In January Davide sent an e-mail to the mailing list to suggest removing
unmaintained language plugins such as Go and Java. The plan was to have
some cool down period to allow users to speak up, however after that the
plugins were never actually removed.
This patch removes the OCaml debugger plugin.
The plugin can be added again in the future if it is mature enough both
in terms of testing and maintenance commitment.
Discussion on the mailing list:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2018-January/013171.html
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54060
llvm-svn: 346159
In January Davide sent an e-mail to the mailing list to suggest removing
unmaintained language plugins such as Go and Java. The plan was to have
some cool down period to allow users to speak up, however after that the
plugins were never actually removed.
This patch removes the Java debugger plugin.
The plugin can be added again in the future if it is mature enough both
in terms of testing and maintenance commitment.
Discussion on the mailing list:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2018-January/013171.html
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54059
llvm-svn: 346158
In January Davide sent an e-mail to the mailing list to suggest removing
unmaintained language plugins such as Go and Java. The plan was to have
some cool down period to allow users to speak up, however after that the
plugins were never actually removed.
This patch removes the Go debugger plugin.
The plugin can be added again in the future if it is mature enough both
in terms of testing and maintenance commitment.
Discussion on the mailing list:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2018-January/013171.html
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54057
llvm-svn: 346157
Summary:
This patch adds syntax highlighting support to LLDB. When enabled (and lldb is allowed
to use colors), printed source code is annotated with the ANSI color escape sequences.
So far we have only one highlighter which is based on Clang and is responsible for all
languages that are supported by Clang. It essentially just runs the raw lexer over the input
and then surrounds the specific tokens with the configured escape sequences.
Reviewers: zturner, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: labath, teemperor, llvm-commits, mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49334
llvm-svn: 338662
This introduces basic support for debugging OCaml binaries.
Use of the native compiler with DWARF emission support (see
https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/574) is required.
Available variables are considered as 64 bits unsigned integers,
their interpretation will be left to a OCaml-made debugging layer.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22132
llvm-svn: 277443
The purpose of these plugins is to make LLDB capable of debugging java
code JIT-ed by the android runtime.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17616
llvm-svn: 262015
Historically, data formatters all exist in a global repository (the category map)
On top of that, some formatters can be "hardcoded" when the conditions under which they apply are not expressible as a typename (or typename regex)
This change paves the way to move formatters into per-language buckets such that the C++ plugin is responsible for ownership of the C++ formatters, and so on
The advantages of this are:
a) language formatters only get created when they might apply
b) formatters for a language are clearly owned by the matching language plugin
The current model is one of static instantiation, that is a language knows the full set of formatters it vends and that is only asked-for once, and then handed off to the FormatManager
In a future revision it might be interesting to add similar ability to the language runtimes, and monitor for certain shared library events to add even more library-specific formatters
No formatters are moved as part of this change, so practically speaking this is NFC
llvm-svn: 246568
The Language plugin is menat to answer language-specific questions that are not bound to the existence of a process. Those are still the domain of the LanguageRuntime plugin
The Language plugin will, instead, answer questions such as providing language-specific data formatters or expression evaluation
At the moment, the interface is hollowed out, and empty do-nothing plugins have been setup for ObjC, C++ and ObjC++
llvm-svn: 246212
Jonas Devlieghere