When I applied r356500 (https://reviews.llvm.org/D59152), I somehow
deleted all of filesystem's tests. I will revert r356500 and re-apply
it properly.
llvm-svn: 356505
Summary:
This patch treats <filesystem> as a first-class citizen of the dylib,
like all other sub-libraries (e.g. <chrono>). As such, it also removes
all special handling for installing the filesystem library separately
or disabling part of the test suite from the lit command line.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF, serge-sans-paille
Subscribers: mgorny, christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, jfb, jdoerfert, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59152
llvm-svn: 356500
Summary:
In r342843, I added deprecation warnings to some facilities that were
deprectated in C++14 and C++17. However, those deprecation warnings
were not enabled by default.
After discussing this on IRC, we had finally gotten consensus to enable
those warnings by default, and I'm getting around to doing that only
now.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, jdoerfert, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58140
llvm-svn: 355961
When Clang tries to complete a type containing `std::optional` it
considers the `in_place_t` constructor with no arguments which checks
if the value type is default constructible. If the value type is a
nested class type, then this check occurs too early and poisons the
is_default_constructible trait.
This patch makes optional deduce `in_place_t` so we can prevent
this early SFINAE evaluation. Technically this could break people
doing weird things with the in_place_t tag, but that seems less
important than making the nested class case work.
llvm-svn: 355877
Those tests fail when linking against a new dylib but running against
macosx10.7. I believe this is caused by a duplicate definition of the
RTTI for exception classes in libc++.dylib and libc++abi.dylib, but
this matter still needs some investigation.
This issue was not caught previously because all the tests always linked
against the same dylib used for running (because LIT made it impossible
to do otherwise before r349171).
rdar://problem/46809586
llvm-svn: 354940
It turns out that I un-XFAILed too many tests in r353210: some tests
actually fail whether exceptions are enabled or not because they use
types that are marked as unavailable even when exceptions are disabled.
llvm-svn: 353215
Some tests are marked as failing on platforms where the dylib does not
provide the required exception classes. However, when testing with
exceptions disabled, those tests shouldn't be marked as failing.
llvm-svn: 353210
When the whole test only works starting at some version of the Standard,
use UNSUPPORTED lit markup instead of #ifdef TEST_STD_VER. This provides
more visibility into the test suite.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D57704.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 353206
This patch removes some vendor-specific availability XFAILs from the
test suite. In the future, when a new feature is introduced in the
dylib, an availability macro should be created and a matching lit
feature should be created. That way, the test suite can XFAIL whenever
the implementation lacks the necessary feature instead of being
cluttered by vendor-specific annotations.
Right now, those vendor-specific annotations are still somewhat cluttering
the test suite by being in `config.py`, but at least they are localized.
In the future, we could design a way to define those less intrusively or
even automatically based on the availability macros that already exist
in <__config>.
llvm-svn: 353201
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
The meta-programming that attempted to form the invoke call expression
was not in a SFINAE context. This made it a hard error to provide
non-referencable types like 'void' or 'void (...) const'.
This patch fixes the error by checking the validity of the call
expression within a SFINAE context.
llvm-svn: 352522
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Summary:
Starting in Clang 8.0 and GCC 8.0, `alignof` and `__alignof` return different values in same cases. Specifically `alignof` and `_Alignof` return the minimum alignment for a type, where as `__alignof` returns the preferred alignment. libc++ currently uses `__alignof` but means to use `alignof`. See llvm.org/PR39713
This patch introduces the macro `_LIBCPP_ALIGNOF` so we can control which spelling gets used.
This patch does not introduce any ABI guard to provide the old behavior with newer compilers. However, if we decide that is needed, this patch makes it trivial to implement.
I think we should commit this change immediately, and decide what we want to do about the ABI afterwards.
Reviewers: ldionne, EricWF
Reviewed By: ldionne, EricWF
Subscribers: jyknight, christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54814
llvm-svn: 351289
Summary:
P0602R4 makes the special member functions of optional and variant
conditionally trivial based on the types in the optional/variant.
We already implemented that, but the tests were organized as if this
were a non-standard extension. This patch reorganizes the tests in a
way that makes more sense since this is not an extension anymore.
Reviewers: EricWF, mpark, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54772
llvm-svn: 350884
There were 3 tests with 'int main(void)', and 6 with the return type on a different line. I'm about to send a patch for main in tests, and this NFC change is unrelated.
llvm-svn: 350770
Makes libc++ behavior consistent between C++03 and C++11.
Can use `decltype` in C++03 because `include/__config` defines a macro when
`decltype` is not available.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF, erik.pilkington, ldionne
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: dexonsmith, cfe-commits, howard.hinnant, ldionne, christof, jkorous, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48753
llvm-svn: 349676
Explicitly disable the -Wformat-zero-length diagnostic when running
ctime tests, since one of the test cases passes zero-length format
string to strftime(). When strftime() is appropriately decorated
with __attribute__(format, ...), this caused the test to fail because
of this warning (e.g. on NetBSD).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55661
llvm-svn: 349294
Summary:
std::tuple marks its constructors as noexcept when the corresponding
memberwise constructors are noexcept too -- this commit improves std::pair
so that it behaves the same.
This is a re-application of r348824, which broke the build in C++03 mode
because a test was marked as supported in C++03 when it shouldn't be.
Note:
I did not add support in the explicit and non-explicit `pair(_Tuple&& __p)`
constructors because those are non-standard extensions, and supporting them
properly is tedious (we have to copy the rvalue-referenceness of the deduced
_Tuple&& onto the result of tuple_element).
<rdar://problem/29537079>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48669
llvm-svn: 348847
Summary:
std::tuple marks its constructors as noexcept when the corresponding
memberwise constructors are noexcept too -- this commit improves std::pair
so that it behaves the same.
Note:
I did not add support in the explicit and non-explicit `pair(_Tuple&& __p)`
constructors because those are non-standard extensions, and supporting them
properly is tedious (we have to copy the rvalue-referenceness of the deduced
_Tuple&& onto the result of tuple_element).
<rdar://problem/29537079>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48669
llvm-svn: 348824
The tests were marked to fail based on the 'availability' LIT feature.
However, those tests should really only be failing when we run them
against the dylibs that were deployed on macosx10.7 and macosx10.8,
which the deployment target has nothing to do with.
This caused the tests to unexpectedly pass when running the tests
with deployment target macosx10.{7,8} but running with a recent dylib.
llvm-svn: 348520
Summary:
This was voted into C++20 in San Diego. Note that there was a revision
D0318R2 which did include unwrap_reference_t, but we mistakingly voted
P0318R1 into the C++20 Working Draft (which does not include
unwrap_reference_t). This patch implements D0318R2, which is what
we'll end up with in the Working Draft once this mistake has been
fixed.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54485
llvm-svn: 348138
This reverts commit 087f065cb0c7463f521a62599884493aaee2ea12.
