This is a performance patch that hoists two conditions in DwarfDebug's
validThroughout to avoid a linear-scan of all instructions in a block. We
now exit early if validThrougout will never return true for the variable
location.
The first added clause filters for the two circumstances where
validThroughout will return true. The second added clause should be
identical to the one that's deleted from after the linear-scan.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77639
Summary:
This patch adds support for emission of following DWARFv5 macro forms
in .debug_macro section.
1. DW_MACRO_start_file
2. DW_MACRO_end_file
3. DW_MACRO_define_strp
4. DW_MACRO_undef_strp.
Reviewed By: dblaikie, ikudrin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72828
Record the address of a tail-calling branch instruction within its call
site entry using DW_AT_call_pc. This allows a debugger to determine the
address to use when creating aritificial frames.
This creates an extra attribute + relocation at tail call sites, which
constitute 3-5% of all call sites in xnu/clang respectively.
rdar://60307600
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76336
When compiling
```
struct S {
float w;
};
void f(long w, long b);
void g(struct S s) {
int w = s.w;
f(w, w*4);
}
```
I get Assertion failed: ((!CombinedExpr || CombinedExpr->isValid()) && "Combined debug expression is invalid").
That's because we combine two epxressions that both end in DW_OP_stack_value:
```
(lldb) p Expr->dump()
!DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 32, DW_ATE_signed, DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 64, DW_ATE_signed, DW_OP_stack_value)
(lldb) p Param.Expr->dump()
!DIExpression(DW_OP_constu, 4, DW_OP_mul, DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 32, DW_ATE_signed, DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 64, DW_ATE_signed, DW_OP_stack_value)
(lldb) p CombinedExpr->isValid()
(bool) $0 = false
(lldb) p CombinedExpr->dump()
!DIExpression(4097, 32, 5, 4097, 64, 5, 16, 4, 30, 4097, 32, 5, 4097, 64, 5, 159, 159)
```
I believe that in this particular case combining two stack values is
safe, but I didn't want to sink the special handling into
DIExpression::append() because I do want everyone to think about what
they are doing.
Patch by Adrian Prantl.
Fixes PR45181.
rdar://problem/60383095
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76164
This is part of PR44213 https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44213
When importing (system) Clang modules, LLDB needs to know which SDK
(e.g., MacOSX, iPhoneSimulator, ...) they came from. While the sysroot
attribute contains the absolute path to the SDK, this doesn't work
well when the debugger is run on a different machine than the
compiler, and the SDKs are installed in different directories. It thus
makes sense to just store the name of the SDK instead of the absolute
path, so it can be found relative to LLDB.
rdar://problem/51645582
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75646
```
// clang -c -gdwarf-5 a.s -o a.o
.section .init; ret
.text; ret
```
.debug_info contains DW_AT_ranges and llvm-dwarfdump will report
a verification error because .debug_rnglists does not exist (not
implemented).
This patch generates .debug_rnglists for assembly files.
emitListsTableHeaderStart() in DwarfDebug.cpp can be shared with
MCDwarf.cpp. Because CodeGen depends on MC, I move the function to
MCDwarf.cpp
Reviewed By: probinson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75375
Summary:
If the describeLoadedValue() hook produced a DIExpression when
describing a instruction, and it was not possible to emit a call site
entry directly (the value operand was not an immediate nor a preserved
register), then that described value could not be inserted into the
worklist, and would instead be dropped, meaning that the parameter's
call site value couldn't be described.
This patch extends the worklist so that each entry has an DIExpression
that is built up when iterating through the instructions.
This allows us to describe instruction chains like this:
$reg0 = mv $fp
$reg0 = add $reg0, offset
call @call_with_offseted_fp
Since DW_OP_LLVM_entry_value operations can't be combined with any other
expression, such call site entries will not be emitted. I have added a
test, dbgcall-site-expr-entry-value.mir, which verifies that we don't
assert or emit broken DWARF in such cases.
Reviewers: djtodoro, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: djtodoro, vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75036
Summary:
This is a preparatory patch for D75036, in which a debug expression is
associated with each parameter register in the worklist. In that patch
the two lambda functions addToWorklist() and finishCallSiteParams() grow
a bit, so move those out to separate functions. This patch also prepares
for each parameter register having their own expression moving the
creation of the DbgValueLoc into finishCallSiteParams().
Reviewers: djtodoro, vsk
Reviewed By: djtodoro, vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75050
This patch enables the debug entry values feature.
- Remove the (CC1) experimental -femit-debug-entry-values option
- Enable it for x86, arm and aarch64 targets
- Resolve the test failures
- Leave the llc experimental option for targets that do not
support the CallSiteInfo yet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73534
This patch enables the debug entry values feature.
- Remove the (CC1) experimental -femit-debug-entry-values option
- Enable it for x86, arm and aarch64 targets
- Resolve the test failures
- Leave the llc experimental option for targets that do not
support the CallSiteInfo yet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73534
Instructions marked as FrameSetup do not cause requestLabelAfterInsn to
be called and so no such label is generated. Call instructions which
require call site entries to be generated require this label to be
present in order to calculate the return PC offset/address, but the
check for whether the call instruction is marked as FrameSetup was not
present.
Therefore in the case where a call instruction is marked as FrameSetup,
an assertion failure occurs if a call site entry is to be generated.
This is the case with RISC-V's implementation of save/restore via
library calls.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71593
Add the isCandidateForCallSiteEntry predicate to MachineInstr to
determine whether a DWARF call site entry should be created for an
instruction.
For now, it's enough to have any call instruction that doesn't belong to
a blacklisted set of opcodes. For these opcodes, a call site entry isn't
meaningful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74159
Summary:
This patch reorders the emission of debug_str section, so that
string can come after macros.
This is necessary for macro forms like DW_MACRO_define_strp,
which emits macro as a string in debug_str section.
Originally committed in: 1ced28cbe7
Reverted in: f75301d16d
(reverted due to tests failing on non-linux/x86 targets, tests have since been
generalized and specialized... since Split DWARF isn't supported on non-elf
targets anyway and we have no way to run on "whatever elf target is available"
so they fail on MacOS without an explicit target triple)
This code was incorrectly emitting extra bytes into arbitrary parts of
the object file when it was meant to be hashing them to compute the DWO
ID.
Follow-up patch(es) will refactor this API somewhat to make such bugs
harder to introduce, hopefully.
