After taking C++98 implicit moves out in D104500,
we put it back in, but now in a new form which preserves
compatibility with pure C++98 programs, while at the same time
giving almost all the goodies from P1825.
* We use the exact same rules as C++20 with regards to which
id-expressions are move eligible. The previous
incarnation would only benefit from the proper subset which is
copy ellidable. This means we can implicit move, in addition:
* Parameters.
* RValue references.
* Exception variables.
* Variables with higher-than-natural required alignment.
* Objects with different type from the function return type.
* We preserve the two-overload resolution, with one small tweak to the
first one: If we either pick a (possibly converting) constructor which
does not take an rvalue reference, or a user conversion operator which
is not ref-qualified, we abort into the second overload resolution.
This gives C++98 almost all the implicit move patterns which we had created test
cases for, while at the same time preserving the meaning of these
three patterns, which are found in pure C++98 programs:
* Classes with both const and non-const copy constructors, but no move
constructors, continue to have their non-const copy constructor
selected.
* We continue to reject as ambiguous the following pattern:
```
struct A { A(B &); };
struct B { operator A(); };
A foo(B x) { return x; }
```
* We continue to pick the copy constructor in the following pattern:
```
class AutoPtrRef { };
struct AutoPtr {
AutoPtr(AutoPtr &);
AutoPtr();
AutoPtr(AutoPtrRef);
operator AutoPtrRef();
};
AutoPtr test_auto_ptr() {
AutoPtr p;
return p;
}
```
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105756
Named return of a variable with aligned attribute would
trip an assert in case alignment was dependent.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105380
This extends the effects of [[ http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p1825r0.html | P1825 ]] to all C++ standards from C++11 up to C++20.
According to Motion 23 from Cologne 2019, P1825R0 was accepted as a Defect Report, so we retroactively apply this all the way back to C++11.
Note that we also remove implicit moves from C++98 as an extension
altogether, since the expanded first overload resolution from P1825
can cause some meaning changes in C++98.
For example it can change which copy constructor is picked when both const
and non-const ones are available.
This also rips out warn_return_std_move since there are no cases where it would be worthwhile to suggest it.
This also fixes a bug with bailing into the second overload resolution
when encountering a non-rvref qualified conversion operator.
This was unnoticed until now, so two new test cases cover these.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104500
Word on the grapevine was that the committee had some discussion that
ended with unanimous agreement on eliminating relational function pointer comparisons.
We wanted to be bold and just ban all of them cold turkey.
But then we chickened out at the last second and are going for
eliminating just the spaceship overload candidate instead, for now.
See D104680 for reference.
This should be fine and "safe", because the only possible semantic change this
would cause is that overload resolution could possibly be ambiguous if
there was another viable candidate equally as good.
But to save face a little we are going to:
* Issue an "error" for three-way comparisons on function pointers.
But all this is doing really is changing one vague error message,
from an "invalid operands to binary expression" into an
"ordered comparison of function pointers", which sounds more like we mean business.
* Otherwise "warn" that comparing function pointers like that is totally
not cool (unless we are told to keep quiet about this).
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104892
This implements a more comprehensive fix than was done at D95409.
Instead of excluding just function pointer subobjects, we also
exclude any user-defined function pointer conversion operators.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103855
Fixes PR50591.
When analyzing classes with members which have user-defined conversion
operators to builtin types, the defaulted comparison analyzer was
picking the member type instead of the type for the builtin operator
which was selected as the best match.
This could either result in wrong comparison category being selected,
or a crash when runtime checks are enabled.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103760
This change caused build errors related to move-only __block variables,
see discussion on https://reviews.llvm.org/D99696
> This expands NRVO propagation for more cases:
>
> Parse analysis improvement:
> * Lambdas and Blocks with dependent return type can have their variables
> marked as NRVO Candidates.
>
> Variable instantiation improvements:
> * Fixes crash when instantiating NRVO variables in Blocks.
