This patch adds support for lowering function calls with the
`clang.arc.attachedcall` bundle. The goal is to expand such calls to the
following sequence of instructions:
callq @fn
movq %rax, %rdi
callq _objc_retainAutoreleasedReturnValue / _objc_unsafeClaimAutoreleasedReturnValue
This sequence of instructions triggers Objective-C runtime optimizations,
hence we want to ensure no instructions get moved in between them.
This patch achieves that by adding a new CALL_RVMARKER ISD node,
which gets turned into the CALL64_RVMARKER pseudo, which eventually gets
expanded into the sequence mentioned above.
The ObjC runtime function to call is determined by the
argument in the bundle, which is passed through as a
target constant to the pseudo.
@ahatanak is working on using this attribute in the front- & middle-end.
Together with the front- & middle-end changes, this should address
PR31925 for X86.
This is the X86 version of 46bc40e502,
which added similar support for AArch64.
Reviewed By: ab
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94597
That review is extracted from D69372.
It fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42219 bug.
For the noimplicitfloat mode, the compiler mustn't generate
floating-point code if it was not asked directly to do so.
This rule does not work with variable function arguments currently.
Though compiler correctly guards block of code, which copies xmm vararg
parameters with a check for %al, it does not protect spills for xmm registers.
Thus, such spills are generated in non-protected areas and could break code,
which does not expect floating-point data. The problem happens in -O0
optimization mode. With this optimization level there is used
FastRegisterAllocator, which spills virtual registers at basic block boundaries.
Register Allocator does not protect spills with additional control-flow modifications.
Thus to resolve that problem, it is suggested to not copy incoming physical
registers into virtual registers. Instead, store incoming physical xmm registers
into the memory from scratch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80163
The X86-64 ABI defines va_list as
typedef struct {
unsigned int gp_offset;
unsigned int fp_offset;
void *overflow_arg_area;
void *reg_save_area;
} va_list[1];
This means the size, alignment, and reg_save_area offset will depend on
whether we are in LP64 or in ILP32 mode, so this commit adds the checks.
Additionally, the VAARG_64 pseudo-instruction assumed 64-bit pointers, so
this commit adds a VAARG_X32 pseudo-instruction that behaves just like
VAARG_64, except for assuming 32-bit pointers.
Some of these changes were originally done by
Michael Liao <michael.hliao@gmail.com>.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48428.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93160
LLVM has TLS_(base_)addr32 for 32-bit TLS addresses in 32-bit mode, and
TLS_(base_)addr64 for 64-bit TLS addresses in 64-bit mode. x32 mode wants 32-bit
TLS addresses in 64-bit mode, which were not yet handled. This adds
TLS_(base_)addrX32 as copies of TLS_(base_)addr64, except that they use
tls32(base)addr rather than tls64(base)addr, and then restricts
TLS_(base_)addr64 to 64-bit LP64 mode, TLS_(base_)addrX32 to 64-bit ILP32 mode.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92346
We need to use LCMPXCHG16B_SAVE_RBX if RBX/EBX is being used as
the frame pointer. We previously checked for this during type
legalization, but that's too early to know for sure if the base
pointer is needed.
This patch adds a new pseudo instruction to emit from isel that
uses a virtual register for the RBX input. Then we use the custom
inserter hook to emit LCMPXCHG16B if RBX isn't needed as a base
pointer or LCMPXCHG16B_SAVE_RBX if it is.
Fixes PR42064.
Reviewed By: pengfei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88808
This and its friend X86ISD::LCMPXCHG8_SAVE_RBX_DAG are used if we need to avoid clobbering the frame pointer in EBX/RBX. EBX/RBX are only used a frame pointer in 64-bit mode. In 64-bit mode we don't use CMPXCHG8B since we have a GR64 cmpxchg available. So we don't need special handling for LCMPXCHG8B.
Split from D88808
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88853
RBX was copied to a virtual register before this instruction
was created. And the EBX input for the final MWAITX is still
in a virtual register. So EBX isn't read by this pseudo.
ebx/rbx only needs to be saved when 64-bit registers are supported
anyway. It should be fine to save/restore the whole rbx register
even in gnux32 where the base is technically just ebx.
