Commit Graph

1135 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Green d10f23a25d [ISel] Expand saddsat and ssubsat via asr and xor
This changes the lowering of saddsat and ssubsat so that instead of
using:
  r,o = saddo x, y
  c = setcc r < 0
  s = c ? INTMAX : INTMIN
  ret o ? s : r
into using asr and xor to materialize the INTMAX/INTMIN constants:
  r,o = saddo x, y
  s = ashr r, BW-1
  x = xor s, INTMIN
  ret o ? x : r
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/TYufgD

This seems to reduce the instruction count in most testcases across most
architectures. X86 has some custom lowering added to compensate for
cases where it can increase instruction count.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105853
2021-08-19 16:08:07 +01:00
Arthur Eubanks 92ce6db9ee [NFC] Rename AttributeList::hasFnAttribute() -> hasFnAttr()
This is more consistent with similar methods.
2021-08-13 11:09:18 -07:00
Nemanja Ivanovic 62fe3dcf98 Fix PPC buildbot break caused by 4c4093e6e3
This commit adds the isnan intrinsic and provides a default expansion
for it in the SDAG. However, it makes the assumption that types
it operates on are IEEE-compliant types. This is not always the case.
An example of that is PPC "double double" which has a representation
that
- Does not need to conform to IEEE requirements for isnan as it is
  not an IEEE-compliant type
- Does not have a representation that allows for straightforward
  reinterpreting as an integer and use of integer operations

The result was that this commit broke __builtin_isnan for ppc_fp128
making many valid numeric values report a NaN.

This patch simply changes the expansion to always expand to unordered
comparison (regardless of whether FP exceptions are tracked). This
is inline with previous semantics.
2021-08-06 22:10:20 -05:00
Serge Pavlov 4c4093e6e3 Introduce intrinsic llvm.isnan
This is recommit of the patch 16ff91ebcc,
reverted in 0c28a7c990 because it had
an error in call of getFastMathFlags (base type should be FPMathOperator
but not Instruction). The original commit message is duplicated below:

    Clang has builtin function '__builtin_isnan', which implements C
    library function 'isnan'. This function now is implemented entirely in
    clang codegen, which expands the function into set of IR operations.
    There are three mechanisms by which the expansion can be made.

    * The most common mechanism is using an unordered comparison made by
      instruction 'fcmp uno'. This simple solution is target-independent
      and works well in most cases. It however is not suitable if floating
      point exceptions are tracked. Corresponding IEEE 754 operation and C
      function must never raise FP exception, even if the argument is a
      signaling NaN. Compare instructions usually does not have such
      property, they raise 'invalid' exception in such case. So this
      mechanism is unsuitable when exception behavior is strict. In
      particular it could result in unexpected trapping if argument is SNaN.

    * Another solution was implemented in https://reviews.llvm.org/D95948.
      It is used in the cases when raising FP exceptions by 'isnan' is not
      allowed. This solution implements 'isnan' using integer operations.
      It solves the problem of exceptions, but offers one solution for all
      targets, however some can do the check in more efficient way.

    * Solution implemented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D96568 introduced a
      hook 'clang::TargetCodeGenInfo::testFPKind', which injects target
      specific code into IR. Now only SystemZ implements this hook and it
      generates a call to target specific intrinsic function.

    Although these mechanisms allow to implement 'isnan' with enough
    efficiency, expanding 'isnan' in clang has drawbacks:

    * The operation 'isnan' is hidden behind generic integer operations or
      target-specific intrinsics. It complicates analysis and can prevent
      some optimizations.

    * IR can be created by tools other than clang, in this case treatment
      of 'isnan' has to be duplicated in that tool.

    Another issue with the current implementation of 'isnan' comes from the
    use of options '-ffast-math' or '-fno-honor-nans'. If such option is
    specified, 'fcmp uno' may be optimized to 'false'. It is valid
    optimization in general, but it results in 'isnan' always returning
    'false'. For example, in some libc++ implementations the following code
    returns 'false':

        std::isnan(std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN())

    The options '-ffast-math' and '-fno-honor-nans' imply that FP operation
    operands are never NaNs. This assumption however should not be applied
    to the functions that check FP number properties, including 'isnan'. If
    such function returns expected result instead of actually making
    checks, it becomes useless in many cases. The option '-ffast-math' is
    often used for performance critical code, as it can speed up execution
    by the expense of manual treatment of corner cases. If 'isnan' returns
    assumed result, a user cannot use it in the manual treatment of NaNs
    and has to invent replacements, like making the check using integer
    operations. There is a discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D18513#387418,
    which also expresses the opinion, that limitations imposed by
    '-ffast-math' should be applied only to 'math' functions but not to
    'tests'.