The tests were failing on 32 bit builds, and I don't have time
to clean them up right now. I'll recommit tomorrow with fixed tests.
llvm-svn: 347816
Summary:
Starting in Clang 8.0 and GCC 8.0, `alignof` and `__alignof` return different values in same cases. Specifically `alignof` and `_Alignof` return the minimum alignment for a type, where as `__alignof` returns the preferred alignment. libc++ currently uses `__alignof` but means to use `alignof`. See llvm.org/PR39713
This patch introduces the macro `_LIBCPP_ALIGNOF` so we can control which spelling gets used.
This patch does not introduce any ABI guard to provide the old behavior with newer compilers. However, if we decide that is needed, this patch makes it trivial to implement.
I think we should commit this change immediately, and decide what we want to do about the ABI afterwards.
Reviewers: ldionne, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54814
llvm-svn: 347787
Summary:
In PR39232, we noticed that some variant tests started failing in C++2a mode
with recent Clangs, because the rules for literal types changed in C++2a. As
a result, a temporary fix was checked in (enabling the test only in C++17).
This commit is what I believe should be the long term fix: I removed the
tests that checked constexpr default-constructibility with a weird type
from the tests for index() and valueless_by_exception(), and instead I
added tests for those using an obviously literal type in the test for the
default constructor.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, libcxx-commits, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54767
llvm-svn: 347568
The XFAIL started passing since we're only testing for trivial-copyability of
reference_wrapper in C++14 and above. This commit constrains the XFAIL to
gcc-4.9 with C++14 (it would also fail on C++17 and above, but those standards
are not available with GCC 4.9).
llvm-svn: 347264
Some tests use type std::max_align_t, but don't include <cstddef> header
directly. As a result, these tests won't compile against some conformant
libraries.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D54645.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 347232
Summary:
P1006 adds support for constexpr in the specialization of pointer_traits
for raw pointers. This is necessary in order to use pointer_traits in
the upcoming constexpr containers. We expect P1006 to be voted into the
working draft for C++20 at the San Diego meeting.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53867
llvm-svn: 346764
Summary:
Some tests (mainly the new C++20 calendar library) fail when libc++ is
tested with '--param=std=c++98'. The failures happen because the tests
actually don't support C++98, but don't mention C++98 in the
'UNSUPPORTED:' line.
This change fixes the issue.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, ldionne
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: arphaman, michaelplatings, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53640
llvm-svn: 345148
Revert r344535 "Wrap up the new chrono literals in an #ifdef..."
Revert r344546 "Mark a couple of test cases as 'C++17-only'..."
Some of the buildbot failures were masked by another error,
and this one was probably missed.
llvm-svn: 344580
Debian build bots are running Clang 4, which apparently does not support
the "deprecated" attribute properly. Clang pretends to support the attribute,
but the attribute doesn't do anything.
(live example: https://wandbox.org/permlink/0De69aXns0t1D59r)
On a separate note, I'm not sure I understand why we're even running the
libc++ tests under Clang-4. Is this a configuration we support? I can
understand that libc++ should _build_ with Clang 4, but it's not clear
to me that new libc++ headers should be usable under older compilers
like that.
llvm-svn: 342854
Summary:
These deprecation warnings are opt-in: they are only enabled when the
_LIBCXX_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS macro is defined, which is not the case
by default. Note that this is a first step in the right direction, but
I wasn't able to get an exhaustive list of all deprecated components
per standard, so there's certainly stuff that's missing. The list of
components this commit marks as deprecated is:
in C++11:
- auto_ptr, auto_ptr_ref
- binder1st, binder2nd, bind1st(), bind2nd()
- pointer_to_unary_function, pointer_to_binary_function, ptr_fun()
- mem_fun_t, mem_fun1_t, const_mem_fun_t, const_mem_fun1_t, mem_fun()
- mem_fun_ref_t, mem_fun1_ref_t, const_mem_fun_ref_t, const_mem_fun1_ref_t, mem_fun_ref()
in C++14:
- random_shuffle()
in C++17:
- unary_negate, binary_negate, not1(), not2()
<rdar://problem/18168350>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48912
llvm-svn: 342843
type.
Libc++ correctly asserts that a set of visitors for a variant all
return the same type. However, we use the visitation machinary to
perform relational operations. This causes a static assertion when
some of the alternatives relops return a UDT which is implicitly
convertible to bool instead of 'bool' exactly.
llvm-svn: 342560
Summary:
Major QoI considerations:
- The facility is backported to C++14, same as libstdc++.
- Efforts have been made to minimize the header dependencies.
- The design is friendly to the uses of MSVC intrinsics (`__emulu`, `_umul128`, `_BitScanForward`, `_BitScanForward64`) but not implemented; future contributions are welcome.
Thanks to Milo Yip for contributing the implementation of `__u64toa` and `__u32toa`.
References:
https://wg21.link/p0067r5https://wg21.link/p0682r1
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: ldionne, Quuxplusone, christof, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41458
llvm-svn: 338479
* Remove unused type from is_assignable.pass.cpp
* Don't specialize `common_type<::X<float>>` in common_type.pass.cpp, which violates the requirements of [meta.trans.other]/5
llvm-svn: 336618
Checking for complete types is really rather tricky when you consider
the amount of specializations required to check a function type. This
specifically caused PR37407 where we incorrectly diagnosed
noexcept function types as incomplete (but there were plenty of other
cases that would cause this).
This patch removes the complete type checking for now. I'm going
to look into adding a clang builtin to correctly do this for us.
llvm-svn: 332040
Be defensive against a reentrant std::function::operator=(nullptr_t), in case
the held function object has a non-trivial destructor. Destroying the function
object in-place can lead to the destructor being called twice.
Patch by Duncan P. N. Exon Smith. C++03 support by Volodymyr Sapsai.
rdar://problem/32836603
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits, arphaman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34331
llvm-svn: 330885
MSVC emits "warning C4244: 'initializing': conversion from 'int'
to 'short', possible loss of data" when it sees pair<Whatever, short>
constructed from (whatever, 4), because int is being truncated to
short within pair's constructor. (The compiler doesn't take into
account the fact that 4 is a literal at the callsite; it generates
this warning when the constructor is instantiated, because it might
be called with a runtime-valued int that would actually truncate.)
Instead of static_cast<short>, we can simply change short to int
in these tests, without affecting the pair operations that they're
trying to test: move assignment, convert copy construction, and
convert move construction.
Fixes D45016.
llvm-svn: 329973
Summary:
D44883 extends -Wself-assign to also work on C++ classes.
These new warnings pop up in the test suite, so they have to be silenced.
Please refer to the D45082 for disscussion on whether this is the right way to solve this.
Testing: `ninja check-libcxx check-libcxxabi` in stage-2 build.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: Quuxplusone, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45128
llvm-svn: 329490
Libc++ implements the pair& operator=(pair<U, V>) assignment operator
using a single template that handles assignment from all tuple-like types.
This patch moves the test for that to the libcxx test directory since
it's non-standard. It also adds additional tests to the std/.../pair
directory to test the standard behavior this template implements.
llvm-svn: 328758
This patch works around variant test failures which are new to
GCC 8. GCC 8 either doesn't perform SFINAE in lexical order, or
it doesn't halt after encountering the first failure. This
causes hard error to occur instead of substitution failure.