This code was incorrectly emitting extra bytes into arbitrary parts of
the object file when it was meant to be hashing them to compute the DWO
ID.
Follow-up patch(es) will refactor this API somewhat to make such bugs
harder to introduce, hopefully.
This is a revert-of-revert (i.e. this reverts commit 802bec89, which
itself reverted fa4701e1 and 79daafc9) with a fix folded in. The problem
was that call site tags weren't emitted properly when LTO was enabled
along with split-dwarf. This required a minor fix. I've added a reduced
test case in test/DebugInfo/X86/fission-call-site.ll.
Original commit message:
This allows a call site tag in CU A to reference a callee DIE in CU B
without resorting to creating an incomplete duplicate DIE for the callee
inside of CU A.
We already allow cross-CU references of subprogram declarations, so it
doesn't seem like definitions ought to be special.
This improves entry value evaluation and tail call frame synthesis in
the LTO setting. During LTO, it's common for cross-module inlining to
produce a call in some CU A where the callee resides in a different CU,
and there is no declaration subprogram for the callee anywhere. In this
case llvm would (unnecessarily, I think) emit an empty DW_TAG_subprogram
in order to fill in the call site tag. That empty 'definition' defeats
entry value evaluation etc., because the debugger can't figure out what
it means.
As a follow-up, maybe we could add a DWARF verifier check that a
DW_TAG_subprogram at least has a DW_AT_name attribute.
Update #1:
Reland with a fix to create a declaration DIE when the declaration is
missing from the CU's retainedTypes list. The declaration is left out
of the retainedTypes list in two cases:
1) Re-compiling pre-r266445 bitcode (in which declarations weren't added
to the retainedTypes list), and
2) Doing LTO function importing (which doesn't update the retainedTypes
list).
It's possible to handle (1) and (2) by modifying the retainedTypes list
(in AutoUpgrade, or in the LTO importing logic resp.), but I don't see
an advantage to doing it this way, as it would cause more DWARF to be
emitted compared to creating the declaration DIEs lazily.
Update #2:
Fold in a fix for call site tag emission in the split-dwarf + LTO case.
Tested with a stage2 ThinLTO+RelWithDebInfo build of clang, and with a
ReleaseLTO-g build of the test suite.
rdar://46577651, rdar://57855316, rdar://57840415, rdar://58888440
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70350
The Version was used only to determine the size of an operand of
DW_OP_call_ref. The size was 4 for all versions apart from 2, but
the DW_OP_call_ref operation was introduced only in DWARF3. Thus,
the code may be simplified and using of Version may be eliminated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73264
Summary:
This fixes PR44118. For cases where we have a chain like this:
R8 = R1 (entry value)
R0 = R8
call @foo R0
the code that emits call site entries using entry values would not
follow that chain, instead emitting a call site entry with R8 as
location rather than R0. Such a case was discovered when originally
adding dbgcall-site-orr-moves.mir. This patch fixes that issue. This is
done by changing the ForwardedRegWorklist set to a map in which the
worklist registers always map to the parameter registers that they
describe.
Another thing this patch fixes is that worklist registers now can
describe more than one parameter register at a time. Such a case
occurred in dbgcall-site-interpretation.mir, resulting in a call site
entry not being emitted for one of the parameters.
Reviewers: djtodoro, NikolaPrica, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73168
Summary:
Since D70431 the describeLoadedValue() hook takes a parameter register,
meaning that it can now be asked to describe any register. This means
that we can drop the difference between explicit and implicit defines
that we previously had in collectCallSiteParameters().
I have not found any case for any upstream targets where a parameter
register is only implicitly defined, and does not overlap with any
explicit defines. I don't know if such a case would even make sense. So
as far as I have tested, this patch should be a non-functional change.
However, this reduces the complexity of the code a bit, and it will
simplify the implementation of an upcoming patch which solves PR44118.
Reviewers: djtodoro, NikolaPrica, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: djtodoro, vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73167
... as well as:
Revert "[DWARF] Defer creating declaration DIEs until we prepare call site info"
This reverts commit fa4701e197.
This reverts commit 79daafc903.
There have been reports of this assert getting hit:
CalleeDIE && "Could not find DIE for call site entry origin
This makes the SectionLabel handling more resilient - specifically for
future PROPELLER work which will have more CU ranges (rather than just
one per function).
Ultimately it might be nice to make this more general/resilient to
arbitrary labels (rather than relying on the labels being created for CU
ranges & then being reused by ranges, loclists, and possibly other
addresses). It's possible that other (non-rnglist/loclist) uses of
addresses will need the addresses to be in SectionLabels earlier (eg:
move the CU.addRange to be done on function begin, rather than function
end, so during function emission they are already populated for other
use).
[this re-applies c0176916a4
with the correct commit message and phabricator link]
This addresses point 1 of PR44213.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44213
The DW_AT_LLVM_sysroot attribute is used for Clang module debug info,
to allow LLDB to import a Clang module from source. Currently it is
part of each DW_TAG_module, however, it is the same for all modules in
a compile unit. It is more efficient and less ambiguous to store it
once in the DW_TAG_compile_unit.
This should have no effect on DWARF consumers other than LLDB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71732
This is a purely cosmetic change that is NFC in terms of the binary
output. I bugs me that I called the attribute DW_AT_LLVM_isysroot
since the "i" is an artifact of GCC command line option syntax
(-isysroot is in the category of -i options) and doesn't carry any
useful information otherwise.
This attribute only appears in Clang module debug info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71722
This reverts D53469, which changed llvm's DWARF emission to emit
DW_AT_call_return_pc as a function-local offset. Such an encoding is not
compatible with post-link block re-ordering tools and isn't standards-
compliant.
In addition to reverting back to the original DW_AT_call_return_pc
encoding, teach lldb how to fix up DW_AT_call_return_pc when the address
comes from an object file pointed-to by a debug map. While doing this I
noticed that lldb's support for tail calls that cross a DSO/object file
boundary wasn't covered, so I added tests for that. This latter case
exercises the newly added return PC fixup.
The dsymutil changes in this patch were originally included in D49887:
the associated test should be sufficient to test DW_AT_call_return_pc
encoding purely on the llvm side.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72489
It isn't necessary to create DIEs for all of the declaration subprograms
in a CU's retainedTypes list. We can defer creating these subprograms
until we need to prepare a call site tag that refers to one.
This cleanup was mentioned in passing in D70350.
This allows a call site tag in CU A to reference a callee DIE in CU B
without resorting to creating an incomplete duplicate DIE for the callee
inside of CU A.
