In turn, that means that our Objective-C
support can keep on incorrectly assuming the "hidden" bit on the declaration is
the whole story with regard to name visibility. This will also be useful once
we support the C++ Modules TS export semantics.
Objective-C name visibility is still incorrect in any case where the "hidden"
bit is not the complete story: for instance, in Objective-C++ the set of
visible categories will be wrong during template instantiation, and with local
submodule visibility enabled it will be wrong when building modules. Fixing that
will require a major overhaul of how visibility is handled for Objective-C (and
particularly for categories).
llvm-svn: 306075
While a function body is being parsed, the function declaration is not considered
as a definition because it does not have a body yet. In some cases it leads to
incorrect interpretation, the case is presented in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14785:
```
template<typename T> struct Somewhat {
void internal() const {}
friend void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<T> const &) {}
};
void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<char> const &x) { x.internal(); }
```
When statement `x.internal()` in the body of global `operator+` is parsed, the type
of `x` must be completed, so the instantiation of `Somewhat<char>` is started. It
instantiates the declaration of `operator+` defined inline, and makes a check for
redefinition. The check does not detect another definition because the declaration
of `operator+` is still not defining as does not have a body yet.
To solves this problem the function `isThisDeclarationADefinition` considers
a function declaration as a definition if it has flag `WillHaveBody` set.
This change fixes PR14785.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30375
This is a recommit of 305379, reverted in 305381, with small changes.
llvm-svn: 305903
While a function body is being parsed, the function declaration is not considered
as a definition because it does not have a body yet. In some cases it leads to
incorrect interpretation, the case is presented in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14785:
```
template<typename T> struct Somewhat {
void internal() const {}
friend void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<T> const &) {}
};
void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<char> const &x) { x.internal(); }
```
When statement `x.internal()` in the body of global `operator+` is parsed, the type
of `x` must be completed, so the instantiation of `Somewhat<char>` is started. It
instantiates the declaration of `operator+` defined inline, and makes a check for
redefinition. The check does not detect another definition because the declaration
of `operator+` is still not defining as does not have a body yet.
To solves this problem the function `isThisDeclarationADefinition` considers
a function declaration as a definition if it has flag `WillHaveBody` set.
This change fixes PR14785.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30375
llvm-svn: 305379
RecursiveASTVisitor was not properly recursing through a
SubstTemplateTypeParmTypes, resulting in crashes in pack expansion where we
couldn't always find an unexpanded pack within a pack expansion.
We also have an issue where substitution of deduced template arguments for an
implicit deduction guide creates the "impossible" case of naming a
non-dependent member of the current instantiation, but within a specialization
that is actually instantiated from a different (partial/explicit)
specialization of the template. We resolve this by declaring that constructors
that do so can only be used to deduce specializations of the primary template.
I'm running this past CWG to see if people agree this is the right thing to do.
llvm-svn: 304862
This fixes the bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32638
int main()
{
[](auto x) noexcept(noexcept(x)) { } (0);
}
In the above code, prior to this patch, when substituting into the noexcept expression, i.e. transforming the DeclRefExpr that represents 'x' - clang attempts to capture 'x' because Sema's CurContext is still pointing to the pattern FunctionDecl (i.e. the templated-decl set in FinishTemplateArgumentDeduction) which does not match the substituted 'x's DeclContext, which leads to an attempt to capture and an assertion failure.
We fix this by adjusting Sema's CurContext to point to the substituted FunctionDecl under which the noexcept specifier's argument should be transformed, and so the ParmVarDecl that 'x' refers to has the same declcontext and no capture is attempted.
I briefly investigated whether the SwitchContext should occur right after VisitMethodDecl creates the new substituted FunctionDecl, instead of only during instantiating the exception specification - but seeing no other code that seemed to rely on that, I decided to leave it just for the duration of the exception specification instantiation.
llvm-svn: 302507
- also replace direct equality checks against the ConstantEvaluated enumerator with isConstantEvaluted(), in anticipation of adding finer granularity to the various ConstantEvaluated contexts and reinstating certain restrictions on where lambda expressions can occur in C++17.
- update the clang tablegen backend that uses these Enumerators, and add the relevant scope where needed.
llvm-svn: 299316
GCC has the alloc_align attribute, which is similar to assume_aligned, except the attribute's parameter is the index of the integer parameter that needs aligning to.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29599
llvm-svn: 299117
Correct class-template deprecation behavior
Based on the comment in the test, and my reading of the standard, a deprecated warning should be issued in the following case:
template<typename T> [[deprecated]] class Foo{}; Foo<int> f;
This was not the case, because the ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl creation did not also copy the deprecated attribute.