    To overcome these drawbacks, this change introduces a new IR intrinsic
    function 'llvm.isnan', which realizes the check as specified by IEEE-754
    and C standards in target-agnostic way. During IR transformations it
    does not undergo undesirable optimizations. It reaches instruction
    selection, where is lowered in target-dependent way. The lowering can
    vary depending on options like '-ffast-math' or '-ffp-model' so the
    resulting code satisfies requested semantics.

    Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104854
2021-08-06 14:32:27 +07:00
Serge Pavlov 0c28a7c990 Revert "Introduce intrinsic llvm.isnan"
This reverts commit 16ff91ebcc.
Several errors were reported mainly test-suite execution time. Reverted
for investigation.
2021-08-04 17:18:15 +07:00
Serge Pavlov 16ff91ebcc Introduce intrinsic llvm.isnan
Clang has builtin function '__builtin_isnan', which implements C
library function 'isnan'. This function now is implemented entirely in
clang codegen, which expands the function into set of IR operations.
There are three mechanisms by which the expansion can be made.

* The most common mechanism is using an unordered comparison made by
  instruction 'fcmp uno'. This simple solution is target-independent
  and works well in most cases. It however is not suitable if floating
  point exceptions are tracked. Corresponding IEEE 754 operation and C
  function must never raise FP exception, even if the argument is a
  signaling NaN. Compare instructions usually does not have such
  property, they raise 'invalid' exception in such case. So this
  mechanism is unsuitable when exception behavior is strict. In
  particular it could result in unexpected trapping if argument is SNaN.

* Another solution was implemented in https://reviews.llvm.org/D95948.
  It is used in the cases when raising FP exceptions by 'isnan' is not
  allowed. This solution implements 'isnan' using integer operations.
  It solves the problem of exceptions, but offers one solution for all
  targets, however some can do the check in more efficient way.

* Solution implemented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D96568 introduced a
  hook 'clang::TargetCodeGenInfo::testFPKind', which injects target
  specific code into IR. Now only SystemZ implements this hook and it
  generates a call to target specific intrinsic function.

Although these mechanisms allow to implement 'isnan' with enough
efficiency, expanding 'isnan' in clang has drawbacks:

* The operation 'isnan' is hidden behind generic integer operations or
  target-specific intrinsics. It complicates analysis and can prevent
  some optimizations.

* IR can be created by tools other than clang, in this case treatment
  of 'isnan' has to be duplicated in that tool.

Another issue with the current implementation of 'isnan' comes from the
use of options '-ffast-math' or '-fno-honor-nans'. If such option is
specified, 'fcmp uno' may be optimized to 'false'. It is valid
optimization in general, but it results in 'isnan' always returning
'false'. For example, in some libc++ implementations the following code
returns 'false':

    std::isnan(std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN())

The options '-ffast-math' and '-fno-honor-nans' imply that FP operation
operands are never NaNs. This assumption however should not be applied
to the functions that check FP number properties, including 'isnan'. If
such function returns expected result instead of actually making
checks, it becomes useless in many cases. The option '-ffast-math' is
often used for performance critical code, as it can speed up execution
by the expense of manual treatment of corner cases. If 'isnan' returns
assumed result, a user cannot use it in the manual treatment of NaNs
and has to invent replacements, like making the check using integer
operations. There is a discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D18513#387418,
which also expresses the opinion, that limitations imposed by
'-ffast-math' should be applied only to 'math' functions but not to
'tests'.