This matches what we do for cmpxchg16b where rbx is saved/restored
regardless of gnux32.
MWAITX doesn't touch EFLAGS so no pseudos should def EFLAGS.
The SAVE_EBX/RBX pseudos only needs to def the EBX register that
the expansion overwrites. The EAX and ECX registers are only read.
The pseudo emitted during isel that is used by the custom inserter
shouldn't have any implicit defs or uses since everything is in
vregs.
pointer.
mwaitx uses EBX as one of its argument.
Using this instruction clobbers RBX as it is defined to hold one of the
input. When the backend uses dynamically allocated stack, RBX is used as
a reserved register for the base pointer.
This patch is adapted from @qcolombet patch for cmpxchg at r263325.
This fixes PR43528.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73475
This adds an isel pattern and special XOR8rr_NOREX instruction
to enable the use of h-registers for __builtin_parity. This avoids
a copy and a shift instruction. The NOREX instruction is in case
register allocation doesn't use the matching l-register for some
reason. If a R8-R15 register gets picked instead, we won't be
able to encode the instruction since an h-register can't be used
with a REX prefix.
Fixes PR46954
> relocImm was a complexPattern that handled both ConstantSDNode
> and X86Wrapper. But it was only applied selectively because using
> it would cause patterns to be not importable into FastISel or
> GlobalISel. So it only got applied to flag setting instructions,
> stores, RMW arithmetic instructions, and rotates.
>
> Most of the test changes are a result of making patterns available
> to GlobalISel or FastISel. The absolute-cmp.ll change is due to
> this fixing a pattern ordering issue to make an absolute symbol
> match to an 8-bit immediate before trying a 32-bit immediate.
>
> I tried to use PatFrags to reduce the repetition, but I was getting
> errors from TableGen.
This caused "Invalid EmitNode" assertions, see the llvm-commits thread for
discussion.
relocImm was a complexPattern that handled both ConstantSDNode
and X86Wrapper. But it was only applied selectively because using
it would cause patterns to be not importable into FastISel or
GlobalISel. So it only got applied to flag setting instructions,
stores, RMW arithmetic instructions, and rotates.
Most of the test changes are a result of making patterns available
to GlobalISel or FastISel. The absolute-cmp.ll change is due to
this fixing a pattern ordering issue to make an absolute symbol
match to an 8-bit immediate before trying a 32-bit immediate.
I tried to use PatFrags to reduce the repetition, but I was getting
errors from TableGen.
Instead of using a fake call and metadata to temporarily represent a probed
static alloca, use a pseudo instruction.
This is inspired by the SystemZ approach proposed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D78717.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80641
For i32 and i64 cases, X86ISD::SHLD/SHRD are close enough to ISD::FSHL/FSHR that we can use them directly, we just need to account for the operand commutation for SHRD.
The i16 SHLD/SHRD case is annoying as the shift amount is modulo-32 (vs funnel shift modulo-16), so I've added X86ISD::FSHL/FSHR equivalents, which matches the generic implementation in all other terms.
Something I'm slightly concerned with is that ISD::FSHL/FSHR legality is controlled by the Subtarget.isSHLDSlow() feature flag - we don't normally use non-ISA features for this but it allows the DAG combines to continue to operate after legalization in a lot more cases.
The X86 *bits.ll changes are all affected by the same issue - we now have a "FSHR(-1,-1,amt) -> ROTR(-1,amt) -> (-1)" simplification that reduces the dependencies enough for the branch fall through code to mess up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75748
The combineSelect code was casting to i64 without any check that
i64 was legal. This can break after type legalization.
It also required splitting the mmx register on 32-bit targets.
It's not clear that this makes sense. Instead switch to using
a cmov pseudo like we do for XMM/YMM/ZMM.
Implement protection against the stack clash attack [0] through inline stack
probing.
Probe stack allocation every PAGE_SIZE during frame lowering or dynamic
allocation to make sure the page guard, if any, is touched when touching the
stack, in a similar manner to GCC[1].
This extends the existing `probe-stack' mechanism with a special value `inline-asm'.
