They were already added to findCommuteOpIndices, but they also
need to be in X86InstrInfo::commuteInstructionImpl in order
to adjust the immediate control.
Avoid a crash when using instruction referencing if x87 floating point
instructions are used. These instructions are significantly mutated when
they're rewritten from referring to registers, to referring to
floating-point-stack positions. As a result, their operands are re-ordered,
and (InstrRef) LiveDebugValues asserts when it sees a DBG_INSTR_REF
referring to a non-reg non-def register operand.
To fix this, drop the instruction numbers, and thus variable locations.
This patch adds a helper utility do do that.
Dropping the variable locations is sub-optimal, but applying DBG_VALUEs to
the $fp0 and similar registers is dropped on emission too. It seems we've
never done well at describing variables that live in x87 registers, at all.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105657
This patch transforms the sequence
lea (reg1, reg2), reg3
sub reg3, reg4
to two sub instructions
sub reg1, reg4
sub reg2, reg4
Similar optimization can also be applied to LEA/ADD sequence.
The modifications to TwoAddressInstructionPass is to ensure the operands of ADD
instruction has expected order (the dest register of LEA should be src register
of ADD).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104684
LLVM provides target hooks to recognise stack spill and restore
instructions, such as isLoadFromStackSlot, and it also provides post frame
elimination versions such as isLoadFromStackSlotPostFE. These are supposed
to return the store-source and load-destination registers; unfortunately on
X86, the PostFE recognisers just return "1", apparently to signify "yes
it's a spill/load". This patch alters the hooks to correctly return the
store-source and load-destination registers:
This is really useful for debug-info as we it helps follow variable values
as they move on/off the stack. There should be no codegen changes: the only
other users of these PostFE target hooks are MachineInstr::getRestoreSize
and MachineInstr::getSpillSize, which don't attempt to interpret the
returned register location.
While we're here, delete the (InstrRef) LiveDebugValues heuristic that
tries to find the spill source register by looking for a killed reg -- we
should be able to rely on the target hooks for that. This involves
temporarily turning off a n InstrRef LivedDebugValues test on aarch64
(patch to re-enable it is in D104521).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105428
This is a cleanup patch -- we're now able to support all flavours of
variable location in instruction referencing mode. This patch updates
various tests for debug instructions to be broader: numerous code paths
try to ignore debug isntructions, and they now have to ignore the
additional DBG_PHI and DBG_INSTR_REFs that we can generate.
A small amount of rework happens for LiveDebugVariables: as we don't need
to track live intervals through regalloc any more, we can get away with
unlinking debug instructions before regalloc, then re-inserting them after.
Note that this isn't (yet) true of DBG_VALUE_LISTs, they still have to go
through live interval tracking.
In SelectionDAG, add a helper lambda that emits half-formed DBG_INSTR_REFs
for arguments in instr-ref mode, DBG_VALUE otherwise. This is one of the
final locations where DBG_VALUEs are emitted for vreg arguments.
X86InstrInfo now un-sets the debug instr number on SUB instructions that
get mutated into CMP instructions. As the instruction no longer computes a
subtraction, we can't use it for variable locations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88898
For CMP imm instruction, when the operand 1 is symbol address we should
check if it is immediate first. Here is the example code.
`CMP64mi32 $noreg, 8, killed renamable $rcx, @d, $noreg, @a, implicit-def
$eflags`
Many thanks to Craig, Topper for the test case to reproduce this issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104037
For CMP imm instruction, when the operand 1 is symbol address we should
check if it is immediate first. Here is the example code.
`CMP64mi32 $noreg, 8, killed renamable $rcx, @d, $noreg, @a, implicit-def
$eflags`
Many thanks to Craig, Topper for the test case to reproduce this issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104037
This patch transforms the sequence
lea (reg1, reg2), reg3
sub reg3, reg4
to two sub instructions
sub reg1, reg4
sub reg2, reg4
Similar optimization can also be applied to LEA/ADD sequence.
The modifications to TwoAddressInstructionPass is to ensure the operands of ADD
instruction has expected order (the dest register of LEA should be src register of ADD).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101970
This patch transforms the sequence
lea (reg1, reg2), reg3
sub reg3, reg4
to two sub instructions
sub reg1, reg4
sub reg2, reg4
Similar optimization can also be applied to LEA/ADD sequence.
