It's possible to define a procedure whose interface depends on a procedure
which has an interface that depends on the original procedure. Such a circular
definition was causing the compiler to fall into an infinite loop when
resolving the name of the second procedure. It's also possible to create
circular dependency chains of more than two procedures.
I fixed this by adding the function HasCycle() to the class DeclarationVisitor
and calling it from DeclareProcEntity() to detect procedures with such
circularly defined interfaces. I marked the associated symbols of such
procedures by calling SetError() on them. When processing subsequent
procedures, I called HasError() before attempting to analyze their interfaces.
Unfortunately, this did not work.
With help from Tim, we determined that the SymbolSet used to track the
erroneous symbols was instantiated using a "<" operator which was defined using
the location of the name of the procedure. But the location of the procedure
name was being changed by a call to ReplaceName() between the times that the
calls to SetError() and HasError() were made. This caused HasError() to
incorrectly report that a symbol was not in the set of erroneous symbols.
I fixed this by changing SymbolSet to be an unordered set that uses the
contents of the name of the symbol as the basis for its hash function. This
works because the contents of the name of the symbol is preserved by
ReplaceName() even though its location changes.
I also fixed the error message used when reporting recursively defined dummy
procedure arguments.
I also added tests that will crash the compiler without this change.
Note that the "<" operator is used in other contexts, for example, in the map
of characterized procedures, maps of items in equivalence sets, maps of
structure constructor values, ... All of these situations happen after name
resolution has been completed and all calls to ReplaceName() have already
happened and thus are not subject to the problem I ran into when ReplaceName()
was called when processing procedure entities.
Note also that the implementation of the "<" operator uses the relative
location in the cooked character stream as the basis of its implementation.
This is potentially problematic when symbols from diffent compilation units
(for example symbols originating in .mod files) are put into the same map since
their names will appear in two different source streams which may not be
allocated in the same relative positions in memory. But I was unable to create
a test that caused a problem. Using a direct comparison of the content of the
name of the symbol in the "<" operator has problems. Symbols in enclosing or
parallel scopes can have the same name. Also using the location of the symbol
in the cooked character stream has the advantage that it preserves the the
order of the symbols in a structure constructor constant, which makes matching
the values with the symbols relatively easy.
This change supersedes D97201.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97749
Semantic checks for the following OpenMP 4.5 clauses.
1. 2.15.4.2 - Copyprivate clause
2. 2.15.3.4 - Firstprivate clause
3. 2.15.3.5 - Lastprivate clause
Add related test cases and resolve test cases marked as XFAIL.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91920
This reverts commit 07de0846a5.
The original patch has caused 6 out 8 of Flang's public buildbots to
fail. As I'm not sure what the fix should be, I'm reverting this for
now. Please see https://reviews.llvm.org/D97201 for more context and
discussion.
It's possible to define a procedure whose interface depends on a procedure
which has an interface that depends on the original procedure. Such a circular
definition was causing the compiler to fall into an infinite loop when
resolving the name of the second procedure. It's also possible to create
circular dependency chains of more than two procedures.
I fixed this by adding the function HasCycle() to the class DeclarationVisitor
and calling it from DeclareProcEntity() to detect procedures with such
circularly defined interfaces. I marked the associated symbols of such
procedures by calling SetError() on them. When processing subsequent
procedures, I called HasError() before attempting to analyze their interfaces.
Unfortunately, this did not work.
With help from Tim, we determined that the SymbolSet used to track the
erroneous symbols was instantiated using a "<" operator which was
defined using the name of the procedure. But the procedure name was
being changed by a call to ReplaceName() between the times that the
calls to SetError() and HasError() were made. This caused HasError() to
incorrectly report that a symbol was not in the set of erroneous
symbols. I fixed this by making SymbolSet be an ordered set, which does
not use the "<" operator.
I also added tests that will crash the compiler without this change.
And I fixed the formatting on an error message from a previous update.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97201
Most Fortran compilers accept the following benign extension,
and it appears in some applications:
SUBROUTINE FOO(A,N)
IMPLICIT NONE
REAL A(N) ! N is used before being typed
INTEGER N
END
Allow it in f18 only for default integer scalar dummy arguments.
Differential Revesion: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96982
Fortran 2018 explicitly permits an ignored type declaration
for the result of a generic intrinsic function. See the comment
added to Semantics/expression.cpp for an explanation of why this
is somewhat dangerous and worthy of a warning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96879
The intrinsic procedure table properly classify the various
intrinsics, but the PURE and ELEMENTAL attributes that these
classifications imply don't always make it to the utility
predicates that test symbols for them, leading to spurious
error messages in some contexts. So set those attribute flags
as appropriate in name resolution, using a new function to
isolate the tests.
An alternate solution, in which the predicates would query
the intrinsic procedure table for these attributes on demand,
was something I also tried, so that this information could
come directly from an authoritative source; but it would have
required references to the intrinsic table to be passed along
on too many seemingly unrelated APIs and ended up looking messy.
Several symbol table tests needed to have their expected outputs
augmented with the PURE and ELEMENTAL flags. Some bogus messages
that were flagged as such in test/Semantics/doconcurrent01.f90 were
removed, since they are now correctly not emitted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96878
Fix Flang build after addition of a new OpenMP clauses for a clang patch (D76342).
Flang is using TableGen to generation the declaration of clause checks and the new clause
was missing a definiton.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96808
Implementation of Do loop iteration variable check, Do while loop check, Do loop cycle restrictions.
Also to check whether the ordered clause is present on the loop construct if any ordered region ever
binds to a loop region arising from the loop construct.
Files:
check-omp-structure.h
check-omp-structure.cpp
resolve-directives.cpp
Testcases:
omp-do06-positivecases.f90
omp-do06.f90
omp-do08.f90
omp-do09.f90
omp-do10.f90
omp-do11.f90
omp-do12.f90
omp-do13.f90
omp-do14.f90
omp-do15.f90
omp-do16.f90
omp-do17.f90
Reviewed by: Kiran Chandramohan @kiranchandramohan , Valentin Clement @clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92732
Instead of using a message attachment with further details,
emit the details as part of a single message.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96465
When accessing a specific procedure of a USE-associated generic
interface, we need to allow for the case in which that specific
procedure has the same name as the generic when testing for
its availability in the current scope.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96467
Some state in name resolution is stored in the DeclarationVisitor
instance and processed at the end of the specification part.
This state needs to accommodate nested specification parts, namely
the ones that can be nested in a subroutine or function interface
body.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96466
Split up MeasureSizeInBytes() so that array element sizes can be
calculated accurately; use the new API in some places where
DynamicType::MeasureSizeInBytes() was being used but the new
API performs better due to TypeAndShape having precise CHARACTER
length information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95897
This patch is a follow up to D94821 to ensure the correct behavior of the
general directive structure checker.