See gcc.gnu.org/PR78489
llvm-svn: 328261
The new/delete tests, in particular those which test replacement
functions, often fail when the optimizer is enabled because the
calls to new/delete may be optimized away, regardless of their side-effects.
This patch converts the tests to use DoNotOptimize in order to prevent
the elision.
llvm-svn: 328245
This patch fixes std::allocator, and more specifically, all users
of __libcpp_allocate and __libcpp_deallocate, to support over-aligned
types.
__libcpp_allocate/deallocate now take an alignment parameter, and when
the specified alignment is greater than that supported by malloc/new,
the aligned version of operator new is called (assuming it's available).
When aligned new isn't available, the old behavior has been kept, and the
alignment parameter is ignored.
This patch depends on recent changes to __builtin_operator_new/delete which
allow them to be used to call any regular new/delete operator. By using
__builtin_operator_new/delete when possible, the new/delete erasure optimization
is maintained.
llvm-svn: 328180
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/exclusive.scan/exclusive_scan.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/exclusive.scan/exclusive_scan_init_op.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/inclusive.scan/inclusive_scan.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/inclusive.scan/inclusive_scan_op.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/inclusive.scan/inclusive_scan_op_init.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/transform.exclusive.scan/transform_exclusive_scan_init_bop_uop.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/transform.inclusive.scan/transform_inclusive_scan_bop_uop.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/transform.inclusive.scan/transform_inclusive_scan_bop_uop_init.pass.cpp
Fix MSVC x64 truncation warnings.
warning C4267: conversion from 'size_t' to 'int', possible loss of data
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.modifiers/string_append/push_back.pass.cpp
Fix MSVC uninitialized memory warning.
warning C6001: Using uninitialized memory 'vl'.
test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/PR20855_tuple_ref_binding_diagnostics.pass.cpp
Include <cassert> for the assert() macro.
Fixes D43273.
llvm-svn: 326120
Clang previously reported an empty union as having a unique object
representation. This was incorrect and was fixed in a recent Clang commit.
This patch fixes the libc++ tests.
llvm-svn: 324153
Summary:
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20855
Libc++ goes out of it's way to diagnose `std::tuple` constructions which are UB due to lifetime bugs caused by reference creation. For example:
```
// The 'const std::string&' is created *inside* the tuple constructor, and its lifetime is over before the end of the constructor call.
std::tuple<int, const std::string&> t(std::make_tuple(42, "abc"));
```
However, we are over-aggressive and we incorrectly diagnose cases such as:
```
void foo(std::tuple<int const&, int const&> const&);
foo(std::make_tuple(42, 42));
```
This patch fixes the incorrectly diagnosed cases, as well as converting the diagnostic to use the newly added Clang trait `__reference_binds_to_temporary`. The new trait allows us to diagnose cases we previously couldn't such as:
```
std::tuple<int, const std::string&> t(42, "abc");
```
Reviewers: rsmith, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41977
llvm-svn: 323380
This patch fixes almost all currently failing tests when
using GCC ToT.
The specific changes are:
(A) Workaround gcc.gnu.org/PR83921 which rejects variables w/o initializers
in constexpr contexts -- even when the variable is an empty class. This
bug has been worked around at all callsites by adding an initializer.
Additionally a new test, constexpr_init.pass.cpp, has been added to
test that Clang doesn't suffer from these bugs.
(B) Fix streambuf.assign/swap.pass.cpp. This test was never actually
calling the swap method as intended. In fact, the swap function it
intended to call was ill-formed when instantiated. GCC diagnosed
this ill-formedness w/o needing an instantiation.
(C) size_delete11.pass.cpp was fixed by adding c++2a to the list of
unsupported dialects.
llvm-svn: 322810
test/support/msvc_stdlib_force_include.hpp
When testing MSVC's STL with C1XX, simulate a couple more compiler feature-test macros.
When testing MSVC's STL, simulate a few library feature-test macros.
test/std/atomics/atomics.lockfree/isalwayslockfree.pass.cpp
The vector_size attribute is a non-Standard extension that's supported by Clang and GCC,
but not C1XX. Therefore, guard this with `__has_attribute(vector_size)`.
Additionally, while these tests pass when MSVC's STL is compiled with Clang,
I don't consider this to be a supported scenario for our library,
so also guard this with defined(_LIBCPP_VERSION).
test/std/utilities/function.objects/func.not_fn/not_fn.pass.cpp
N4713 23.14.10 [func.not_fn]/1 depicts only `call_wrapper(call_wrapper&&) = default;`
and `call_wrapper(const call_wrapper&) = default;`. According to
15.8.2 [class.copy.assign]/2 and /4, this makes call_wrapper non-assignable.
Therefore, guard the assignability tests as libc++ specific.
Add a (void) cast to tolerate not_fn() being marked as nodiscard.
Fixes D41213.
llvm-svn: 322144
Summary:
After rL319736 for D28253 (which fixes PR28929), gcc cannot compile `<memory>` anymore in pre-C+11 modes, complaining:
```
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:648:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory: In static member function 'static std::__1::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::__1::shared_ptr<_Tp>::make_shared(_A0&, _A1&, _A2&)':
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:4365:5: error: wrong number of template arguments (4, should be at least 1)
static_assert((is_constructible<_Tp, _A0, _A1, _A2>::value), "Can't construct object in make_shared" );
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:649:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/type_traits:3198:29: note: provided for 'template<class _Tp, class _A0, class _A1> struct std::__1::is_constructible'
struct _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS is_constructible
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:648:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:4365:5: error: template argument 1 is invalid
static_assert((is_constructible<_Tp, _A0, _A1, _A2>::value), "Can't construct object in make_shared" );
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory: In static member function 'static std::__1::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::__1::shared_ptr<_Tp>::allocate_shared(const _Alloc&, _A0&, _A1&, _A2&)':
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:4444:5: error: wrong number of template arguments (4, should be at least 1)
static_assert((is_constructible<_Tp, _A0, _A1, _A2>::value), "Can't construct object in allocate_shared" );
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:649:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/type_traits:3198:29: note: provided for 'template<class _Tp, class _A0, class _A1> struct std::__1::is_constructible'
struct _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS is_constructible
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:648:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:4444:5: error: template argument 1 is invalid
static_assert((is_constructible<_Tp, _A0, _A1, _A2>::value), "Can't construct object in allocate_shared" );
^
```
This is also reported in https://bugs.freebsd.org/224946 (FreeBSD is apparently one of the very few projects that regularly builds programs against libc++ with gcc).
The reason is that the static assertions are invoking `is_constructible` with three arguments, while gcc does not have the built-in `is_constructible` feature, and the pre-C++11 `is_constructible` wrappers in `<type_traits>` only provide up to two arguments.
I have added additional wrappers for three arguments, modified the `is_constructible` entry point to take three arguments instead, and added a simple test to is_constructible.pass.cpp.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: krytarowski, cfe-commits, emaste
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41805
llvm-svn: 321963
benchmarks/util_smartptr.bench.cpp
Change CRLF to LF.
test/std/localization/locale.categories/category.monetary/locale.money.get/locale.money.get.members/get_long_double_fr_FR.pass.cpp
Consistently comment "\u20ac" as EURO SIGN, its Unicode name, instead of the actual Unicode character.
test/std/utilities/allocator.adaptor/allocator.adaptor.members/construct_type.pass.cpp
Avoid non-ASCII dash.
