This patch handles the `<<` operator defined for `std::unique_ptr` in
the std namespace (ignores custom overloads of the operator).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105421
This patch handles all the comparision methods (defined via overloaded
operators) on std::unique_ptr. These operators compare the underlying
pointers, which is modelled by comparing the corresponding inner-pointer
SVal. There is also a special case for comparing the same pointer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104616
Previously, information about `ConstructionContextLayer` was not
propagated thru causing the expression like:
Var c = (createVar());
To produce unrelated temporary for the `createVar()` result and conjure
a new symbol for the value of `c` in C++17 mode.
Reviewed By: steakhal
Patch By: tomasz-kaminski-sonarsource!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102835
When searching for stores and creating corresponding notes, the
analyzer is more specific about the target region of the store
as opposed to the stored value. While this description was tweaked
for constant and undefined values, it lacked in the most general
case of symbolic values.
This patch tries to find a memory region, where this value is stored,
to use it as a better alias for the value.
rdar://76645710
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101041
Since we can report memory leaks on one variable, while the originally
allocated object was stored into another one, we should explain
how did it get there.
rdar://76645710
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100852
When reporting leaks, we try to attach the leaking object to some
variable, so it's easier to understand. Before the patch, we always
tried to use the first variable that stored the object in question.
This can get very confusing for the user, if that variable doesn't
contain that object at the moment of the actual leak. In many cases,
the warning is dismissed as false positive and it is effectively a
false positive when we fail to properly explain the warning to the
user.
This patch addresses the bigest issue in cases like this. Now we
check if the variable still contains the leaking symbolic object.
If not, we look for the last variable to actually hold it and use
that variable instead.
rdar://76645710
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100839
This category is generic enough to hold a variety of checkers.
Currently it contains the Dead Stores checker and an alpha unreachable
code checker.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98741
Before `bc713f6a004723d1325bc16e1efc32d0ac82f939` landed, the analyzer
crashed on this reduced example.
It seems important to have bot `ctu` and `-analyzer-opt-analyze-headers`
enabled in the example.
This test file ensures that no regression happens in the future in this regard.
Reviewed By: martong, NoQ
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96586
The SwitchStmt::FirstCase member is not initialized when the AST is
built by the ASTStmtReader. See the below code of
ASTStmtReader::VisitSwitchStmt in the case where the for loop does not
have any iterations:
```
// ... more code ...
SwitchCase *PrevSC = nullptr;
for (auto E = Record.size(); Record.getIdx() != E; ) {
SwitchCase *SC = Record.getSwitchCaseWithID(Record.readInt());
if (PrevSC)
PrevSC->setNextSwitchCase(SC);
else
S->setSwitchCaseList(SC); // Sets FirstCase !!!
PrevSC = SC;
}
} // return
```
Later, in ASTNodeImporter::VisitSwitchStmt,
we have a condition that depends on this uninited value:
```
for (SwitchCase *SC = S->getSwitchCaseList(); SC != nullptr;
SC = SC->getNextSwitchCase()) {
// ... more code ...
