This patch adds support for the next-generation arch14
CPU architecture to the SystemZ backend.
This includes:
- Basic support for the new processor and its features.
- Detection of arch14 as host processor.
- Assembler/disassembler support for new instructions.
- New LLVM intrinsics for certain new instructions.
- Support for low-level builtins mapped to new LLVM intrinsics.
- New high-level intrinsics in vecintrin.h.
- Indicate support by defining __VEC__ == 10304.
Note: No currently available Z system supports the arch14
architecture. Once new systems become available, the
official system name will be added as supported -march name.
Code in getCPUNameFromS390Model currently assumes that the
numerical value of the model number always increases with
future hardware. While this has happened to be the case
with the last few machines, it is not guaranteed -- that
assumption was violated with (much) older machines, and
it can be violated again with future machines.
Fix by explicitly listing model numbers for all supported
machine models.
Fix a bug that `computeHostNumPhysicalCores` is fallback to default
unknown when building for Apple Silicon macs.
rdar://80533675
Reviewed By: arphaman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106012
[llvm-exegesis] Disable the LBR check on AMD
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48918
The bug reported a hang (or very very slow runtime) on a Zen2. Unfortunately, we don't have the hardware right now to debug it and I was not able to reproduce the bug on a HSW.
Theory we've got is that the lbr-checking code could be confused on AMD.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97504
New change:
- Surround usages of x86 helper in llvm-exegesis/X86/Target.cpp with ifdef
- Fix bug which caused the caller of getVendorSignature to not have a copy of EAX that it expected.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48918
The bug reported a hang (or very very slow runtime) on a Zen2. Unfortunately, we don't have the hardware right now to debug it and I was not able to reproduce the bug on a HSW.
Theory we've got is that the lbr-checking code could be confused on AMD.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97504
We implement getHostCPUName() for AIX via systemcfg interfaces since access to the processor version register is a privileged operation. We return a value based on the current processor implementation mode.
This fixes the cpu detection used by clang for `-mcpu=native`.
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95966
All of these families were claiming to be a73 based, which was causing
-mcpu/mtune=native to never use the newer features available to these
cores.
Goes through each and bumps the individual cores to their respective Big
counterparts. Since this code path doesn't support big.little detection,
there was already a precedent set with the Qualcomm line to choose the
big cores only.
Adds a comment on each line for the product's name that the part number
refers to. Confirmed on-device and through Linux header naming
convections.
Additionally newer SoCs mix CPU implementer parts from multiple
implementers. Both 0x41 (ARM) and 0x51 (Qualcomm) in the Snapdragon case
This was causing a desync in information where the scan at the start to
find the implementer would mismatch the part scan later on.
Now scan for both implementer and part at the start so these stay in
sync.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94954
This patch mainly made the following changes:
1. Support AVX-VNNI instructions;
2. Introduce ExplicitVEXPrefix flag so that vpdpbusd/vpdpbusds/vpdpbusds/vpdpbusds instructions only use vex-encoding when user explicity add {vex} prefix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89105
Key Locker provides a mechanism to encrypt and decrypt data with an AES key without having access
to the raw key value by converting AES keys into “handles”. These handles can be used to perform the
same encryption and decryption operations as the original AES keys, but they only work on the current
system and only until they are revoked. If software revokes Key Locker handles (e.g., on a reboot),
then any previous handles can no longer be used.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88398
Support -march=sapphirerapids for x86.
Compare with Icelake Server, it includes 14 more new features. They are
amxtile, amxint8, amxbf16, avx512bf16, avx512vp2intersect, cldemote,
enqcmd, movdir64b, movdiri, ptwrite, serialize, shstk, tsxldtrk, waitpkg.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86503
On z/OS, the information is stored in the Common System Data Area
(CSD). It is the number of CPs allocated to the current LPAR.
Reviewers: aganea, hubert.reinterpertcast, MaskRay
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpertcast
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85531
Commit https://reviews.llvm.org/rGcd53ded557c3 attempts to fix the
computation in computeHostNumPhysicalCores() to respect Affinity.
However, the GLIBC wrapper of the affinity system call fails with
a default size of cpu_set_t on systems that have more than 1024 CPUs.
This just fixes the computation on such large machines.
computeHostNumPhysicalCores() is designed to respect CPU affinity.
D84764 used sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN) which does not respect
affinity.
SupportTests Threading.PhysicalConcurrency may fail if taskset -c is specified.
ThinLTO is run using a single thread on Linux on Power. The
compute_thread_count() routine calls getHostNumPhysicalCores which
returns -1 by default, and so `MaxThreadCount is set to 1.
unsigned llvm::ThreadPoolStrategy::compute_thread_count() const {
int MaxThreadCount = UseHyperThreads
? computeHostNumHardwareThreads()
: sys::getHostNumPhysicalCores();
if (MaxThreadCount <= 0)
MaxThreadCount = 1;
…
}
Fix: provide custom implementation of getHostNumPhysicalCores for
Linux on Power and Linux on Z.