Fixes D40991.
llvm-svn: 320536
test/std/algorithms/alg.modifying.operations/alg.generate/generate_n.pass.cpp
Silence MSVC warning C4244. This is expected when passing
floating-point values for size.
test/std/utilities/template.bitset/bitset.members/to_ullong.pass.cpp
test/std/utilities/template.bitset/bitset.members/to_ulong.pass.cpp
Avoid MSVC "warning C4293: '<<': shift count negative or too big,
undefined behavior". MSVC sees (1ULL << N) and warns - being guarded
by const bool canFit is insufficient. A small change to the code
avoids the warning without the need for a pragma.
Remove a spurious printf() declaration from to_ullong.pass.cpp.
Change ULL to UL in to_ulong.pass.cpp. The ULL suffix was
probably copy-pasted.
test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.general/ignore.pass.cpp
Use LIBCPP_STATIC_ASSERT for consistency with other files.
test/support/container_test_types.h
Fix a null pointer dereference, found by MSVC /analyze
warning C6011 "Dereferencing NULL pointer 'm_expected_args'."
Fixes D41030.
llvm-svn: 320535
Summary:
Introduce a new form of `result_of` without function type encoding.
Rename and split `is_callable/is_nothrow_callable` into `is_invocable/is_nothrow_invocable/is_invocable_r/is_nothrow_invocable_r` (and associated types accordingly)
Change function type encoding of previous `is_callable/is_nothrow_callable` traits to conventional template type parameter lists.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, bebuch
Reviewed By: EricWF, bebuch
Subscribers: lichray, bebuch, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38831
llvm-svn: 320509
Clang recently changed the way it outputs static assert diagnostics.
This patch fixes libc++'s -verify tests so they tolerate both the old
and new message format.
llvm-svn: 313499
There were a number of cases where __double_underscore functions,
for example __has_construct_test, were called without being qualified,
causing ADL to occur. This patch qualifies those calls to avoid this
problem.
Thanks to David L. Jones for point out the issue initially.
llvm-svn: 313324
This patch fixes llvm.org/PR34298. Previously libc++ incorrectly evaluated
the __invokable trait via the converting constructor `function(Tp)` [with Tp = std::function]
whenever the copy constructor or copy assignment operator
was required. This patch further constrains that constructor to short
circut before evaluating the troublesome SFINAE when `Tp` matches
std::function.
The original patch is from Alex Lorenz.
llvm-svn: 312892
This reverts commit r312890 because the test case fails to compile for
older versions of Clang that reject initializing a const object without
a user defined constructor.
Since this patch should go into 5.0.1, I want to keep it an atomic change,
and will re-commit it with a fixed test case.
llvm-svn: 312891
This patch fixes llvm.org/PR34298. Previously libc++ incorrectly evaluated
the __invokable trait via the converting constructor `function(Tp)` [with Tp = std::function]
whenever the copy constructor or copy assignment operator
was required. This patch further constrains that constructor to short
circut before evaluating the troublesome SFINAE when `Tp` matches
std::function.
The original patch is from Alex Lorenz.
llvm-svn: 312890
* Update specification text from N4387
* Delete not_brace_initializable.fail.cpp: it's redundant with nullopt_t.fail.cpp
* is_empty<T> implies is_class<T>
* is_literal is deprecated; directly verify that we can create a nullopt_t in a constexpr context
Differential Revision: D37024
llvm-svn: 312256
test/std/containers/Emplaceable.h
test/std/containers/NotConstructible.h
test/support/counting_predicates.hpp
Replace unary_function/binary_function inheritance with typedefs.
test/std/depr/depr.function.objects/depr.base/binary_function.pass.cpp
test/std/depr/depr.function.objects/depr.base/unary_function.pass.cpp
test/std/utilities/function.objects/func.require/binary_function.pass.cpp
test/std/utilities/function.objects/func.require/unary_function.pass.cpp
Mark these tests as requiring 98/03/11/14 because 17 removed unary_function/binary_function.
test/std/thread/futures/futures.task/futures.task.members/ctor_func_alloc.pass.cpp
test/std/thread/futures/futures.task/futures.task.nonmembers/uses_allocator.pass.cpp
Mark these tests as requiring 11/14 because 17 removed packaged_task allocator support.
test/std/utilities/function.objects/func.wrap/func.wrap.func/derive_from.pass.cpp
This test doesn't need to be skipped in C++17 mode. Only the construction of
std::function from an allocator needs to be skipped in C++17 mode.
test/std/utilities/function.objects/refwrap/refwrap.access/conversion.pass.cpp
test/std/utilities/function.objects/refwrap/refwrap.assign/copy_assign.pass.cpp
test/std/utilities/function.objects/refwrap/refwrap.const/copy_ctor.pass.cpp
test/std/utilities/function.objects/refwrap/refwrap.const/type_ctor.pass.cpp
When testing these reference_wrapper features, unary_function inheritance is totally irrelevant.
test/std/utilities/function.objects/refwrap/weak_result.pass.cpp
Define and use my_unary_function/my_binary_function to test the weak result type machinery
(which is still present in C++17, although deprecated).
test/support/msvc_stdlib_force_include.hpp
Now we can test C++17 strictly, without enabling removed features.
Fixes D36503.
llvm-svn: 311705
This improves readability and (theoretically) improves portability,
as _Ugly names are reserved.
This performs additional de-uglification, so all of these tests
follow the example of iterator.traits/empty.pass.cpp.
llvm-svn: 310761
This makes them consistent (many comments already used uppercase).
The special REQUIRES, UNSUPPORTED, and XFAIL comments are excluded from this change.
llvm-svn: 309468
Clang and C1XX both complain about mismatched class/struct, but libc++ and MSVC's STL
differ on what they use for tuple_element/tuple_size, so there's no way to win here.
I'm reverting this part of my previous change. In the future, I'll have to suppress
the warning for one compiler or the other.
llvm-svn: 305854
Style/paranoia: 42.1 doesn't have an exact binary representation. Although this doesn't
cause failures, it makes me uncomfortable, so I'm changing it to 42.5.
C1XX rightly warns about unreferenced variables. Adding tests for their values
makes C1XX happy and improves test coverage.
C1XX (somewhat obnoxiously) warns about seeing a struct specialized as a class.
Although the Standard doesn't care, saying struct consistently is better.
(The Standard itself is still inconsistent about whether to depict tuple_element
and tuple_size as structs or classes.)
Fixes D33953.
llvm-svn: 305843
Remarks: This function shall not participate in overload resolution unless
`is_same_v<decay_t<T>, variant>` is false, unless `decay_t<T>` is
neither a specialization of `in_place_type_t` nor a specialization of
`in_place_index_t`, unless `is_constructible_v<Tj, T>` is true, and
unless the expression `FUN(std::forward<T>(t))` (with `FUN` being the
above-mentioned set of imaginary functions) is well formed.