We already allow cross-CU references of subprogram declarations, so it
doesn't seem like definitions ought to be special.
This improves entry value evaluation and tail call frame synthesis in
the LTO setting. During LTO, it's common for cross-module inlining to
produce a call in some CU A where the callee resides in a different CU,
and there is no declaration subprogram for the callee anywhere. In this
case llvm would (unnecessarily, I think) emit an empty DW_TAG_subprogram
in order to fill in the call site tag. That empty 'definition' defeats
entry value evaluation etc., because the debugger can't figure out what
it means.
As a follow-up, maybe we could add a DWARF verifier check that a
DW_TAG_subprogram at least has a DW_AT_name attribute.
Update:
Reland with a fix to create a declaration DIE when the declaration is
missing from the CU's retainedTypes list. The declaration is left out
of the retainedTypes list in two cases:
1) Re-compiling pre-r266445 bitcode (in which declarations weren't added
to the retainedTypes list), and
2) Doing LTO function importing (which doesn't update the retainedTypes
list).
It's possible to handle (1) and (2) by modifying the retainedTypes list
(in AutoUpgrade, or in the LTO importing logic resp.), but I don't see
an advantage to doing it this way, as it would cause more DWARF to be
emitted compared to creating the declaration DIEs lazily.
Tested with a stage2 ThinLTO+RelWithDebInfo build of clang, and with a
ReleaseLTO-g build of the test suite.
rdar://46577651, rdar://57855316, rdar://57840415
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70350
Extends DWARF expression language to express locals/globals locations. (via
target-index operands atm) (possible variants are: non-virtual registers
or address spaces)
The WebAssemblyExplicitLocals can replace virtual registers to targertindex
operand type at the time when WebAssembly backend introduces
{get,set,tee}_local instead of corresponding virtual registers.
Reviewed By: aprantl, dschuff
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52634
Since the address pool doesn't get populated in this case (due to the
lack of inlining, no child DIEs are added to the CU - so no addresses
are needed for the DIEs themselves) until the range list is emitted - at
the time the attributes are added to the CU, the address pool is empty.
So check whether the address pool will be used for the range lists & add
an addr_base if that's the case.
Move these data structures closer together so their emission code can
eventually share more of its implementation.
Was an egregious bug (completely untested, evidently) where I hadn't
inverted a DWARFv5 test as needed, so it was doing the exact opposite of
what was required & thus tried to emit a DWARFv5 range list header in
DWARFv4.
Reapply 8e04896288 which was
reverted in a8154e5e0c.
added a test case for macinfo.dwo emission."
This was reverted in caa4120906,
since it was causing an assertion failure on Windows bots.
This revision is revised to fix that.
Original commit message -
[DebugInfo] Refactored macro related generation, added a test case for macinfo.dwo emission.
Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl, jini.susan.george
Tags: #debug-info #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71008
(except for v4 loclists, which are sufficiently different to not fit
well in this generic implementation)
In subsequent patches I intend to refactor the DebugLoc and ranges data
structures to be more similar so I can common more of the implementation
here.
Summary:
Support alloca-referencing dbg.value in hwasan instrumentation.
Update AsmPrinter to emit DW_AT_LLVM_tag_offset when location is in
loclist format.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: srhines, aprantl, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70753
This reverts commit 30038da15b. It causes
the stage2 thinLTO bot to fail with:
Assertion failed: (CU.getDIE(CalleeSP) && "Expected declaration subprogram DIE for callee")
rdar://57840415
This allows a call site tag in CU A to reference a callee DIE in CU B
without resorting to creating an incomplete duplicate DIE for the callee
inside of CU A.
We already allow cross-CU references of subprogram declarations, so it
doesn't seem like definitions ought to be special.
This improves entry value evaluation and tail call frame synthesis in
the LTO setting. During LTO, it's common for cross-module inlining to
produce a call in some CU A where the callee resides in a different CU,
and there is no declaration subprogram for the callee anywhere. In this
case llvm would (unnecessarily, I think) emit an empty DW_TAG_subprogram
in order to fill in the call site tag. That empty 'definition' defeats
entry value evaluation etc., because the debugger can't figure out what
it means.
As a follow-up, maybe we could add a DWARF verifier check that a
DW_TAG_subprogram at least has a DW_AT_name attribute.
rdar://46577651
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70350
Summary:
Currently the describeLoadedValue() hook is assumed to describe the
value of the instruction's first explicit define. The hook will not be
called for instructions with more than one explicit define.
This commit adds a register parameter to the describeLoadedValue() hook,
and invokes the hook for all registers in the worklist.
This will allow us to for example describe instructions which produce
more than two parameters' values; e.g. Hexagon's various combine
instructions.
This also fixes situations in our downstream target where we may pass
smaller parameters in the high part of a register. If such a parameter's
value is produced by a larger copy instruction, we can't describe the
call site value using the super-register, and we instead need to know
which sub-register that should be used.
This also allows us to handle cases like this:
$ebx = [...]
$rdi = MOVSX64rr32 $ebx
$esi = MOV32rr $edi
CALL64pcrel32 @call
The hook will first be invoked for the MOV32rr instruction, which will
say that @call's second parameter (passed in $esi) is described by $edi.
As $edi is not preserved it will be added to the worklist. When we get
to the MOVSX64rr32 instruction, we need to describe two values; the
sign-extended value of $ebx -> $rdi for the first parameter, and $ebx ->
$edi for the second parameter, which is now possible.
This commit modifies the dbgcall-site-lea-interpretation.mir test case.
In the test case, the values of some 32-bit parameters were produced
with LEA64r. Perhaps we can in general cases handle such by emitting
expressions that AND out the lower 32-bits, but I have not been able to
land in a case where a LEA64r is used for a 32-bit parameter instead of
LEA64_32 from C code.
I have not found a case where it would be useful to describe parameters
using implicit defines, so in this patch the hook is still only invoked
for explicit defines of forwarding registers.
Reviewers: djtodoro, NikolaPrica, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: djtodoro, vsk
Subscribers: ormris, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70431
Currently the describeLoadedValue() hook is assumed to describe the
value of the instruction's first explicit define. The hook will not be
called for instructions with more than one explicit define.
This commit adds a register parameter to the describeLoadedValue() hook,
and invokes the hook for all registers in the worklist.
This will allow us to for example describe instructions which produce
more than two parameters' values; e.g. Hexagon's various combine
instructions.