To overcome these drawbacks, this change introduces a new IR intrinsic
function 'llvm.isnan', which realizes the check as specified by IEEE-754
and C standards in target-agnostic way. During IR transformations it
does not undergo undesirable optimizations. It reaches instruction
selection, where is lowered in target-dependent way. The lowering can
vary depending on options like '-ffast-math' or '-ffp-model' so the
resulting code satisfies requested semantics.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104854
2021-08-04 15:27:49 +07:00
Alexandros Lamprineas 7d940432c4 [AArch64] Legalize MVT::i64x8 in DAG isel lowering
This patch legalizes the Machine Value Type introduced in D94096 for loads
and stores. A new target hook named getAsmOperandValueType() is added which
maps i512 to MVT::i64x8. GlobalISel falls back to DAG for legalization.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94097
2021-07-31 09:51:28 +01:00
Fraser Cormack f924a3d474 [SelectionDAG] Support scalable-vector splats in yet more cases
This patch extends support for (scalable-vector) splats in the
DAGCombiner via the `ISD::matchBinaryPredicate` function, which enable a
variety of simple combines of constants.

Users of this function may now have to distinguish between
`BUILD_VECTOR` and `SPLAT_VECTOR` vector operands. The way of dealing
with this in-tree follows the approach added for
`ISD::matchUnaryPredicate` implemented in D94501.

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106575
2021-07-26 10:15:08 +01:00
Simon Pilgrim c261a06b7a [DAG] Add initial SelectionDAG::isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison framework (PR51129)
I've setup the basic framework for the isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison call and updated DAGCombiner::visitFREEZE to use it, further Opcodes can be handled when we have test coverage.

I'm not aware of any vector test freeze coverage so the DemandedElts (and the Depth) args are not being used yet - but they are in place.

SelectionDAG::isGuaranteedNotToBePoison wrappers have also been added.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106668
2021-07-24 11:36:35 +01:00
Roman Lebedev af8fa36bf0
[NFCI][TLI] prepare[US]REMEqFold(): don't add nonsensical 'exact' flag to rotates created
As pointed out by Craig Topper.
2021-07-22 23:02:58 +03:00
Roman Lebedev 5b51bd1878
[TLI] prepareSREMEqFold(): use correct VT for the final VSELECT (PR51133)
We were using the wrong VT for this final VSELECT,
it should be in the final comparison VT,
not the source value's VT.

Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51133
2021-07-19 16:44:00 +03:00
Arthur Eubanks aad41e2299 [OpaquePtr] Use ArgListEntry::IndirectType for lowering ABI attributes
Consolidate PreallocatedType and ByValType into IndirectType, and use that for inalloca.
2021-07-07 14:58:38 -07:00
Bradley Smith 2668727929 [SelectionDAG] Implement PromoteIntRes_INSERT_SUBVECTOR
Inserting into a smaller-than-legal scalable vector would result in an
internal compiler error. For example, inserting a <vscale x 4 x i8> into
a <vscale x 8 x i8> (both illegal vector types for SVE) would cause a
crash.

This crash was happening because there was no code to promote (legalise)
the result of an INSERT_SUBVECTOR node.

This patch implements PromoteIntRes_INSERT_SUBVECTOR, which legalises
the ISD node. This is currently done by going through memory. This is
necessary because of the requirement that the SubVec parameter of the
INSERT_SUBVECTOR node must be smaller than the Vec parameter, which
means that INSERT_SUBVECTOR cannot always have a legal result/operand
types.

Co-Authored-by: Joe Ellis <joe.ellis@arm.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102766
2021-07-01 17:05:53 +01:00
Bradley Smith 002911503f [TargetLowering][AArch64][SVE] Take into account accessed type when clamping address
When clamping the index for a memory access to a stacked vector we must
take into account the entire type being accessed, not just assume that
we are accessing only a single element.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105016
2021-06-30 13:30:18 +01:00
Martin Storsjö 42f74e8249 [llvm] Rename StringRef _lower() method calls to _insensitive()
This is a mechanical change. This actually also renames the
similarly named methods in the SmallString class, however these
methods don't seem to be used outside of the llvm subproject, so
this doesn't break building of the rest of the monorepo.
2021-06-25 00:22:01 +03:00
Craig Topper 03f9e04bc3 [TargetLowering][ARM] Don't alter opaque constants in TargetLowering::ShrinkDemandedConstant.
We don't constant fold based on demanded bits elsewhere in
SimplifyDemandedBits, so I don't think we should shrink them either.

The affected ARM test changes because a constant become non-opaque
and eventually enabled some constant folding. This no longer happens.
I checked and InstCombine is able to simplify this test. I'm not sure exactly
what it was trying to test.

