Summary:
Currently loading core files on lldb-vscode is broken because there's a check in the attach workflow that asserts that the PID is valid, which of course fails for this case.
Hence, I'm adding a "coreFile" argument for the attach request, which does the work correctly.
I don't know how to test it effectively so that it runs on the buildbots and the debugger can in fact makes sense of it. Anyway, the change has been relatively simple.
Reviewers: labath, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78839
to make the code conform to llvm style better:
- avoid use of auto where the type is not obivous
- avoid StringRef::data where it is not needed
No functional change intended.
Summary:
When using source maps for a breakpoint, in order to find the actual source that breakpoint has resolved, we
need to use a query similar to what CommandObjectSource::DumpLinesInSymbolContexts does, which is the logic
used by the CLI to display the source line at a given breakpoint. That's necessary because from a breakpoint
location you only have an address, which points to the original source location, not the source mapped one.
in the setBreakpoints request handler, we haven't been doing such query and we were returning the original
source location, which was breaking the UX of VSCode, as many breakpoints were being set but not displayed
in the source file next to each line. Besides, clicking the source path of a breakpoint in the breakpoints
view in the debug tab was not working for this case, as VSCode was trying to open a non-existent file, thus
showing an error to the user.
Ideally, we should do the query mentioned above to find the actual source location to respond to the IDE,
however, that query is expensive and users can have an arbitrary number of breakpoints set. As a simpler fix,
the request sent by VSCode already contains the full source path, which exists because the user set it from
the IDE itself, so we can simply reuse it instead of querying from the SB API.
I wrote a test for this, and found out that I had to move SetSourceMapFromArguments after RunInitCommands in
lldb-vscode.cpp, because an init command used in all tests is `settings clear -all`, which would clear the
source map unless specified after initCommands. And in any case, I think it makes sense to have initCommands
run before anything the debugger would do.
Reviewers: clayborg, kusmour, labath, aadsm
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76968
Summary: The IDE has no packets that are sent to lldb-vscode that say which thread and frame are selected. The only way we know is we get a request for variables for a stack frame via a "scopes" request. When we receive this packet we make that thread and frame the selected thread and frame in lldb. This way when people execute lldb commands in the debug console by prefixing the expression with the backtick character, we will have the right thread and frame selected. Previously this was not updated as new stack frames were selected.
Reviewers: labath, aadsm, wallace, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77347
Summary:
The DAP specifies the following for the SetBreakpoints request:
The breakpoints returned are in the same order as the elements of the 'breakpoints' arguments
This was not followed, as lldb-vscode was returning the breakpoints in a different order, because they were first stored into a map, and then traversed. Of course, maps normally don't preserve ordering.
See this log I captured:
-->
{"command":"setBreakpoints",
"arguments":{
"source":{
"name":"main.cpp",
"path":"/Users/wallace/fbsource/xplat/sand/test-projects/buck-cpp/main.cpp"
},
"lines":[6,10,11],
"breakpoints":[{"line":6},{"line":10},{"line":11}],
"sourceModified":false
},
"type":"request",
"seq":3
}
<--
{"body":{
"breakpoints":[
{"id":1, "line":11,"source":{"name":"main.cpp","path":"xplat/sand/test-projects/buck-cpp/main.cpp"},"verified":true},
{"id":2,"line":6,"source":{"name":"main.cpp","path":"xplat/sand/test-projects/buck-cpp/main.cpp"},"verified":true},
{"id":3,"line":10,"source":{"name":"main.cpp","path":"xplat/sand/test-projects/buck-cpp/main.cpp"},"verified":true}]},
"command":"setBreakpoints",
"request_seq":3,
"seq":0,
"success":true,
"type":"response"
}
As you can see, the order was not respected. This was causing the IDE not to be able to disable/enable breakpoints by clicking on them in the breakpoint view in the lower corner of the Debug tab.
This diff fixes the ordering problem. The traversal + querying was done very fast in O(nlogn) time. I'm keeping the same complexity.
I also updated a couple of tests to account for the ordering.
Reviewers: clayborg, aadsm, kusmour, labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76891
Those fields inside of the global variable can be local variables because
they are used in only inside of one function: request_launch for launch_info
and request_attach for attach_info.
To avoid confusion an already existing local variable attach_info of
request_attach has been renamed to better reflect its purpose.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76593
Summary:
If no custom launching is used, lldb-vscode launches a program with an empty environment by default. In some scenarios, the user might want to simply use the same environment as the IDE to have a set of working environment variables (e.g. PATH wouldn't be empty). In fact, most DAPs in VSCode have this behavior by default. In other cases the user definitely needs to set their custom environment, which is already supported. To make the first case easier for the user (e.g. not having to copy the PATH to the launch.json every time they want to debug simple programs that rely on PATH), a new option is now offered. inheritEnvironment will launch the program copying its own environment, and it's just a boolean flag.
{F11347695}
Reviewers: clayborg, aadsm, diazhector98, kusmour
Subscribers: labath, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74636
Summary:
On Linux, when executing lldb-vscode on a remote machine, lldb-vscode doesn't die after the debug session ends. It keeps trying to read JSON input to no avail.
This diff indicates lldb-vscode to stop reading after a termination event has been processed.
Reviewers: clayborg, aadsm, kusmour
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76314
If LLDB attaches to an already running target, then structure SBAttachInfo is
used instead of SBLaunchInfo. lldb-vscode function request_attach sets some
values to g_vsc.launch_info, however this field is then not passed anywhere, so
this action has no effect. This commit removes invocation of
SBLaunchInfo::SetDetachOnError, which has no equivalent in SBAttachInfo.