This patch add the generation of the Enter function declaration for clauses in
the TableGen backend.
This helps to ensure each clauses declared in the TableGen file has at least
a basic check.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95108
Analyze the shape of the result of TRANSFER(ptr,array) correctly
when "ptr" is an array of deferred shape. Fixing this bug led to
some refactoring and concentration of common code in TypeAndShape
member functions with code in general shape and character length
analysis, and this led to some regression test failures that have
all been cleaned up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95744
Legacy Fortran implementations support an alternative form of the
PARAMETER statement; it differs syntactically from the standard's
PARAMETER statement by lacking parentheses, and semantically by
using the type and shape of the initialization expression to define
the attributes of the named constant. (GNU Fortran gets that part
wrong; Intel Fortran and nvfortran have full support.)
This patch disables the old style PARAMETER statement by default, as
it is syntactically ambiguous with conforming assignment statements;
adds a new "-falternative-parameter-statement" option to enable it;
and implements it correctly when enabled.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48774, in which a user
tripped over the syntactic ambiguity.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95697
* Remove an unimplemented and unused member function declaration
* Remove a misleading comment about an unrelated constraint number
* Fix a comment
* Add f18 crash message to "flang" driver script
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95180
Don't emit a bogus error message about a bad forward reference
when it's an IMPORT of a USE-associated symbol; don't ignore
intrinsic functions when USE-associating the contents of a
module when the intrinsic has been explicitly USE'd; allow
PUBLIC or PRIVATE accessibility attribute to be specified
for an enumerator before the declaration of the enumerator.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95175
It's possible to declare deferred shape array using the POINTER
statement, for example:
POINTER :: var(:)
When analyzing POINTER declarations, we were not capturing the array
specification information, if present. I fixed this by changing the
"Post" function for "parser::PointerDecl" to check to see if the
declaration contained a "DeferredShapeSpecList". In such cases, I
analyzed the shape and used to information to declare an "ObjectEntity"
that contains the shape information rather than an "UnknownEntity".
I also added a couple of small tests that fail to compile without these
changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95080
* IsArrayElement() needs another option to control whether it
should ignore trailing component references.
* Add IsObjectPointer().
* Add const Scope& variants of IsFunction() and IsProcedure().
* Make TypeAndShape::Characterize() work with procedure bindings.
* Handle CHARACTER length in MeasureSizeInBytes().
* Fine-tune FindExternallyVisibleObject()'s handling of dummy arguments
to conform with Fortran 2018: only INTENT(IN) and dummy pointers
in pure functions signify; update two tests accordingly.
Also: resolve some stylistic inconsistencies and add a missing
"const" in the expression traversal template framework.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95011
F18 Clause 19.4p9 says:
The associate names of an ASSOCIATE construct have the scope of the
block.
Clause 11.3.1p1 says the ASSOCIATE statement is not itself in the block:
R1102 associate-construct is: associate-stmt block end-associate-stmt
Associate statement associations are currently fully processed from left
to right, incorrectly interposing associating entities earlier in the
list on same-named entities in the host scope.
1 program p
2 logical :: a = .false.
3 real :: b = 9.73
4 associate (b => a, a => b)
5 print*, a, b
6 end associate
7 print*, a, b
8 end
Associating names 'a' and 'b' at line 4 in this code are now both
aliased to logical host entity 'a' at line 2. This happens because the
reference to 'b' in the second association incorrectly resolves 'b' to
the entity in line 4 (already associated to 'a' at line 2), rather than
the 'b' at line 3. With bridge code to process these associations,
f18 output is:
F F
F 9.73
It should be:
9.73 F
F 9.73
To fix this, names in right-hand side selector variables/expressions
must all be resolved before any left-hand side entities are resolved.
This is done by maintaining a stack of lists of associations, rather
than a stack of associations. Each ASSOCIATE statement's list of
assocations is then visited once for right-hand side processing, and
once for left-hand side processing.
Note that other construct associations do not have this problem.
SELECT RANK and SELECT TYPE each have a single assocation, not a list.
Constraint C1113 prohibits the right-hand side of a CHANGE TEAM
association from referencing any left-hand side entity.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95010
The utility routine WhyNotModifiable() needed to become more
aware of the use of pointers in data-refs; the targets of
pointer components are sometimes modifiable even when the
leftmost ("base") symbol of a data-ref is not.
Added a new unit test for WhyNotModifiable() that uses internal
READ statements (mostly), since I/O semantic checking uses
WhyNotModifiable() for all its definability checking.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94849
The TableGen emitter for directives has two slots for flangClass information and this was mainly
to be able to keep up with the legacy openmp parser at the time. Now that all clauses are encapsulated in
AccClause or OmpClause, these two strings are not necessary anymore and were the the source of couple
of problem while working with the generic structure checker for OpenMP.
This patch remove the flangClassValue string from DirectiveBase.td and use the string flangClass as the
placeholder for the encapsulated class.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94821
Add Semantic checks for OpenMP 4.5 - 2.7.4 Workshare Construct.
- The structured block in a workshare construct may consist of only
scalar or array assignments, forall or where statements,
forall, where, atomic, critical or parallel constructs.
- All array assignments, scalar assignments, and masked array
assignments must be intrinsic assignments.
- The construct must not contain any user defined function calls unless
the function is ELEMENTAL.
Test cases : omp-workshare03.f90, omp-workshare04.f90, omp-workshare05.f90
Resolve test cases (omp-workshare01.f90 and omp-workshare02.f90) marked as XFAIL
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93091
When a reference to a generic interface occurs in a specification
expression that must be emitted to a module file, we have a problem
when the generic resolves to a function whose name is inaccessible
due to being PRIVATE or due to a conflict with another use of the
same name in the scope. In these cases, construct a new name for
the specific procedure and emit a renaming USE to the module file.
Also, relax enforcement of PRIVATE when analyzing module files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94815
C843 states that "An entity with the INTENT attribute shall be a dummy
data object or a dummy procedure pointer." This change enforces that
and fixes some tests that erroneously violated this rule.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94781
Semantic checks added to check the worksharing 'single' region closely nested inside a worksharing 'do' region. And also to check whether the 'do' iteration variable is a variable in 'Firstprivate' clause.
Files:
check-directive-structure.h
check-omp-structure.h
check-omp-structure.cpp
Testcases:
omp-do01-positivecase.f90
omp-do01.f90
omp-do05-positivecase.f90
omp-do05.f90
Reviewed by: Kiran Chandramohan @kiranchandramohan , Valentin Clement @clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93205
When a use-associated procedure was included in a generic, we weren't
correctly recording that fact. The ultimate symbol was added rather than
the local symbol.