Note: I did NOT audit the complete set of attributes to see WHICH ones should be copied, so instead I simply copy ONLY the deprecated attribute.
Previous DiffRev: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27486, was reverted.
This patch fixes the issues brought up here by the reverter: https://reviews.llvm.org/rL298410
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31245
llvm-svn: 298634
Based on the comment in the test, and my reading of the standard, a deprecated warning should be issued in the following case:
template<typename T> [[deprecated]] class Foo{}; Foo<int> f;
This was not the case, because the ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl creation did not also copy the deprecated attribute.
Note: I did NOT audit the complete set of attributes to see WHICH ones should be copied, so instead I simply copy ONLY the deprecated attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27486
llvm-svn: 298410
case where the class template has a parameter pack.
Checking of the template arguments expects an "as-written" template argument
list, which in particular does not have any parameter packs. So flatten the
packs into separate arguments before passing them in.
llvm-svn: 295710
template deduction guides for class template argument deduction.
Ensure that we have a local instantiation scope for tracking the instantiated
parameters. Additionally, unusually, we're substituting at depth 1 and leaving
depth 0 alone; make sure that we don't reduce template parameter depth by 2 for
inner parameters in the process. (This is probably also broken for alias
templates in the case where they're expanded within a dependent context, but
this patch doesn't fix that.)
llvm-svn: 295696
Summary: Previously the cleanups (e.g. dtor calls) are inserted into the
outer scope (e.g. function body scope), instead of it's own scope. After
the fix, the cleanups are inserted right after getting the size value.
This fixes pr30306.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24333
llvm-svn: 295123
such guides below explicit ones, and ensure that references to the class's
template parameters are not treated as forwarding references.
We make a few tweaks to the wording in the current standard:
1) The constructor parameter list is copied faithfully to the deduction guide,
without losing default arguments or a varargs ellipsis (which the standard
wording loses by omission).
2) If the class template declares no constructors, we add a T() -> T<...> guide
(which will only ever work if T has default arguments for all non-pack
template parameters).
3) If the class template declares nothing that looks like a copy or move
constructor, we add a T(T<...>) -> T<...> guide.
#2 and #3 follow from the "pretend we had a class type with these constructors"
philosophy for deduction guides.
llvm-svn: 295007
FindInstantiatedDecl or passing it to RebuildMemberExpr.
This fixes PR30361.
rdar://problem/17341274
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24969
llvm-svn: 293678
non-template function instantiated from a friend declaration in a class
template from TSK_ImplicitInstantiation to TSK_Undeclared.
It doesn't make sense for a non-template function to be flagged as being
instantiated from a template; that property really belongs to the entity
as a whole and not an individual declaration of it. There's some history
here:
* r137934 started marking these functions as instantiations in order to
work around an issue where we might instantiate a class template while
we're still parsing its member definitions, and would otherwise fail
to instantiate the friend definition
* r177003 fixed the same issue but for friend templates, but did so by
making the friends claim to be definitions even before we'd parsed
their actual bodies; this made the r137934 change redundant
* r293558 worked around a problem caused by the marking of a non-template
function as a template instantiation in r137934
This change reverts the code changes from r293358 and r137934 and retains
all the tests.
llvm-svn: 293367
Fixes a crash in modules where the template class decl becomes the most recent
decl in the redeclaration chain and forcing the template instantiator try to
instantiate the friend declaration, rather than the template definition.
In practice, A::list<int> produces a TemplateSpecializationType
A::__1::list<int, allocator<type-parameter-0-0> >' failing to replace to
subsitute the default argument to allocator<int>.
Kudos Richard Smith (D28399).
llvm-svn: 291753
This flag serves no purpose other than to prevent us walking through a type to
check whether it contains an 'auto' specifier; this duplication of information
is error-prone, does not appear to provide any performance benefit, and will
become less practical once we support C++1z deduced class template types and
eventually constrained types from the Concepts TS.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 291737
`diagnose_if` can be used to have clang emit either warnings or errors
for function calls that meet user-specified conditions. For example:
```
constexpr int foo(int a)
__attribute__((diagnose_if(a > 10, "configurations with a > 10 are "
"expensive.", "warning")));
int f1 = foo(9);
int f2 = foo(10); // warning: configuration with a > 10 are expensive.
int f3 = foo(f2);
```
It currently only emits diagnostics in cases where the condition is
guaranteed to always be true. So, the following code will emit no
warnings:
```
constexpr int bar(int a) {
foo(a);
return 0;
}
constexpr int i = bar(10);
```
We hope to support optionally emitting diagnostics for cases like that
(and emitting runtime checks) in the future.
