Previously dangling samples were represented by INT64_MAX in sample profile while probes never executed were not reported. This was based on an observation that dangling probes were only at a smaller portion than zero-count probes. However, with compiler optimizations, dangling probes end up becoming at large portion of all probes in general and reporting them does not make sense from profile size point of view. This change flips sample reporting by reporting zero-count probes instead. This enabled dangling probe to be represented by none (missing entry in profile). This has a couple benefits:
1. Reducing sample profile size in optimize mode, even when the number of non-executed probes outperform the number of dangling probes, since INT64_MAX takes more space over 0 to encode.
2. Binary size savings. No need to encode dangling probe anymore, since missing probes are treated as dangling in the profile reader.
3. Reducing compiler work to track dangling probes. However, for probes that are real dead and removed, we still need the compiler to identify them so that they can be reported as zero-count, instead of mistreated as dangling probes.
4. Improving counts quality by respecting the counts already collected on the non-dangling copy of a probe. A probe, when duplicated, gets two copies at runtime. If one of them is dangling while the other is not, merging the two probes at profile generation time will cause the real samples collected on the non-dangling one to be discarded. Not reporting the dangling counterpart will keep the real samples.
5. Better readability.
6. Be consistent with non-CS dwarf line number based profile. Zero counts are trusted by the compiler counts inferencer while missing counts will be inferred by the compiler.
Note that the current patch does include any work for #3. There will be follow-up changes.
For #1, I've seen for a large Facebook service, the text profile is reduced by 7%. For extbinary profile, the size of LBRProfileSection is reduced by 35%.
For #4, I have seen general counts quality for SPEC2017 is improved by 10%.
Reviewed By: wenlei, wlei, wmi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104129
The change adds support for triming and merging cold context when mergine CSSPGO profiles using llvm-profdata. This is similar to the context profile trimming in llvm-profgen, however the flexibility to trim cold context after profile is generated can be useful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100528
Recently we switched to use InvalidProbeCount = UINT64_MAX (instead of 0) to represent dangling probe, but UINT64_MAX is not excluded when computing profile summary. This caused profile summary to produce incorrect hot/cold threshold. The change fixed it by excluding UINT64_MAX from summary builder.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99788
Context-sensitive profile effectively split a function profile into many copies each representing the CFG profile of a particular calling context. That makes the count distribution looks more flat as we now have more function profiles each with lower counts, which in turn leads to lower hot thresholds. Now we tells threshold computation to merge context profile first before calculating percentile based cutoffs to compensate for seemingly flat context profile. This can be controlled by swtich `sample-profile-contextless-threshold`.
Earlier measurement showed ~0.4% perf boost with this tuning on spec2k6 for CSSPGO (with pseudo-probe and new inliner).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95980
PGO profile is usually more precise than sample profile. However, PGO profile
needs to be collected from loadtest and loadtest may not be representative
enough to the production workload. Sample profile collected from production
can be used as a supplement -- for functions cold in loadtest but warm/hot
in production, we can scale up the related function in PGO profile if the
function is warm or hot in sample profile.
The implementation contains changes in compiler side and llvm-profdata side.
Given an instr profile and a sample profile, for a function cold in PGO
profile but warm/hot in sample profile, llvm-profdata will either mark
all the counters in the profile to be -1 or scale up the max count in the
function to be above hot threshold, depending on the zero counter ratio in
the profile. The assumption is if there are too many counters being zero
in the function profile, the profile is more likely to cause harm than good,
then llvm-profdata will mark all the counters to be -1 indicating the
function is hot but the profile is unaccountable. In compiler side, if a
function profile with all -1 counters is seen, the function entry count will
be set to be above hot threshold but its internal profile will be dropped.
In the long run, it may be useful to let compiler support using PGO profile
and sample profile at the same time, but that requires more careful design
and more substantial changes to make two profiles work seamlessly. The patch
here serves as a simple intermediate solution.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81981
Change file static function getEntryForPercentile to be a static member function
in ProfileSummaryBuilder so it can be used by other files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83439
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
Summary: Currently ProfileSummaryBuilder doesn't count into callsite samples when computing total samples. Considering that ProfileSummaryInfo is used to checked the hotness of not only body samples but also callsite samples (from SampleProfileLoader), I think the callsite sample counts should be considered when computing total samples.
Reviewers: eraman, danielcdh, wmi
Subscribers: hiraditya, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59835
llvm-svn: 357627
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
r327219 added wrappers to std::sort which randomly shuffle the container before sorting.
This will help in uncovering non-determinism caused due to undefined sorting
order of objects having the same key.
To make use of that infrastructure we need to invoke llvm::sort instead of std::sort.
Note: This patch is one of a series of patches to replace *all* std::sort to llvm::sort.
Refer the comments section in D44363 for a list of all the required patches.
Reviewers: bogner, vsk, eraman, ruiu
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: ruiu, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45139
llvm-svn: 330057
This removes the subclasses of ProfileSummary, moves the members of the derived classes to the base class.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20390
llvm-svn: 270143
This splits ProfileSummary into two classes: a ProfileSummary class that has methods to convert from/to metadata and a ProfileSummaryBuilder class that computes the profiles summary which is in ProfileData.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20314
llvm-svn: 270136
Hongtao Yu