Also, improve the message emitted for the specific procedure by
mentioning the module it came from.
This fixes one of the problems in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48648.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94696
This patch rename the tablegen generated file ACC.cpp.inc to ACC.inc in order
to match what was done in D92955. This file is included in header file as well as .cpp
file so it make more sense.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93485
Generic type-bound interfaces for user-defined operators need to be formatted
as "OPERATOR(.op.)", not just ".op."
PRIVATE generics need to be marked as such.
Declaration ordering: when a generic interface shadows a
derived type of the same name, it needs to be emitted to the
module file at the point of definition of the derived type;
otherwise, the derived type's definition may appear after its
first use.
The module symbol for a module read from a module file needs
to be marked as coming from a module file before semantic
processing is performed on the contents of the module so that
any special handling for declarations in module files can be
properly activated.
IMPORT statements were sometimes missing for use-associated
symbols in surrounding scopes; fine-tune NeedImport().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94636
`DirectiveStructureChecker` was passing in a pointer to a temporary
string for the `construct` argument to the constructor for `LabelEnforce`.
The `LabelEnforce` object had a lifetime longer than the temporary,
resulting in accessing a dangling pointer when emitting an error message
for `omp-parallell01.f90`.
The fix is to make the lifetime of the temporary as long as the lifetime
of the `LabelEnforce` object.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94618
It's possible to declare an external procedure and then pass it as an
actual argument to a subprogram expecting a procedure argument. I added
tests for this and added an error message to distinguish passing an
actual argument with an implicit interface from passing an argument with
a mismatched explicit interface.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94505
If a module specifies default private accessibility, names that have
been use-associated are private by default. This was not reflected in
.mod files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94602
When needed due to a specification expression in a derived type,
the host association symbols should be created in the surrounding
subprogram's scope instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94567
In some contexts, including the motivating case of determining whether
the expressions that define the shape of a variable are "constant expressions"
in the sense of the Fortran standard, expression rewriting via Fold()
is not necessary, and should not be required. The inquiry intrinsics LBOUND,
UBOUND, and SIZE work correctly now in specification expressions and are
classified correctly as being constant expressions (or not). Getting this right
led to a fair amount of API clean-up as a consequence, including the
folding of shapes and TypeAndShape objects, and new APIs for shapes
that do not fold for those cases where folding isn't needed. Further,
the symbol-testing predicate APIs in Evaluate/tools.h now all resolve any
associations of their symbols and work transparently on use-, host-, and
construct-association symbols; the tools used to resolve those associations have
been defined and documented more precisely, and their clients adjusted as needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94561
`CheckNoBranching` is currently handling only illegal branching out for constructs
with `Parser::Name` in them.
Extend the same for handling illegal branching out caused by `Parser::Label` based statements.
This patch could possibly solve one of the issues(typically branching out) mentioned in D92735.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93447
Remove duplicated function to check for required clauses on a directive. This was
still there from the merging of OpenACC and OpenMP common semantic checks and it can now be
removed so we use only one function.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93575
Internal subprograms have explicit interfaces. If an internal subprogram has
an alternate return, we check its explicit interface. But we were not
putting the label values of alternate returns into the actual argument.
I fixed this by changing the definition of actual arguments to be able
to contain a common::Label and putting the label for an alternate return
into the actual argument.
I also verified that we were already doing all of the semantic checking
required for alternate returns and removed a "TODO" for this.
I also added the test altreturn06.f90.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94017
Add semantic check for most of the restrictions for the declare directive.
Reviewed By: kiranktp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92741
After discussion in D93105 we found that the reduction clause was not following
the common OmpClause convention. This patch makes reduction clause part of OmpClause
with a value of OmpReductionClause in a similar way than task_reduction.
The unparse function for OmpReductionClause is adapted since the keyword and parenthesis
are issued by the corresponding unparse function for parser::OmpClause::Reduction.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93482
See OMP-5.0 2.19.5.5 task_reduction Clause.
To add a positive test case we need `taskgroup` directive which is not added hence skipping the test.
This is a dependency for `taskgroup` construct.
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93105
Co-authored-by: Valentin Clement <clementval@gmail.com>
When an abstract interface is defined, add the ABSTRACT attribute to
subprogram symbols that define the interface body. Make use of that
when writing .mod files to include "abstract" on the interface statement.
Also, fix a problem with the order of symbols in a .mod file. Sometimes
a name is mentioned before the "real" declaration, e.g. in an access
statement. We want the order to be based on the real definitions. In
these cases we replace the symbol name with an identical name with a
different source location. Then by sorting based on the source location
we get symbols in the right order.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93572
OpenMP 4.5 - Variables that appear in expressions for statement function definitions
may not appear in OpenMP Private, Firstprivate or Lastprivate clauses.
Test case : omp-private03.f90
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93213
See OMP-5.0 2.19.5.5 task_reduction Clause.
To add a positive test case we need `taskgroup` directive which is not added hence skipping the test.
This is a dependency for `taskgroup` construct.
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93105
After discussion in `D93482` we found that the some of the clauses were not
following the common OmpClause convention.
The benefits of using OmpClause:
- Functionalities from structure checker are mostly aligned to work with
`llvm::omp::Clause`.
- The unparsing as well can take advantage.
- Homogeneity with OpenACC and rest of the clauses in OpenMP.
- Could even generate the parser with TableGen, when there is homogeneity.
- It becomes confusing when to use `flangClass` and `flangClassValue` inside
TableGen, if incase we generate parser using TableGen we could have only a
single `let expression`.
This patch makes `OmpDistScheduleClause` clause part of `OmpClause`.
The unparse function for `OmpDistScheduleClause` is adapted since the keyword
and parenthesis are issued by the corresponding unparse function for
`parser::OmpClause::DistSchedule`.
Reviewed By: clementval, kiranktp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93644
After discussion in `D93482` we found that the some of the clauses were not
following the common OmpClause convention.
The benefits of using OmpClause:
- Functionalities from structure checker are mostly aligned to work with
`llvm::omp::Clause`.
- The unparsing as well can take advantage.
- Homogeneity with OpenACC and rest of the clauses in OpenMP.
- Could even generate the parser with TableGen, when there is homogeneity.
- It becomes confusing when to use `flangClass` and `flangClassValue` inside
TableGen, if incase we generate parser using TableGen we could have only a
single `let expression`.
This patch makes `OmpNoWait` clause part of `OmpClause`.
Reviewed By: clementval, kiranktp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93643
After discussion in `D93482` we found that the some of the clauses were not
following the common OmpClause convention.
The benefits of using OmpClause:
- Functionalities from structure checker are mostly aligned to work with
`llvm::omp::Clause`.