}
```
This is clearly an UB. This causes non-deterministic crashes when
ClangSA analyzes some code with CTU. See the below report by valgrind
(the whole valgrind output is attached):
```
==31019== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==31019== at 0x12ED1983: clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitSwitchStmt(clang::SwitchStmt*) (ASTImporter.cpp:6195)
==31019== by 0x12F1D509: clang::StmtVisitorBase<std::add_pointer, clang::ASTNodeImporter, llvm::Expected<clang::Stmt*>>::Visit(clang::Stmt*) (StmtNodes.inc:591)
==31019== by 0x12EE4FDF: clang::ASTImporter::Import(clang::Stmt*) (ASTImporter.cpp:8484)
==31019== by 0x12F09498: llvm::Expected<clang::Stmt*> clang::ASTNodeImporter::import<clang::Stmt>(clang::Stmt*) (ASTImporter.cpp:164)
==31019== by 0x12F3A1F5: llvm::Error clang::ASTNodeImporter::ImportArrayChecked<clang::Stmt**, clang::Stmt**>(clang::Stmt**, clang::Stmt**, clang::Stmt**) (ASTImporter.cpp:653)
==31019== by 0x12F13152: llvm::Error clang::ASTNodeImporter::ImportContainerChecked<llvm::iterator_range<clang::Stmt**>, llvm::SmallVector<clang::Stmt*, 8u> >(llvm::iterator_range<clang::Stmt**> const&, llvm::SmallVector<clang::Stmt*, 8u>&) (ASTImporter.cpp:669)
==31019== by 0x12ED099F: clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitCompoundStmt(clang::CompoundStmt*) (ASTImporter.cpp:6077)
==31019== by 0x12F1CC2D: clang::StmtVisitorBase<std::add_pointer, clang::ASTNodeImporter, llvm::Expected<clang::Stmt*>>::Visit(clang::Stmt*) (StmtNodes.inc:73)
==31019== by 0x12EE4FDF: clang::ASTImporter::Import(clang::Stmt*) (ASTImporter.cpp:8484)
==31019== by 0x12F09498: llvm::Expected<clang::Stmt*> clang::ASTNodeImporter::import<clang::Stmt>(clang::Stmt*) (ASTImporter.cpp:164)
==31019== by 0x12F13275: clang::Stmt* clang::ASTNodeImporter::importChecked<clang::Stmt*>(llvm::Error&, clang::Stmt* const&) (ASTImporter.cpp:197)
==31019== by 0x12ED0CE6: clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitCaseStmt(clang::CaseStmt*) (ASTImporter.cpp:6098)
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97849
Removes the obsolete ad-hoc macro expansions during bugreport constructions.
It will skip the macro expansion if the expansion happened in an imported TU.
Also removes the expected plist file, while expanding matching context for
the tests.
Adds a previously crashing `plist-macros-with-expansion.c` testfile.
Temporarily marks `plist-macros-with-expansion-ctu.c ` to `XFAIL`.
Reviewed By: xazax.hun, Szelethus
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93224
Add the BufferSize argument constraint to fread and fwrite. This change
itself makes it possible to discover a security critical case, described
in SEI-CERT ARR38-C.
We also add the not-null constraint on the 3rd arguments.
In this patch, I also remove those lambdas that don't take any
parameters (Fwrite, Fread, Getc), thus making the code better
structured.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87081
In short, macro expansions handled the case where a variadic parameter mapped to
multiple arguments, but not the other way around. An internal ticket was
submitted that demonstrated that we fail an assertion. Macro expansion so far
worked by lexing the source code token-by-token and using the Preprocessor to
turn these tokens into identifiers or just get their proper spelling, but what
this counter intuitively doesn't do, is actually expand these macros, so we have
to do the heavy lifting -- in this case, figure out what __VA_ARGS__ expands
into. Since this case can only occur in a nested macro, the information we
gathered from the containing macro does contain this information. If a parameter
resolves to __VA_ARGS__, we need to temporarily stop getting our tokens from the
lexer, and get the tokens from what __VA_ARGS__ maps to.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86135
llvm::isa<>() and llvm::isa_and_not_null<>() template functions recently became
variadic. Unfortunately this causes crashes in case of isa_and_not_null<>()
and incorrect behavior in isa<>(). This patch fixes this issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85728
We found a case where Typedef Name Declarations were not being added
correctly when importing builtin types. This exposed the need for a
TypedefNameDecl visitor so these types can be added by RecordDecl and
fields.
This code is covered by the ASTImporterTest cases that use the implicit
struct __NSConstantString_tag definitions.
Thanks to @martong for the debugging assist!
Depends on D83970.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83992
Summary:
Random access iterators must handle operator+, where the iterator is on the
RHS. The system header simulator library is extended with these operators.
Reviewers: Szelethus
Subscribers: whisperity, xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, Charusso, steakhal, martong, ASDenysPetrov, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83226
Similarly to other patches of mine, I'm trying to uniformize the checker
interface so that dependency checkers don't emit diagnostics. The checker that
made me most anxious so far was definitely RetainCount, because it is definitely
impacted by backward compatibility concerns, and implements a checker hierarchy
that is a lot different to other examples of similar size. Also, I don't have
authority, nor expertise regarding ObjC related code, so I welcome any
objection/discussion!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78099
Summary:
Add an option to enable on-demand parsing of needed ASTs during CTU analysis.