This also fixes a case in our downstream target where we may pass
smaller parameters in the high part of a register. If such a parameter's
value is produced by a larger copy instruction, we can't describe the
call site value using the super-register, and we instead need to know
which sub-register that should be used.
This also allows us to handle cases like this:
$ebx = [...]
$rdi = MOVSX64rr32 $ebx
$esi = MOV32rr $edi
CALL64pcrel32 @call
The hook will first be invoked for the MOV32rr instruction, which will
say that @call's second parameter (passed in $esi) is described by $edi.
As $edi is not preserved it will be added to the worklist. When we get
to the MOVSX64rr32 instruction, we need to describe two values; the
sign-extended value of $ebx -> $rdi for the first parameter, and $ebx ->
$edi for the second parameter, which is now possible.
This commit modifies the dbgcall-site-lea-interpretation.mir test case.
In the test case, the values of some 32-bit parameters were produced
with LEA64r. Perhaps we can in general cases handle such by emitting
expressions that AND out the lower 32-bits, but I have not been able to
land in a case where a LEA64r is used for a 32-bit parameter instead of
LEA64_32 from C code.
I have not found a case where it would be useful to describe parameters
using implicit defines, so in this patch the hook is still only invoked
for explicit defines of forwarding registers.
This is for the case where -gmlt -gsplit-dwarf -fsplit-dwarf-inlining
are used together in some but not all units during LTO (or, in the
reduced case, even without LTO) - ensuring that no split dwarf is used
(because split-dwarf-inlining puts the same data in the .o file, so
there's no need to duplicate it into the .dwo file)
The loclists_table_base was being overwritten for each CU even though
only one loclists contribution is made so everything but the last CU
would have a label that was never defined and fail to assemble.
Summary:
If a call is bundled then the code that looks for instructions that
produce parameter values would break when reaching the call's bundle
header, due to the `ifCall(/*AnyInBundle*/)` invocation returning true.
It is not enough to simply ignore bundle headers in the `isCall()`
invocation, as the bundle header may have defines of parameter registers
due to the call, meaning that such registers would incorrectly be
removed from the worklist. Therefore, do not look at bundle headers at
all.
Reviewers: djtodoro, NikolaPrica, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: aprantl, vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71024
That patch fixes incompatible compilation unit type (DW_UT_skeleton) and root DIE (DW_TAG_compile_unit) error.
cat split-dwarf.cpp
int main()
{
int a = 1;
return 0;
}
clang++ -O -g -gsplit-dwarf -gdwarf-5 split-dwarf.cpp; llvm-dwarfdump --verify ./a.out | grep skeleton
error: Compilation unit type (DW_UT_skeleton) and root DIE (DW_TAG_compile_unit) do not match.
The fix is to change DW_TAG_compile_unit into DW_TAG_skeleton_unit when skeleton file is generated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70880
This patch adds support for debug_macinfo.dwo section[pre-standardized]
to llvm and llvm-dwarfdump.
Reviewers: probinson, dblaikie, aprantl, jini.susan.george, alok
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70705
Tags: #debug-info #llvm
The original commit message follows.
This patch adds support for debug_loclists.dwo section in llvm and llvm-dwarfdump.
Also Fixes PR43622, PR43623.
Reviewers: dblaikie, probinson, labath, aprantl, jini.susan.george
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69462
This patch adds support for debug_loclists.dwo section in llvm and llvm-dwarfdump.
Also Fixes PR43622, PR43623.
Reviewers: dblaikie, probinson, labath, aprantl, jini.susan.george
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69462
Summary:
Assert in getFunctionLocalOffsetAfterInsn() fails when processing a call
MachineInstr inside a bundle and compiling with debug info. This is
because labels are added by DwarfDebug::beginInstruction() which is
called for each top-level MI by EmitFunctionBody()'s for-loop iteration
but constructCallSiteEntryDIEs() which calls
getFunctionLocalOffsetAfterInsn() iterates over all MIs.
This commit modifies constructCallSiteEntryDIEs() to get the associated
bundle MI for call MIs inside a bundle and use that to when calling
getFunctionLocalOffsetAfterInsn() and getLabelAfterInsn(). It also skips
loop iterations for bundle MIs since the loop statements are concerned
with debug info for each physical instructions and bundles represent a
group of instructions. It also fix the comment about PCAddr since the
code is getting the return address and not the call address.
Reviewers: dstenb, vsk, aprantl, djtodoro, dblaikie, NikolaPrica
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70293
This only implements the non-dwo part, but loclistx is necessary to use
location lists in DWARFv5, so it's a precursor to that work - and
generally reduces relocations (only using one reloc, then
indexes/relative offsets for all location list references) in non-split
DWARF.
The macinfo support was broken for LTO situations, by terminating
macinfo lists only once - multiple macinfo contributions were correctly
labeled, but they all continued/flowed into later contributions until
only one terminator appeared at the end of the section.
Correctly terminate each contribution & fix the parsing to handle this
situation too. The parsing fix is also necessary for dumping linked
binaries - the previous code would stop at the end of the first
contribution - missing all later contributions in a linked binary.
It'd be nice to improve the dumping to print the offsets of each
contribution so it'd be easier to know which CU AT_macro_info refers to
which macinfo contribution.
Extend the describeLoadedValue() with support for target specific ARM and
AArch64 instructions interpretation. The patch provides specialization for
ADD and SUB operations that include a register and an immediate/offset
operand. Some of the instructions can operate with global string addresses
or constant pool indexes but such cases are omitted since we currently lack
flexible support for processing such operands at DWARF production stage.
Patch by Nikola Prica
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67556
There's no need to have more than one of these (there can be two
DwarfFiles - one for the .o, one for the .dwo - but only one loc/loclist
section (either in the .o or the .dwo) & certainly one per
DebugLocStream, which is currently singular in DwarfDebug)
llvm-svn: 375183
Summary:
Internally in LLVM's metadata we use DW_OP_entry_value operations with
the same semantics as DWARF; that is, its operand specifies the number
of bytes that the entry value covers.
At the time of emitting entry values we don't know the emitted size of
the DWARF expression that the entry value will cover. Currently the size
is hardcoded to 1 in DIExpression, and other values causes the verifier
to fail. As the size is 1, that effectively means that we can only have
valid entry values for registers that can be encoded in one byte, which
are the registers with DWARF numbers 0 to 31 (as they can be encoded as
single-byte DW_OP_reg0..DW_OP_reg31 rather than a multi-byte
DW_OP_regx). It is a bit confusing, but it seems like llvm-dwarfdump
will print an operation "correctly", even if the byte size is less than
that, which may make it seem that we emit correct DWARF for registers
with DWARF numbers > 31. If you instead use readelf for such cases, it
will interpret the number of specified bytes as a DWARF expression. This
seems like a limitation in llvm-dwarfdump.
