The class only supports a single DWARF unit (needed for my new test), and it
reimplements chunks of object and symbol file classes. We can just make it use
the real thing, save some LOC and get the full feature set.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90393
This applies the same fix that D84748 did for macro definitions.
Appropriate include path is now automatically set for all libraries
which link against gtest targets, which avoids the need to set
include_directories in various parts of the project.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86616
These definitions are needed by any file which uses gtest. Previously we
were adding them in the add_unittest function, but over time we've
accumulated libraries (which don't go through add_unittest) building on
gtest and this has resulted in proliferation of the definitions.
Making this a part of the library interface enables them to be managed
centrally. This follows a patch for -Wno-suggest-override (D84554) which
took a similar approach.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84748
This patch refactors `emitDebugInfo()` to make the length field be
inferred from its content. Besides, the `Visitor` class is removed in
this patch. The original `Visitor` class helps us determine an
appropriate length and emit the .debug_info section. These two
processes can be merged into one process. Besides, the length field
should be inferred when it's missing rather than when it's zero.
Reviewed By: jhenderson, labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84008
Types that came from a Clang module are nested in DW_TAG_module tags
in DWARF. This patch recreates the Clang module hierarchy in LLDB and
1;95;0csets the owning module information accordingly. My primary motivation
is to facilitate looking up per-module APINotes for individual
declarations, but this likely also has other applications.
This reapplies the previously reverted commit, but without support for
ClassTemplateSpecializations, which I'm going to look into separately.
rdar://problem/59634380
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75488
Types that came from a Clang module are nested in DW_TAG_module tags
in DWARF. This patch recreates the Clang module hierarchy in LLDB and
sets the owning module information accordingly. My primary motivation
is to facilitate looking up per-module APINotes for individual
declarations, but this likely also has other applications.
rdar://problem/59634380
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75488
Summary:
This patch removes the bitrotted SymbolFileDWARF(Dwo)Dwp classes, and
replaces them with dwp support implemented directly inside
SymbolFileDWARFDwo, in a manner mirroring the implementation in llvm.
This patch does:
- add support for the .debug_cu_index section to our DWARFContext
- adds a llvm::DWARFUnitIndex argument to the DWARFUnit constructors.
This argument is used to look up the offsets of the debug_info and
debug_abbrev contributions in the sections of the dwp file.
- makes sure the creation of the DebugInfo object as well as the initial
discovery of DWARFUnits is thread-safe, as we can now call this
concurrently when doing parallel indexing.
This patch does not:
- use the DWARFUnitIndex to search for other kinds of contributions
(debug_loc, debug_ranges, etc.). This means that units which reference
these sections will not work correctly. These will be handled by
follow-up patches, but even the present level of support is sufficient
to enable basic functionality.
- Make the llvm::DWARFContext thread-safe. Right now, it just avoids this
problem by ensuring everything is initialized ahead of time. However,
this is something we will run into more often as we try to use more of
llvm, and so I plan to start looking into our options here.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny, mgrang, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73783
Summary:
This change represents the move of ClangASTImporter, ClangASTMetadata,
ClangExternalASTSourceCallbacks, ClangUtil, CxxModuleHandler, and
TypeSystemClang from lldbSource to lldbPluginExpressionParserClang.h
This explicitly removes knowledge of clang internals from lldbSymbol,
moving towards a more generic core implementation of lldb.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, davide, aprantl, teemperor, clayborg, labath, jingham, shafik
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73661
Summary:
This commit renames ClangASTContext to TypeSystemClang to better reflect what this class is actually supposed to do
(implement the TypeSystem interface for Clang). It also gets rid of the very confusing situation that we have both a
`clang::ASTContext` and a `ClangASTContext` in clang (which sometimes causes Clang people to think I'm fiddling
with Clang's ASTContext when I'm actually just doing LLDB work).
I also have plans to potentially have multiple clang::ASTContext instances associated with one ClangASTContext so
the ASTContext naming will then become even more confusing to people.
Reviewers: #lldb, aprantl, shafik, clayborg, labath, JDevlieghere, davide, espindola, jdoerfert, xiaobai
Reviewed By: clayborg, labath, xiaobai
Subscribers: wuzish, emaste, nemanjai, mgorny, kbarton, MaskRay, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, jingham, xiaobai, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72684
Summary:
I often struggle to understand what exactly LLDB is doing by looking at our expression evaluation logging as our messages look like this:
```
CompleteTagDecl[2] on (ASTContext*)0x7ff31f01d240 Completing (TagDecl*)0x7ff31f01d568 named DeclName1
```
From the log messages it's unclear what this ASTContext is. Is it the scratch context, the expression context, some decl vendor context or a context from a module?
The pointer value isn't helpful for anyone unless I'm in a debugger where I could inspect the memory at the address. But even with a debugger it's not easy to
figure out what this ASTContext is without having deeper understanding about all the different ASTContext instances in LLDB (e.g., valid SourceLocation
from the file system usually means that this is the Objective-C decl vendor, a file name from multiple expressions is probably the scratch context, etc.).
This patch adds a name field to ClangASTContext instances that we can use to store a name which can be used for logging and debugging. With this
our log messages now look like this:
```
CompleteTagDecl[2] on scratch ASTContext. Completing (TagDecl*)0x7ff31f01d568 named Foo
```
We can now also just print a ClangASTContext from the debugger and see a useful name in the `m_display_name` field, e.g.
```
m_display_name = "AST for /Users/user/test/main.o";
```
Reviewers: shafik, labath, JDevlieghere, mib
Reviewed By: shafik
Subscribers: clayborg, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72391
ClangASTContext::getASTContext() currently returns a ptr but we have an assert there since a
while that the ASTContext is not a nullptr. This causes that we still have a lot of code
that is doing nullptr checks on the result of getASTContext() which is all unreachable code.
This patch changes the return value to a reference to make it clear this can't be a nullptr
and deletes all the nullptr checks.
Their naming is misleading as they only return the
ClangASTContext-owned variables. For ClangASTContext instances constructed
for a given clang::ASTContext they silently generated duplicated instances
(e.g., a second IdentifierTable) that were essentially unusable.
This removes all these getters as they are anyway not very useful in comparison
to just calling the clang::ASTContext getters. The initialization
code has been moved to the CreateASTContext initialization method so that all
code for making our own clang::ASTContext is in one place.
Pavel Labath