Instead of just mutex members we also consider mutex globals.
Unsurprisingly they are always in scope. Now the paper [1] says that
> The scope of a class member is assumed to be its enclosing class,
> while the scope of a global variable is the translation unit in
> which it is defined.
But I don't think we should limit this to TUs where a definition is
available - a declaration is enough to acquire the mutex, and if a mutex
is really limited in scope to a translation unit, it should probably be
only declared there.
The previous attempt in 9dcc82f34e was causing false positives because
I wrongly assumed that LiteralPtrs were always globals, which they are
not. This should be fixed now.
[1] https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en/us/pubs/archive/42958.pdf
Fixes PR46354.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84604
Instead of just mutex members we also consider mutex globals.
Unsurprisingly they are always in scope. Now the paper [1] says that
> The scope of a class member is assumed to be its enclosing class,
> while the scope of a global variable is the translation unit in
> which it is defined.
But I don't think we should limit this to TUs where a definition is
available - a declaration is enough to acquire the mutex, and if a mutex
is really limited in scope to a translation unit, it should probably be
only declared there.
[1] https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en/us/pubs/archive/42958.pdf
Fixes PR46354.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84604
Other warning messages for negative capabilities also mention their
kind, and the double space was ugly.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84603
Summary:
We run the tests for -Wthread-safety-{negative,verbose} with the new
attributes as well as the old ones. Also put the macros in a header so
that we don't have to copy them all around.
The warn-thread-safety-parsing.cpp test checks for warnings depending on
the actual attribute name, so it can't undergo the same treatment.
Together with D49275 this should fix PR33754.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, grooverdan
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52141
llvm-svn: 342418
Construction of LocalInstantiationScope automatically updates the current scope
inside Sema. However, when cloning a scope, the current scope does not change.
Change the cloning function to preserve the current scope.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8407
BUG: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22931
llvm-svn: 232675
-Wthread-safety umbrella flag, pending updates to documentation. The flag
works, but is likely to be confusing to existing users of -Wthread-safety.
llvm-svn: 215679
Aaron Puchert