As suggested in D66746, a way forward would be to add an internal
variant of DW_OP_entry_value, DW_OP_LLVM_entry_value, whose operand
instead specifies the number of operations that the entry value covers,
and we then translate that into the byte size at the time of emission.
In this patch that internal operation is added. This patch keeps the
limitation that a entry value can only be applied to simple register
locations, but it will fix the issue with the size operand being
incorrect for DWARF numbers > 31.
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk, djtodoro, NikolaPrica
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: jyknight, fedor.sergeev, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67492
llvm-svn: 374881
Summary:
DWARF's DW_OP_entry_value operation has two operands; the first is a
ULEB128 operand that specifies the size of the second operand, which is
a DWARF block. This means that we need to be able to pre-calculate and
emit the size of DWARF expressions before emitting them. There is
currently no interface for doing this in DwarfExpression, so this patch
introduces that.
When implementing this I initially thought about running through
DwarfExpression's emission two times; first with a temporary buffer to
emit the expression, in order to being able to calculate the size of
that emitted data. However, DwarfExpression is a quite complex state
machine, so I decided against that, as it seemed like the two runs could
get out of sync, resulting in incorrect size operands. Therefore I have
implemented this in a way that we only have to run DwarfExpression once.
The idea is to emit DWARF to a temporary buffer, for which it is
possible to query the size. The data in the temporary buffer can then be
emitted to DwarfExpression's main output.
In the case of DIEDwarfExpression, a temporary DIE is used. The values
are all allocated using the same BumpPtrAllocator as for all other DIEs,
and the values are then transferred to the real value list. In the case
of DebugLocDwarfExpression, the temporary buffer is implemented using a
BufferByteStreamer which emits to a buffer in the DwarfExpression
object.
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk, NikolaPrica, djtodoro
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67768
llvm-svn: 374879
Summary:
This addresses a bug in collectCallSiteParameters() where call site
immediates would be truncated from int64_t to unsigned.
This fixes PR43525.
Reviewers: djtodoro, NikolaPrica, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68869
llvm-svn: 374770
Unify the range and loc emission (for both DWARFv4 and DWARFv5 style lists) and take advantage of that unification to use strategic base addresses for loclists.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68620
llvm-svn: 374600
Doing this makes MSVC complain that `empty(someRange)` could refer to
either C++17's std::empty or LLVM's llvm::empty, which previously we
avoided via SFINAE because std::empty is defined in terms of an empty
member rather than begin and end. So, switch callers over to the new
method as it is added.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68439
llvm-svn: 373935
Brings this struct in line with the RangeSpan class so they might
eventually be used by common template code for generating range/loc
lists with less duplicate code.
llvm-svn: 373540
This is an effort to make RangeSpan and DebugLocStream::Entry more
similar to share code for their emission (to reuse the more complicated
code for using (& choosing when to use) base address selection entries,
etc).
It didn't seem like this struct was worth the complexity of
encapsulation - when the members could be initialized by the ctor to any
value (no validation) and the type is assignable (so there's no
mutability or other constraint being implemented by its interface).
llvm-svn: 373533
DIFlagBlockByRefStruct is an unused DIFlag that originally was used by
clang to express (Objective-)C block captures in debug info. For the
last year Clang has been emitting complex DIExpressions to describe
block captures instead, which makes all the code supporting this flag
redundant.
This patch removes the flag and all supporting "dead" code, so we can
reuse the bit for something else in the future.
Since this only affects debug info generated by Clang with the block
extension this mostly affects Apple platforms and I don't have any
bitcode compatibility concerns for removing this. The Verifier will
reject debug info that uses the bit and thus degrade gracefully when
LTO'ing older bitcode with a newer compiler.
rdar://problem/44304813
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67453
llvm-svn: 372272
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet, JDevlieghere, alexshap, rupprecht, jhenderson
Subscribers: sdardis, nemanjai, hiraditya, kbarton, jakehehrlich, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, jsji, seiya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67499
llvm-svn: 371742
Emit debug entry values using standard DWARF5 opcodes when the debugger
tuning is set to lldb.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67410
llvm-svn: 371666
Summary:
Add zero-materializing XORs to X86's describeLoadedValue() hook in order
to produce call site values.
I have had to change the defs logic in collectCallSiteParameters() a bit
to be able to describe the XORs. The XORs implicitly define $eflags,
which would cause them to never be considered, due to a guard condition
that I->getNumDefs() is one. I have changed that condition so that we
now only consider instructions where a forwarded register overlaps with
the instruction's single explicit define. We still need to collect the implicit
defines of other forwarded registers to remove them from the work list.
I'm not sure how to move towards supporting instructions with multiple
explicit defines, cases where forwarded register are implicitly defined,
and/or cases where an instruction produces values for multiple forwarded
registers. Perhaps the describeLoadedValue() hook should take a register
argument, and we then leave it up to the hook to describe the loaded
value in that register? I have not yet encountered a situation where
that would be necessary though.
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk, djtodoro, NikolaPrica
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: ychen, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67225
llvm-svn: 371333
Summary:
This changes the ParamLoadedValue pair which the describeLoadedValue()
hook returns so that MachineOperand objects are returned instead of
pointers.
When describing call site values we may need to describe operands which
are not part of the instruction. One such example is zero-materializing
XORs on x86, which I have implemented support for in a child revision.
Instead of having to return a pointer to an operand stored somewhere
outside the instruction, start returning objects directly instead, as
that simplifies the code.
The MachineOperand class only holds POD members, and on x86-64 it is 32
bytes large. That combined with copy elision means that the overhead of
returning a machine operand object from the hook does not become very
large.
I benchmarked this on a 8-thread i7-8650U machine with 32 GB RAM. The
benchmark consisted of building a clang 8.0 binary configured with:
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo \
-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=X86 \
-DLLVM_USE_SANITIZER=Address \
-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="-Xclang -femit-debug-entry-values -stdlib=libc++"
The average wall clock time increased by 4 seconds, from 62:05 to
62:09, which is an 0.1% increase.
