Tests that require support for Clang-verify are already marked as such
explicitly by their extension, which is .verify.cpp. Requiring the use
of an explicit Lit feature is, after thought, not really helpful.
This is a change in design: we have been bitten in the past by tests not
being enabled when we thought they were. However, the issue was mostly
with file extensions being ignored. The fix for that is not to blindly
require explicit features all the time, but instead to report all files
that are in the suite but that don't match any known test format. This
can be implemented in a follow-up patch.
Instead of having different names for the same Lit feature accross code
bases, use the same name everywhere. This NFC commit is in preparation
for a refactor where all three projects will be using the same Lit
feature detection logic, and hence it won't be convenient to use
different names for the feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78370
By renaming .fail.cpp tests that don't need clang-verify to .compile.fail.cpp,
the new test format will not try to compile these tests with clang-verify,
and the old test format will work just the same. However, this allows
removing a workaround that requires parsing each test looking for
clang-verify markup.
After this change, a .fail.cpp test should always have clang-verify markup.
When clang-verify is not supported by the compiler, we will just check that
these tests fail to compile. When clang-verify is supported, these tests
will be compiled with clang-verify whether they have markup or not (so
they should have markup, or they will fail).
This simplifies the test suite and also ensures that all of our .fail.cpp
tests provide clang-verify markup. If it's impossible for a test to have
clang-verify markup, it can be moved to a .compile.fail.cpp test, which
are unconditionally just checked for compilation failure.
The libc++ test suite has a lot of old Lit features used to XFAIL tests
and mark them as UNSUPPORTED. Many of them are to workaround problems on
old compilers or old platforms. As time goes by, it is good to go and
clean those up to simplify the configuration of the test suite, and also
to reflect the testing reality. It's not useful to have markup that gives
the impression that e.g. clang-3.3 is supported, when we don't really
test on it anymore (and hence several new tests probably don't have the
necessary markup on them).
The testing script used to test libc++ historically did not like directories
without any testing files, so these tests had been added. Since this is
not necessary anymore, we can now remove these files. This has the benefit
that the total number of tests reflects the real number of tests more
closely, and we also skip some unnecessary work (especially relevant when
running tests over SSH).
However, some nothing_to_do.pass.cpp tests actually serve the purpose of
documenting that an area of the Standard doesn't need to be tested, or is
tested elsewhere. These files are not removed by this commit.
Removal done with:
import os
import itertools
for (dirpath, dirnames, filenames) in itertools.chain(os.walk('./libcxx/test'),
os.walk('./libcxxabi/test')):
if len(filenames + dirnames) > 1 and \
any(p == 'nothing_to_do.pass.cpp' for p in filenames):
os.remove(os.path.join(dirpath, 'nothing_to_do.pass.cpp'))
Forcing -Werror and other warnings means that the test suite isn't
actually testing what most people are seeing in their code -- it seems
better and less arbitrary to compile these tests as close as possible
to the compiler default instead.
Removing -Werror also means that we get to differentiate between
diagnostics that are errors and those that are warnings, which makes
the test suite more precise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76311
Some tests do not fail at all when -verify is not supported, unless some
arbitrary warning flag is added to make them fail. We currently used
-Werror=unused-result to make them fail, but doing so makes the test
suite a lot more inscrutable. It seems better to just disable those
tests when -verify is not supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76256
Summary:
This is a re-application of r357533 and r357531. They had been reverted
because we thought the commits broke the LLDB data formatters, but it
turns out this was because only r357531 had been included in the CI
run.
Before this patch, we would only ever throw an exception if the badbit
was set on the stream. The Standard is currently very unclear on how
exceptions should be propagated and what error flags should be set by
the input stream operations. This commit changes libc++ to behave under
a different (but valid) interpretation of the Standard. This interpretation
of the Standard matches what other implementations are doing.
This effectively implements the wording in p1264r0. It hasn't been voted
into the Standard yet, however there is wide agreement that the fix is
correct and it's just a matter of time before the fix is standardized.
PR21586
PR15949
rdar://problem/15347558
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49863
llvm-svn: 357775
Fixed the inability to properly rebind the testing allocator, by making the
inner alloc_impl type a plain struct and making the operations templates. Before
rebind failed to compile complaining that a alloc_impl<T>* was not convertible
to an alloc_impl<U>*.