Depends on D34111.
Reviewers: EricWF, K-ballo
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34112
llvm-svn: 305668
Summary:
- Removed the move-constructibe requirement from copy-assignable.
- Updated `__assign_alt` such that we direct initialize if
`_Tp` can be `nothrow`-constructible from `_Arg`, or `_Tp`'s
move construction can throw. Otherwise, construct a temporary and move it.
- Updated the tests to remove the pre-LWG2904 path.
Depends on D32671.
Reviewers: EricWF, CaseyCarter
Reviewed By: EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33965
llvm-svn: 304891
Also: Move constexpr / triviality extension tests into the std tree and make them conditional on _LIBCPP_VERSION / _MSVC_STL_VERSION.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D32671
llvm-svn: 304847
The tests were previously guarded by #if defined(_LIBCPP_VER) || defined(_MSVC_STL_VER),
which is both incorrect (e.g. _LIBCPP_VERSION) and unneeded. Although the tests are
technically non-standard (yet) they are supported by both libc++ and MSVC's STL.
libstdc++ doesn't regularly use the test suite so I'm not concerned about guarding these
tests for them.
llvm-svn: 303953
This patch cleans up a number of issues reported by STL, including:
1) Fix duplicate is_convertible test.
2) Move non-standard reference_wrapper tests under test/libcxx
3) Fix assumption that sizeof(wchar_t) == 32 in the codecvt and
wstring_convert tests.
llvm-svn: 302870
Clang 5.0 implements these changes here: 87cd035326
MSVC++ will implement these changes in the first toolset update to 2017.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33021
llvm-svn: 302710
Summary:
This patch fixes bugs.llvm.org/PR32979.
[util.smartptr.shared.const] says:
> In the constructor definitions below, enables shared_from_this with p, for a pointer p of type Y*, means
> that if Y has an unambiguous and accessible base class that is a specialization of enable_shared_from_-
> this.
This means that libc++ needs to respect the access specifier of the base class, and not attempt to construct
and enabled_shared_from_this base if it is private. However access specifiers don't affect overload resolution
so our current implementation will attempt to construct the private base.
This patch uses SFINAE to correctly detect if the shared_ptr input has an accessible enable_shared_from_this
base class.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33033
llvm-svn: 302709
On Windows the function template `template <class T> void test()` has
the same mangled name when instantiated with the distinct types `void()`
and `void() noexcept`. When this occurs Clang emits an error. This error
was causing two type-traits tests to fail.
However this can be worked around by using class templates instead of
function templates, which is what this patch does to fix the errors.
llvm-svn: 302380
Libc++ is used as a system library on macOS and iOS (amongst others). In order
for users to be able to compile a binary that is intended to be deployed to an
older version of the platform, clang provides the
availability attribute <https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#availability>_
that can be placed on declarations to describe the lifecycle of a symbol in the
library.
See docs/DesignDocs/AvailabilityMarkup.rst for more information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31739
llvm-svn: 302172
* Cover optional's emplace-from-initializer_list overload
* Verify that any::emplace and optional::emplace return a reference to the correct type even for throwing cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32106
llvm-svn: 301055
These tests were unconditionally asserting that optional and unique_ptr declare throwing hashes, but MSVC++ implements conditional noexcept forwarding that of the underlying hash function. As a result we were failing these tests but there's nothing forbidding strengthening noexcept in that way.
Changed the ASSERT_NOT_NOEXCEPT asserts to use types which themselves have non-noexcept hash functions.
llvm-svn: 300516
This patch overhauls both specializations of unique_ptr while implementing
the following LWG issues:
* LWG 2801 - This issue constrains unique_ptr's constructors when the deleter type
is not default constructible. Additionally it adds SFINAE conditions
to unique_ptr<T[]>::unique_ptr(Up).
* LWG 2905 - This issue reworks the unique_ptr(pointer, /* see below */ deleter)
constructors so that they correctly SFINAE when the deleter argument cannot
be used to construct the stored deleter.
* LWG 2520 - This issue fixes initializing unique_ptr<T[]> from nullptr.
Libc++ had previously implemented this issue, but the suggested resolution
still broke initialization from NULL. This patch re-works the
unique_ptr<T[]>(Up, deleter) overloads so that they accept NULL as well
as nullptr.
llvm-svn: 300406
This patch almost entirely rewrites the unique_ptr tests. There are a couple
of reasons for this:
A) Most of the *.fail.cpp tests were either incorrect or could be better written
as a *.pass.cpp test that uses <type_traits> to check if certain operations
are valid (Ex. Using static_assert(!std::is_copy_constructible_v<T>) instead
of writing a failure test).
B) [unique.ptr.runtime] has very poor test coverage. Many of the constructors
and assignment operators have to tests at all. The special members that have
tests have very few test cases and are typically way out of date.
C) The tests for [unique.ptr.single] and [unique.ptr.runtime] are largely
duplicates of each other. This means common requirements have two different
sets of tests in two different test files. This makes the tests harder to
maintain than if there was a single copy.
To address (A) this patch changes almost all of the *.fail.cpp tests into
.pass.cpp tests using type traits; Allowing the *.fail.cpp tests to be removed.
The address (B) and (C) the tests for [unique.ptr.single] and [unique.ptr.runtime]
have been combined into a single directory, allowing both specializations to share
common tests. Tests specific to the single/runtime specializations are given the
suffix "*.single.pass.cpp" or "*.runtime.pass.cpp".
Finally the unique.ptr test have been moved into the correct directory according
to the standard. Specifically they have been removed from "utilities/memory" into
"utilities/smartptr".
PS. This patch also adds newly written tests for upcoming unique_ptr changes/fixes.
However since these tests don't currently pass they are guarded by the macro
TEST_WORKAROUND_UPCOMING_UNIQUE_PTR_CHANGES. This allows other STL's to validate
the tests before libc++ implements the changes. The relevant libc++ changes should
land in the next week.
llvm-svn: 300388
std::unique_ptr's default constructor must be constexpr in order
to allow constant initialization to take place for static objects;
Even though we can never have a constexpr unique_ptr variable since
it's not a literal type.
This patch adds tests that constant initialization takes place by
using the __attribute__((require_constant_initialization)) macro.
llvm-svn: 300158
Summary:
__compressed_pair takes and passes it's constructor arguments by value. This causes arguments to be moved 3 times instead of once. This patch addresses that issue and fixes `constexpr` on the constructors.
I would rather have this fix than D27564, and I'm fairly confident it's not ABI breaking but I'm not 100% sure.
I prefer this solution because it removes a lot of code and makes the implementation *much* smaller.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, K-ballo
Reviewed By: K-ballo
Subscribers: K-ballo, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27565
llvm-svn: 300140
For reference deleter types the const qualifier on the return type
of get_deleter() should be ignored, and a non-const deleter should
be returned.
This patch fixes a bug where "const deleter_type&" is incorrectly
formed.
llvm-svn: 300121
These tests were unconditionally asserting that optional and unique_ptr declare throwing hashes, but MSVC++ implements conditional noexcept forwarding that of the underlying hash function. As a result we were failing these tests but there's nothing forbidding strengthening noexcept in that way.