Two options are introduced. CTUOnDemandParsing enables the feature, and
CTUOnDemandParsingDatabase specifies the path to a compilation database, which
has all the necessary information to generate the ASTs.
Reviewers: martong, balazske, Szelethus, xazax.hun
Subscribers: ormris, mgorny, whisperity, xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, rnkovacs, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, Charusso, steakhal, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75665
Exactly what it says on the tin! The included testfile demonstrates why this is
important -- for C++ dynamic memory operators, we don't always recognize custom,
or even standard-specified new/delete operators as CXXAllocatorCall or
CXXDeallocatorCall.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77391
Whenever the analyzer budget runs out just at the point where
`std::advance()`, `std::prev()` or `std::next()` is invoked the function
are not inlined. This results in strange behavior such as
`std::prev(v.end())` equals `v.end()`. To prevent this model these
functions if they were not inlined. It may also happend that although
`std::advance()` is inlined but a function it calls inside (e.g.
`__advance()` in some implementations) is not. This case is also handled
in this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76361
In the path-sensitive vfork() checker that keeps a list of operations
allowed after a successful vfork(), unforget to include execve() in the list.
Patch by Jan Včelák!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73629
STL Algorithms are usually implemented in a tricky for performance
reasons which is too complicated for the analyzer. Furthermore inlining
them is costly. Instead of inlining we should model their behavior
according to the specifications.
This patch is the first step towards STL Algorithm modeling. It models
all the `find()`-like functions in a simple way: the result is either
found or not. In the future it can be extended to only return success if
container modeling is also extended in a way the it keeps track of
trivial insertions and deletions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70818
MallocChecker warns when memory is passed into -[NSData initWithBytesNoCopy]
but isn't allocated by malloc(), because it will be deallocated by free().
However, initWithBytesNoCopy has an overload that takes an arbitrary block
for deallocating the object. If such overload is used, it is no longer
necessary to make sure that the memory is allocated by malloc().
This patch introduces the namespaces for the configured functions and
also enables the use of the member functions.
I added an optional Scope field for every configured function. Functions
without Scope match for every function regardless of the namespace.
Functions with Scope will match if the full name of the function starts
with the Scope.
Multiple functions can exist with the same name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70878
This patch is the last of the series of patches which allow the user to
annotate their functions with taint propagation rules.
I implemented the use of the configured filtering functions. These
functions can remove taintedness from the symbols which are passed at
the specified arguments to the filters.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59516
Fix a canonicalization problem for the newly added property accessor stubs that
was causing a wrong decl to be used for 'self' in the accessor's body farm.
Fix a crash when constructing a body farm for accessors of a property
that is declared and @synthesize'd in different (but related) interfaces.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70158
The recently committed debug.IteratorDebugging checker enables
standalone white-box testing of the modelling of containers and
iterators. For the three checkers based on iterator modelling only
simple tests are needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70123
This patch is motivated by (and factored out from)
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66121 which is a debug info bugfix. Starting
with DWARF 5 all Objective-C methods are nested inside their
containing type, and that patch implements this for synthesized
Objective-C properties.
1. SemaObjCProperty populates a list of synthesized accessors that may
need to inserted into an ObjCImplDecl.
2. SemaDeclObjC::ActOnEnd inserts forward-declarations for all
accessors for which no override was provided into their
ObjCImplDecl. This patch does *not* synthesize AST function
*bodies*. Moving that code from the static analyzer into Sema may
be a good idea though.
3. Places that expect all methods to have bodies have been updated.
I did not update the static analyzer's inliner for synthesized
properties to point back to the property declaration (see
test/Analysis/Inputs/expected-plists/nullability-notes.m.plist), which
I believed to be more bug than a feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68108
rdar://problem/53782400
There are some functions which can't be given a null pointer as parameter either
because it has a nonnull attribute or it is declared to have undefined behavior
(e.g. strcmp()). Sometimes it is hard to determine from the checker message
which parameter is null at the invocation, so now this information is included
in the message.
This commit fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39358
Reviewed By: NoQ, Szelethus, whisperity
Patch by Tibor Brunner!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66333
llvm-svn: 370798
Deep Majumder