Reviewed By: lebedev.ri, dmgreen

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104832
2021-06-24 10:09:36 -07:00
Roman Lebedev 585e65d330
[TLI] SimplifyDemandedVectorElts(): handle SCALAR_TO_VECTOR(EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT(?, 0))
Iff we have `SCALAR_TO_VECTOR` (and we demand it's only defined 0'th element),
and said scalar was produced by `EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT` from the 0'th element
of some vector, then we can just continue traversal into said source vector.

This comes up in X86 vector uniform shift lowering.

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104250
2021-06-14 23:52:53 +03:00
Arthur Eubanks 47211fa889 Revert "[TargetLowering] Only inspect attributes in the arguments for ArgListEntry"
Needs to be discussed more.

This reverts commit 255a5c1baa6020c009934b4fa342f9f6dbbcc46
This reverts commit df2056ff3730316f376f29d9986c9913b95ceb1
This reverts commit faff79b7ca144e505da6bc74aa2b2f7cffbbf23
This reverts commit d2a9020785c6e02afebc876aa2778fa64c5cafd
2021-06-07 16:07:44 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks 9255a5c1ba [TargetLowering] Only inspect attributes in the arguments for ArgListEntry
Parameter attributes are considered part of the function [1], and like
mismatched calling conventions [2], we can't have the verifier check for
mismatched parameter attributes.

Issues can be diagnosed with D103412.

[1] https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#parameter-attributes
[2] https://llvm.org/docs/FAQ.html#why-does-instcombine-simplifycfg-turn-a-call-to-a-function-with-a-mismatched-calling-convention-into-unreachable-why-not-make-the-verifier-reject-it

Reviewed By: rnk

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101806
2021-06-03 15:52:01 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks 71cca4f728 Revert "[TargetLowering] Only inspect attributes in the arguments for ArgListEntry"
This reverts commit 1c7f32334d.

Some code still needs to properly set parameter ABI attributes, see
D101806.
2021-05-29 23:08:15 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks 3a6f12f915 Revert "[NFC] Use ArgListEntry indirect types more in ISel lowering"
This reverts commit bc7d15c61d.

Dependent change is to be reverted.
2021-05-29 22:40:33 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks bc7d15c61d [NFC] Use ArgListEntry indirect types more in ISel lowering
For opaque pointers, we're trying to avoid uses of
PointerType::getElementType().

A couple of ISel places use PointerType::getElementType(). Some of these
are easy to fix by using ArgListEntry's indirect types.

The inalloca type wasn't stored there, as opposed to preallocated and
byval which have their indirect types available, so add it and use it.

This is a reland after an MSan fix in D102667.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101713
2021-05-18 14:30:22 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks 1c7f32334d [TargetLowering] Only inspect attributes in the arguments for ArgListEntry
Parameter attributes are considered part of the function [1], and like
mismatched calling conventions [2], we can't have the verifier check for
mismatched parameter attributes.

This is a reland after fixing MSan issues in D102667.

[1] https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#parameter-attributes
[2] https://llvm.org/docs/FAQ.html#why-does-instcombine-simplifycfg-turn-a-call-to-a-function-with-a-mismatched-calling-convention-into-unreachable-why-not-make-the-verifier-reject-it

Reviewed By: rnk

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101806
2021-05-18 14:30:22 -07:00
Simon Pilgrim c29522d648 [TargetLowering] prepareUREMEqFold/prepareSREMEqFold - account for non legal shift types
Ensure we tell getShiftAmountTy that we're working with pre-legalized types to prevent cases where the (legalized) shift type can no longer handle the (non-legalized) type width.

Fixes https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=34366
2021-05-17 11:03:27 +01:00
Arthur Eubanks 341902672c Revert "[TargetLowering] Only inspect attributes in the arguments for ArgListEntry"
This reverts commit 16748bd2fb.

Causes https://crbug.com/1209013
2021-05-16 22:02:10 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks 7647cb14dc Revert "[NFC] Use ArgListEntry indirect types more in ISel lowering"
This reverts commit 85af8a8c1b.
2021-05-16 22:00:54 -07:00
Tim Northover ea0eec69f1 IR+AArch64: add a "swiftasync" argument attribute.
This extends any frame record created in the function to include that
parameter, passed in X22.

The new record looks like [X22, FP, LR] in memory, and FP is stored with 0b0001
in bits 63:60 (CodeGen assumes they are 0b0000 in normal operation). The effect
of this is that tools walking the stack should expect to see one of three
values there:

  * 0b0000 => a normal, non-extended record with just [FP, LR]
  * 0b0001 => the extended record [X22, FP, LR]
  * 0b1111 => kernel space, and a non-extended record.