Changed the ASSERT_NOT_NOEXCEPT asserts to use types which themselves have non-noexcept hash functions.
llvm-svn: 299734
The tests for libc++ specify -target on the command-line to the
compiler, but this is problematic for a few reasons.
Firstly, the -target option isn't supported on Apple platforms. Parts
of the triple get dropped and ignored. Instead, software should be
compiled with a combination of the -arch and -m<name>-version-min
options.
Secondly, the generic "darwin" target references a kernel version
instead of a platform version. Each platform has its own independent
versions (with different versions of libc++.1.dylib), independent of the
version of the Darwin kernel.
This commit adds support to the LIT infrastructure for testing against
Apple platforms using -arch and -platform options.
If the host is not on OS X, or the compiler type is not clang or apple-clang, then this commit has NFC.
If the host is on OS X and --param=target_triple=... is specified, then a warning is emitted to use arch and platform instead. Besides the warning, there's NFC.
If the host is on OS X and *no* target-triple is specified, then use the new deployment target logic. This uses two new lit parameters, --param=arch=<arch> and --param=platform=<platform>. <platform> has the form <name>[<version>].
By default, arch is auto-detected from clang -dumpmachine, and platform is "macosx".
If the platform doesn't have a version:
For "macosx", the version is auto-detected from the host system using sw_vers. This may give a different version than the SDK, since new SDKs can be installed on older hosts.
Otherwise, the version is auto-detected from the SDK version using xcrun --show-sdk-path.
-arch <arch> -m<name>-version-min=<version> is added to the compiler flags.
The target triple is computed as <arch>-apple-<platform>. It is *not* passed to clang, but it is available for XFAIL and UNSUPPORTED (as is with_system_cxx_lib=<target>).
For convenience, apple-darwin and <arch>-apple-darwin are added to the set of available features.
There were a number of tests marked to XFAIL on x86_64-apple-darwin11
and x86_64-apple-darwin12. I updated these to
x86_64-apple-macosx10.7 and x86_64-apple-macosx10.8.
llvm-svn: 297798
These tests are failing in XCode 8.0, 8.1, and 8.2, but not in Xcode
8.3. Annoyingly the version numbering for clang does not follow Xcode
and is bumped to 8.1 only in Xcode 8.3. So Xfailing apple-clang-8.0
should catch all cases here.
llvm-svn: 296704
This patch fixes llvm.org/PR32097 by using the __is_abstract
builtin type-trait instead of the previous library-only implementation.
All supported compilers provide this trait. I've tested as far
back as Clang 3.2, GCC 4.6 and MSVC trunk.
llvm-svn: 296561
Summary:
`ConstexprTestTypes::NoCtors` is an aggregate type (and consequently a literal type) in C++17,
but not in C++14 since it has a base class. This patch updates the comment to accurately describe the reason for the XFAIL.
Reviewers: EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30481
llvm-svn: 296558
A static assertion was misfiring since it checked
is_callable<Visitor, decltype(__variant_alt<T>.value)>. However
the decltype expression doesn't capture the value category as
required. This patch applies extra braces to decltype to fix
that.
llvm-svn: 294612
In addition to the PR for LWG 2773 this patch also ensures
that each of std::ignores constructors or assignment operators
are constexpr.
llvm-svn: 294165
When compiled with Clang for Windows, this was emitting "enumerator value
evaluates to 4294967295, which cannot be narrowed to type 'int' [-Wc++11-narrowing]".
The test should more strenuously avoid poking this ABI deficiency (and it
already has coverage for explicitly specified underlying types).
Fixes D29140.
llvm-svn: 294159
test/std/strings/string.classes/typedefs.pass.cpp
Actually test what basic_string's typedefs stand for.
test/std/utilities/meta/meta.trans/meta.trans.other/result_of11.pass.cpp
NotDerived and ND were completely unused.
test/std/utilities/utility/pairs/pairs.pair/default.pass.cpp
P2 was mistakenly not being used. Yes, that's
right: -Wunused-local-typedef CAUGHT A MISTAKE! AMAZING!
Fixes D29137.
llvm-svn: 294156
Pending LIT changes are about to remove the REQUIRES-ANY keyword
in place of supporting boolean && and || within "REQUIRES". This
patch prepares libc++ for that change so that when applied
the bots don't lose their mind.
llvm-svn: 292901
Summary:
Exactly what the title says.
This patch also adds a `std::hash<nullptr_t>` specialization in C++17, but it was not added by this paper and I can't find the actual paper that adds it.
See http://wg21.link/P0513R0 for more info.
If there are no comments in the next couple of days I'll commit this
Reviewers: mclow.lists, K-ballo, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28938
llvm-svn: 292684
MSVC has compiler warnings C4127 "conditional expression is constant" (enabled
by /W4) and C6326 "Potential comparison of a constant with another constant"
(enabled by /analyze). They're potentially useful, although they're slightly
annoying to library devs who know what they're doing. In the latest version of
the compiler, C4127 is suppressed when the compiler sees simple tests like
"if (name_of_thing)", so extracting comparison expressions into named
constants is a workaround. At the same time, using std::integral_constant
avoids C6326, which doesn't look at template arguments.
test/std/containers/sequences/vector.bool/emplace.pass.cpp
Replace 1 == 1 with true, which is the same as far as the library is concerned.
Fixes D28837.
llvm-svn: 292432
This is the subject of an active NB comment. Regardless of what the Working
Paper currently says, asking this question is morally wrong, because the
answer can change when the type is completed. C1XX now detects such
precondition violations and complains about them; perhaps Clang should too.
Fixes D28591.
llvm-svn: 292281
The test was previously set to XFAIL if __cpp_structured_bindings
wasn't defined. However there are Clang 4.0 versions which do not
define this macro but do provide structured bindings, which causes
the test to pass unexpectedly.
This patch changes the XFAIL to an UNSUPPORTED.
llvm-svn: 291060
In ABI v1 libc++ implements std::pointer_safety as a class type instead
of an enumeration. However this class type does not provide
a default constructor as it should. This patch adds that default constructor.
llvm-svn: 291059
In the C++ standard `std::pointer_safety` is defined
as a C++11 strongly typed enum. However libc++ currently defines
it as a class type which simulates a C++11 enumeration. This
can be detected in valid C++ code.
This patch introduces an the _LIBCPP_ABI_POINTER_SAFETY_ENUM_TYPE ABI option.
When defined `std::pointer_safety` is implemented as an enum type.
Unfortunatly this also means it can no longer be provided as an extension
in C++03.
Additionally this patch moves the definition for `get_pointer_safety()`
out of the dylib, and into the headers. New usages of `get_pointer_safety()`
will now use the inline version instead of the dylib version. However in
order to keep the dylib ABI compatible the old definition is explicitly
compiled into it.
llvm-svn: 291046
Summary:
This patch attempts to re-implement a fix for LWG 2770, but not the actual specified PR.