Release notes will appear shortly. :)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27424
llvm-svn: 291418
Summary:
Replace some old code that probably pre-dated the change to delay
emission of dllexported code until after the closing brace of the
outermost record type. Only uninstantiated default argument expressions
need to be handled now. It is enough to instantiate default argument
expressions when instantiating dllexported default ctors. This also
fixes some double-diagnostic issues in this area.
Fixes PR31500
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28274
llvm-svn: 291045
to make reference to template parameters. This is only a partial
implementation; we retain the restriction that the argument must not be
type-dependent, since it's unclear how that would work given the existence of
other language rules requiring an exact type match in this context, even for
type-dependent cases (a question has been raised on the core reflector).
llvm-svn: 290647
This change introduces UsingPackDecl as a marker for the set of UsingDecls
produced by pack expansion of a single (unresolved) using declaration. This is
not strictly necessary (we just need to be able to map from the original using
declaration to its expansions somehow), but it's useful to maintain the
invariant that each declaration reference instantiates to refer to one
declaration.
This is a re-commit of r290080 (reverted in r290092) with a fix for a
use-after-lifetime bug.
llvm-svn: 290203
This change introduces UsingPackDecl as a marker for the set of UsingDecls
produced by pack expansion of a single (unresolved) using declaration. This is
not strictly necessary (we just need to be able to map from the original using
declaration to its expansions somehow), but it's useful to maintain the
invariant that each declaration reference instantiates to refer to one
declaration.
llvm-svn: 290080
* a dependent non-type using-declaration within a function template can be
valid, as it can refer to an enumerator, so don't reject it in the template
definition
* we can partially substitute into a dependent using-declaration if it appears
within a (local class in a) generic lambda within a function template, which
means an UnresolvedUsing*Decl doesn't necessarily instantiate to a UsingDecl.
llvm-svn: 290071
Summary:
clang-tidy checks frequently use source ranges of functions.
The source range of constructors and destructors in template instantiations
is currently a single token.
The factory method for constructors and destructors does not allow the
end source location to be specified.
Set end location manually after creating instantiation.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rsmith, arphaman
Subscribers: arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26849
llvm-svn: 288025
During template instantiation, we currently fall back to just calling
Sema::SubstExpr for enable_if attributes that aren't value-dependent or
type-dependent. Since Sema::SubstExpr strips off any implicit casts
we've added to an expression, it's possible that this behavior will
leave us with an enable_if condition that's just a DeclRefExpr.
Conditions like that deeply confuse Sema::CheckEnableIf.
llvm-svn: 287187
Only look for a variable's value in the constant expression evaluation activation frame, if the variable was indeed declared in that frame, otherwise it might be a constant expression and be usable within a nested local scope or emit an error.
void f(char c) {
struct X {
static constexpr char f() {
return c; // error gracefully here as opposed to crashing.
}
};
int I = X::f();
}
llvm-svn: 286748
1) Merge and demote variable definitions when we find a redefinition in
MergeVarDecls, not only when we find one in AddInitializerToDecl (we only reach
the second case if it's the addition of the initializer itself that converts an
existing declaration into a definition).
2) When rebuilding a redeclaration chain for a variable, if we merge two
definitions together, mark the definitions as merged so the retained definition
is made visible whenever the demoted definition would have been.
Original commit message (from r283882):
[modules] PR28752: Do not instantiate variable declarations which are not visible.
Original patch by Vassil Vassilev! Changes listed above are mine.
llvm-svn: 284284
Original message:
"[modules] PR28752: Do not instantiate variable declarations which are not visible.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24508
Patch developed in collaboration with Richard Smith!"
llvm-svn: 284008
Summary:
This is possible now that MapVector supports move-only values.
Depends on D25404.
Reviewers: timshen
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25405
llvm-svn: 283766
within the instantiation of that same specialization. This could previously
happen for eagerly-instantiated function templates, variable templates,
exception specifications, default arguments, and a handful of other cases.
We still have an issue here for default template arguments that recursively
make use of themselves and likewise for substitution into the type of a
non-type template parameter, but in those cases we're producing a different
entity each time, so they should instead be caught by the instantiation depth
limit. However, currently we will typically run out of stack before we reach
it. :(
llvm-svn: 280190
to DiagnoseUninstantiableTemplate, teach hasVisibleDefinition to correctly
determine whether a function definition is visible, and mark both the function
and the template as visible when merging function template definitions to
provide hasVisibleDefinition with the relevant information.
The change to always pass the right declaration as the PatternDef to
DiagnoseUninstantiableTemplate also caused those checks to happen before other
diagnostics in InstantiateFunctionDefinition, giving worse diagnostics for the
same situations, so I sunk the relevant diagnostics into
DiagnoseUninstantiableTemplate. Those parts of this patch are based on changes
in reviews.llvm.org/D23492 by Vassil Vassilev.
