C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
This commit adds missing support for constexpr in std::array under all
standard modes up to and including C++20. It also transforms the <array>
tests to check for constexpr-friendliness under the right standard modes.
Fixes https://llvm.org/PR40124
Fixes rdar://57522096
Supersedes https://reviews.llvm.org/D60666
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80452
When the new libc++ test format was enabled, warnings were accidentally
dropped cause they were not part of the %{compile_flags} substitution.
This commit adds them back, however `-Werror` is only used for non-verify
tests (cause it doesn't make sense for verify tests).
This commit is a re-application of 20fd624380, which was reverted in
5ec6fdb058 because it broke the C++03 bot. This failure should have
been fixed in b4fb705e77.
When the new libc++ test format was enabled, warnings were accidentally
dropped cause they were not part of the %{compile_flags} substitution.
This commit adds them back, however `-Werror` is only used for non-verify
tests (cause it doesn't make sense for verify tests).
Forcing -Werror and other warnings means that the test suite isn't
actually testing what most people are seeing in their code -- it seems
better and less arbitrary to compile these tests as close as possible
to the compiler default instead.
Removing -Werror also means that we get to differentiate between
diagnostics that are errors and those that are warnings, which makes
the test suite more precise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76311
Summary:
This patch implements https://wg21.link/P0325.
Please mind that at it is my first contribution to libc++, so I may have forgotten to abide to some conventions.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, ldionne, lichray
Reviewed By: ldionne, lichray
Subscribers: lichray, dexonsmith, zoecarver, christof, ldionne, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69882
Louis Dionne