Technically the former uses function call before stack allocation while this
patch provides inlined stack probes and chunk allocation.
Only implemented for x86.
[0] https://www.qualys.com/2017/06/19/stack-clash/stack-clash.txt
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00556.html
This a recommit of 39f50da2a3 with proper LiveIn
declaration, better option handling and more portable testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68720
Implement protection against the stack clash attack [0] through inline stack
probing.
Probe stack allocation every PAGE_SIZE during frame lowering or dynamic
allocation to make sure the page guard, if any, is touched when touching the
stack, in a similar manner to GCC[1].
This extends the existing `probe-stack' mechanism with a special value `inline-asm'.
Technically the former uses function call before stack allocation while this
patch provides inlined stack probes and chunk allocation.
Only implemented for x86.
[0] https://www.qualys.com/2017/06/19/stack-clash/stack-clash.txt
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00556.html
This a recommit of 39f50da2a3 with proper LiveIn
declaration, better option handling and more portable testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68720
Implement protection against the stack clash attack [0] through inline stack
probing.
Probe stack allocation every PAGE_SIZE during frame lowering or dynamic
allocation to make sure the page guard, if any, is touched when touching the
stack, in a similar manner to GCC[1].
This extends the existing `probe-stack' mechanism with a special value `inline-asm'.
Technically the former uses function call before stack allocation while this
patch provides inlined stack probes and chunk allocation.
Only implemented for x86.
[0] https://www.qualys.com/2017/06/19/stack-clash/stack-clash.txt
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00556.html
This a recommit of 39f50da2a3 with better option
handling and more portable testing
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68720
Implement protection against the stack clash attack [0] through inline stack
probing.
Probe stack allocation every PAGE_SIZE during frame lowering or dynamic
allocation to make sure the page guard, if any, is touched when touching the
stack, in a similar manner to GCC[1].
This extends the existing `probe-stack' mechanism with a special value `inline-asm'.
Technically the former uses function call before stack allocation while this
patch provides inlined stack probes and chunk allocation.
Only implemented for x86.
[0] https://www.qualys.com/2017/06/19/stack-clash/stack-clash.txt
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00556.html
This a recommit of 39f50da2a3 with correct option
flags set.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68720
This reverts commit 39f50da2a3.
The -fstack-clash-protection is being passed to the linker too, which
is not intended.
Reverting and fixing that in a later commit.
Implement protection against the stack clash attack [0] through inline stack
probing.
Probe stack allocation every PAGE_SIZE during frame lowering or dynamic
allocation to make sure the page guard, if any, is touched when touching the
stack, in a similar manner to GCC[1].
This extends the existing `probe-stack' mechanism with a special value `inline-asm'.
Technically the former uses function call before stack allocation while this
patch provides inlined stack probes and chunk allocation.
Only implemented for x86.
[0] https://www.qualys.com/2017/06/19/stack-clash/stack-clash.txt
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00556.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68720
Only 32 and 64 bit SBB are dependency breaking instructons on some
CPUs. The 8 and 16 bit forms have to preserve upper bits of the GPR.
This patch removes the smaller forms and selects the wider form
instead. I had to do this with custom code as the tblgen generated
code glued the eflags copytoreg to the extract_subreg instead of
to the SETB pseudo.
Longer term I think we can remove X86ISD::SETCC_CARRY and use
(X86ISD::SBB zero, zero). We'll want to keep the pseudo and select
(X86ISD::SBB zero, zero) to either a MOV32r0+SBB for targets where
there is no dependency break and SETB_C32/SETB_C64 for targets
that have a dependency break. May want some way to avoid the MOV32r0
if the instruction that produced the carry flag happened to def a
register that we can use for the dependency.
I think the flag copy lowering should be using NEG instead of SUB to
handle SETB. That would avoid the MOV32r0 there. Or maybe it should
use a ADC with -1 to recreate the carry flag and keep the SETB?
That would avoid a MOVZX on the input of the SUB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74024
Same for any_extend though we don't have coverage for that.
The test changes are because isel didn't check one use of the
setcc_carry. So in isel we would end up with two different
sized setcc_carry instructions. And since it clobbers
the flags we would need to recreate the flags for the second
instruction.