This reinstates r279486, reverted in r279500, with a fix to
DiagnoseUninstantiableTemplate to only mark uninstantiable explicit
instantiation declarations as invalid if we actually diagnosed them. (When we
trigger an explicit instantiation of a class member from an explicit
instantiation declaration for the class, it's OK if there is no corresponding
definition and we certainly don't want to mark the member invalid in that
case.) This previously caused a build failure during bootstrap.
llvm-svn: 279557
to DiagnoseUninstantiableTemplate, teach hasVisibleDefinition to correctly
determine whether a function definition is visible, and mark both the function
and the template as visible when merging function template definitions to
provide hasVisibleDefinition with the relevant information.
The change to always pass the right declaration as the PatternDef to
DiagnoseUninstantiableTemplate also caused those checks to happen before other
diagnostics in InstantiateFunctionDefinition, giving worse diagnostics for the
same situations, so I sunk the relevant diagnostics into
DiagnoseUninstantiableTemplate. Those parts of this patch are based on changes
in reviews.llvm.org/D23492 by Vassil Vassilev.
llvm-svn: 279486
decomposition declarations.
There are a couple of things in the wording that seem strange here:
decomposition declarations are permitted at namespace scope (which we partially
support here) and they are permitted as the declaration in a template (which we
reject).
llvm-svn: 276492
Summary:
Space for storing the //constraint-expression// of the
//requires-clause// associated with a `TemplateParameterList` is
arranged by taking a bit out of the `NumParams` field for the purpose
of determining whether there is a //requires-clause// or not, and by
adding to the trailing objects tied to the `TemplateParameterList`. An
accessor is provided.
An appropriate argument is supplied to `TemplateParameterList::Create`
at the various call sites.
Serialization changes will addressed as the Concepts implementation
becomes more solid.
Drive-by fix:
This change also replaces the custom
`FixedSizeTemplateParameterListStorage` implementation with one that
follows the interface provided by `llvm::TrailingObjects`.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, faisalv, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, nwilson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D19322
llvm-svn: 276069
Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into
C++ last year as a DR against C++11.
Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited
base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to
constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for
using-declarations.
For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived
class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow
constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the
actual initialization, and have a new expression node,
CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such
a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect
forwarding of arguments.)
In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls,
variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting
constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code
into the caller of the inherited constructor.
Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some
corner cases. In particular:
* if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to
construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B
befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and
* if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default
constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from
a base class
llvm-svn: 274049
pretty stack trace entries for all cases where we instantiate the definition of
something, and include the fully-qualified name with template arguments in the
name of the instantiated entity.
llvm-svn: 270904
declared before it is used. Because we don't use normal name lookup to find
these, the normal code to filter out non-visible names from name lookup results
does not apply.
llvm-svn: 268585
with a generic lambda.
This patch fixes Sema::InstantiateVariableInitializer to switch to the
context of the variable before instantiating its initializer, which is
necessary to set the correct type for VarTemplateSpecializationDecl.
This is the first part of the patch that was reviewed here:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19175
rdar://problem/23440346
llvm-svn: 267956
With this patch compiler emits warning if it tries to make implicit instantiation
of a template but cannot find the template definition. The warning can be suppressed
by explicit instantiation declaration or by command line options
-Wundefined-var-template and -Wundefined-func-template. The implementation follows
the discussion of http://reviews.llvm.org/D12326.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16396
llvm-svn: 266719
The linear clause declares one or more list items to be private to a SIMD lane and to have a linear relationship with respect to the iteration space of a loop.
'linear' '(' <linear-list> [ ':' <linear-step> ] ')'
When a linear-step expression is specified in a linear clause it must be
either a constant integer expression or an integer-typed parameter that is specified in a uniform clause on the directive.
The special this pointer can be used as if was one of the arguments to the function in any of the linear, aligned, or uniform clauses.
llvm-svn: 266056
The aligned clause declares that the object to which each list item points is aligned to the number of bytes expressed in the optional parameter of the aligned clause.
'aligned' '(' <argument-list> [ ':' <alignment> ] ')'
The optional parameter of the aligned clause, alignment, must be a constant positive integer expression. If no optional parameter is specified, implementation-defined default alignments for SIMD instructions on the target platforms are assumed.
The special this pointer can be used as if was one of the arguments to the function in any of the linear, aligned, or uniform clauses.
llvm-svn: 266052
OpenMP 4.0 defines clause 'uniform' in 'declare simd' directive:
'uniform' '(' <argument-list> ')'
The uniform clause declares one or more arguments to have an invariant value for all concurrent invocations of the function in the execution of a single SIMD loop.