The modifications to TwoAddressInstructionPass is to ensure the operands of ADD
instruction has expected order (the dest register of LEA should be src register
of ADD).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101970
XADD has the same EFLAGS behaviour as ADD
Reapplies rG2149aa73f640 (after it was reverted at rG535df472b042) - AFAICT rG029e41ec9800 should ensure we correctly tag the LXADD* ops as load/stores - I haven't been able to repro the sanitizer buildbot fails locally so this is a speculative commit.
Extend D94856 to handle 'and', 'or' and 'xor' instructions as well
We still fail on many i8/i16 cases as the test and the logic-op are performed on different widths
We previously couldn't optimize out a TEST if the branch/setcc/cmov
used the overflow flag. This patches allows the TEST to be removed
if the flag producing instruction is known to clear the OF flag.
Thats what the TEST instruction would have done so that should be
equivalent.
Need to add test cases. I'll try to get back to this if I have bandwidth.
Fixes PR48768.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94856
Currently needsStackRealignment returns false if canRealignStack returns false.
This means that the behavior of needsStackRealignment does not correspond to
it's name and description; a function might need stack realignment, but if it
is not possible then this function returns false. Furthermore,
needsStackRealignment is not virtual and therefore some backends have made use
of canRealignStack to indicate whether a function needs stack realignment.
This patch attempts to clarify the situation by separating them and introducing
new names:
- shouldRealignStack - true if there is any reason the stack should be
realigned
- canRealignStack - true if we are still able to realign the stack (e.g. we
can still reserve/have reserved a frame pointer)
- hasStackRealignment = shouldRealignStack && canRealignStack (not target
customisable)
Targets can now override shouldRealignStack to indicate that stack realignment
is required.
This change will make it easier in a future change to handle the case where we
need to realign the stack but can't do so (for example when the register
allocator creates an aligned spill after the frame pointer has been
eliminated).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98716
Change-Id: Ib9a4d21728bf9d08a545b4365418d3ffe1af4d87
Previously we only used RIP relative when PIC was enabled. But
we know we're in small/kernel code model here so we should
be able to always use RIP-relative which will give a smaller
encoding.
Here's a godbolt link that demonstrates the current codegen https://godbolt.org/z/j3158o
Note in the non-PIC version the load from .LCPI0_0 doesn't use
RIP-relative addressing, but if you change the constant in the
source from 0.0 to 1.0 it will become RIP-relative.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97208
Prefer (self-documenting) return values to output parameters (which are
liable to be used).
While here, rename Noop to Nop which is more widely used and improves
consistency with hasEmitNops/setEmitNops/emitNop/etc.
Per the discussion in D97453. We currently disable it due to it's not a
common scenario and has some problem in implementation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97453
Spilling and reloading AMX registers are expensive. We allow PTILEZEROV
and PTILELOADDV to be rematerializable to avoid the register spilling.
Reviewed By: LuoYuanke
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97453
loadRegFromStackSlot()/storeRegToStackSlot() can generate aligned access
instructions for stack slots even if the stack is unaligned, based on the
assumption that the stack can be realigned.
However, this doesn't work for fixed slots, which are e.g. used for
spilling XMM registers in a non-leaf function with
`__attribute__((preserve_all))`.
When compiling such code with `-mstack-alignment=8`, this causes general
protection faults.
Fix it by only considering stack realignment for non-fixed slots.
Note that this changes the output of three existing tests which spill AVX
registers, since AVX requires higher alignment than the ABI provides on
stack frame entry.
Reviewed By: rnk, jyknight
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73126
This is an optimized approach for D94155.
Previous code build the model that tile config register is the user of
each AMX instruction. There is a problem for the tile config register
spill. When across function, the ldtilecfg instruction may be inserted
on each AMX instruction which use tile config register. This cause all
tile data register clobber.
To fix this issue, we remove the model of tile config register. Instead,
we analyze the AMX instructions between one call to another. We will
insert ldtilecfg after the first call if we find any AMX instructions.
Reviewed By: LuoYuanke
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95136
Previous code build the model that tile config register is the user of
each AMX instruction. There is a problem for the tile config register
spill. When across function, the ldtilecfg instruction may be inserted
on each AMX instruction which use tile config register. This cause all
tile data register clobber.
To fix this issue, we remove the model of tile config register. We
analyze the regmask of call instruction and insert ldtilecfg if there is
any tile data register live across the call. Inserting the sttilecfg
before the call is unneccessary, because the tile config doesn't change
and we can just reload the config.
