The semantic analysis of index-names of FORALL statements looks up symbols with
the same name as the index-name. This is needed to exclude symbols that are
not objects. But if the symbol found is host-, use-, or construct-associated
with another entity, the check fails.
I fixed this by getting the root symbol of the symbol found and doing the check
on the root symbol. This required creating a non-const version of
"GetAssociationRoot()".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92970
This patch plugs many holes in static initializer semantics, improves error
messages for default initial values and other component properties in
parameterized derived type instantiations, and cleans up several small
issues noticed during development. We now do proper scalar expansion,
folding, and type, rank, and shape conformance checking for component
default initializers in derived types and PDT instantiations.
The initial values of named constants are now guaranteed to have been folded
when installed in the symbol table, and are no longer folded or
scalar-expanded at each use in expression folding. Semantics documentation
was extended with information about the various kinds of initializations
in Fortran and when each of them are processed in the compiler.
Some necessary concomitant changes have bulked this patch out a bit:
* contextual messages attachments, which are now produced for parameterized
derived type instantiations so that the user can figure out which
instance caused a problem with a component, have been added as part
of ContextualMessages, and their implementation was debugged
* several APIs in evaluate::characteristics was changed so that a FoldingContext
is passed as an argument rather than just its intrinsic procedure table;
this affected client call sites in many files
* new tools in Evaluate/check-expression.cpp to determine when an Expr
actually is a single constant value and to validate a non-pointer
variable initializer or object component default value
* shape conformance checking has additional arguments that control
whether scalar expansion is allowed
* several now-unused functions and data members noticed and removed
* several crashes and bogus errors exposed by testing this new code
were fixed
* a -fdebug-stack-trace option to enable LLVM's stack tracing on
a crash, which might be useful in the future
TL;DR: Initialization processing does more and takes place at the right
times for all of the various kinds of things that can be initialized.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92783
We were keeping the state of parsed equivalence sets in the class
DeclarationVisitor. A problem happened when analyzing the the specification
part of a declaration that contained an EQUIVALENCE statement followed by an
interface block. The same DeclarationVisitor object that was created for the
outer declaration was being used to analyze the specification part
of a procedure body in the interface block. When analyzing the specification
part of the procedure in the interface block, the names in the outer
declaration's EQUIVALENCE statement were erroneously compared with the names in
the arguments of the interface procedure. This resulted in a bogus error
message.
I fixed this by not checking equivalence sets when we're in an interface
block. I also added a test that will produce an error message without
this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92501
When the same generic name is use-associated from two modules, the
generics are merged into a single one in the current scope. This change
fixes some bugs in that process.
When a generic is merged, it can have two specific procedures with the
same name as the generic (c.f. module m7c in modfile07.f90). We were
disallowing that by checking for duplicate names in the generic rather
than duplicate symbols. Changing `namesSeen` to `symbolsSeen` in
`ResolveSpecificsInGeneric` fixes that.
We weren't including each USE of those generics in the .mod file so in
some cases they were incorrect. Extend GenericDetails to specify all
use-associated symbols that are merged into the generic. This is used to
write out .mod files correctly.
The distinguishability check for specific procedures of a generic
sometimes have to refer to procedures from a use-associated generic in
error messages. In that case we don't have the source location of the
procedure so adapt the message to say where is was use-associated from.
This requires passing the scope through the checks to make that
determination.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92492
`GetTopLevelUnitContaining` returns the Scope nested in the global scope
that contains the given Scope or Symbol.
Use "Get" rather than "Find" in the name because "Find" implies it might
not be found, which can't happen. Following that logic, rename
`FindProgramUnitContaining` to `GetProgramUnitContaining` and have it
also return a reference rather that a pointer.
Note that the use of "ProgramUnit" is slightly confusing. In the Fortran
standard, "program-unit" refers to what is called a "TopLevelUnit" here.
What we are calling a "ProgramUnit" (here and in `ProgramTree`) includes
internal subprograms while "TopLevelUnit" does not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92491
Add the semantic checks for the OpenMP 4.5 - 2.15.3.3 Private clause.