- The unparsing as well can take advantage.
- Homogeneity with OpenACC and rest of the clauses in OpenMP.
- Could even generate the parser with TableGen, when there is homogeneity.
- It becomes confusing when to use `flangClass` and `flangClassValue` inside
TableGen, if incase we generate parser using TableGen we could have only a
single `let expression`.
This patch makes `OmpProcBindClause` clause part of `OmpClause`.
The unparse function is dropped as the unparsing is done by `WALK_NESTED_ENUM`
for `OmpProcBindClause`.
Reviewed By: clementval, kiranktp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93642
After discussion in `D93482` we found that the some of the clauses were not
following the common OmpClause convention.
The benefits of using OmpClause:
- Functionalities from structure checker are mostly aligned to work with
`llvm::omp::Clause`.
- The unparsing as well can take advantage.
- Homogeneity with OpenACC and rest of the clauses in OpenMP.
- Could even generate the parser with TableGen, when there is homogeneity.
- It becomes confusing when to use `flangClass` and `flangClassValue` inside
TableGen, if incase we generate parser using TableGen we could have only a
single `let expression`.
This patch makes `OmpDefaultClause` clause part of `OmpClause`.
The unparse function is dropped as the unparsing is done by `WALK_NESTED_ENUM`
for `OmpDefaultClause`.
Reviewed By: clementval, kiranktp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93641
After discussion in `D93482` we found that the some of the clauses were not
following the common OmpClause convention.
The benefits of using OmpClause:
- Functionalities from structure checker are mostly aligned to work with
`llvm::omp::Clause`.
- The unparsing as well can take advantage.
- Homogeneity with OpenACC and rest of the clauses in OpenMP.
- Could even generate the parser with TableGen, when there is homogeneity.
- It becomes confusing when to use `flangClass` and `flangClassValue` inside
TableGen, if incase we generate parser using TableGen we could have only a
single `let expression`.
This patch makes `allocate` clause part of `OmpClause`.The unparse function for
`OmpAllocateClause` is adapted since the keyword and parenthesis are issued by
the corresponding unparse function for `parser::OmpClause::Allocate`.
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93640
Use the TableGen feature to have enum values for clauses.
Next step will be to extend the MLIR part used currently by OpenMP
to use the same enum on the dialect side.
This patch also add function that convert the enum to StringRef to be
used on the dump-parse-tree from flang.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93576
We were only checking the restrictions of IMPLICIT NONE(EXTERNAL) when a
procedure name is first encountered. But it can also happen with an
existing symbol, e.g. if an external function's return type is declared
before is it called. This change adds a check in that branch too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93552
Remove the OpenMP clause information from the OMPKinds.def file and use the
information from the new OMP.td file. There is now a single source of truth for the
directives and clauses.
To avoid generate lots of specific small code from tablegen, the macros previously
used in OMPKinds.def are generated almost as identical. This can be polished and
possibly removed in a further patch.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92955
This patch add some checks for the restriction on the routine directive
and fix several issue at the same time.
Validity tests have been added in a separate file than acc-clause-validity.f90 since this one
became quite large. I plan to split the larger file once on-going review are done.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92672
Names in EQUIVALENCE statements are only allowed to indicate local
objects as per 19.5.1.4, paragraph 2, item (10). Thus, a name appearing
in an EQUIVALENCE statement with no corresponding declaration in the
same scope is an implicit declaration of the name. If that scope
contains an IMPLICIT NONE, it's an error.
I implemented this by adding a state variable to ScopeHandler to
indicate if we're resolving the names in an EQUIVALENCE statement and
then checked this state when resolving names. I also added a test to
the existing tests for EQUIVALENCE statements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93345
Some operators have more than one name, e.g. operator(==), operator(.eq).
That was working correctly in generic definitions but they can also
appear in other contexts: USE statements and access statements, for
example.
This changes FindInScope to always look for each of the names for
a symbol. So an operator may be use-associated under one name but
declared private under another name and it will be the same symbol.
This replaces GenericSpecInfo::FindInScope which was only usable in
some cases.
Add a version of FindInScope() that looks in the current scope to
simplify many of the calls.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93344
STORAGE_SIZE() is a standard inquiry intrinsic (size in bits
of an array element of the same type as the argument); SIZEOF()
is a common extension that returns the size in bytes of its
argument; C_SIZEOF() is a renaming of SIZEOF() in module ISO_C_BINDING.
STORAGE_SIZE() and SIZEOF() are implemented via rewrites to
expressions; these expressions will be constant when the necessary
type parameters and bounds are also constant.
Code to calculate the sizes of types (with and without alignment)
was isolated into Evaluate/type.* and /characteristics.*.
Code in Semantics/compute-offsets.* to calculate sizes and alignments
of derived types' scopes was exposed so that it can be called at type
instantiation time (earlier than before) so that these inquiry intrinsics
could be called from specification expressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93322
When merging use associations into a generic, we weren't handling
the case where the name that was use associated was itself a use
association. This is fixed by following that association to its
ultimate symbol (`useUltimate` in `DoAddUse`).
An example of the bug is `m12d` in `resolve17.f90`. `g` is associated
with `gc` in `m12c` which is associated with `gb` in `m12b`. It was that
last association that we weren't correctly following.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93343
Remove resolved & moot TODO comments in Common/, Parser/,
and Evaluate/. Address a pending one relating to parsing
ambiguity in DATA statement constants, handling it with
symbol table information in Semantics and adding a test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93323
Before this patch, the Restorer depended on copy elision to happen.
Without copy elision, the function ScopedSet calls the move constructor
before its dtor. The dtor will prematurely restore the reference to the
original value.
Instead of relying the compiler to not use the Restorer's copy
constructor, delete its copy and assign operators. Hence, callers cannot
move or copy a Restorer object anymore, and have to explicitly provide
the reset state. ScopedSet avoids calling move/copy operations by
relying on unnamed return value optimization, which is mandatory in
C++17.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88797
From OMP 5.0 [2.17.8]
Restriction:
If memory-order-clause is release,acquire, or acq_rel, list items must not be specified on the flush directive.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan, clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89879
Patch implements restrictions from 2.17.7 of OpenMP 5.0 standard for atomic Construct. Tests for the same are added.
One of the restriction
`OpenMP constructs may not be encountered during execution of an atomic region.`
Is mentioned in 5.0 standard to be a semantic restriction, but given the stricter nature of parser in F18 it's caught at parsing itself.
This patch is a next patch in series from D88965.
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89583
The semantic analysis of index-names of FORALL statements looks up symbols with
the same name as the index-name. This is needed to exclude symbols that are
not objects. But if the symbol found is host-, use-, or construct-associated
with another entity, the check fails.