The special this pointer can be used as if was one of the arguments to the function in any of the linear, aligned, or uniform clauses.
llvm-svn: 266041
construct.
OpenMP 4.0 defines '#pragma omp declare simd' construct that may have
associated 'simdlen' clause with constant positive expression as an
argument:
simdlen(<const_expr>)
Patch adds parsin and semantic analysis for simdlen clause.
llvm-svn: 265668
Add parsing, sema analysis and serialization/deserialization for 'declare reduction' construct.
User-defined reductions are defined as
#pragma omp declare reduction( reduction-identifier : typename-list : combiner ) [initializer ( initializer-expr )]
These custom reductions may be used in 'reduction' clauses of OpenMP constructs. The combiner specifies how partial results can be combined into a single value. The
combiner can use the special variable identifiers omp_in and omp_out that are of the type of the variables being reduced with this reduction-identifier. Each of them will
denote one of the values to be combined before executing the combiner. It is assumed that the special omp_out identifier will refer to the storage that holds the resulting
combined value after executing the combiner.
As the initializer-expr value of a user-defined reduction is not known a priori the initializer-clause can be used to specify one. Then the contents of the initializer-clause
will be used as the initializer for private copies of reduction list items where the omp_priv identifier will refer to the storage to be initialized. The special identifier
omp_orig can also appear in the initializer-clause and it will refer to the storage of the original variable to be reduced.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11182
llvm-svn: 262582
This is like r262493, but for pragma detect_mismatch instead of pragma comment.
The two pragmas have similar behavior, so use the same approach for both.
llvm-svn: 262506
`#pragma comment` was handled by Sema calling a function on ASTConsumer, and
CodeGen then implementing this function and writing things to its output.
Instead, introduce a PragmaCommentDecl AST node and hang one off the
TranslationUnitDecl for every `#pragma comment` line, and then use the regular
serialization machinery. (Since PragmaCommentDecl has codegen relevance, it's
eagerly deserialized.)
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17799
llvm-svn: 262493
In VisitNonTypeTemplateParamDecl, before SubstExpr with the default argument,
we should create a ConstantEvaluated ExpressionEvaluationContext. Without this,
it is possible to use a PotentiallyEvaluated ExpressionEvaluationContext; and
MaybeODRUseExprs will not be cleared when popping the context, causing
assertion failure.
This is similar to how we handle the context before SubstExpr with the
default argument, in SubstDefaultTemplateArgument.
Part of PR13986.
rdar://24480205
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17576
llvm-svn: 261803
OMPCapturedExprDecl allows caopturing not only of fielddecls, but also
other expressions. It also allows to simplify codegen for several
clauses.
llvm-svn: 260492
OpenMP 4.5 introduces privatization of non-static data members of current class in non-static member functions.
To correctly handle such kind of privatization a new (pseudo)declaration VarDecl-based node is added. It allows to reuse an existing code for capturing variables in Lambdas/Block/Captured blocks of code for correct privatization and codegen.
llvm-svn: 260077
Allow "mode" attribute for enum types, except for vector modes, for compatibility with GCC.
Support "mode" attribute with dependent types.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16219
llvm-svn: 259497
For
void f() {
union { int i; };
}
clang used to omit the RecordDecl from the anonymous union from the AST.
That's because the code creating it only called PushOnScopeChains(), which adds
it to the current DeclContext, which here is the function's DeclContext. But
RecursiveASTVisitor doesn't descent into all decls in a FunctionDecl.
Instead, for DeclContexts that contain statements, return the RecordDecl so
that it can be included in the DeclStmt containing the VarDecl for the union.
Interesting bits from the AST before this change:
|-FunctionDecl
| `-CompoundStmt
| |-DeclStmt
| | `-VarDecl 0x589cd60 <col:3> col:3 implicit used 'union (anonymous at test.cc:3:3)' callinit
After this change:
-FunctionDecl
| `-CompoundStmt
| |-DeclStmt
| | |-CXXRecordDecl 0x4612e48 <col:3, col:18> col:3 union definition
| | | |-FieldDecl 0x4612f70 <col:11, col:15> col:15 referenced i 'int'
| | `-VarDecl 0x4613010 <col:3> col:3 implicit used 'union (anonymous at test.cc:3:3)' callinit
This is now closer to how anonymous struct and unions are represented as
members of structs. It also enabled deleting some one-off code in the
template instantiation code.
Finally, it fixes a crash with ASTMatchers, see the included test case
(this fixes http://crbug.com/580749).
llvm-svn: 259079
This new builtin template allows for incredibly fast instantiations of
templates like std::integer_sequence.
Performance numbers follow:
My work station has 64 GB of ram + 20 Xeon Cores at 2.8 GHz.