1. Pointers with the INTENT(IN) attribute may not appear in a private clause.
2. Variables that appear in namelist statements may not appear in a private clause.
A flag 'InNamelist' is added to the Symbol::Flag to identify the symbols
in Namelist statemnts.
Test cases : omp-private01.f90, omp-private02.f90
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90210
Fortran defines "null-init" null pointer initializers as
being function references, syntactically, that have to resolve
to calls to the intrinsic function NULL() with no actual
arguments.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91657
According to section 19.4, paragraph 5, the scope of an ac-implied-do variable
is the enclosing ac-implied-do. But we were not creating new scopes upon
entry to an ac-implied-do. This was causing error messages to be erroneously
emitted.
I fixed, the code, added a test to array-constr-values.f90, added the test
folding15.f90 and corrected the test symbol05.f90.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91560
Implicitly typed references to external functions are applying
the IMPLICIT typing rules of the global scope in which their
symbols were created, not the IMPLICIT typing rules in force in
the scope from which they were referenced.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91214
Subclause 10.1.12 in F'2018 prohibits forward references from
a specification expression to an object declared later in the
same specification part. Catch this error better and emit
specific error messages about the violation.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90492
2 Bug fixes:
- Do not resolve procedure as intrinsic if they appeared in an
EXTERNAL attribute statement (one path was not considering this flag)
- Emit an error if a procedure resolved to be an intrinsic function
(resp. subroutine) is used as a subroutine (resp. function).
Lowering was attempted while the evaluate::Expression for the
call was missing without any errors.
1 behavior change:
- Do not implicitly resolve subroutines (resp. functions) as intrinsics
because their name is the name of an intrinsic function (resp.
subroutine). Add justification in documentation.
Reviewed By: klausler, tskeith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90049
When processing declarations in resolve-names.cpp, we were returning a
symbol that had SubprogramName details to PushSubprogramScope(), which
expects a symbol with Subprogram details.
I adjusted the code and added a test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89829
Represent FINAL subroutines in the symbol table entries of
derived types. Enforce constraints. Update tests that have
inadvertent violations or modified messages. Added a test.
The specific procedure distinguishability checking code for generics
was used to enforce distinguishability of FINAL procedures.
(Also cleaned up some confusion and redundancy noticed in the
type compatibility infrastructure while digging into that area.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88613
Change how generic operators and assignments are checked for
distinguishable procedures. Because of how they are invoked, available
type-bound generics and normal generics all have to be considered
together. This is different from how generic names are checked.
Move common part of checking into DistinguishabilityHelper so that it
can be used in both cases after the appropriate procedures have been
added.
Cache result of Procedure::Characterize(Symbol) in a map in
CheckHelper so that we don't have to worry about passing the
characterized Procedures around or the cost of recomputing them.
Add MakeOpName() to construct names for defined operators and assignment
for using in error messages. This eliminates the need for different
messages in those cases.
When the procedures for a defined operator or assignment are undistinguishable,
include the type name in the error message, otherwise it may be ambiguous.
Add missing check that procedures for defined operators are functions
and that their dummy arguments are INTENT(IN) or VALUE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87341
When an error is associated with a symbol, it was marked with a flag
from Symbol::Flag. The problem with that is that you need a mutable
symbol to do that. Instead, store the set of error symbols in the
SemanticsContext. This allows for some const_casts to be eliminated.
Also, improve the internal error that occurs if SetError is called
but no fatal error has been reported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86740
Accept and represent "global" compiler directives that appear
before and between program units in a source file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86555
A specification expression can reference an implicitly declared variable
in the host procedure. Because we have to process specification parts
before execution parts, this may be the first time we encounter the
variable. We were assuming the variable was implicitly declared in the
scope where it was encountered, leading to an error because local
variables may not be referenced in specification expressions.
The fix is to tentatively create the implicit variable in the host
procedure because that is the only way the specification expression can
be valid. We mark it with the flag `ImplicitOrError` to indicate that
either it must be implicitly defined in the host (by being mentioned in
the execution part) or else its use turned out to be an error.