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk, djtodoro, NikolaPrica
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, ychen, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67261
llvm-svn: 371332
Summary:
This clang-tidy check is looking for unsigned integer variables whose initializer
starts with an implicit cast from llvm::Register and changes the type of the
variable to llvm::Register (dropping the llvm:: where possible).
Partial reverts in:
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FixupLEAs.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
HexagonBitSimplify.cpp - Function takes BitTracker::RegisterRef which appears to be unsigned&
MachineVerifier.cpp - Ambiguous operator==() given MCRegister and const Register
PPCFastISel.cpp - No Register::operator-=()
PeepholeOptimizer.cpp - TargetInstrInfo::optimizeLoadInstr() takes an unsigned&
MachineTraceMetrics.cpp - MachineTraceMetrics lacks a suitable constructor
Manual fixups in:
ARMFastISel.cpp - ARMEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
HexagonSplitDouble.cpp - Ternary operator was ambiguous between unsigned/Register
HexagonConstExtenders.cpp - Has a local class named Register, used llvm::Register instead of Register.
PPCFastISel.cpp - PPCEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
Depends on D65919
Reviewers: arsenm, bogner, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: RKSimon, craig.topper, lenary, aemerson, wuzish, jholewinski, MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, tpr, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65962
llvm-svn: 369041
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
Summary: There are places where a case that debug label scope has an extra lexical block file is not considered properly. The modified test won't pass without this patch.
Reviewers: aprantl, HsiangKai
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66187
llvm-svn: 368891
This updates all libraries and tools in LLVM Core to use 64-bit offsets
which directly or indirectly come to DataExtractor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65638
llvm-svn: 368014
Dump the DWARF information about call sites and call site parameters into
debug info sections.
The patch also provides an interface for the interpretation of instructions
that could load values of a call site parameters in order to generate DWARF
about the call site parameters.
([13/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60716
llvm-svn: 365467
Add the IR and the AsmPrinter parts for handling of the DW_OP_entry_values
DWARF operation.
([11/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60866
llvm-svn: 364542
A unique DISubprogram may be attached to a function declaration used for
call site debug info.
([6/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60713
llvm-svn: 364500
Since the DebugLocEntry::Value is used as part of DwarfDebug and
DebugLocEntry make it as the separate class.
Reviewers: aprantl, dstenb
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63213
llvm-svn: 363246
Variable's stack location can stretch longer than it should. If a
variable is placed at the stack in a some nested basic block its range
can be calculated to be up to the next occurrence of the variable's
DBG_VALUE, or up to the end of the function, thus covering a basic
blocks that should not be included in the variable’s location range.
This happens because the DbgEntityHistoryCalculator ends register
locations at the end of a basic block only if the variable’s location
register has been changed throughout the function, which is not the
case for the register used to reference stack objects.
This patch also tries to produce a single value location if the location
list builder managed to merge all the locations into one.
Reviewers: aprantl, dstenb, jmorse
Reviewed By: aprantl, dstenb, jmorse
Subscribers: djtodoro, ivanbaev, asowda
Tags: #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61600
llvm-svn: 362923
Summary:
When DwarfDebug::buildLocationList() encountered an undef debug value,
it would truncate all open values, regardless if they were overlapping or
not. This patch fixes so that it only does that for overlapping fragments.
This change unearthed a bug that I had introduced in D57511,
which I have fixed in this patch. The code in DebugHandlerBase that
changes labels for parameter debug values could break DwarfDebug's
assumption that the labels for the entries in the debug value history
are monotonically increasing. Before this patch, that bug could result
in location list entries whose ending address was lower than the
beginning address, and with the changes for undef debug values that this
patch introduces it could trigger an assertion, due to attempting to
emit location list entries with empty ranges. A reproducer for the bug
is added in param-reg-const-mix.mir.
Reviewers: aprantl, jmorse, probinson
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62379
llvm-svn: 361820
The condition !AddrPool.empty() is tested before attachRangesOrLowHighPC(), which may add an entry to AddrPool. We emit DW_AT_low_pc (DW_FORM_addrx) but may incorrectly omit DW_AT_addr_base for LineTablesOnly. This can be easily reproduced:
clang -gdwarf-5 -gmlt -c a.cc
Fix this by moving !AddrPool.empty() below.
This was discovered while investigating an lld crash (fixed by D61889) on such object files: ld.lld --gdb-index a.o
Reviewed By: probinson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61891
llvm-svn: 360678
TypedDINodeRef<T> is a redundant wrapper of Metadata * that is actually a T *.
Accordingly, change DI{Node,Scope,Type}Ref uses to DI{Node,Scope,Type} * or their const variants.
This allows us to delete many resolve() calls that clutter the code.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61369
llvm-svn: 360108
The PrologEpilogInserter need to insert a DW_OP_deref_size before
prepending a memory location expression to an already implicit
expression to avoid having the existing expression act on the memory
address instead of the value behind it.
The reason for using DW_OP_deref_size and not plain DW_OP_deref is that
big-endian targets need to read the right size as simply truncating a
larger read would yield the wrong result (LSB bytes are not at the lower
address).
This re-commit fixes issues reported in the first one. Namely deref was
inserted under wrong conditions and additionally the deref_size argument
was incorrectly encoded.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59687
llvm-svn: 359535
While this doesn't come up in reasonable cases currently (the only user
defined types not in type units are ones without linkage - which makes
for near-ODR violations, because it'd be a type with linkage referencing
a type without linkage - such a type can't be validly defined in more
than one TU, so arguably it shouldn't be in a type unit to begin with -
but it's a convenient way to demonstrate an issue that will become more
revalent with homed modular debug info type definitions - which also
don't need to be in type units but more legitimately so).
Precursor to the Clang change to de-type-unit (by omitting the
'identifier') types homed due to strong linkage vtables. (making that
change without this one would lead to major type duplication in type
units)
llvm-svn: 359122
Originally committed in r358931
Reverted in r358997
Seems this change made Apple accelerator tables miss names (because
names started respecting the CU NameTableKind GNU & assuming that
shouldn't produce accelerated names too), which is never correct (apple
accelerator tables don't have separators or CU lists - if present, they
must describe all names in all CUs).
Original Description:
Currently to opt in to debug_names in DWARFv5, the IR must contain
'nameTableKind: Default' which also enables debug_pubnames.