I fixed this by getting the root symbol of the symbol found and doing the check
on the root symbol. This required creating a non-const version of
"GetAssociationRoot()".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92970
Update all reference from the specification to the new OpenACC 3.1
document.
Reviewed By: SouraVX
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92120
Add restriction on loop construct associated with DO CONCURRENT. Add couple of tests to ensure
clause validity checks.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92533
Define Fortran derived types that describe the characteristics
of derived types, and instantiations of parameterized derived
types, that are of relevance to the runtime language support
library. Define a suite of corresponding C++ structure types
for the runtime library to use to interpret instances of the
descriptions.
Create instances of these description types in Semantics as
static initializers for compiler-created objects in the scopes
that define or instantiate user derived types.
Delete obsolete code from earlier attempts to package runtime
type information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92802
Add couple of clause validity tests for the update directive and check for
the restriction where at least self, host or device clause must appear on the directive.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92447
This patch plugs many holes in static initializer semantics, improves error
messages for default initial values and other component properties in
parameterized derived type instantiations, and cleans up several small
issues noticed during development. We now do proper scalar expansion,
folding, and type, rank, and shape conformance checking for component
default initializers in derived types and PDT instantiations.
The initial values of named constants are now guaranteed to have been folded
when installed in the symbol table, and are no longer folded or
scalar-expanded at each use in expression folding. Semantics documentation
was extended with information about the various kinds of initializations
in Fortran and when each of them are processed in the compiler.
Some necessary concomitant changes have bulked this patch out a bit:
* contextual messages attachments, which are now produced for parameterized
derived type instantiations so that the user can figure out which
instance caused a problem with a component, have been added as part
of ContextualMessages, and their implementation was debugged
* several APIs in evaluate::characteristics was changed so that a FoldingContext
is passed as an argument rather than just its intrinsic procedure table;
this affected client call sites in many files
* new tools in Evaluate/check-expression.cpp to determine when an Expr
actually is a single constant value and to validate a non-pointer
variable initializer or object component default value
* shape conformance checking has additional arguments that control
whether scalar expansion is allowed
* several now-unused functions and data members noticed and removed
* several crashes and bogus errors exposed by testing this new code
were fixed
* a -fdebug-stack-trace option to enable LLVM's stack tracing on
a crash, which might be useful in the future
TL;DR: Initialization processing does more and takes place at the right
times for all of the various kinds of things that can be initialized.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92783
Add couple of clause validity tests for the update directive and check for
the restriction where at least self, host or device clause must appear on the directive.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92447
We were keeping the state of parsed equivalence sets in the class
DeclarationVisitor. A problem happened when analyzing the the specification
part of a declaration that contained an EQUIVALENCE statement followed by an
interface block. The same DeclarationVisitor object that was created for the
outer declaration was being used to analyze the specification part
of a procedure body in the interface block. When analyzing the specification
part of the procedure in the interface block, the names in the outer
declaration's EQUIVALENCE statement were erroneously compared with the names in
the arguments of the interface procedure. This resulted in a bogus error
message.
I fixed this by not checking equivalence sets when we're in an interface
block. I also added a test that will produce an error message without
this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92501
When the same generic name is use-associated from two modules, the
generics are merged into a single one in the current scope. This change
fixes some bugs in that process.
When a generic is merged, it can have two specific procedures with the
same name as the generic (c.f. module m7c in modfile07.f90). We were
disallowing that by checking for duplicate names in the generic rather
than duplicate symbols. Changing `namesSeen` to `symbolsSeen` in
`ResolveSpecificsInGeneric` fixes that.
We weren't including each USE of those generics in the .mod file so in
some cases they were incorrect. Extend GenericDetails to specify all
use-associated symbols that are merged into the generic. This is used to
write out .mod files correctly.
The distinguishability check for specific procedures of a generic
sometimes have to refer to procedures from a use-associated generic in
error messages. In that case we don't have the source location of the
procedure so adapt the message to say where is was use-associated from.
This requires passing the scope through the checks to make that
determination.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92492
`GetTopLevelUnitContaining` returns the Scope nested in the global scope
that contains the given Scope or Symbol.
Use "Get" rather than "Find" in the name because "Find" implies it might
not be found, which can't happen. Following that logic, rename
`FindProgramUnitContaining` to `GetProgramUnitContaining` and have it
also return a reference rather that a pointer.
Note that the use of "ProgramUnit" is slightly confusing. In the Fortran
standard, "program-unit" refers to what is called a "TopLevelUnit" here.
What we are calling a "ProgramUnit" (here and in `ProgramTree`) includes
internal subprograms while "TopLevelUnit" does not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92491
Add the semantic checks for the OpenMP 4.5 - 2.15.3.3 Private clause.
1. Pointers with the INTENT(IN) attribute may not appear in a private clause.
2. Variables that appear in namelist statements may not appear in a private clause.
A flag 'InNamelist' is added to the Symbol::Flag to identify the symbols
in Namelist statemnts.
Test cases : omp-private01.f90, omp-private02.f90
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90210
Add semantic check for the cache directive. According to section 2.10 from the specification:
A var in a cache directive must be a single array element or a simple subarray.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90184
Semantic check added to check and restrict the value of the parameter in the COLLAPSE or ORDERED clause
if it is larger than the number of nested loops following the construct.
Test Cases:
omp-do-collapse-positivecases.f90
omp-do-collapse.f90
omp-do-ordered-positivecases.f90
omp-do-ordered.f90
Reviewed by: Kiran Chandramohan @kiranchandramohan , Valentin Clement @clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89860
Semantic check to restrict the appearance of a variable that is part of another variable
(as an array or structure element) in a PRIVATE or SHARED clause.
Test Cases:
omp-parallel-private01.f90
omp-parallel-private02.f90
omp-parallel-private03.f90
omp-parallel-private04.f90
omp-parallel-shared01.f90
omp-parallel-shared02.f90
omp-parallel-shared03.f90
omp-parallel-shared04.f90
Reviewed by: Kiran Chandramohan @kiranchandramohan , Valentin Clement @clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89395
This patch introduce the separate parser for the memory-order-clause from the general
OmpClauseList. This parser still creates OmpClause node and therefore can use all the feature
from TableGen and the OmpStructureChecker.
This is applied only for the Flush construct in this patch and it should be applied for
atomic as well.
This is the approach we disscussed several time during the weekly call.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan, sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91839
`OmpStructureChecker` has too much boilerplate code in source file.