The PR for 2770 specifies tuple_size<T const> as only conditionally providing a `::value` member. However C++17 structured bindings require `tuple_size<T const>` to be complete only if `tuple_size<T>` is also complete. Therefore this patch implements only provides the specialization `tuple_size<T CV>` iff `tuple_size<T>` is a complete type.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR31513.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith, mpark
Subscribers: mpark, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28222
llvm-svn: 291019
These tests were using malloc()'s return value without checking for null,
which MSVC's /analyze rightly warns about. Asserting that the pointer is
non-null both expresses the test's intention and silences the warning.
Fixes D27785.
llvm-svn: 290921
This patch implements the correct PR for LWG 2770. It also makes the primary
tuple_size template incomplete again which fixes part of llvm.org/PR31513.
llvm-svn: 290846
This patch reverts the changes to tuple which fixed construction from
types derived from tuple. It breaks the code mentioned in llvm.org/PR31384.
I'll follow this commit up with a test case.
llvm-svn: 289773
Summary:
The standard requires tuple have the following constructors:
```
tuple(tuple<OtherTypes...> const&);
tuple(tuple<OtherTypes...> &&);
tuple(pair<T1, T2> const&);
tuple(pair<T1, T2> &&);
tuple(array<T, N> const&);
tuple(array<T, N> &&);
```
However libc++ implements these as a single constructor with the signature:
```
template <class TupleLike, enable_if_t<__is_tuple_like<TupleLike>::value>>
tuple(TupleLike&&);
```
This causes the constructor to reject types derived from tuple-like types; Unlike if we had all of the concrete overloads, because they cause the derived->base conversion in the signature.
This patch fixes this issue by detecting derived types and the tuple-like base they are derived from. It does this by creating an overloaded function with signatures for each of tuple/pair/array and checking if the possibly derived type can convert to any of them.
This patch fixes [PR17550]( https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17550)
This patch
Reviewers: mclow.lists, K-ballo, mpark, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27606
llvm-svn: 289727
test/support/test_macros.h
For convenience/greppability, add macros for libcxx-specific static_asserts about noexceptness.
(Moving the definitions of ASSERT_NOEXCEPT/ASSERT_NOT_NOEXCEPT isn't technically necessary
because they're macros, but I think it's better style to define stuff before using it.)
test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.apply/apply.pass.cpp
There was a completely unused `TrackedCallable obj;`.
apply() isn't depicted with conditional noexcept in C++17.
test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.apply/make_from_tuple.pass.cpp
Now that we have LIBCPP_ASSERT_NOEXCEPT, use it.
Fixes D27622.
llvm-svn: 289264
This patch removes libc++'s tuple extension which allowed it to be
constructed from fewer initializers than elements; with the remaining
elements being default constructed. However the implicit version of
this extension breaks conforming code. For example:
int fun(std::string);
int fun(std::tuple<std::string, int>);
int x = fun("hello"); // ambigious
Because existing code may already depend on this extension it can be re-enabled
by defining _LIBCPP_ENABLE_TUPLE_IMPLICIT_REDUCED_ARITY_EXTENSION.
Note that the explicit version of this extension is still supported,
although it's somewhat less useful than the implicit one.
llvm-svn: 289158
test/std/input.output/iostream.format/input.streams/istream.unformatted/get.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<char> because basic_istream::get() returns int_type (N4606 27.7.2.3 [istream.unformatted]/4).
test/std/input.output/iostream.format/output.streams/ostream.formatted/ostream.inserters.arithmetic/minus1.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<char> because toupper() returns int (C11 7.4.2.2/1).
test/std/iterators/stream.iterators/ostream.iterator/ostream.iterator.ops/assign_t.pass.cpp
This test is intentionally writing doubles to ostream_iterator<int>.
It's silencing -Wliteral-conversion for Clang, so I'm adding C4244 silencing for MSVC.
test/std/language.support/support.limits/limits/numeric.limits.members/infinity.pass.cpp
Given `extern float zero;`, the expression `1./zero` has type double, which emits a truncation warning
when being passed to test<float>() taking float. The fix is to say `1.f/zero` which has type float.
test/std/numerics/complex.number/cmplx.over/arg.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/complex.number/cmplx.over/norm.pass.cpp
These tests were constructing std::complex<double>(x, 0), emitting truncation warnings when x is long long.
Saying static_cast<double>(x) avoids this.
test/std/numerics/rand/rand.eng/rand.eng.lcong/seed_result_type.pass.cpp
This was using `int s` to construct and seed a linear_congruential_engine<T, stuff>, where T is
unsigned short/unsigned int/unsigned long/unsigned long long. That emits a truncation warning in the
unsigned short case. Because the range [0, 20) is tiny and we aren't doing anything else with the index,
we can just iterate with `T s`.
test/std/re/re.traits/value.pass.cpp
regex_traits<wchar_t>::value()'s first parameter is wchar_t (N4606 28.7 [re.traits]/13). This loop is
using int to iterate through ['g', 0xFFFF), emitting a truncation warning from int to wchar_t
(which is 16-bit for some of us). Because the bound is exclusive, we can just iterate with wchar_t.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.cons/size_char_alloc.pass.cpp
This test is a little strange. It's trying to verify that basic_string's (InIt, InIt) range constructor
isn't confused by "N copies of C" when N and C have the same integral type. To do this, it was
testing (100, 65), but that eventually emits truncation warnings from int to char. There's a simple way
to avoid this - passing (static_cast<char>(100), static_cast<char>(65)) also exercises the disambiguation.
(And 100 is representable even when char has a signed range.)
test/std/strings/string.view/string.view.hash/string_view.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<char_type> because `'0' + i` has type int.
test/std/utilities/function.objects/bind/func.bind/func.bind.bind/nested.pass.cpp
What's more horrible than nested bind()? pow() overloads! This operator()(T a, T b) was assuming that
std::pow(a, b) can be returned as T. (In this case, T is int.) However, N4606 26.9.1 [cmath.syn]/2
says that pow(int, int) returns double, so this was truncating double to int.
Adding static_cast<T> silences this.
test/std/utilities/function.objects/unord.hash/integral.pass.cpp
This was iterating `for (int i = 0; i <= 5; ++i)` and constructing `T t(i);` but that's truncating
when T is short. (And super truncating when T is bool.) Adding static_cast<T> silences this.
test/std/utilities/utility/exchange/exchange.pass.cpp
First, this was exchanging 67.2 into an int, but that's inherently truncating.
Changing this to static_cast<short>(67) avoids the truncation while preserving the
"what if T and U are different" test coverage.
Second, this was exchanging {} with the explicit type float into an int, and that's also
inherently truncating. Specifying short is just as good.
test/std/utilities/utility/pairs/pairs.spec/make_pair.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<short>. Note that this affects template argument deduction for make_pair(),
better fulfilling the test's intent. For example, this was saying
`typedef std::pair<int, short> P1; P1 p1 = std::make_pair(3, 4);` but that was asking
make_pair() to return pair<int, int>, which was then being converted to pair<int, short>.
(pair's converting constructors are tested elsewhere.)
Now, std::make_pair(3, static_cast<short>(4)) actually returns pair<int, short>.