We need to apply the implicit type rules of the host, which requires
some changes to implicit typing.
Variables in common blocks are allowed to appear in specification expressions
(because they are not locals) but the common block definition may not appear
until after their use. To handle this we create common block symbols and object
entities for each common block object during the `PreSpecificationConstruct`
pass. This allows us to remove the corresponding code in the main visitor and
`commonBlockInfo_.curr`. The change in order of processing causes some
different error messages to be emitted.
Some cleanup is included with this change:
- In `ExpressionAnalyzer`, if an unresolved name is encountered but
no error has been reported, emit an internal error.
- Change `ImplicitRulesVisitor` to hide the `ImplicitRules` object
that implements it. Change the interface to pass in names rather
than having to get the first character of the name.
- Change `DeclareObjectEntity` to have the `attrs` argument default
to an empty set; that is the typical case.
- In `Pre(parser::SpecificationPart)` use "structured bindings" to
give names to the pieces that make up a specification-part.
- Enhance `parser::Unwrap` to unwrap `Statement` and `UnlabeledStatement`
and make use of that in PreSpecificationConstruct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86322
When we report an error for a bad character kind, don't keep it in the
`DeclTypeSpec`. Otherwise there could be further problems. In this case,
`ComputeOffsets()` got an assertion error because we didn't recognize
`CHARACTER(*,8)` as needing a descriptor because of the bad kind.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86357
As with use-associated symbols, copy the attributes and flags from the
original symbol onto host-associated symbols when they are created.
This was showing up as an error on a deallocate of a host-associated
name. We reported an error because the symbol didn't have the POINTER
or ALLOCATABLE attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85763
If an unrestricted specific intrinsic function name is first encountered
as an actual argument, it should be interpreted as an object entity,
not a procedure entity.
Fix some tests that depended on the previous interpretation by adding
explicit INTRINSIC statements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85792
Allow compiler directives in the implicit-part and before USE statements
in the specification-part.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85693
Add `-fimplicit-none-type-always` to treat each specification-part
like it has `IMPLICIT NONE`. This is helpful for enforcing good Fortran
programming practices. We might consider something similar for
`IMPLICIT NONE(EXTERNAL)` as well.
Add `-fimplicit-none-type-never` to ignore occurrences of `IMPLICIT NONE`
and `IMPLICIT NONE(TYPE)`. This is to handle cases like the one below,
which violates the standard but it accepted by some compilers:
```
subroutine s(a, n)
implicit none
real :: a(n)
integer :: n
end
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85363
When declaring the same variable twice with an initialization, we were failing
an internal check. I fixed this by checking to see if the associated symbol
already had an error.
I added tests for pointer and non-pointer initialization of duplicate names.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84969
To make it easier for lowering to identify which symbols from the host
are captured by internal subprograms, create HostAssocDetails for them.
In particular, if a symbol is referenced and it is contained in a
subprogram or main program that is not the same as the containing
program unit of the reference, a HostAssocDetails symbol is created
in the current scope.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84889
When an instrinsic function is declared in a type declaration statement
we need to set the INTRINSIC attribute and (per 8.2(3)) ignore the
specified type.
To simplify the check, add IsIntrinsic utility to BaseVisitor.
Also, intrinsics and external procedures were getting assigned a size
and offset and they shouldn't be.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84702
Move `ResolveAccParts` and `ResolveOmpParts` from resolve-names.cpp to
resolve-directives.{h,cpp}. Move the implementation in the classes
`DirectiveAttributeVisitor`, `AccAttributeVisitor`, and
`OmpAttributeVisitor` to resolve-directives.cpp as well.
To allow this to happen, move `EvaluateIntExpr` and introduce
`EvaluateInt64` to resolve-names-utils.h. The latter is also useful
elsewhere in resolve-names.cpp for converting an Expr to std::int64_t.