This patch:
1. Use helpers from `check-directive-structure.h` and reduces the boilerplate.
2. Use TableGen infrastructure as much as possible.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90834
Fortran defines "null-init" null pointer initializers as
being function references, syntactically, that have to resolve
to calls to the intrinsic function NULL() with no actual
arguments.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91657
When comparing LOGICAL operands using ".eq." or ".ne." we were not
guiding users to the ".eqv." and ".neqv." operations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91736
According to section 19.4, paragraph 5, the scope of an ac-implied-do variable
is the enclosing ac-implied-do. But we were not creating new scopes upon
entry to an ac-implied-do. This was causing error messages to be erroneously
emitted.
I fixed, the code, added a test to array-constr-values.f90, added the test
folding15.f90 and corrected the test symbol05.f90.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91560
Add the semantic checks for the OpenMP 4.5 - 2.13.9 Depend clause.
1. List items in depend clause should not be zero length array sections.
2. A variable that is part of another variable like structure component
should not be specified on a depend clause.
Test cases : omp-depend01.f90, omp-depend02.f90, omp-depend03.f90
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89934
An io-unit that is an internal-file-variable is syntactically identical
to a file-unit-number expression that is a variable reference. An
ambiguous unit is initially parsed as an internal-file-variable. If
semantic analysis determines that the unit is not of character type,
it is rewritten as an internal-file-variable. This modification must
retain source coordinate information.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91375
Avoid a spurious error message about a dummy procedure reference
in a specification expression by restructuring the handling of
use-associated and host-associated symbols.
Updated to fix a circular dependence between shared library
binaries that was introduced by the original patch.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91286
F18 clause 5.3.3 explicitly allows labels on program unit END statements.
Label resolution code accounts for this for singleton program units,
but incorrectly generates an error for host subprograms with internal
subprograms.
subroutine s(n)
call s1(n)
if (n == 0) goto 88 ! incorrect error
print*, 's'
contains
subroutine s1(n)
if (n == 0) goto 77 ! ok
print*, 's1'
77 end subroutine s1
88 end
Label resolution code makes a sequential pass over an entire file to
collect label information for all subprograms, followed by a pass through
that information for semantics checks. The problem is that END statements
may be separated from prior subprogram code by internal subprogram
definitions, so an END label can be associated with the wrong subprogram.
There are several ways to fix this. Labels are always local to a
subprogram. So the two separate passes over the entire file could probably
instead be interleaved to perform analysis on a subprogram as soon as the
end of the subprogram is reached, using a small stack. The stack structure
would account for the "split" code case. This might work.
It is possible that there is some not otherwise apparent advantage to
the current full-file pass design. The parse tree has productions that
provide access to a subprogram END statement "in advance". An alternative
is to access this information to solve the problem. This PR implements
this latter option.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91217
Implicitly typed references to external functions are applying
the IMPLICIT typing rules of the global scope in which their
symbols were created, not the IMPLICIT typing rules in force in
the scope from which they were referenced.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91214
The initial approach was to go with changing parser nodes from `std::list<parser::Name>` to `OmpObjectList`, but that might have lead to illegal programs.
Resolving the symbols inside `OmpAttributeVisitor`.
Fix a couple of `XFAIL` tests.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90538
Add the semantic checks for the OpenMP 4.5 - 2.15.4.1 copyin clause.
Resolve OpenMPThreadprivate directive since the list of items specified
in copyin clause should be threadprivate.
Test cases : omp-copyin01.f90, omp-copyin02.f90, omp-copyin03.f90,
omp-copyin04.f90, omp-copyin05.f90
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89385
`OmpStructureChecker` has too much boilerplate code in source file.
It was not easy to figure out the seperation of clauses inside 'OmpClause' and
the ones which had a seperate node in parse-tree.h.
This patch:
1. Removes the boilerplate by defining a few macros.
2. Makes seperation between constructs, directives and clauses(sub classes are seperated).
3. Macros could have been shared between OMP and OACC, template specilizations might have
been costly hence used macros.
Follows the same strategy used for `AccStructureChecker`.
Next patch in series to simplify OmpStructureChecker would try to simplify
boilerplates inside the functions and either create abstractions or use if
something is available inside check-directive-structure.h
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan, clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90324
Ensure that character length is properly calculated for
actual arguments to intrinsics, and that source provenance
information is available when expression analysis calls
folding in cases where the length is invalid.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90636
When the bounds of an implied DO loop in an array constructor are
constant, the index variable of that loop is considered a constant
expression and can be used as such in the items in the value list
of the implied DO loop. Since the KIND type parameter values of items
in the value list can depend on the various values taken by such an
index, it is not possible to represent those values with a single
typed expression. So implement such loops by taking multiple passes
over the parse tree of the implied DO loop instead.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90494
Subclause 10.1.12 in F'2018 prohibits forward references from
a specification expression to an object declared later in the
same specification part. Catch this error better and emit
specific error messages about the violation.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90492
Fortran's FINAL feature is sensitive to object rank.
When an object's rank excludes it from finalization, but
the type has FINAL subroutines for other ranks, emit
a warning. This should be especially helpful in the
case of a scalar FINAL subroutine not being declared
(IMPURE) ELEMENTAL.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90495
READ(CVAR)[,item-list] with a character variable CVAR
could be parsed as an unformatted READ from an internal
unit or as a formatted READ from the default external unit
with a needlessly parenthesized variable format. We parse
it as the former, but Fortran doesn't have unformatted
internal I/O.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90493
Some changes introduced in https://reviews.llvm.org/D88655 cause compiler
warnings. Since in Flang warnings are treated as errors (`-Werror` is on by
default), these are in practice compiler errors (verified with clang-10 and
clang-11, gcc-10). This patches fixes these warning/failures.
Warning/error 1:
```
llvm-project/flang/lib/Semantics/check-omp-structure.cpp:107:3: error:
unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Werror,-Wimplicit-fallthrough]
```
Warning/error 2:
```
llvm-project/flang/lib/Semantics/check-directive-structure.h:39:9: error: field
'currentDirective_' will be initialized after field 'upperCaseDirName_'
[-Werror,-Wreorder-ctor]
```
Failing buildbot:
* http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/33/builds/386
From below mentioned standard references
OpenACC 3.0 Standards document
840 • A program may not branch into or out of an OpenACC parallel construct
OpenMP 5.0 Standards document
A program that branches into or out of a parallel region is non-conforming.
This patch
Resolves the issue of exit out of a parallel region, other branching out issues like goto statements are not handled with this patch.
Moves code from D87906 to be reused by other OpenMP/OpenACC to check-directive-structure.h.
Adds support in OpenMP parallel construct and a test case to verify.
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88655
Enter data can have the copyin clause and exit data can have the copyout clause.
Both clauses support modifier with other directive but for these two directives no modifier
are supported. This semantic check enforce this rule.