This enables the test to pass for MSVC++ once we provide the strong guarantee
for the copy assignment operator.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D60023
llvm-svn: 357545
This reverts commits r357533 and r357531, which broke the LLDB
data formatters. I'll hold off until we know how to fix the data
formatters accordingly.
llvm-svn: 357536
Summary:
Before this patch, we would only ever throw an exception if the badbit
was set on the stream. The Standard is currently very unclear on how
exceptions should be propagated and what error flags should be set by
the input stream operations. This commit changes libc++ to behave under
a different (but valid) interpretation of the Standard. This interpretation
of the Standard matches what other implementations are doing.
I will submit a paper in San Diego to clarify the Standard such that the
interpretation used in this commit (and other implementations) is the only
possible one.
PR21586
PR15949
rdar://problem/15347558
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49863
llvm-svn: 357531
Those tests fail when linking against a new dylib but running against
macosx10.7. I believe this is caused by a duplicate definition of the
RTTI for exception classes in libc++.dylib and libc++abi.dylib, but
this matter still needs some investigation.
This issue was not caught previously because all the tests always linked
against the same dylib used for running (because LIT made it impossible
to do otherwise before r349171).
rdar://problem/46809586
llvm-svn: 354940
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
After two failed attempts last week to make this work I am
going back to a known good method of making this test pass on
macOS...adding the current apple-clang version to the
UNSUPPORTED list.
During a previous patch review (https://reviews.llvm.org/D44103)
it was suggested to just XFAIL libcpp-no-deduction-guides
as was done to iter_alloc_deduction.pass.cpp. However
this caused a an unexpected pass on:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc-tot-latest-std/builds/214
I then attempted to just mark libcpp-no-deduction-guides
as UNSUPPORTED, however this caused an additional bot
failure. So I reverted everything (https://reviews.llvm.org/rCXX327191).
To solve this and get work unblocked I am adding
apple-clang-9 to the original UNSUPPORTED list.
llvm-svn: 327304
Summary: Refactor the previous version method of marking each apple-clang version as UNSUPPORTED and just XFAIL'ing the libcpp-no-deduction-guides instead. This brings this test inline with the same style as iter_alloc_deduction.pass.cpp
Reviewers: EricWF, dexonsmith
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: EricWF, vsapsai, vsk, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44103
llvm-svn: 327178
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/exclusive.scan/exclusive_scan.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/exclusive.scan/exclusive_scan_init_op.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/inclusive.scan/inclusive_scan.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/inclusive.scan/inclusive_scan_op.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/inclusive.scan/inclusive_scan_op_init.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/transform.exclusive.scan/transform_exclusive_scan_init_bop_uop.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/transform.inclusive.scan/transform_inclusive_scan_bop_uop.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/transform.inclusive.scan/transform_inclusive_scan_bop_uop_init.pass.cpp
Fix MSVC x64 truncation warnings.
warning C4267: conversion from 'size_t' to 'int', possible loss of data
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.modifiers/string_append/push_back.pass.cpp
Fix MSVC uninitialized memory warning.
warning C6001: Using uninitialized memory 'vl'.
test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/PR20855_tuple_ref_binding_diagnostics.pass.cpp
Include <cassert> for the assert() macro.
Fixes D43273.
llvm-svn: 326120
This makes them consistent (many comments already used uppercase).
The special REQUIRES, UNSUPPORTED, and XFAIL comments are excluded from this change.
llvm-svn: 309468
In T_size_size.pass, there is an explicit template argument to std::min to ask
for unsigned, to avoid type deduction errors. However, C1XX' warnings still
hate this use, because a 64 bit value (a size_t) is being passed to a function
accepting an unsigned (a 32 bit value).
Instead, change the tests to pass around std::size_t instances, and explicitly
narrow when constructing the string type under test. This also allows
removal of explicit template arguments to std::min.
llvm-svn: 302473
Libc++ is used as a system library on macOS and iOS (amongst others). In order
for users to be able to compile a binary that is intended to be deployed to an
older version of the platform, clang provides the
availability attribute <https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#availability>_
that can be placed on declarations to describe the lifecycle of a symbol in the
library.