The other problem was that `ResolveDesignator` was called from the code
that was moved. At the moment it doesn't seem to be doing anything so I
removed the calls (and no tests failed). If it proves to be needed, we
can either resolve those designators in resolve-names.cpp or pass the
`ResolveDesignator` function in to the code that needs to call it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84768
If a symbol (that is not a dummy argument) is implicitly declared inside
a statement function, don't create it in the statement function's scope.
Instead, treat statement functions like blocks when finding the inclusive
scope and create the symbol there.
Add a new flag, StmtFunction, to symbols that represent statement functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84588
The result of a statement function may require an implicit conversion
to match its result type. Add that to the expression that represents
the statement function body in SubprogramDetails.
Extract the analysis of that expression into a separate function.
Dump the statement function expression as part of the dump of
SubprogramDetails.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84452
When an intrinsic is referenced in a module scope, a symbol for it is
added. When that module is USEd, the intrinsic should not be included.
Otherwise we can get ambiguous reference errors with the same intrinsic
coming from two difference modules.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83905
A SAVE statement with no entity list applies the SAVE attribute only to
the entities that it is allowed on. We were applying it to automatic
data objects and reporting an error that they can't have SAVE.
The fix is to change `DeclarationVisitor::CheckSaveAttr` to check for
automatic objects. That controls both checking and setting the
attribute. This allows us to remove the check from `CheckSpecExpr`
(along with `symbolBeingChecked_`). Also, it was only called on constant
objects so the non-const overload can be eliminated.
The check in `CheckSpecExpr` is replaced by an explicit check for
automatic objects in modules. This caught an error in modfile03.f90 so
that part of the test was eliminated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83899
Summary:
A program may erroneously reference the same name as both a data object
and as a function. Some of these references were causing an internal
error in expression analysis.
It was already the case that a symbol referenced in a parse tree for a
call was changed from an `Entity` to a `ProcEntity`. I added code to
detect when a symbol was referenced in a parse tree as an array element
gets changed from an `Entity` to an `ObjectEntity`. Then, if an
`ObjectEntity` gets called as a function or a `ProcEntity` gets
referenced as a data object, errors get emitted.
This analysis was previously confined to the name resolution of the
specification part of a `ProgramTree`. I added a pass to the execution
part of a `ProgramTree` to catch names declared in blocks.
Reviewers: tskeith, klausler, DavidTruby
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #flang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82903
Summary:
This patch is removing the custom enumeration for OpenMP Directives and Clauses and replace them
with the newly tablegen generated one from llvm/Frontend. This is a first patch and some will follow to share the same
infrastructure where possible. The next patch should use the clauses allowance defined in the tablegen file.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, DavidTruby, sscalpone, kiranchandramohan, ichoyjx
Reviewed By: DavidTruby, ichoyjx
Subscribers: jholewinski, cfe-commits, dblaikie, MaskRay, ymandel, ichoyjx, mgorny, yaxunl, guansong, jfb, sstefan1, aaron.ballman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #flang, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82906
Summary:
This patch is removing the custom enumeration for OpenMP Directives and Clauses and replace them
with the newly tablegen generated one from llvm/Frontend. This is a first patch and some will follow to share the same
infrastructure where possible. The next patch should use the clauses allowance defined in the tablegen file.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, DavidTruby, sscalpone, kiranchandramohan, ichoyjx
Reviewed By: DavidTruby, ichoyjx
Subscribers: ichoyjx, mgorny, yaxunl, guansong, jfb, sstefan1, aaron.ballman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #flang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82906
Expression analysis was being invoked on the bodies of statement functions
as they were being encountered during name resolution. This led to failures
on some FCVS tests in cases where those expressions contained implicitly
typed objects. Defer the analysis of statemet function bodies to the end
of the specification part, at which time the symbols of the enclosing scope
will have been typed.
Reviewed By: tskeith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82796
Implement rest of DATA statement semantics and conversion of
DATA statement initializations into static initializers of
objects in their symbol table entries.