Reviewed By: kiranktp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90280
2 Bug fixes:
- Do not resolve procedure as intrinsic if they appeared in an
EXTERNAL attribute statement (one path was not considering this flag)
- Emit an error if a procedure resolved to be an intrinsic function
(resp. subroutine) is used as a subroutine (resp. function).
Lowering was attempted while the evaluate::Expression for the
call was missing without any errors.
1 behavior change:
- Do not implicitly resolve subroutines (resp. functions) as intrinsics
because their name is the name of an intrinsic function (resp.
subroutine). Add justification in documentation.
Reviewed By: klausler, tskeith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90049
I added a test to verify that the associated symbol did not have errors before
doing the anaylsis of a call to a component ref along with a test that
triggers the original problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90074
wait and atomic directives are represented by OpenACCWaitConstruct, OpenACCAtmicConstruct in the parser. Those contrsuct were
not taken into account in the semantic check so far.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88628
When processing declarations in resolve-names.cpp, we were returning a
symbol that had SubprogramName details to PushSubprogramScope(), which
expects a symbol with Subprogram details.
I adjusted the code and added a test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89829
Check INTENT(OUT)/INTENT(INOUT) constraints for actual argument
of intrinsic procedure calls.
- Adding a common::Intent field to the IntrinsicDummyArgument
in the intrinsic table.
- Propagating it to the DummyDataObject intent field so that it can
later be used in CheckExplicitDataArg semantic checks.
- Add related tests.
- Fix regression (C846 false error), C846 INTENT(OUT) rule does
not apply to intrinsic call. Propagate the information that we
are in an intrinsic call up to CheckExplicitDataArg (that is
doing this check). Still enforce C846 on intrinsics other than MOVE_ALLOC (for which
allocatable coarrays are explicitly allowed) since it's not clear it is allowed in all
intrinsics and allowing this would lead to runtime penalties in the intrinsic runtime.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89473
From OpenACC 3.0 Standards document
840 • A program may not branch into or out of an OpenACC parallel construct.
Exits are allowed provided it does not cause an exit outside the parallel region.
Test case exits out of the inner do loop, but it is still inside the parallel region.
Patch tries to extract labels from block attached to a construct,
If the exit is to a label not in the collected list then flags an error.
Reviewed By: tskeith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87906
We had neglected to check for name mismatches for procedure definitions that
appear in interfaces.
I also changed label11.f90 to an error test since I think they're better than
"FileCheck" tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89611
Calling "ASSOCATED(NULL()) was causing an internal check of the compiler to
fail.
I fixed this by changing the entry for "ASSOCIATED" in the intrinsics table to
accept "AnyPointer" which contains a new "KindCode" of "pointerType". I also
changed the function "FromActual()" to return a typeless intrinsic when called
on a pointer, which duplicates its behavior for BOZ literals. This required
changing the analysis of procedure arguments. While testing processing for
procedure arguments, I found another bad call to `CHECK()` which I fixed.
I made several other changes:
-- I implemented constant folding for ASSOCIATED().
-- I fixed handling of NULL() in relational operations.
-- I implemented semantic analysis for ASSOCIATED().
-- I noticed that the semantics for ASSOCIATED() are similar to those for
pointer assignment. So I extracted the code that pointer assignment uses
for procedure pointer compatibility to a place where it could be used by
the semantic analysis for ASSOCIATED().
-- I couldn't figure out how to make the general semantic analysis for
procedure arguments work with ASSOCIATED()'s second argument, which can
be either a pointer or a target. So I stopped using normal semantic
analysis for arguments for ASSOCIATED().
-- I added tests for all of this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88313
The OpenMP 5.0 standard restricts nowait clause to appear only once on sections
directive.
See OpenMP 5.0
- 2.8.1
- point 3 in restrictions.
Added a test with fix.
Reviewed By: DavidTruby
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88556
`OmpStructureChecker` is supposed to work only with `parser::OmpClause`
after tablegen changes for OpenMP and OpenACC were introduced.
Hence `OmpMemoryOrderClause`, `OmpAtomicMemoryOrderClause` and similar ones were failing
to catch semantic errors, inspite of having code for semantic checks.
This patch tries to change parser for `OmpMemoryOrderClause` and similar dependent ones
and use `OmpClauseList` which resides/comes from common tablegen for OpenMP/OpenACC eventually using `parser::OmpClause`.
This patch also tries to :
1. Change `OmpCriticalDirective` in `openmp-parsers.cpp` to support `OmpClauseList`.
2. Check-flang regresses when changes were introduced due to missing semantic checks in OmpCritical, patch implements them at the minimal level to pass the regression.
3. Change tablegen to support Hint clause.
4. Adds missing source locations `CharBlock Source` in each atomic construct.
5. Remove dead code realted to `memory-order-clauses` after moving to `OmpClauseList`.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88965
The semantics pass currently checks for several constraints
that apply to the use of whole assumed-size arrays in various
contexts, but C1002 wasn't really implemented. This patch
implements C1002 by disallowing the use of whole assumed-size
arrays in expressions and variables unless specifically
allowed by the context. This centralizes the error reporting,
which has been improved with a link to the array's declaration.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88691
CHARACTER length expressions were not always being
captured or computed as part of procedure "characteristics",
leading to test failures due to an inability to compute
memory size expressions accurately.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88689
Represent FINAL subroutines in the symbol table entries of
derived types. Enforce constraints. Update tests that have
inadvertent violations or modified messages. Added a test.
The specific procedure distinguishability checking code for generics
was used to enforce distinguishability of FINAL procedures.
(Also cleaned up some confusion and redundancy noticed in the
type compatibility infrastructure while digging into that area.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88613
The Microsoft compiler seems to have difficulties to decide between a const/non-const method of a captured object context in a closure. The error message is:
```
symbol.cpp(261): error C2668: 'Fortran::semantics::Symbol::detailsIf': ambiguous call to overloaded function
symbol.h(535): note: could be 'const D *Fortran::semantics::Symbol::detailsIf<Fortran::semantics::DerivedTypeDetails>(void) const'
symbol.h(534): note: or 'D *Fortran::semantics::Symbol::detailsIf<Fortran::semantics::DerivedTypeDetails>(void)'
symbol.cpp(261): note: while trying to match the argument list '()'
```
Explicitly using the this-pointer resolves this problem.
This patch is part of the series to make flang compilable with MS Visual Studio <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2020-July/000448.html>.
Reviewed By: DavidTruby
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88052
A type name in an IMPLICIT declaration that was later used in a PARAMETER
statement caused problems because the default symbol scope had not yet been
initialized. I avoided dereferencing in the situation where the default scope
was uninitialized and added a test that triggers the problem.
Also, once I corrected the bad dereference, the compiler was putting out
misleading error messages. The underlying error us due to violating section
7.5.10, paragraph 4, which states:
A structure constructor shall not appear before the referenced type is
defined.
