As Richard Smith pointed out in the review of D90123, both the C and C++
standard call it lvalue and rvalue, so let's stick to the same spelling
in Clang.
When an overloaded member function has a ref-qualifier, like:
class X {
void f() &&;
void f(int) &;
};
we would print strange notes when the ref-qualifier doesn't fit the value
category:
X x;
x.f();
X().f(0);
would both print a note "no known conversion from 'X' to 'X' for object
argument" on their relevant overload instead of pointing out the
mismatch in value category.
At first I thought the solution is easy: just use the FailureKind member
of the BadConversionSequence struct. But it turns out that we weren't
properly setting this for function arguments. So I went through
TryReferenceInit to make sure we're doing that right, and found a number
of notes in the existing tests that improved as well.
Fixes PR47791.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90123
Fixes <rdar://problem/15584219> and <rdar://problem/12241361>.
This change looks large, but all it does is reuse and consolidate
the delayed diagnostic logic for deprecation warnings with unavailability
warnings. By doing so, it showed various inconsistencies between the
diagnostics, which were close, but not consistent. It also revealed
some missing "note:"'s in the deprecated diagnostics that were showing
up in the unavailable diagnostics, etc.
This change also changes the wording of the core deprecation diagnostics.
Instead of saying "function has been explicitly marked deprecated"
we now saw "'X' has been been explicitly marked deprecated". It
turns out providing a bit more context is useful, and often we
got the actual term wrong or it was not very precise
(e.g., "function" instead of "destructor"). By just saying the name
of the thing that is deprecated/deleted/unavailable we define
this issue away. This diagnostic can likely be further wordsmithed
to be shorter.
llvm-svn: 197627
when returning an NRVO candidate expression. For example, this
properly picks the move constructor when dealing with code such as
MoveOnlyType f() { MoveOnlyType mot; return mot; }
The previously-XFAIL'd rvalue-references test case now works, and has
been moved into the appropriate paragraph-specific test case.
llvm-svn: 123992
Aaron Puchert