This code handles additional uses by truncating the new wide
setcc_carry back to the original size for those uses.
The CATCHPAD node mostly existed to be selected into the EH_RESTORE
instruction, which sets the frame back up when 32-bit Windows exceptions
return to the parent function. However, creating this MachineInstr early
increases the risk that other passes will come along and insert
instructions that use the stack before ESP and EBP are restored. That
happened in PR44697.
Instead of representing these in the instruction stream early, delay it
until PEI. Mark the blocks where this needs to happen as EHPads, but not
funclet entry blocks. Passes after PEI have to be careful not to hoist
instructions that can use stack across frame setup instructions, so this
should be relatively reliable.
Fixes PR44697
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73752
This removes the need for ConvertToTarget opcodes in the isel table.
It's also consistent with the recent changes to use TargetConstant
for intrinsic nodes that always take immediates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67902
llvm-svn: 372645
This reverts r370525 (git commit 0bb1630685)
Also reverts r370543 (git commit 185ddc08ee)
The approach I took only works for functions marked `noreturn`. In
general, a call that is not known to be noreturn may be followed by
unreachable for other reasons. For example, there could be multiple call
sites to a function that throws sometimes, and at some call sites, it is
known to always throw, so it is followed by unreachable. We need to
insert an `int3` in these cases to pacify the Windows unwinder.
I think this probably deserves its own standalone, Win64-only fixup pass
that runs after block placement. Implementing that will take some time,
so let's revert to TrapUnreachable in the mean time.
llvm-svn: 370829
Users have complained llvm.trap produce two ud2 instructions on Win64,
one for the trap, and one for unreachable. This change fixes that.
TrapUnreachable was added and enabled for Win64 in r206684 (April 2014)
to avoid poorly understood issues with the Windows unwinder.
There seem to be two major things in play:
- the unwinder
- C++ EH, _CxxFrameHandler3 & co
The unwinder disassembles forward from the return address to scan for
epilogues. Inserting a ud2 had the effect of stopping the unwinder, and
ensuring that it ran the EH personality function for the current frame.
However, it's not clear what the unwinder does when the return address
happens to be the last address of one function and the first address of
the next function.
The Visual C++ EH personality, _CxxFrameHandler3, needs to figure out
what the current EH state number is. It does this by consulting the
ip2state table, which maps from PC to state number. This seems to go
wrong when the return address is the last PC of the function or catch
funclet.
I'm not sure precisely which system is involved here, but in order to
address these real or hypothetical problems, I believe it is enough to
insert int3 after a call site if it would otherwise be the last
instruction in a function or funclet. I was able to reproduce some
similar problems locally by arranging for a noreturn call to appear at
the end of a catch block immediately before an unrelated function, and I
confirmed that the problems go away when an extra trailing int3
instruction is added.
MSVC inserts int3 after every noreturn function call, but I believe it's
only necessary to do it if the call would be the last instruction. This
change inserts a pseudo instruction that expands to int3 if it is in the
last basic block of a function or funclet. I did what I could to run the
Microsoft compiler EH tests, and the ones I was able to run showed no
behavior difference before or after this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66980
llvm-svn: 370525
Rename the old versions that use FR32/FR64 to MOVSSrm_alt/MOVSDrm_alt.
Use the new versions in patterns that previously used a COPY_TO_REGCLASS
to VR128. These patterns expect the upper bits to be zero. The
current set up appears to work, but I'm not sure we should be
enforcing upper bits being zero through a COPY_TO_REGCLASS.
I wanted to flip the arrangement and use a COPY_TO_REGCLASS to
FR32/FR64 for the patterns that need an f32/f64 result, but that
complicated fastisel and globalisel.
I've been doing some experiments with reducing some isel patterns
and ended up in a situation where I had a
(SUBREG_TO_REG (COPY_TO_RECLASS (VMOVSSrm), VR128)) and our
post-isel peephole was unable to avoid using an instruction for
the SUBREG_TO_REG due to the COPY_TO_REGCLASS. Having a VR128
instruction removes the COPY_TO_REGCLASS that was breaking this.
llvm-svn: 363643
Wang, Pengfei