__make_integer_seq<std::integer_sequence, int, 90000> takes 0.25
seconds.
std::make_integer_sequence<int, 90000> takes unbound time, it is still
running. Clang is consuming gigabytes of memory.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13786
llvm-svn: 252036
consider the following:
enum E *p;
enum E { e };
The above snippet is not ANSI C because 'enum E' has not bee defined
when we are processing the declaration of 'p'; however, it is a popular
extension to make the above work. This would fail using the Microsoft
enum semantics because the definition of 'E' would implicitly have a
fixed underlying type of 'int' which would trigger diagnostic messages
about a mismatch between the declaration and the definition.
Instead, treat fixed underlying types as not fixed for the purposes of
the diagnostic.
llvm-svn: 249674
A class without a name for linkage purposes gets a name along the lines
of <unnamed-type-foo> where foo is either the name of a declarator which
defined it (like a variable or field) or a
typedef-name (like a typedef or alias-declaration).
We handled the declarator case correctly but it would fall down during
template instantiation if the declarator didn't share the tag's type.
We failed to handle the typedef-name case at all.
Instead, keep track of the association between the two and keep it up to
date in the face of template instantiation.
llvm-svn: 246469
If a function declaration is found inside a template function as in:
template<class T> void f() {
void g(int x = T::v) except(T::w);
}
it must be instantiated along with the enclosing template function,
including default arguments and exception specification.
Together with the patch committed in r240974 this implements DR1484.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11194
llvm-svn: 245810
SmallVector::set_size does not reallocate the vector. Sadly I have no
idea how to test this. The vector never has more than one member in all
of the regression tests.
Found by inspection.
llvm-svn: 243987
If a function containing a local class is instantiated, instantiate
all of local class member, including default arguments and exception
specifications.
This change fixes PR21332 and thus implements DR1484.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9990
llvm-svn: 240974
Previously we'd complain about redefinition of default arguments when we
instantiated a class with a friend template that inherits its default argument,
because we propagate the default template arguemnt onto the friend when we
reload the AST.
llvm-svn: 239857
Starting from r236426 FindInstantiatedDecl may instantiate types that
are referenced before definition. This change limit the set of types
that can be instantiated by this function.
llvm-svn: 237434
This is necessary in order to allow the use of a constexpr member function, or
a member function with deduced return type, of a local class within a
surrounding instantiated function template specialization.
Patch by Michael Park!
This re-commits r236063, which was reverted in r236134, along with a fix for a
delayed template parsing bug that was exposed by this change.
llvm-svn: 237064
If a class is absent from instantiation and is incomplete, instantiate it as
an incomplete class thus avoiding compiler crash.
This change fixes PR18653.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8281
llvm-svn: 236426
This is necessary in order to allow the use of a constexpr member function, or
a member function with deduced return type, of a local class within a
surrounding instantiated function template specialization.
Patch by Michael Park!
llvm-svn: 236063
- Changed CUDALaunchBounds arguments from integers to Expr* so they can
be saved in AST for instantiation.
- Added support for template instantiation of launch_bounds attrubute.
- Moved evaluation of launch_bounds arguments to NVPTXTargetCodeGenInfo::
SetTargetAttributes() where it can be done after template instantiation.
- Added a warning on negative launch_bounds arguments.
- Amended test cases.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8985
llvm-svn: 235452
Reverts the code changes from r234675 but keeps the test case.
We were already maintaining a DenseMap of globals with dynamic
initializers anyway.
Fixes the test case from PR23234.
llvm-svn: 234961
It breaks down on this test case:
void foo();
template <typename T> class C {
friend void foo();
};
inline void foo() {}
C<int> c;
We shouldn't be marking the instantiation of the friend decl of foo as
inline-specified. It may be possible to fix this by determining if the
full definition is part of the current template, but it seems better to
rever tot green until we come up with a full solution.
This reverts commit r233817, as well as follow-ups r233820 and r233821.
llvm-svn: 234355
A function template pattern can be declared without the 'inline'
specifier and defined later with the 'inline' specifier. However, during
instantiation, we were only looking at the canonical decl to see if we
should mark the instantiated decl as inline specified. Since the
instantiated decl actually represents many pattern declarations, put the
inline specifier on the instantiation decl if any of the pattern decls
have it.
llvm-svn: 233817
of extern "C" declarations. This is simpler and vastly more efficient for
modules builds (we no longer need to load *all* extern "C" declarations to
determine if we have a redeclaration).