See docs/DesignDocs/AvailabilityMarkup.rst for more information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31739
llvm-svn: 302172
The clang assertion causing these tests failing with sanitizer is fixed
in r295794. All the bots running libcxx tests should be upgraded and
running the compiler with the fix.
llvm-svn: 296385
Summary:
This patch fixes http://llvm.org/PR31938. The description below is copy/pasted from the bug:
The standard says:
template<class charT, class traits = char_traits<charT>,
class Allocator = allocator<charT>>
class basic_string {
using value_type = typename traits::char_type;
// ...
basic_string(const charT* s, const Allocator& a = Allocator());
};
libc++ actually chooses to declare the constructor as
basic_string(const value_type* s, const Allocator& a = Allocator());
The implicit deduction guides from class template argument deduction make what was previously an implementation detail visible:
std::basic_string s = "foo"; // error, can't deduce charT.
The constructor in question is in the libc++ DSO, but fortunately it looks like fixing this will not result in an ABI break.
@rsmith How does this look? I did more than just the constructors mentioned in the PR, but IDK how far to take it.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29863
llvm-svn: 295393
Guard typedefs and static_asserts with _LIBCPP_VERSION.
test/std/containers/sequences/vector.bool/move_assign_noexcept.pass.cpp
test/std/containers/sequences/vector.bool/move_noexcept.pass.cpp
test/std/containers/sequences/vector.bool/swap_noexcept.pass.cpp
Additionally deal with conditional compilation.
test/std/containers/associative/map/map.cons/move_noexcept.pass.cpp
test/std/containers/associative/multimap/multimap.cons/move_noexcept.pass.cpp
Additionally deal with typedefs used by other typedefs.
Fixes D29135.
llvm-svn: 294154
When support for `basic_string_view` was added to string it also
added new assignment operators from `basic_string_view`. These caused
ambiguity when assigning from a braced initializer. This patch fixes
that regression by making the basic_string_view assignment operator
rank lower in overload resolution by making it a template.
llvm-svn: 292276
test/std/containers/container.adaptors/queue/queue.cons.alloc/ctor_container_alloc.pass.cpp
test/std/containers/container.adaptors/stack/stack.cons.alloc/ctor_container_alloc.pass.cpp
Iterate with C::size_type because that's what operator[] takes.
test/std/containers/sequences/vector/contiguous.pass.cpp
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.require/contiguous.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<typename C::difference_type> because that's what the iterator's operator+ takes.
Fixes D27777.
llvm-svn: 289734
test/std/input.output/iostream.format/input.streams/istream.unformatted/get.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<char> because basic_istream::get() returns int_type (N4606 27.7.2.3 [istream.unformatted]/4).
test/std/input.output/iostream.format/output.streams/ostream.formatted/ostream.inserters.arithmetic/minus1.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<char> because toupper() returns int (C11 7.4.2.2/1).
test/std/iterators/stream.iterators/ostream.iterator/ostream.iterator.ops/assign_t.pass.cpp
This test is intentionally writing doubles to ostream_iterator<int>.
It's silencing -Wliteral-conversion for Clang, so I'm adding C4244 silencing for MSVC.
test/std/language.support/support.limits/limits/numeric.limits.members/infinity.pass.cpp
Given `extern float zero;`, the expression `1./zero` has type double, which emits a truncation warning
when being passed to test<float>() taking float. The fix is to say `1.f/zero` which has type float.
test/std/numerics/complex.number/cmplx.over/arg.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/complex.number/cmplx.over/norm.pass.cpp
These tests were constructing std::complex<double>(x, 0), emitting truncation warnings when x is long long.
Saying static_cast<double>(x) avoids this.
test/std/numerics/rand/rand.eng/rand.eng.lcong/seed_result_type.pass.cpp
This was using `int s` to construct and seed a linear_congruential_engine<T, stuff>, where T is
unsigned short/unsigned int/unsigned long/unsigned long long. That emits a truncation warning in the
unsigned short case. Because the range [0, 20) is tiny and we aren't doing anything else with the index,
we can just iterate with `T s`.
test/std/re/re.traits/value.pass.cpp
regex_traits<wchar_t>::value()'s first parameter is wchar_t (N4606 28.7 [re.traits]/13). This loop is
using int to iterate through ['g', 0xFFFF), emitting a truncation warning from int to wchar_t
(which is 16-bit for some of us). Because the bound is exclusive, we can just iterate with wchar_t.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.cons/size_char_alloc.pass.cpp
This test is a little strange. It's trying to verify that basic_string's (InIt, InIt) range constructor
isn't confused by "N copies of C" when N and C have the same integral type. To do this, it was
testing (100, 65), but that eventually emits truncation warnings from int to char. There's a simple way
to avoid this - passing (static_cast<char>(100), static_cast<char>(65)) also exercises the disambiguation.