> * Functions, Lambdas, and Blocks which have auto return type have their
> variables' NRVO status propagated. For Blocks with non-auto return type,
> as a limitation, this propagation does not consider the actual return
> type.
>
> This also implements exclusion of VarDecls which are references to
> dependent types.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
>
> Reviewed By: Quuxplusone
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99696
This also reverts the follow-on change which was hard to tease apart
form the one above:
> "[clang] Implement P2266 Simpler implicit move"
>
> This Implements [[http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2266r1.html|P2266 Simpler implicit move]].
>
> Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
>
> Reviewed By: Quuxplusone
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99005
This reverts commits 1e50c3d785 and
bf20631782.
This reworks a small set of tests, as preparatory work for implementing
P2266.
* Run for more standard versions, including c++2b.
* Normalize file names and run commands.
* Adds some extra tests.
New Coroutine tests taken from Aaron Puchert's D68845.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99225
Review D88220 turns out to have some pretty severe bugs, but I *think*
this patch fixes them.
Paper P1825 is supposed to enable implicit move from "non-volatile objects
and rvalue references to non-volatile object types." Instead, what was committed
seems to have enabled implicit move from "non-volatile things of all kinds,
except that if they're rvalue references then they must also refer to non-volatile
things." In other words, D88220 accidentally enabled implicit move from
lvalue object references (super yikes!) and also from non-object references
(such as references to functions).
These two cases are now fixed and regression-tested.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98971
This patch just makes the error message clearer by reinforcing the cause
was a lack of viable **three-way** comparison function for the
**complete object**.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97990
See bug #48856
Definitions of classes with member function pointers and default
spaceship operator were getting accepted with no diagnostic on
release build, and triggering assert on builds with runtime checks
enabled. Diagnostics were only produced when actually comparing
instances of such classes.
This patch makes it so Spaceship and Less operators are not considered
as builtin operator candidates for function pointers, producing
equivalent diagnostics for the cases where pointers to member function
and pointers to data members are used instead.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95409
Implement all of P1825R0:
- implicitly movable entity can be an rvalue reference to non-volatile
automatic object.
- operand of throw-expression can be a function or catch-clause parameter
(support for function parameter has already been implemented).
- in the first overload resolution, the selected function no need to be
a constructor.
- in the first overload resolution, the first parameter of the selected
function no need to be an rvalue reference to the object's type.
This patch also removes the diagnostic `-Wreturn-std-move-in-c++11`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88220
In implicitly movable test, a two-stage overload resolution is performed.
If the first overload resolution selects a deleted function, Clang directly
performs the second overload resolution, without checking whether the
deleted function matches the additional criteria.
This patch fixes the above problem.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92936
In implicitly movable test, a two-stage overload resolution is performed.
If the first overload resolution selects a deleted function, Clang directly
performs the second overload resolution, without checking whether the
deleted function matches the additional criteria.
This patch fixes the above problem.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92936
In C++11 standard, to become implicitly movable, the expression in return
statement should be a non-volatile automatic object. CWG1579 changed the rule
to require that the expression only needs to be an automatic object. C++14
standard and C++17 standard kept this rule unchanged. C++20 standard changed
the rule back to require the expression be a non-volatile automatic object.
This should be a typo in standards, and VD should be non-volatile.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88295
The current C++ grammar allows an anonymous bit-field with an attribute,
but this is ambiguous (the attribute in that case could appertain to the
type instead of the bit-field). The current thinking in the Core Working
Group is that it's better to disallow attributes in that position at the
grammar level so that the ambiguity resolves in favor of applying to the
type.
During discussions about the behavior of the attribute, the Core Working
Group also felt it was better to disallow anonymous bit-fields from
specifying a default member initializer.
This implements both sets of related grammar changes.
Also add extension warnings for the cases that are disallowed by the
current rules for destructor name lookup, refactor and simplify the
lookup code, and improve the diagnostic quality when lookup fails.