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 231538
The FIXME in the test is caused by TemplateDeclInstantiator::VisitCXXRecordDecl
returning a nullptr instead of creating an invalid decl. This is a common
pattern across all of TemplateDeclInstantiator, so I'm not comfortable changing
it. The reason it's not invalid in the class template is due to support for an
MSVC extension, see r137573.
llvm-svn: 225071
than the type of a function declaration). We previously didn't instantiate
these at all! This also covers the pathological case where the only mention of
a parameter pack is within the exception specification; this gives us a second
way (other than alias templates) to reach the horrible state where a type
contains an unexpanded pack, but its canonical type does not.
This is a re-commit of r219977:
r219977 was reverted in r220038 because it hit a wrong-code bug in GCC 4.7.2.
(That's gcc.gnu.org/PR56135, and affects any implicit lambda-capture of
'this' within a template.)
r219977 was a re-commit of r217995, r218011, and r218053:
r217995 was reverted in r218058 because it hit a rejects-valid bug in MSVC.
(Incorrect overload resolution in the presence of using-declarations.)
It was re-committed in r219977 with a workaround for the MSVC rejects-valid.
r218011 was a workaround for an MSVC parser bug. (Incorrect desugaring of
unbraced range-based for loop).
llvm-svn: 221750
of a member function of a class template that is defined outside the template.
This substitution can actually fail in some weird cases.
llvm-svn: 220085
It broke some builders. I guess it'd be reproducible with --vg.
Failing Tests (3):
Clang :: CXX/except/except.spec/p1.cpp
Clang :: SemaTemplate/instantiate-exception-spec-cxx11.cpp
Clang :: SemaTemplate/instantiate-exception-spec.cpp
llvm-svn: 220038
reverted in r218058 because they triggered a rejects-valid bug in MSVC.
Original commit message from r217995:
Instantiate exception specifications when instantiating function types (other
than the type of a function declaration). We previously didn't instantiate
these at all! This also covers the pathological case where the only mention of
a parameter pack is within the exception specification; this gives us a second
way (other than alias templates) to reach the horrible state where a type
contains an unexpanded pack, but its canonical type does not.
llvm-svn: 219977
declaration in the instantiation if the previous declaration came from another
definition of the class template that got merged into the pattern definition.
llvm-svn: 219552
This adds support for the align_value attribute. This attribute is supported by
Intel's compiler (versions 14.0+), and several of my HPC users have requested
support in Clang. It specifies an alignment assumption on the values to which a
pointer points, and is used by numerical libraries to encourage efficient
generation of vector code.
Of course, we already have an aligned attribute that can specify enhanced
alignment for a type, so why is this additional attribute important? The
problem is that if you want to specify that an input array of T is, say,
64-byte aligned, you could try this:
typedef double aligned_double attribute((aligned(64)));
void foo(aligned_double *P) {
double x = P[0]; // This is fine.
double y = P[1]; // What alignment did those doubles have again?
}
the access here to P[1] causes problems. P was specified as a pointer to type
aligned_double, and any object of type aligned_double must be 64-byte aligned.
But if P[0] is 64-byte aligned, then P[1] cannot be, and this access causes
undefined behavior. Getting round this problem requires a lot of awkward
casting and hand-unrolling of loops, all of which is bad.
With the align_value attribute, we can accomplish what we'd like in a well
defined way:
typedef double *aligned_double_ptr attribute((align_value(64)));
void foo(aligned_double_ptr P) {
double x = P[0]; // This is fine.
double y = P[1]; // This is fine too.
}
This attribute does not create a new type (and so it not part of the type
system), and so will only "propagate" through templates, auto, etc. by
optimizer deduction after inlining. This seems consistent with Intel's
implementation (thanks to Alexey for confirming the various Intel-compiler
behaviors).
As a final note, I would have chosen to call this aligned_value, not
align_value, for better naming consistency with the aligned attribute, but I
think it would be more useful to users to adopt Intel's name.
llvm-svn: 218910
In addition to __builtin_assume_aligned, GCC also supports an assume_aligned
attribute which specifies the alignment (and optional offset) of a function's
return value. Here we implement support for the assume_aligned attribute by making
use of the @llvm.assume intrinsic.
llvm-svn: 218500
r218053: Use exceptions() instead of getNumExceptions()/getExceptionType() to avoid
r218011: Work around MSVC parser bug by putting redundant braces around the body of
r217997: Skip parens when detecting whether we're instantiating a function declaration.
r217995: Instantiate exception specifications when instantiating function types (other
The Windows build was broken for 16 hours and no one had any good ideas of how to
fix it. Reverting for now to make the builders green. See the cfe-commits thread [1] for
more info.