I fixed this by testing to see if a type that is used in a structure
constructor is forward referenced.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87535
Change the analyzed form of type-bound assignment to match that of call
statements. Resolve the binding name to a specific subprogram when
possible by using `GetBindingResolution`. Otherwise leave it as a
type-bound procedure call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87541
A type name in an IMPLICIT declaration that was later used in a PARAMETER
statement caused problems because the default symbol scope had not yet been
initialized. I avoided dereferencing in the situation where the default scope
was uninitialized and added a test that triggers the problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87535
Define Fortran::Semantics::Scope::GetName in the header so it is available
to Fortran::Evaluate::Tool::AttachDeclaration without a circular dependency
introduced in 82edd42.
Reviewed By: tskeith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87505
Change how generic operators and assignments are checked for
distinguishable procedures. Because of how they are invoked, available
type-bound generics and normal generics all have to be considered
together. This is different from how generic names are checked.
Move common part of checking into DistinguishabilityHelper so that it
can be used in both cases after the appropriate procedures have been
added.
Cache result of Procedure::Characterize(Symbol) in a map in
CheckHelper so that we don't have to worry about passing the
characterized Procedures around or the cost of recomputing them.
Add MakeOpName() to construct names for defined operators and assignment
for using in error messages. This eliminates the need for different
messages in those cases.
When the procedures for a defined operator or assignment are undistinguishable,
include the type name in the error message, otherwise it may be ambiguous.
Add missing check that procedures for defined operators are functions
and that their dummy arguments are INTENT(IN) or VALUE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87341
These are owned by an instance of a new class AllCookedSources.
This removes the need for a Scope to own a string containing
a module's cooked source stream, and will enable errors to be
emitted when parsing module files in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86891
The DumpSymbolsSources() routine ordered its output by the addresses
of the names of the symbols, and was susceptible to variation across
environments. Fixed by using a multimap using the values of the names.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87035
Don't use just 128-bit integer as the type for integer
CASE statement constants. Use the actual type of the
literal constants that appeared.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86875
Conformance checking of the shapes of the operands of
array expressions can't, of course, always be done at
compilation time; but when the shapes are known and
nonconformable, we should catch the errors that we can.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86887
Change the expression representation TypeParamInquiry from being
a class that's templatized on the integer KIND of its result into
a monomorphic representation that results in a SubscriptInteger
that can then be converted.
This is a minor simplification, but it's worth doing because
it is believed to also be a work-around for bugs in the MSVC
compiler with overload resolution that affect the expression
traversal framework.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86551
Compilation of the following program currently generates a warning message:
i = 1
if (i .eq. 0) then
write(6, 200) i
200 format (I8)
end if
write(6, 200) i
end
x.f90:6:9: Label '200' is not in scope
write(6, 200) i
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Whereas branch targets must conform to the Clause 11.1.2.1 program
requirement "Transfer of control to the interior of a block from
outside the block is prohibited, ...", this doesn't apply to format
statement references.
When an error is associated with a symbol, it was marked with a flag
from Symbol::Flag. The problem with that is that you need a mutable
symbol to do that. Instead, store the set of error symbols in the
SemanticsContext. This allows for some const_casts to be eliminated.
Also, improve the internal error that occurs if SetError is called
but no fatal error has been reported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86740
The tile clause in OpenACC 3.0 imposes some restriction. Element in the tile size list are either * or a
constant positive integer expression. If there are n tile sizes in the list, the loop construct must be immediately
followed by n tightly-nested loops.
This patch implement these restrictions and add some tests.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86655
A number of I/O syntax rules involve variables that will be written to,
and must therefore be definable. This includes internal file variables,
IOSTAT= and IOMSG= specifiers, most INQUIRE statement specifiers, a few
other specifiers, and input variables. This patch checks for
these violations, and implements several additional I/O TODO constraint
checks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86557
Accept and represent "global" compiler directives that appear
before and between program units in a source file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86555
If an error has occurred a symbol may have a DeclTypeSpec but no
valid DynamicType. There is no need to compute the size of erroneous
symbols.
Also, we only need to process object entities and procedure entities.
All other kinds of symbols can be skipped.
This fixes another problem revealed by https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47265
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86484
A specification expression can reference an implicitly declared variable
in the host procedure. Because we have to process specification parts
before execution parts, this may be the first time we encounter the
variable. We were assuming the variable was implicitly declared in the
scope where it was encountered, leading to an error because local
variables may not be referenced in specification expressions.
The fix is to tentatively create the implicit variable in the host
procedure because that is the only way the specification expression can
be valid. We mark it with the flag `ImplicitOrError` to indicate that
either it must be implicitly defined in the host (by being mentioned in
the execution part) or else its use turned out to be an error.
We need to apply the implicit type rules of the host, which requires
some changes to implicit typing.
Variables in common blocks are allowed to appear in specification expressions
(because they are not locals) but the common block definition may not appear
until after their use. To handle this we create common block symbols and object
entities for each common block object during the `PreSpecificationConstruct`
pass. This allows us to remove the corresponding code in the main visitor and
`commonBlockInfo_.curr`. The change in order of processing causes some
different error messages to be emitted.
Some cleanup is included with this change:
- In `ExpressionAnalyzer`, if an unresolved name is encountered but
no error has been reported, emit an internal error.
- Change `ImplicitRulesVisitor` to hide the `ImplicitRules` object
that implements it. Change the interface to pass in names rather
than having to get the first character of the name.
- Change `DeclareObjectEntity` to have the `attrs` argument default
to an empty set; that is the typical case.
- In `Pre(parser::SpecificationPart)` use "structured bindings" to
give names to the pieces that make up a specification-part.
- Enhance `parser::Unwrap` to unwrap `Statement` and `UnlabeledStatement`
and make use of that in PreSpecificationConstruct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86322
When we report an error for a bad character kind, don't keep it in the
`DeclTypeSpec`. Otherwise there could be further problems. In this case,
`ComputeOffsets()` got an assertion error because we didn't recognize
`CHARACTER(*,8)` as needing a descriptor because of the bad kind.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86357
When a procedure name was used on the RHS of an assignment we were not
reporting the error. When one was used in an expression the error
message wasn't very good (e.g. "Operands of + must be numeric; have
INTEGER(4) and untyped").
Detect these cases in ArgumentAnalyzer and emit better messages,
depending on whether the named procedure is a function or subroutine.
Procedure names may appear as actual arguments to function and
subroutine calls so don't report errors in those cases. That is the same
case where assumed type arguments are allowed, so rename `isAssumedType_`
to `isProcedureCall_` and use that to decide if it is an error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86107
Andrzej Warzynski