Instead, only allow one of {debug_names, apple_names, debug_pubnames,
debug_gnu_pubnames}.
nameTableKind: Default gives debug_names in DWARFv5 and greater,
debug_pubnames in v4 and earlier - and apple_names when tuning for lldb
on MachO.
nameTableKind: GNU always gives gnu_pubnames
llvm-svn: 359026
Currently to opt in to debug_names in DWARFv5, the IR must contain
'nameTableKind: Default' which also enables debug_pubnames.
Instead, only allow one of {debug_names, apple_names, debug_pubnames,
debug_gnu_pubnames}.
nameTableKind: Default gives debug_names in DWARFv5 and greater,
debug_pubnames in v4 and earlier - and apple_names when tuning for lldb
on MachO.
nameTableKind: GNU always gives gnu_pubnames
llvm-svn: 358931
Summary:
Currently the DbgValueHistorymap only keeps track of clobbered registers
for the last debug value that it has encountered. This could lead to
preceding register-described debug values living on longer in the
location lists than they should. See PR40283 for an example. This
patch does not introduce tracking of multiple registers, but changes
the DbgValueHistoryMap structure to allow for that in a follow-up
patch. This patch is not NFC, as it at least fixes two bugs in
DwarfDebug (both are covered in the new clobbered-fragments.mir test):
* If a debug value was clobbered (its End pointer set), the value would
still be added to OpenRanges, meaning that the succeeding location list
entries could potentially contain stale values.
* If a debug value was clobbered, and there were non-overlapping
fragments that were still live after the clobbering, DwarfDebug would
not create a location list entry starting directly after the
clobbering instruction. This meant that the location list could have
a gap until the next debug value for the variable was encountered.
Before this patch, the history map was represented by <Begin, End>
pairs, where a new pair was created for each new debug value. When
dealing with partially overlapping register-described debug values, such
as in the following example:
DBG_VALUE $reg2, $noreg, !1, !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 32, 32)
[...]
DBG_VALUE $reg3, $noreg, !1, !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 64, 32)
[...]
$reg2 = insn1
[...]
$reg3 = insn2
the history map would then contain the entries `[<DV1, insn1>, [<DV2, insn2>]`.
This would leave it up to the users of the map to be aware of
the relative order of the instructions, which e.g. could make
DwarfDebug::buildLocationList() needlessly complex. Instead, this patch
makes the history map structure monotonically increasing by dropping the
End pointer, and replacing that with explicit clobbering entries in the
vector. Each debug value has an "end index", which if set, points to the
entry in the vector that ends the debug value. The ending entry can
either be an overlapping debug value, or an instruction which clobbers
the register that the debug value is described by. The ending entry's
instruction can thus either be excluded or included in the debug value's
range. If the end index is not set, the debug value that the entry
introduces is valid until the end of the function.
Changes to test cases:
* DebugInfo/X86/pieces-3.ll: The range of the first DBG_VALUE, which
describes that the fragment (0, 64) is located in RDI, was
incorrectly ended by the clobbering of RAX, which the second
(non-overlapping) DBG_VALUE was described by. With this patch we
get a second entry that only describes RDI after that clobbering.
* DebugInfo/ARM/partial-subreg.ll: This test seems to indiciate a bug
in LiveDebugValues that is caused by it not being aware of fragments.
I have added some comments in the test case about that. Also, before
this patch DwarfDebug would incorrectly include a register-described
debug value from a preceding block in a location list entry.
Reviewers: aprantl, probinson, dblaikie, rnk, bjope
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59941
llvm-svn: 358072
Summary:
In an upcoming commit the history map will be changed so that it
contains explicit entries for instructions that clobber preceding debug
values, rather than Begin- End range pairs, so generalize the name to
"Entry".
Also, prefix the iterator variable names in buildLocationList() with
"E". In an upcoming commit the entry will have query functions such as
"isD(e)b(u)gValue", which could at a glance make one confuse it for
iterations over MachineInstrs, so make the iterator names a bit more
distinct to avoid that.
Reviewers: aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59939
llvm-svn: 358060
Summary:
Replace use of std::pair by creating a class for the debug value
instruction ranges instead. This is a preparatory refactoring for
improving handling of clobbered fragments.
In an upcoming commit the Begin pointer will become a PointerIntPair, so
it will be cleaner to have a getter for that.
Reviewers: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59938
llvm-svn: 358059
Summary:
With MergeValues() removed, amend DebugLocEntry's constructor so that it
takes multiple values rather than a single, and keep non-fragment values
in OpenRanges, as this allows some cleanup of the code in
buildLocationList().
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, loladiro
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59303
llvm-svn: 357988
Summary:
The MergeValues() function would try to merge two entries if they shared
the same beginning label. Having the same beginning label means that the
former entry's range would be empty; however, after D55919 we no longer
create entries for empty ranges, so we can no longer land in a situation
where that check in MergeValues would succeed. Instead, the "merging" is
done by keeping the live values from the preceding empty ranges in
OpenRanges, and adding them to the first non-empty range.
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, loladiro
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59301
llvm-svn: 357974
This reverts commit rL357020.
The commit broke the test llvm/test/tools/llvm-objdump/embedded-source.test
on some builds including clang-ppc64be-linux-multistage,
clang-s390x-linux, clang-with-lto-ubuntu, clang-x64-windows-msvc,
llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-windows10pro-fast (and others).
llvm-svn: 357026
Reapply rL356941 after regenerating the object file in the failing test
llvm/test/tools/llvm-objdump/embedded-source.test from source.
Original commit message:
[llvm] Prevent duplicate files in debug line header in dwarf 5.
Motivation: In previous dwarf versions, file name indexes started from 1, and
the primary source file was not explicit. Dwarf 5 standard (6.2.4) prescribes
the primary source file to be explicitly given an entry with an index number 0.
The current implementation honors the specification by just duplicating the
main source file, once with index number 0, and later maybe with another
index number. While this is compliant with the letter of the standard, the
duplication causes problems for consumers of this information such as lldb.
(Some files are duplicated, where only some of them have a line table although
all refer to the same file)
With this change, dwarf 5 debug line section files always start from 0, and
the zeroth entry is not duplicated whenever possible. This requires different
handling of dwarf 4 and dwarf 5 during generation (e.g. when a function returns
an index zero for a file name, it signals an error in dwarf 4, but not in dwarf 5)
However, I think the minor complication is worth it, because it enables all
consumers (lldb, gdb, dwarfdump, objdump, and so on) to treat all files in the
file name list homogenously.