All other values are currently reserved.

If compiling for arm64e this context pointer is address-discriminated with the
discriminator 0xc31a and the DB (process-specific) key.

There is also an "i8** @llvm.swift.async.context.addr()" intrinsic providing
front-ends access to this slot (and forcing its creation initialized to nullptr
if necessary).
2021-05-14 11:43:58 +01:00
Arthur Eubanks 85af8a8c1b [NFC] Use ArgListEntry indirect types more in ISel lowering
For opaque pointers, we're trying to avoid uses of
PointerType::getElementType().

A couple of ISel places use PointerType::getElementType(). Some of these
are easy to fix by using ArgListEntry's indirect types.

The inalloca type wasn't stored there, as opposed to preallocated and
byval which have their indirect types available, so add it and use it.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101713
2021-05-10 13:05:15 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks 16748bd2fb [TargetLowering] Only inspect attributes in the arguments for ArgListEntry
Parameter attributes are considered part of the function [1], and like
mismatched calling conventions [2], we can't have the verifier check for
mismatched parameter attributes.

[1] https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#parameter-attributes
[2] https://llvm.org/docs/FAQ.html#why-does-instcombine-simplifycfg-turn-a-call-to-a-function-with-a-mismatched-calling-convention-into-unreachable-why-not-make-the-verifier-reject-it

Reviewed By: rnk

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101806
2021-05-10 12:35:11 -07:00
Simon Pilgrim 280aa3415e [DAG] Add a generic expansion for SHIFT_PARTS opcodes using funnel shifts
Based off a discussion on D89281 - where the AARCH64 implementations were being replaced to use funnel shifts.

Any target that has efficient funnel shift lowering can handle the shift parts expansion using the same expansion, avoiding a lot of duplication.

I've generalized the X86 implementation and moved it to TargetLowering - so far I've found that AARCH64 and AMDGPU benefit, but many other targets (ARM, PowerPC + RISCV in particular) could easily use this with a few minor improvements to their funnel shift lowering (or the folding of their target ops that funnel shifts lower to).

NOTE: I'm trying to avoid adding full SHIFT_PARTS legalizer handling as I think it might actually be possible to remove these opcodes in the medium-term and use funnel shift / libcall expansion directly.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101987
2021-05-07 13:12:30 +01:00
Craig Topper 3067520bf4 [SelectionDAG] Use a VTSDNode to store the saturation width for FP_TO_SINT_SAT/FP_TO_UINT_SAT
Previously we used an i32 constant to store the saturation width, but i32 isn't
legal on RISCV64. This wasn't a big deal to fix, but it is extra work for the
type legalizer.

This patch uses a VTSDNode to store the type similar to SEXT_INREG. This makes
it opaque to the type legalizer.

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101262
2021-04-27 14:38:42 -07:00
Dávid Bolvanský ef2dc7ed9f [Analysis] Attribute alignment should not prevent tail call optimization
Fixes tail folding issue mentioned in D100879.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101230
2021-04-24 19:57:42 +02:00
Simon Pilgrim d860bf2d0e [DAG] TargetLowering.cpp - breakup if-else chains where each block returns. NFCI.
Match style guide that requests that if+return blocks are separate.
2021-04-21 11:17:27 +01:00
David Sherwood 83f5fa519e [CodeGen] Improve code generation for clamping of constant indices with scalable vectors
When trying to clamp a constant index into a scalable vector we can
test if the index is less than the minimum number of elements in the
vector. If so, we can simply return the index because we know it is
guaranteed to fit inside the vector.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100639
2021-04-19 08:34:17 +01:00
Serge Guelton d6de1e1a71 Normalize interaction with boolean attributes
Such attributes can either be unset, or set to "true" or "false" (as string).
throughout the codebase, this led to inelegant checks ranging from

        if (Fn->getFnAttribute("no-jump-tables").getValueAsString() == "true")

to

        if (Fn->hasAttribute("no-jump-tables") && Fn->getFnAttribute("no-jump-tables").getValueAsString() == "true")

Introduce a getValueAsBool that normalize the check, with the following
behavior:

no attributes or attribute set to "false" => return false
attribute set to "true" => return true