(And 100 is representable even when char has a signed range.)
test/std/strings/string.view/string.view.hash/string_view.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<char_type> because `'0' + i` has type int.
test/std/utilities/function.objects/bind/func.bind/func.bind.bind/nested.pass.cpp
What's more horrible than nested bind()? pow() overloads! This operator()(T a, T b) was assuming that
std::pow(a, b) can be returned as T. (In this case, T is int.) However, N4606 26.9.1 [cmath.syn]/2
says that pow(int, int) returns double, so this was truncating double to int.
Adding static_cast<T> silences this.
test/std/utilities/function.objects/unord.hash/integral.pass.cpp
This was iterating `for (int i = 0; i <= 5; ++i)` and constructing `T t(i);` but that's truncating
when T is short. (And super truncating when T is bool.) Adding static_cast<T> silences this.
test/std/utilities/utility/exchange/exchange.pass.cpp
First, this was exchanging 67.2 into an int, but that's inherently truncating.
Changing this to static_cast<short>(67) avoids the truncation while preserving the
"what if T and U are different" test coverage.
Second, this was exchanging {} with the explicit type float into an int, and that's also
inherently truncating. Specifying short is just as good.
test/std/utilities/utility/pairs/pairs.spec/make_pair.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<short>. Note that this affects template argument deduction for make_pair(),
better fulfilling the test's intent. For example, this was saying
`typedef std::pair<int, short> P1; P1 p1 = std::make_pair(3, 4);` but that was asking
make_pair() to return pair<int, int>, which was then being converted to pair<int, short>.
(pair's converting constructors are tested elsewhere.)
Now, std::make_pair(3, static_cast<short>(4)) actually returns pair<int, short>.
(There's still a conversion from pair<nullptr_t, short> to pair<unique_ptr<int>, short>.)
Fixes D27544.
llvm-svn: 289111
test/std/containers/sequences/vector.bool/copy.pass.cpp
test/std/containers/sequences/vector.bool/copy_alloc.pass.cpp
test/std/containers/sequences/vector/vector.cons/copy.pass.cpp
test/std/containers/sequences/vector/vector.cons/copy_alloc.pass.cpp
Change "unsigned s = x.size();" to "typename C::size_type s = x.size();"
because that's what it returns.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.cons/pointer_alloc.pass.cpp
Include <cstddef>, then change "unsigned n = T::length(s);"
to "std::size_t n = T::length(s);" because that's what char_traits returns.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.cons/substr.pass.cpp
Change unsigned to typename S::size_type because that's what str.size() returns.
test/std/utilities/template.bitset/bitset.cons/ull_ctor.pass.cpp
This was needlessly truncating std::size_t to unsigned.
It's being used to compare and initialize std::size_t.
llvm-svn: 288753
Various changes:
test/std/algorithms/alg.sorting/alg.merge/inplace_merge.pass.cpp
This is comparing value_type to unsigned. value_type is sometimes int and sometimes struct S (implicitly constructible from int).
static_cast<value_type>(unsigned) silences the warning and doesn't do anything bad (as the values in question are small).
test/std/algorithms/alg.sorting/alg.nth.element/nth_element_comp.pass.cpp
This is comparing an int remote-element to size_t. The values in question are small and non-negative,
so either type is fine. I think that converting int to size_t is marginally better here than the reverse.
test/std/containers/sequences/deque/deque.cons/size.pass.cpp
DefaultOnly::count is int (and non-negative). When comparing to unsigned, use static_cast<unsigned>.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.access/index.pass.cpp
We're comparing char to '0' through '9', but formed with the type size_t. Add static_cast<char>.
test/std/utilities/template.bitset/bitset.cons/ull_ctor.pass.cpp
Include <cstddef> for pedantic correctness (this test was already mentioning std::size_t).
"v[i] == (i & 1)" was comparing bool to size_t. Saying "v[i] == ((i & 1) != 0)" smashes the RHS to bool.
llvm-svn: 288749
Add static_cast<std::size_t> to more comparisons. (Performed manually, unlike part 8/12.)