Reviewed By: tskeith, PeteSteinfeld
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82207
Rolls up small changes across the frontend to prepare for the large
forthcoming patch (part 4/4) that completes DATA statement processing
via conversion to initializers.
Reviewed By: PeteSteinfeld
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82137
When we encountered a type name in a derived type definition, we were
sometimes finding a component of that name rather than the type from
the enclosing scope. Fix this by introducing `NonDerivedTypeScope()` to
start the search in the right scope.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81493
Summary:
Some Symbol-related functions used in Evaluate were moved to
Evaluate/tools.h. This includes changing some member functions that were
replaced by non-member functions `IsDummy`, `GetUsedModule`, and
`CountLenParameters`.
Some member functions were made inline in `Scope`, `Symbol`,
`ArraySpec`, and `DeclTypeSpec`. The definitions were preceded by a
comment explaining why they are inline.
`IsConstantShape` was expanded inline in `IsDescriptor` because it isn't
used anywhere else
After this change, at least when compiling with clang on macos,
`libFortranEvaluate.a` has no undefined symbols that are satisfied by
`libFortranSemantics.a`.
Reviewers: klausler, PeteSteinfeld, sscalpone, jdoerfert, DavidTruby
Reviewed By: PeteSteinfeld
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #flang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80762
Summary:
We were not detecting declaring multiple interfaces to the same procedure.
Also, we were not handling the initialization of entitiies where the associated
Symbol had previously had errors.
I added the function `IsInterfaceSet()` to ProcEntityDetails to see if
the value of `interface_` had been previously set. I then checked this
function before calling set_interface() and emitted an error message if
the interface was already set.
Also, in situations where we were emitting error messages for symbols, I
set the Error flag on the Symbol. Then when performing initialization
on the Symbol, I first check to see if the Symbol had an error.
Reviewers: tskeith, klausler, DavidTruby
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80453
Summary:
Many of these were already implemented, and I just annotated the tests and/or
the code.
C752 was a simple check to verify that CONTIGUOUS components are arrays with
C754 proved to be virtually identical to C750 that I implemented previously.
This caused me to remove the distinction between specification expressions for
type parameters and bounds expressions that I'd previously created.
the POINTER attribute.
I also changed the error messages to specify that errors in specification
expressions could arise from either bad derived type components or type
parameters.
In cases where we detect a type param that was not declared, I created a symbol
marked as erroneous. That avoids subsequent semantic process for expressions
containing the symbol. This change caused me to adjust tests resolve33.f90 and
resolve34.f90. Also, I avoided putting out error messages for erroneous type
param symbols in `OkToAddComponent()` in resolve-names.cpp and in
`EvaluateParameters()`, type.cpp.
C756 checks that procedure components have the POINTER attribute.
Reviewers: tskeith, klausler, DavidTruby
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #flang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79798
Summary:
If the value in the collapse close is negative f18 abort without the correct error message. This PR change the size_t in name resolution to a int64_t and check appropriately for negative or zero before the privatization of induction variable.
The correct error is then catch by the OpenMP structure check.
This diff is migrated from the GitHub pull request https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/1098
Reviewers: ichoyjx, jdoerfert, sscalpone, DavidTruby
Reviewed By: ichoyjx, sscalpone, DavidTruby
Subscribers: sscalpone, klausler, yaxunl, guansong, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #flang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77821
Summary:
Initially on github I worked on semantic checks.Then I tried some compile-time
test of the rank value, they were failing as there were no symbols
generated for them inside SELECT RANK's scope.So I went further to
add new symbol in each scope, also added the respective 'rank: '
field for a symbol when we dump the symboltable. I added a field to
keep track of the rank in AssocEntityDetails class.This caused shape
analysis framework to become inconsistent. So shape analysis framework
was updated to handle this new representation.
* I added more tests for above changes.
* On phabricator I addressed some minor changes.
* Lastly I worked on review comments.
Reviewers: klausler,sscalpone,DavidTruby,kiranchandramohan,tskeith,anchu-rajendran,kiranktp
Reviewed By:klausler, DavidTruby, tskeith
Subscribers:#flang-commits, #llvm-commits
Tags: #flang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78623
Add a way to get mutable equivalence sets to Scope so that they can
have sizes and offsets assigned to them.