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99299
2021-04-17 08:17:33 +02:00
Momchil Velikov f9d932e673 [clang][AArch64] Correctly align HFA arguments when passed on the stack
When we pass a AArch64 Homogeneous Floating-Point
Aggregate (HFA) argument with increased alignment
requirements, for example

    struct S {
      __attribute__ ((__aligned__(16))) double v[4];
    };

Clang uses `[4 x double]` for the parameter, which is passed
on the stack at alignment 8, whereas it should be at
alignment 16, following Rule C.4 in
AAPCS (https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/master/aapcs64/aapcs64.rst#642parameter-passing-rules)

Currently we don't have a way to express in LLVM IR the
alignment requirements of the function arguments. The align
attribute is applicable to pointers only, and only for some
special ways of passing arguments (e..g byval). When
implementing AAPCS32/AAPCS64, clang resorts to dubious hacks
of coercing to types, which naturally have the needed
alignment. We don't have enough types to cover all the
cases, though.

This patch introduces a new use of the stackalign attribute
to control stack slot alignment, when and if an argument is
passed in memory.

The attribute align is left as an optimizer hint - it still
applies to pointer types only and pertains to the content of
the pointer, whereas the alignment of the pointer itself is
determined by the stackalign attribute.

For byval arguments, the stackalign attribute assumes the
role, previously perfomed by align, falling back to align if
stackalign` is absent.

On the clang side, when passing arguments using the "direct"
style (cf. `ABIArgInfo::Kind`), now we can optionally
specify an alignment, which is emitted as the new
`stackalign` attribute.

Patch by Momchil Velikov and Lucas Prates.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98794
2021-04-15 22:58:14 +01:00
Simonas Kazlauskas 777a58e05b Support {S,U}REMEqFold before legalization
This allows these optimisations to apply to e.g. `urem i16` directly
before `urem` is promoted to i32 on architectures where i16 operations
are not intrinsically legal (such as on Aarch64). The legalization then
later can happen more directly and generated code gets a chance to avoid
wasting time on computing results in types wider than necessary, in the end.

Seems like mostly an improvement in terms of results at least as far as x86_64 and aarch64 are concerned, with a few regressions here and there. It also helps in preventing regressions in changes like {D87976}.

Reviewed By: lebedev.ri

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88785
2021-04-01 01:35:41 +03:00
Bradley Smith 9745dce8c3 [SelectionDAG][AArch64][SVE] Perform SETCC condition legalization in LegalizeVectorOps
This is currently performed in SelectionDAGLegalize, here we make it also
happen in LegalizeVectorOps, allowing a target to lower the SETCC condition
codes first in LegalizeVectorOps and then lower to a custom node afterwards,
without having to duplicate all of the SETCC condition legalization in the
target specific lowering.

As a result of this, fixed length floating point SETCC nodes can now be
properly lowered for SVE.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98939
2021-03-29 15:32:25 +01:00
Cullen Rhodes 2750f3ed31 [IR] Introduce llvm.experimental.vector.splice intrinsic
This patch introduces a new intrinsic @llvm.experimental.vector.splice
that constructs a vector of the same type as the two input vectors,
based on a immediate where the sign of the immediate distinguishes two
variants. A positive immediate specifies an index into the first vector
and a negative immediate specifies the number of trailing elements to
extract from the first vector.

For example:

  @llvm.experimental.vector.splice(<A,B,C,D>, <E,F,G,H>, 1) ==> <B, C, D, E>  ; index
  @llvm.experimental.vector.splice(<A,B,C,D>, <E,F,G,H>, -3) ==> <B, C, D, E> ; trailing element count

These intrinsics support both fixed and scalable vectors, where the
former is lowered to a shufflevector to maintain existing behaviour,
although while marked as experimental the recommended way to express
this operation for fixed-width vectors is to use shufflevector. For
scalable vectors where it is not possible to express a shufflevector
mask for this operation, a new ISD node has been implemented.

This is one of the named shufflevector intrinsics proposed on the
mailing-list in the RFC at [1].

Patch by Paul Walker and Cullen Rhodes.

[1] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-November/146864.html

Reviewed By: sdesmalen

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94708
2021-03-09 10:44:22 +00:00
Craig Topper 74e6030bcb [TargetLowering] Use HandleSDNodes to prevent nodes from being deleted by recursive calls in getNegatedExpression.
For binary or ternary ops we call getNegatedExpression multiple
times and then compare costs. While we're doing this we need to
hold a node from the first call across the second call, but its
not yet attached to the DAG. Its possible the second call creates
an identical node and then decides it didn't need it so will try
to delete it if it has no uses. This can cause a reference to the
node we're holding further up the call stack to become invalidated.