Reviewed By: Kai, uweigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84764
For model 6 CPUs, we have a fallback detection method based on
available features. That mechanism should be enough to detect
these early family 6 CPUs as they only differ in the features
used by the detection anyway.
Rather than converting type/subtype into strings, just directly
select the string as part of family/model decoding. This avoids
the need for creating fake Type/SubTypes for CPUs not supported
by compiler-rtl. I've left the Type/SubType in place where it matches
compiler-rt so that the code can be diffed, but the Type/SubType
is no longer used by Host.cpp.
compiler-rt was already updated to select strings that aren't used
so the code will look similar.
This patch upstreams support for the Arm-v8 Cortex-A78 and Cortex-X1
processors for AArch64 and ARM.
In detail:
- Adding cortex-a78 and cortex-x1 as cpu options for aarch64 and arm targets in clang
- Adding Cortex-A78 and Cortex-X1 CPU names and ProcessorModels in llvm
details of the CPU can be found here:
https://www.arm.com/products/cortex-xhttps://www.arm.com/products/silicon-ip-cpu/cortex-a/cortex-a78
The following people contributed to this patch:
- Luke Geeson
- Mikhail Maltsev
Reviewers: t.p.northover, dmgreen
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: dmgreen, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, danielkiss, cfe-commits,
llvm-commits, miyuki
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83206
This time without the change to make operator| use operator&=.
That seems to be the source of the gcc 5.3 miscompile.
Original commit message:
These represent the same thing but 64BIT only showed up from
getHostCPUFeatures providing a list of featuers to clang. While
EM64T showed up from getting the features for a named CPU.
EM64T didn't have a string specifically so it would not be passed
up to clang when getting features for a named CPU. While 64bit
needed a name since that's how it is index.
Merge them by filtering 64bit out before sending features to clang
for named CPUs.
It gets miscompiled with GCC 5.3, causing Clang to crash with
"error: unknown target CPU 'x86-64'"
See the llvm-commits thread for reproduction steps.
This reverts commit 51b0da731a.
This seems to be leftover copied from an older implementation
of getHostCPUName where we needed this to check the name of
CPU vendor. We don't check the CPU vendor at all in
getHostCPUFeatures so this union and the variable are unneeded.
These represent the same thing but 64BIT only showed up from
getHostCPUFeatures providing a list of featuers to clang. While
EM64T showed up from getting the features for a named CPU.
EM64T didn't have a string specifically so it would not be passed
up to clang when getting features for a named CPU. While 64bit
needed a name since that's how it is index.
Merge them by filtering 64bit out before sending features to clang
for named CPUs.
These represent the same thing but 64BIT only showed up from
getHostCPUFeatures providing a list of featuers to clang. While
EM64T showed up from getting the features for a named CPU.
EM64T didn't have a string specifically so it would not be passed
up to clang when getting features for a named CPU. While 64bit
needed a name since that's how it is index.
Merge them by filtering 64bit out before sending features to clang
for named CPUs.
This patch upstreams support for the Arm-v8 Cortex-A77
processor for AArch64 and ARM.
In detail:
- Adding cortex-a77 as a cpu option for aarch64 and arm targets in clang
- Cortex-A77 CPU name and ProcessorModel in llvm
details of the CPU can be found here:
https://www.arm.com/products/silicon-ip-cpu/cortex-a/cortex-a77
and a similar submission to GCC can be found here:
e0664b7a63
The following people contributed to this patch:
- Luke Geeson
- Mikhail Maltsev
Reviewers: t.p.northover, dmgreen, ostannard, SjoerdMeijer
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: dmgreen, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, danielkiss, cfe-commits,
llvm-commits, miyuki
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82887
Brand index was a feature some Pentium III and Pentium 4 CPUs.
It provided an index into a software lookup table to provide a
brand name for the CPU. This is separate from the family/model.
It's unclear to me why this index being non-zero was used to
block checking family/model. I think the effect of this is that
-march=native was not working correctly on the CPUs that have a
non-zero brand index. They are all about 20 years old so this
probably hasn't affected many users.
We have three 32 bit variables containing feature bits. But our
enum is a flat 96 bit space. So we need to pick which of the
variables to use based on the bit value. We used to do this
manually by mentioning the correct variable and subtracting an
offset from the enum. But this is error prone.
The exact same #if is already inside isCpuIdSupported and causes
it to return true. The definition of isCpuIdSupported isn't
conditional so we should be able just rely on its body doing
the right thing.
Summary:
This patch simply adds support for the new CPU in anticipation of
Power10. There isn't really any functionality added so there are no
associated test cases at this time.
Reviewers: stefanp, nemanjai, amyk, hfinkel, power-llvm-team, #powerpc
Reviewed By: stefanp, nemanjai, amyk, #powerpc
Subscribers: NeHuang, steven.zhang, hiraditya, llvm-commits, wuzish, shchenz, cfe-commits, kbarton, echristo
Tags: #clang, #powerpc, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80020
Wang, Pengfei