File package.json doesn't describe detachOnError property for "attach" request
type, therefore it is not needed to update it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76351
This change will bring lldb-vscode in line with how several other llvm
tools process command line arguments and make it easier to add future
options.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74798
This commit fixes an issue with lldb-vscode failing to run programs that
use different architecture/platform than the "empty" in the target.
Original implementation was creating a default target without specifying
the target architecture, platform or program, and then would set
executable file through SBLaunchInfo, assuming that this would update
architecture and platform accordingly. However this wasn't really
happening, and architecture and platform would remain at whatever values
were in the "empty" target. The simple solution is to create target
already for a desired architecture and platform.
Function request_attach is updated in a similar fashion.
This commit also adds new JSON properties to "launch" and "attach"
packets to allow user to override desired platform and architecture.
This might be especially important for cases where information in ELF is
not enough to derive those values correctly.
New code has a behavior similar to LLDB MI [1], where typically IDE would
specify target file with -file-exec-and-symbols, and then only do -exec-run
command that would launch the process. In lldb-vscode those two actions are
merged into one request_launch function. Similarly in the interpreter
session, user would first do "file" command, then "process launch"
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70847
Signed-off-by: Anton Kolesov <anton.kolesov@synopsys.com>
Summary: The VS Code DAP expects on response for each breakpoint that was requested. If we responsd with multiple entries for one breakpoint the VS Code UI gets out of date. Currently the VS code DAP doesn't handle one breakpoint with multiple locations. If this ever gets fixed we can modify our code.
Reviewers: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73665
Summary:
Completion requests are causing some problems in the debugger, which is explained in the comment in the code.
I'm disabling it for now until we have time to do a good implementation of it.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74264
Summary:
There was a bug on LLDB VSCode where there was the following behavior:
//Code
```
struct foo {
int bar:
};
...
foo my_foo = {10};
```
Trying to auto-complete my_foo.b with my_foo.bar resulted instead with my_foo.my_foo.bar
This diff fixes this bug and adds some tests to check correct behavior.
It also fixes the same bug using the arrow operator (->) when user manually requests completions.
TODO: Fix bug where no recommended completions are automatically shown with arrow operator
{F11249959}
{F11249958}
Reviewers: wallace
Reviewed By: wallace
Subscribers: teemperor, labath, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73506
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
"The debug adapter supports the delayed loading of parts of the stack,
which requires that both the 'startFrame' and 'levels' arguments and the
'totalFrames' result of the 'StackTrace' request are supported."
Lack of this field makes VSCode incorrectly display stack traces information
D71034
Summary:
The DAP has a completion request that has been unimplemented. It allows showing autocompletion tokens inside the Debug Console.
I implemented it in a very simple fashion mimicking what the user would see when autocompleting an expression inside the CLI.
There are two cases: normal variables and commands. The latter occurs when a text is prepepended with ` in the Debug Console.
These two cases work well and have tests.
Reviewers: clayborg, aadsm
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69873
Summary:
`lldb-vscode` concatenates a string of sourceMap entries
specified in the config, but fails to put a space between
each entry, which causes the settings command to fail.
This patch adds a space between each mapping.
Patch by Richard Howell
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67569
llvm-svn: 373016
This silences warnings about comparison of integers between unsigned
long long (which is what the Windows SOCKET type is) and signed int
when building in MinGW mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67863
llvm-svn: 372486
Summary:
This can help `lldb-vscode` handle launch commands associate with remote platform
attach request have field `attachCommands` to handle attach specific commands
add a corresponding one for launch request
if no launch command is provided, create a new target and launch; otherwise, execute the launch command
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65363
Patch by Wanyi Ye <kusmour@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 369296
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
SBError::GetCString() returns a pointer to a string owned by the SBError
object. The code here was calling GetCString on a temporary and using
the returned pointer after the temporary was destroyed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59400
llvm-svn: 356227
If an invalid program is specified, lldb-vscode will send back a
response with "success" = false, but then will continue executing the
rest of request_launch(), try to launch the program anyway and try to
send another response (possibly using the `response` object after it was
moved).
This change adds a return statement so we stop executing the handler
after producing the first failing response.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59340
llvm-svn: 356110
Previously if an invalid program was specified, there was a bug
which, when we attempted to launch the program, would report that
the operation succeeded, causing LLDB to then hang while waiting
indefinitely to receive some events from the process.
After this patch, when an invalid program is specified, we immediately
return to vs code with an error message that indicates that the
program can not be found.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59114
llvm-svn: 355656
Windows can't use standard i/o system calls such as read and write
to work with sockets, it instead needs to use the specific send
and recv calls. This complicates matters for the debug adapter,
since it needs to be able to work in both server mode where it
communicates over a socket, as well as non-server mode where it
communicates via stdin and stdout. To abstract this out, I've
introduced a class IOStream which hides all these details and
exposes a read/write interface that does the right on each
platform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59104
llvm-svn: 355637
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Highlighing junk data on VSCode can send a query for evaluate which
fails. In particular cases on Windows, this the error message can end
up as a c-string of [-35,-35,-35,-35,...]. Attempting to emplace this
as the error message causes an assert failure.
Prior to emplacing the error message, confirm that it is valid UTF8 to
eliminate errors such as mentione above.
Reviewers: xiaobai, clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53008
llvm-svn: 346988
Include PosixAPI.h to get a PATH_MAX definition and replace CreateEvent
with CreateEventObject to avoid conflicts with the windows.h definition
of CreateEvent to CreateEventW.
llvm-svn: 339920
This patch adds a new lldb-vscode tool that speaks the Microsoft Visual Studio Code debug adaptor protocol. It has full unit tests that test all packets.
This tool can be easily packaged up into a native extension and used with Visual Studio Code, and it can also be used by Nuclide
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50365
llvm-svn: 339911
Walter Erquinigo