To prevent this, we can use a HandleSDNode to artifically give
the node a use without connecting it to the DAG.

I've used a std::list of HandleSDNodes so we can create handles
only when we have a node to hold. HandleSDNode does not have
default constructor and cannot be copied or moved.

Fixes PR49393.

Reviewed By: spatel

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97914
2021-03-04 22:48:25 -08:00
Simon Pilgrim 7d3d9fe8cd [DAG] TargetLowering::BuildUDIV - use APInt as const ref. NFCI.
Fixes clang-tidy warning.
2021-03-04 12:15:08 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 73adc26ac0 [DAG] expandAddSubSat - break if-else chain. NFCI.
Fix styleguide issue - each if() block always returns so we don't need to make them a if-else chain.
2021-02-26 11:02:08 +00:00
Kazu Hirata ffba9e596d [CodeGen] Use range-based for loops (NFC) 2021-02-21 19:58:07 -08:00
Craig Topper 064ada4ec6 [SelectionDAG][AArch64] Restrict matchUnaryPredicate to only handle SPLAT_VECTOR for scalable vectors.
fde2466171 added support for
scalable vectors to matchUnaryPredicate by handling SPLAT_VECTOR in
addition to BUILD_VECTOR. This was used to enabled UDIV/SDIV/UREM/SREM
by constant expansion in BuildUDIV/BuildSDIV in TargetLowering.cpp

The caller there expects to call getBuildVector from the match factors.
This leads to a crash right now if there is a SPLAT_VECTOR of
fixed vectors since the number of vectors won't match the number
of elements.

To fix this, this patch updates the callers to check the opcode
instead of whether the type is fixed or scalable. This assumes
that only 3 opcodes are handled by matchUnaryPredicate so
I've added an assertion to the final else to check that opcode.

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96174
2021-02-16 09:22:46 -08:00
Craig Topper eb75f250fe [RISCV][LegalizeTypes] Try to expand BITREVERSE before promoting if the promoted BITREVERSE would expand anyway.
If we're going to end up expanding anyway, we should do it early
so we don't create extra operations to handle the bytes added by
promotion.

Simlilar was done for BSWAP previously.

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96681
2021-02-15 12:33:16 -08:00
Simon Pilgrim 7ad0c573bd [DAG] Fix shift amount limit in SimplifyDemandedBits trunc(shift(x,c)) to truncated bitwidth
We lost this in D56387/rG69bc0990a9181e6eb86228276d2f59435a7fae67 - where I got the src/dst bitwidths mixed up and assumed getValidShiftAmountConstant would catch it.

Patch by @craig.topper - confirmed by @Carrot that it fixes PR49162
2021-02-13 12:00:08 +00:00
Craig Topper 5744502a13 [TargetLowering][RISCV][AArch64][PowerPC] Enable BuildUDIV/BuildSDIV on illegal types before type legalization if we can find a larger legal type that supports MUL.
If we wait until the type is legalized, we'll lose information
about the orginal type and need to use larger magic constants.
This gets especially bad on RISCV64 where i64 is the only legal
type.

I've limited this to simple scalar types so it only works for
i8/i16/i32 which are most likely to occur. For more odd types
we might want to do a small promotion to a type where MULH is legal
instead.

Unfortunately, this does prevent some urem/srem+seteq matching since
that still require legal types.

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96210
2021-02-11 09:43:13 -08:00
Craig Topper 11ef356d9e [TargetLowering] Use Align in allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses.
Reviewed By: arsenm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96097
2021-02-04 19:22:06 -08:00
Craig Topper 8cc9c42a0c [TargetLowering] Use LegalOnly operand to isOperationLegalOrCustom to simplify some code. NFC 2021-02-04 12:30:37 -08:00
xgupta 94fac81fcc [Branch-Rename] Fix some links
According to the [[ https://foundation.llvm.org/docs/branch-rename/ | status of branch rename ]], the master branch of the LLVM repository is removed on 28 Jan 2021.

Reviewed By: mehdi_amini

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95766
2021-02-01 16:43:21 +05:30