(There's still a conversion from pair<nullptr_t, short> to pair<unique_ptr<int>, short>.)
Fixes D27544.
llvm-svn: 289111
Instead of storing double in double and then truncating to int, store int in long
and then widen to long long. This preserves test coverage (as these tests are
interested in various tuple conversions) while avoiding truncation warnings.
test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/const_pair.pass.cpp
Since we aren't physically truncating anymore, t1 is equal to p0.
test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/convert_copy.pass.cpp
One edit is different from the usual pattern. Previously, we were storing
double in double and then converting to A, which has an implicitly converting
constructor from int. Now, we're storing int in int and then converting to A,
avoiding the truncation.
Fixes D27542.
llvm-svn: 289109
Change char to long and remove some char casts. This preserves test coverage for tuple's
heterogeneous comparisons, while avoiding int-to-char truncation warnings.
Fixes D27541.
llvm-svn: 289108
These tests for some guy's transparent operator functors were needlessly truncating their
double results to int. Preserving the doubleness makes compilers happier. I'm following
existing practice by adding an "// exact in binary" comment when the result isn't a whole number.
(The changes from 6 to 6.0 and so forth are stylistic, not critical.)
Fixes D27539.
llvm-svn: 289106
test/std/containers/sequences/vector.bool/copy.pass.cpp
test/std/containers/sequences/vector.bool/copy_alloc.pass.cpp
test/std/containers/sequences/vector/vector.cons/copy.pass.cpp
test/std/containers/sequences/vector/vector.cons/copy_alloc.pass.cpp
Change "unsigned s = x.size();" to "typename C::size_type s = x.size();"
because that's what it returns.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.cons/pointer_alloc.pass.cpp
Include <cstddef>, then change "unsigned n = T::length(s);"
to "std::size_t n = T::length(s);" because that's what char_traits returns.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.cons/substr.pass.cpp
Change unsigned to typename S::size_type because that's what str.size() returns.
test/std/utilities/template.bitset/bitset.cons/ull_ctor.pass.cpp
This was needlessly truncating std::size_t to unsigned.
It's being used to compare and initialize std::size_t.
llvm-svn: 288753
Use static_cast<int> when storing size_t in int (or passing size_t to int).
Also, remove a spurious semicolon in test/support/archetypes.hpp.
test/support/count_new.hpp
Additionally, change data members (and parameters) to size_t.
llvm-svn: 288752
Various changes:
test/std/algorithms/alg.sorting/alg.merge/inplace_merge.pass.cpp
This is comparing value_type to unsigned. value_type is sometimes int and sometimes struct S (implicitly constructible from int).
static_cast<value_type>(unsigned) silences the warning and doesn't do anything bad (as the values in question are small).
test/std/algorithms/alg.sorting/alg.nth.element/nth_element_comp.pass.cpp
This is comparing an int remote-element to size_t. The values in question are small and non-negative,
so either type is fine. I think that converting int to size_t is marginally better here than the reverse.
test/std/containers/sequences/deque/deque.cons/size.pass.cpp
DefaultOnly::count is int (and non-negative). When comparing to unsigned, use static_cast<unsigned>.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.access/index.pass.cpp
We're comparing char to '0' through '9', but formed with the type size_t. Add static_cast<char>.
test/std/utilities/template.bitset/bitset.cons/ull_ctor.pass.cpp
Include <cstddef> for pedantic correctness (this test was already mentioning std::size_t).
"v[i] == (i & 1)" was comparing bool to size_t. Saying "v[i] == ((i & 1) != 0)" smashes the RHS to bool.
llvm-svn: 288749
This patch overhalls the libc++ test format/configuration in order to fully support modules. By "fully support" I mean get almost all of the tests passing. The main hurdle for doing this is handling tests that `#define _LIBCPP_FOO` macros to test a different configuration. This patch deals with these tests in the following ways:
1. For tests that define single `_LIBCPP_ABI_FOO` macros have been annotated with `// MODULES_DEFINES: _LIBCPP_ABI_FOO`. This allows the test suite to define the macro on the command line so it uses a different set of modules.
2. Tests for libc++'s debug mode (which define custom `_LIBCPP_ASSERT`) are automatically detected by the test suite and are compiled and run with modules disabled.
This patch also cleans up how the `CXXCompiler` helper class handles enabling/disabling language features.
NOTE: This patch uses `LIT` features which were only committed to LLVM today. If this patch breaks running the libc++ tests you probably need to update LLVM.
llvm-svn: 288728
The Standard doesn't provide any guarantees beyond "valid but unspecified" for
moved-from std::functions. libcxx moves from small targets and leaves them
there, while MSVC's STL empties out the source. Mark these assertions as
libcxx-specific.
llvm-svn: 287382
N4582 17.6.3.5 [allocator.requirements] says that allocators are given
cv-unqualified object types, and N4582 20.9.9 [default.allocator]
implies that allocator<const T> is ill-formed (due to colliding
address() overloads). Therefore, tests for allocator<const T>
should be marked as libcxx-specific (if not removed outright).
llvm-svn: 287381
Bitset tests feature a sequence of tests of increasing bitset sizes,
but these tests rely on exceptions when the bitset size is less than
50 elements.
This change adds a flag to tell whether a test should throw. If it must
throw it will be skipped under no-exceptions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26140
llvm-svn: 286474
This replaces every occurrence of _LIBCPP_STD_VER in the tests with
TEST_STD_VER. Additionally, for every affected
file, #include "test_macros.h" is being added explicitly if it wasn't
already there.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26294
llvm-svn: 286007
Previously __libcpp_is_constructible checked the validity of reference
construction using 'eat<To>(declval<From>())' but this doesn't consider
From's explicit conversion operators. This patch teaches __libcpp_is_constructible
how to handle these cases. To do this we need to check the validity
using 'static_cast<To>(declval<From>())'. Unfortunately static_cast allows
additional base-to-derived and lvalue-to-rvalue conversions, which have to be
checked for and manually rejected.
While implementing these changes I discovered that Clang incorrectly
rejects `static_cast<int&&>(declval<float&>())` even though
`int &&X(declval<float&>())` is well formed. In order to tolerate this bug
the `__eat<T>(...)` needs to be left in-place. Otherwise it could be replaced
entirely with the new static_cast implementation.
Thanks to Walter Brown for providing the test cases.
llvm-svn: 285786
This is a follow up of D24562.
These tests do not check anything but exceptions, so it makes sense to mark
them as UNSUPPORTED under a library built without exceptions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26075
llvm-svn: 285550
Fixes MS issues 63, 64, and 65.
test/std/utilities/any/any.class/any.cons/move.pass.cpp:
* "Moves are always destructive" is not a portable assumption; check with LIBCPP_ASSERT.
test/std/utilities/any/any.class/any.cons/value.pass.cpp:
* The standard does not forbid initializing std::any from any pointer-to-function type. Remove the non-conforming "DecayTag" test.
test/std/utilities/any/any.class/any.modifiers/swap.pass.cpp:
* Self-swap is not specified to perform no moves; check with LIBCPP_ASSERT.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26007
llvm-svn: 285234
Louis Dionne