This was the build error (from [2]):
C:\bb-win7\ninja-clang-i686-msc17-R\llvm-project\clang\lib\Sema\SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp(1590) : error C2668: '`anonymous-namespace'::TemplateInstantiator::TransformFunctionProtoType' : ambiguous call to overloaded function
C:\bb-win7\ninja-clang-i686-msc17-R\llvm-project\clang\lib\Sema\SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp(1313): could be 'clang::QualType `anonymous-namespace'::TemplateInstantiator::TransformFunctionProtoType<clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>>(clang::TypeLocBuilder &,clang::FunctionProtoTypeLoc,clang::CXXRecordDecl *,unsigned int,Fn)'
with
[
Fn=clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>
]
c:\bb-win7\ninja-clang-i686-msc17-r\llvm-project\clang\lib\sema\TreeTransform.h(4532): or 'clang::QualType clang::TreeTransform<Derived>::TransformFunctionProtoType<clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>>(clang::TypeLocBuilder &,clang::FunctionProtoTypeLoc,clang::CXXRecordDecl *,unsigned int,Fn)'
with
[
Derived=`anonymous-namespace'::TemplateInstantiator,
Fn=clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>
]
while trying to match the argument list '(clang::TypeLocBuilder, clang::FunctionProtoTypeLoc, clang::CXXRecordDecl *, unsigned int, clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>)'
1. http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140915/115011.html
2. http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/ninja-clang-i686-msc17-R/builds/10515/steps/build_clang_tools_1/logs/stdio
llvm-svn: 218058
than the type of a function declaration). We previously didn't instantiate
these at all! This also covers the pathological case where the only mention of
a parameter pack is within the exception specification; this gives us a second
way (other than alias templates) to reach the horrible state where a type
contains an unexpanded pack, but its canonical type does not.
llvm-svn: 217995
The warning warns on TypedefNameDecls -- typedefs and C++11 using aliases --
that are !isReferenced(). Since the isReferenced() bit on TypedefNameDecls
wasn't used for anything before this warning it wasn't always set correctly,
so this patch also adds a few missing MarkAnyDeclReferenced() calls in
various places for TypedefNameDecls.
This is made a bit complicated due to local typedefs possibly being used only
after their local scope has closed. Consider:
template <class T>
void template_fun(T t) {
typename T::Foo s3foo; // YYY
(void)s3foo;
}
void template_fun_user() {
struct Local {
typedef int Foo; // XXX
} p;
template_fun(p);
}
Here the typedef in XXX is only used at end-of-translation unit, when YYY in
template_fun() gets instantiated. To handle this, typedefs that are unused when
their scope exits are added to a set of potentially unused typedefs, and that
set gets checked at end-of-TU. Typedefs that are still unused at that point then
get warned on. There's also serialization code for this set, so that the
warning works with precompiled headers and modules. For modules, the warning
is emitted when the module is built, for precompiled headers each time the
header gets used.
Finally, consider a function using C++14 auto return types to return a local
type defined in a header:
auto f() {
struct S { typedef int a; };
return S();
}
Here, the typedef escapes its local scope and could be used by only some
translation units including the header. To not warn on this, add a
RecursiveASTVisitor that marks all delcs on local types returned from auto
functions as referenced. (Except if it's a function with internal linkage, or
the decls are private and the local type has no friends -- in these cases, it
_is_ safe to warn.)
Several of the included testcases (most of the interesting ones) were provided
by Richard Smith.
(gcc's spelling -Wunused-local-typedefs is supported as an alias for this
warning.)
llvm-svn: 217298
pattern of an alias template declaration. Use this to merge alias templates
properly when they're members of class template specializations.
llvm-svn: 216437
We would previously assert (a decl cannot have two DLL attributes) on this code:
template <typename T> struct __declspec(dllimport) S { T f() { return T(); } };
template struct __declspec(dllexport) S<int>;
The problem was that when instantiating, we would take the attribute from the
template even if the instantiation itself already had an attribute.
Also, don't inherit DLL attributes from the template to its members before
instantiation, as the attribute may change.
I couldn't figure out what MinGW does here, so I'm leaving that open. At least
we're not asserting anymore.
llvm-svn: 216340
This fixes PR20671, see the bug for details. In short, ActOnTranslationUnit()
calls DefineUsedVTables() and only then PerformPendingInstantiations(). But
PerformPendingInstantiations() is what does delayed template parsing, so
vtables only references from late-parsed templates weren't marked used.
As a fix, move the SavePendingInstantiationsAndVTableUsesRAII in
PerformPendingInstantiations() up above the delayed template parsing code.
That way, vtables referenced from templates end up in the RAII object, and the
call to DefineUsedVTables() in PerformPendingInstantiations() marks them used.
llvm-svn: 215786
FunctionProtoType::ExtProtoInfo. Most of the users of these fields don't care
about the other ExtProtoInfo bits and just want to talk about the exception
specification.
llvm-svn: 214450
Mikael Nilsson