Tags: #llvm, #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59515
llvm-svn: 357018
Summary:
Motivation: In previous dwarf versions, file name indexes started from 1, and
the primary source file was not explicit. Dwarf 5 standard (6.2.4) prescribes
the primary source file to be explicitly given an entry with an index number 0.
The current implementation honors the specification by just duplicating the
main source file, once with index number 0, and later maybe with another
index number. While this is compliant with the letter of the standard, the
duplication causes problems for consumers of this information such as lldb.
(Some files are duplicated, where only some of them have a line table although
all refer to the same file)
With this change, dwarf 5 debug line section files always start from 0, and
the zeroth entry is not duplicated whenever possible. This requires different
handling of dwarf 4 and dwarf 5 during generation (e.g. when a function returns
an index zero for a file name, it signals an error in dwarf 4, but not in dwarf 5)
However, I think the minor complication is worth it, because it enables all
consumers (lldb, gdb, dwarfdump, objdump, and so on) to treat all files in the
file name list homogenously.
Reviewers: dblaikie, probinson, aprantl, espindola
Reviewed By: probinson
Subscribers: emaste, jvesely, nhaehnle, aprantl, javed.absar, arichardson, hiraditya, MaskRay, rupprecht, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59515
llvm-svn: 356941
Nothing prevents entries from being bigger than the 16 bit size field in
Dwarf < 5. For entries that are too big, just emit an empty entry
instead of crashing.
This fixes PR41038.
Reviewers: probinson, aprantl, davide
Reviewed By: probinson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59518
llvm-svn: 356514
Introduce a DW_OP_LLVM_convert Dwarf expression pseudo op that allows
for a convenient way to perform type conversions on the Dwarf expression
stack. As an additional bonus it paves the way for using other Dwarf
v5 ops that need to reference a base_type.
The new DW_OP_LLVM_convert is used from lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp
to perform sext/zext on debug values but mainly the patch is about
preparing terrain for adding other Dwarf v5 ops that need to reference a
base_type.
For Dwarf v5 the op maps to DW_OP_convert and for earlier versions a
complex shift & mask pattern is generated to emulate sext/zext.
This is a recommit of r356442 with trivial fixes for the failing tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56587
llvm-svn: 356451
Introduce a DW_OP_LLVM_convert Dwarf expression pseudo op that allows
for a convenient way to perform type conversions on the Dwarf expression
stack. As an additional bonus it paves the way for using other Dwarf
v5 ops that need to reference a base_type.
The new DW_OP_LLVM_convert is used from lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp
to perform sext/zext on debug values but mainly the patch is about
preparing terrain for adding other Dwarf v5 ops that need to reference a
base_type.
For Dwarf v5 the op maps to DW_OP_convert and for earlier versions a
complex shift & mask pattern is generated to emulate sext/zext.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56587
llvm-svn: 356442
This configuration (due to r349207) was intended not to emit any DWO CU,
but a degenerate CU was still being emitted - containing a header and a
DW_TAG_compile_unit with no attributes.
Under that situation, emit nothing to the .dwo file. (since this is a
dynamic property of the input the .dwo file is still emitted, just with
nothing in it (so a valid, but empty, ELF file) - if some other CU
didn't satisfy this criteria, its DWO CU would still go there, etc)
llvm-svn: 353771
Summary: Initial function labels must follow the debug location for the correct relocation info generation.
Reviewers: tra, jlebar, echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45784
llvm-svn: 351843
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Currently we do not always collapse subsequent .loc 0 0 directives. The
reason is that we were checking for a PrevInstLoc which is not set when
we emit a line-0 record. We should only check the LastAsmLine, which
seems to be created exactly for this purpose.
// When we emit a line-0 record, we don't update PrevInstLoc; so look at
// the last line number actually emitted, to see if it was line 0.
unsigned LastAsmLine =
Asm->OutStreamer->getContext().getCurrentDwarfLoc().getLine();
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56767
llvm-svn: 351395
Summary:
This fixes PR39710. In that case we emitted a location list looking like
this:
.Ldebug_loc0:
.quad .Lfunc_begin0-.Lfunc_begin0
.quad .Lfunc_begin0-.Lfunc_begin0
.short 1 # Loc expr size
.byte 85 # DW_OP_reg5
.quad .Lfunc_begin0-.Lfunc_begin0
.quad .Lfunc_end0-.Lfunc_begin0
.short 1 # Loc expr size
.byte 85 # super-register DW_OP_reg5
.quad 0
.quad 0
As seen, the first entry's beginning and ending addresses evalute to 0,
which meant that the entry inadvertently became an "end of list" entry,
resulting in the location list ending sooner than expected.
To fix this, omit all entries with empty ranges. Location list entries
with empty ranges do not have any effect, as specified by DWARF, so we
might as well drop them:
"A location list entry (but not a base address selection or end of list
entry) whose beginning and ending addresses are equal has no effect
because the size of the range covered by such an entry is zero."
Reviewers: davide, aprantl, dblaikie
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: javed.absar, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55919
llvm-svn: 350698
When deciding lazily whether a CU would be split or non-split I
accidentally dropped some handling for the line tables comp_dir (by
doing it lazily it was too late to be handled properly by the MC line
table code).
Move that bit of the code back to the non-lazy place.
llvm-svn: 349819
In ThinLTO many split CUs may be effectively empty because of the lack
of support for cross-unit references in split DWARF.
Using a split unit in those cases is just a waste/overhead - and turned
out to be one contributor to a significant symbolizer performance issue
when global variable debug info was being imported (see r348416 for the
primary fix) due to symbolizers seeing CUs with no ranges, assuming
there might still be addresses covered and walking into the split CU to
see if there are any ranges (when that split CU was in a DWP file, that
meant loading the DWP and its index, the index was extra large because
of all these fractured/empty CUs... and so was very expensive to load).
(the 3rd fix which will follow, is to assume that a CU with no ranges is
empty rather than merely missing its CU level range data - and to not
walk into its DIEs (split or otherwise) in search of address information
that is generally not present)
llvm-svn: 349207
Summary:
The comment refers to the field as "Kind:". However, in gdb,
https://sourceware.org/gdb//onlinedocs/gdb/Index-Section-Format.html names it "attributes",
gdb/dwarf2read.c:dw2_symtab_iter_next refers to the whole value as "cu_index_and_attrs"
Change it to `Attributes:` for consistency.
Reviewers: dblaikie
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: aprantl, JDevlieghere, arphaman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54480
llvm-svn: 346790
Jeremy Morse