Change CommonBlockDetails to have mutable symbols so that they can have
sizes and offets assigned to them. This also allows the removal of some
`const_cast`s.
Add MutableSymbolRef and MutableSymbolVector as mutable analogs to
SymbolRef and SymbolVector. Replace uses of equivalent types with those
names.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79346
Summary:
Most of these checks were already implemented, and I just added references to
them to the code and tests. Also, much of this code was already
reviewed in the old flang/f18 GitHub repository, but I didn't get to
merge it before we switched repositories.
I implemented the check for C747 to not allow coarray components in derived
types that are of type C_PTR, C_FUNPTR, or type TEAM_TYPE.
I implemented the check for C748 that requires a data component whose type has
a coarray ultimate component to be a nonpointer, nonallocatable scalar and not
be a coarray.
I implemented the check for C750 that adds additional restrictions to the
bounds expressions of a derived type component that's an array.
These bounds expressions are sepcification expressions as defined in
10.1.11. There was already code in lib/Evaluate/check-expression.cpp to
check semantics for specification expressions, but it did not check for
the extra requirements of C750.
C750 prohibits specification functions, the intrinsic functions
ALLOCATED, ASSOCIATED, EXTENDS_TYPE_OF, PRESENT, and SAME_TYPE_AS. It
also requires every specification inquiry reference to be a constant
expression, and requires that the value of the bound not depend on the
value of a variable.
To implement these additional checks, I added code to the intrinsic proc
table to get the intrinsic class of a procedure. I also added an
enumeration to distinguish between specification expressions for
derived type component bounds versus for type parameters. I then
changed the code to pass an enumeration value to
"CheckSpecificationExpr()" to indicate that the expression was a bounds
expression and used this value to determine whether to emit an error
message when violations of C750 are found.
I changed the implementation of IsPureProcedure() to handle statement
functions and changed some references in the code that tested for the
PURE attribute to call IsPureProcedure().
I also fixed some unrelated tests that got new errors when I implemented these
new checks.
Reviewers: tskeith, DavidTruby, sscalpone
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #flang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79263
Summary:
This includes a refactor of the existing combined construct checks
that were present, as well as adding the remaining combined constructs
that had not been implemented yet.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: yaxunl, guansong, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77812
Summary:
Updates recent work on DATA statement semantic checking in
flang/lib/Semantics/check-data.{h,cpp} to use the compiler's
internal representation for typed expressions rather than working
on the raw parse tree. Saves the analyzed expressions for DATA
statement values as parse tree decorations because they'll soon be
needed in lowering. Corrects wording of some error messages.
Fixes a bug in constant expression checking: structure constructors
are not constant expressions if they set an allocatable component
to anything other than NULL.
Includes infrastructure changes to make this work, some renaming
to reflect the fact that the implied DO loop indices tracked by
expression analysis are not (just) from array constructors, remove
some dead code, and improve some comments.
Reviewers: tskeith, sscalpone, jdoerfert, DavidTruby, anchu-rajendran, schweitz
Reviewed By: tskeith, anchu-rajendran, schweitz
Subscribers: llvm-commits, flang-commits
Tags: #flang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78834
There is no printf formatting string for std::int64_t. Instead we have
to cast to std::intmax_t and use `%jd`. This change simplifies that by
automatically converting std::int64_t to std::intmax_t when formatting
messages.
Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@8a2343dfff
Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/1101
Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
In most cases, I just added the contraint names to the code and tests.
I implemented the following checks:
- C736 A child type with a coarray ultimate component must have a parent with
a coarray ultimate component.
- C737 A child type with and EVENT_TYPE or LOCK_TYPE component must have a
parent either which is EVENT_TYPE or LOCK_TYPE or a type with an EVENT_TYPE
or LOCK_TYPE component.
- C740 Sequence types must contain at least on component
- C740 Data components of sequence types must either be of an intrinsic type
or a sequenced derived type.