Also, include <cstddef> when it wasn't already being included.
llvm-svn: 288746
Various changes:
test/std/algorithms/alg.sorting/alg.binary.search/binary.search/binary_search.pass.cpp
Change M from unsigned to int. It's compared against "int x",
and we binary_search() for it within a vector<int>.
test/std/numerics/rand/rand.dis/rand.dist.norm/rand.dist.norm.f/eval.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/rand/rand.dis/rand.dist.norm/rand.dist.norm.f/eval_param.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<unsigned> when comparing int to unsigned.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.cons/size_char_alloc.pass.cpp
Change unsigned indices to int when we're being given int as a bound.
llvm-svn: 287825
test/std/depr/depr.c.headers/inttypes_h.pass.cpp
test/std/input.output/file.streams/c.files/cinttypes.pass.cpp
test/std/input.output/iostream.forward/iosfwd.pass.cpp
Add test() to avoid a bunch of void-casts, although we still need a few.
test/std/input.output/iostream.format/quoted.manip/quoted.pass.cpp
skippingws was unused (it's unclear to me whether this was mistakenly copy-pasted from round_trip() below).
test/std/localization/locale.categories/category.collate/locale.collate/types.pass.cpp
test/std/localization/locale.categories/category.ctype/facet.ctype.special/types.pass.cpp
test/std/localization/locale.categories/category.ctype/locale.codecvt/types_char.pass.cpp
test/std/localization/locale.categories/category.ctype/locale.codecvt/types_wchar_t.pass.cpp
test/std/localization/locale.categories/category.ctype/locale.ctype/types.pass.cpp
test/std/localization/locale.categories/facet.numpunct/locale.numpunct/types.pass.cpp
test/std/localization/locales/locale.global.templates/use_facet.pass.cpp
When retrieving facets, the references are unused.
test/std/localization/locale.categories/category.numeric/locale.nm.put/facet.num.put.members/put_long.pass.cpp
test/std/localization/locale.categories/category.numeric/locale.nm.put/facet.num.put.members/put_unsigned_long.pass.cpp
"std::ios_base::iostate err = ios.goodbit;" was completely unused here.
test/std/localization/locale.categories/category.time/locale.time.get/time_base.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/c.math/ctgmath.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/rand/rand.device/entropy.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/rand/rand.device/eval.pass.cpp
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.modifiers/string_copy/copy.pass.cpp
test/std/strings/char.traits/char.traits.specializations/char.traits.specializations.char16_t/eof.pass.cpp
test/std/strings/char.traits/char.traits.specializations/char.traits.specializations.char32_t/eof.pass.cpp
test/std/thread/futures/futures.promise/dtor.pass.cpp
test/std/thread/futures/futures.task/futures.task.members/dtor.pass.cpp
test/std/thread/thread.condition/thread.condition.condvar/wait_for_pred.pass.cpp
These variables are verifying types but are otherwise unused.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.capacity/reserve.pass.cpp
old_cap was unused (it's unclear to me whether it was intended to be used).
test/std/strings/char.traits/char.traits.specializations/char.traits.specializations.char/eq.pass.cpp
test/std/strings/char.traits/char.traits.specializations/char.traits.specializations.char16_t/eq.pass.cpp
test/std/strings/char.traits/char.traits.specializations/char.traits.specializations.char16_t/lt.pass.cpp
test/std/strings/char.traits/char.traits.specializations/char.traits.specializations.char32_t/eq.pass.cpp
test/std/strings/char.traits/char.traits.specializations/char.traits.specializations.char32_t/lt.pass.cpp
test/std/strings/char.traits/char.traits.specializations/char.traits.specializations.wchar.t/eq.pass.cpp
test/std/strings/char.traits/char.traits.specializations/char.traits.specializations.wchar.t/lt.pass.cpp
These tests contained unused characters.
llvm-svn: 286847
These tests are of the form
try {
action-that-may-throw
assert(!exceptional-condition)
assert(some-other-facts)
} catch (relevant-exception) {
assert(exceptional-condition)
}
Under libcpp-no-exceptions there is still value in verifying
some-other-facts while avoiding the exceptional case. So for these tests
just conditionally check some-other-facts if exceptional-condition is
false. When exception are supported make sure that a true
exceptional-condition throws an exception
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26136
llvm-svn: 285697
This is a follow up of D24562.
These tests do not check anything but exceptions, so it makes sense to mark
them as UNSUPPORTED under a library built without exceptions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26075
llvm-svn: 285550
This prevent the symbols from being both externally available and hidden, which
causes them to be linked incorrectly. This is only a problem when the address
of the function is explicitly taken since it will always be inlined otherwise.
This patch fixes the issues that caused r285456 to be reverted, and can
now be reapplied.
llvm-svn: 285531
Louis Dionne