The special case we previously supported for converting
p->N::S<int>::~S() from naming a class template into naming a
specialization thereof is subsumed by a more general rule here (which is
also consistent with Clang's historical behavior and that of other
compilers): if we can't find a suitable S in N, also look in N::S<int>.
The extension warnings are off by default, except for a warning when
lookup for p->N::S::~T() looks for T in scope instead of in N (or N::S).
That seems sufficiently heinous to warn on by default, especially since
we can't support it for a dependent nested-name-specifier.
Summary:
Due to a recent (but retroactive) C++ rule change, only sufficiently
C-compatible classes are permitted to be given a typedef name for
linkage purposes. Add an enabled-by-default warning for these cases, and
rephrase our existing error for the case where we encounter the typedef
name for linkage after we've already computed and used a wrong linkage
in terms of the new rule.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74103
types are needed to compute the return type of a defaulted operator<=>.
This raises the question of what to do if return type deduction fails.
The standard doesn't say, and implementations vary, so for now reject
that case eagerly to keep our options open.
when building a defaulted comparison.
As a convenient way of asking whether `x @ y` is valid and building it,
we previouly always performed overload resolution and built an
overloaded expression, which would both end up picking a builtin
operator candidate when given a non-overloadable type. But that's not
quite right, because it can result in our finding a user-declared
operator overload, which we should never do when applying operators
non-overloadable types.
Handle this more correctly: skip overload resolution when building
`x @ y` if the operands are not overloadable. But still perform overload
resolution (considering only builtin candidates) when checking validity,
as we don't have any other good way to ask whether a binary operator
expression would be valid.
Now with concepts support merged and mostly complete, we do not need -fconcepts-ts
(which was also misleading as we were not implementing the TS) and can enable
concepts features under C++2a. A warning will be generated if users still attempt
to use -fconcepts-ts.
This requires us to essentially fully form the body of the defaulted
comparison, but from an unevaluated context. Naively this would require
generating the function definition twice; instead, we ensure that the
function body is implicitly defined before performing the check, and
walk the actual body where possible.
function.
We need to perform unqualified lookups from the context of a defaulted
comparison, but not until we implicitly define the function, at which
point we can't do those lookups any more. So perform the lookup from the
end of the class containing the =default declaration and store the
lookup results on the defaulted function until we synthesize the body.
Array members are not yet handled. In addition, defaulted comparisons
can't yet find comparison operators by unqualified lookup (only by
member lookup and ADL). These issues will be fixed in follow-on changes.
template specialization if there is no matching non-template function.
This exposed a couple of related bugs:
- we would sometimes substitute into a friend template instead of a
suitable non-friend declaration; this would now crash because we'd
decide the specialization of the friend is a redeclaration of itself
- ADL failed to properly handle the case where an invisible local
extern declaration redeclares an invisible friend
Both are fixed herein: in particular, we now never make invisible
friends or local extern declarations visible to name lookup unless
they are the only declaration of the entity. (We already mostly did
this for local extern declarations.)
llvm-svn: 350505
Diagnose the name of the class being shadowed by using declarations, and
improve the diagnostics for the case where the name of the class is
shadowed by a non-static data member in a class with constructors. In
the latter case, we now always give the "member with the same name as
its class" diagnostic regardless of the relative order of the member and
the constructor, rather than giving an inscrutible diagnostic if the
constructor appears second.
llvm-svn: 335182
Prior to this patch clang would not error here:
template <class T> struct B;
template <class T> struct A {
void foo();
void foo2();
void test1() {
B<T>::foo(); // OK, foo is declared in A<int> - matches type of 'this'.
B<T>::foo2(); // This should be an error!
// foo2 is found in B<int>, 'base unrelated' to 'this'.
}
};
template <class T> struct B : A<T> {
using A<T>::foo2;
};
llvm-svn: 311851
Matheus Izvekov