After implementing these checks, some tests had new errors unrelated to their
original purpose, so I fixed them.
Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@098f01bc47
Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/1097
The full list of constraints is C727, C728, C729, C730, C743, C755, C759, C778,
and C1543.
I added a function to tools.cpp to check to see if a symbol name is the name
of an intrinsic type.
The biggest change was to resolve-names.cpp to check to see if attributes were
either duplicated or in conflict with each other. I changed all locations
where attributes were set to check for duplicates or conflicts.
I also added tests for all checks and annotated the tests and code with the
numbers of the constraints being tested/checked.
Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3f30e8a61e
Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/1084
This patch replaces the occurrence of std::ostream by llvm::raw_ostream.
In LLVM Coding Standards[1] "All new code should use raw_ostream
instead of ostream".[1]
As a consequence, this patch also replaces the use of:
std::stringstream by llvm::raw_string_ostream or llvm::raw_ostream*
std::ofstream by llvm::raw_fd_ostream
std::endl by '\n' and flush()[2]
std::cout by llvm::outs() and
std::cerr by llvm::errs()
It also replaces std::strerro by llvm::sys::StrError** , but NOT in Fortran
runtime libraries
*std::stringstream were replaced by llvm::raw_ostream in all methods that
used std::stringstream as a parameter. Moreover, it removes the pointers to
these streams.
[1]https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html
[2]https://releases.llvm.org/2.5/docs/CodingStandards.html#ll_avoidendl
Signed-off-by: Caroline Concatto <caroline.concatto@arm.com>
Running clang-format-7
Signed-off-by: Caroline Concatto <caroline.concatto@arm.com>
Removing residue of ostream library
Signed-off-by: Caroline Concatto <caroline.concatto@arm.com>
Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@a3507d44b8
Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/1047
A separate-module-subprogram is declared as `module procedure ...`
and gets its characteristics from the declaration of that name as
a separate module procedure. When we encounter one, we need to create
symbols in the new subprogram scope for the dummy arguments and
function return (if any).
The failure to create these symbols led to the bug in issue flang-compiler/f18#1054:
when a dummy argument was referenced, the compiler interpreted it as
an implicit declaration because there was no symbol for the argument.
Fixesflang-compiler/f18#1054.
Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@4d3c4bac84
Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/1080
Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
When we encounter a ProcDecl and a symbol for it has already been
created, replace the CharBlock for the name with the one in the ProcDecl
as it is the "main" declaration of that name. This matches what is done
for an EntityDecl.
This moves the location of some error messages to a better source
location so update the affected tests.
Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@514c0f2c94
Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/1080
Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
When a misparsed FunctionReference was converted to a StructureConstructor,
the components accessed were not checked for accessibility.
The conversion happens in expression analysis so that where the accessibity
must be checked. So move `CheckAccessibleComponent` to `tools.h` so that it
can be shared by `resolve-names.cpp` and `expression.cpp`.
Add FindModuleContaining to help implement this and use it other places.
Check that an access-spec can only appear in a module.
Remove some unnecessary "semantics::" qualifiers.
Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@99ce156e49
Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/1046
I've updated the compiler and test source with references to the contraints at
the points where they were enforced and tested. Many of these were already
implemented and required no code change. A few constraint checks were both
implemented and tested, and I only added references to the constraint
numbers in the compiler source and tests. Here are the things I had to
implement:
Constraint C716 states that, in a REAL constant, if both a kind-param and an
exponent letter appear, the exponent letter must be 'E'.
Constraints C715 and C719 require that a KIND value be actually implemented.
Constraint C722 requires that functions that return assumed-length character
types are external.
Constraint C726 disallows assumed lenght charater types for dummy arguments and
return types.
Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@45998741e5
Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/1031
Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
In a data statement like `data x / a(1) /`, `a(1)` may be an array
element or a structure constructor. It is parsed as an array element
so if it turns out `a` is a derived type it must be rewritten as a
strucutre constructor.
Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@a2b2a330e7
Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/1024
Peter Steinfeld