Besides we also need check tile config register interference. Since we
don't model the config register we should check interference from the
ldtilecfg to each tile data register def.
ldtilecfg
/ \
BB1 BB2
/ \
call BB3
/ \
%1=tileload %2=tilezero
We can start from the instruction of each tile def, and backward to
ldtilecfg. If there is any call instruction, and tile data register is
not preserved, we should insert ldtilecfg after the call instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94155
This patch implements amx programming model that discussed in llvm-dev
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-August/144302.html).
Thank Hal for the good suggestion in the RA. The fast RA is not in the patch yet.
This patch implemeted 7 components.
1. The c interface to end user.
2. The AMX intrinsics in LLVM IR.
3. Transform load/store <256 x i32> to AMX intrinsics or split the
type into two <128 x i32>.
4. The Lowering from AMX intrinsics to AMX pseudo instruction.
5. Insert psuedo ldtilecfg and build the def-use between ldtilecfg to amx
intruction.
6. The register allocation for tile register.
7. Morph AMX pseudo instruction to AMX real instruction.
Change-Id: I935e1080916ffcb72af54c2c83faa8b2e97d5cb0
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87981
This patch mainly made the following changes:
1. Support AVX-VNNI instructions;
2. Introduce ExplicitVEXPrefix flag so that vpdpbusd/vpdpbusds/vpdpbusds/vpdpbusds instructions only use vex-encoding when user explicity add {vex} prefix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89105
We have pseudo instructions we use for bitcasts between these types.
We have them in the load folding table, but not the store folding
table. This adds them there so they can be used for stack spills.
I added an exact size check so that we don't fold when the stack slot
is larger than the GPR. Otherwise the upper bits in the stack slot
would be garbage. That would be fine for Eli's test case in PR47874,
but I'm not sure its safe in general.
A step towards fixing PR47874. Next steps are to change the ADDSSrr_Int
pseudo instructions to use FR32 as the second source register class
instead of VR128. That will keep the coalescer from promoting the
register class of the bitcast instruction which will make the stack
slot 4 bytes instead of 16 bytes.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89656
The pass is updated to handle loads through complex addressing mode,
specifically, when we have a scaled register and a scale.
It requires two API updates in TII which have been implemented for X86.
See added IR and MIR testcases.
Tests-Run: make check
Reviewed-By: reames, danstrushin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87148
This is the first in a series of patches to make implicit null checks
more general. This patch identifies instructions that preserves zero
value of a register and considers that as a valid instruction to hoist
along with the faulting load. See added testcases.
Reviewed-By: reames, dantrushin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87108
X86 is the only user of this interface in tree. Previously the
X86 pass would loop over operands looking for one undef operand for
the pass to fix. But there could theoretically be multiple operands
to fix. So it makes more sense for the pass to do the looping and
ask the target if an operand needs to be fixed.
This is just a thin wrapper around computeRegisterLivness which
we can just call directly. The only real difference is that
isSafeToClobberEFLAGS returns a bool and computeRegisterLivness
returns an enum. So we need to check for the specific enum value
that isSafeToClobberEFLAGS was hiding.
I've also adjusted which sites pass an explicit value for
Neighborhood since the default for computeRegisterLivness is 10.
I messed up the bug numbers in the commit message before
Previously this function searched 4 instructions forwards or
backwards to determine if it was ok to clobber eflags.
This is called in 3 places: rematerialization, turning 2 operand
leas into adds or splitting 3 ops leas into an lea and add on some
CPU targets.
This patch increases the search limit to 10 instructions for
rematerialization and 2 operand lea to add. I've left the old
treshold for 3 ops lea spliting as that increases code size.
Fixes PR47024 and PR46315.
Previously this function searched 4 instructions forwards or
backwards to determine if it was ok to clobber eflags.
This is called in 3 places: rematerialization, turning 2 operand
leas into adds or splitting 3 ops leas into an lea and add on some
CPU targets.
This patch increases the search limit to 10 instructions for
rematerialization and 2 operand lea to add. I've left the old
treshold for 3 ops lea spliting as that increases code size.
Fixes PR47024 and PR43014
Instructions should not be scheduled across ENDBR instructions, as this would result in the ENDBR being displaced, breaking the parity needed for the Indirect Branch Tracking feature of CET.
Currently, the X86IndirectBranchTracking pass is later than the instruction scheduling in the pipeline, what causes the bug to be unnoticeable and very hard (if not unfeasible) to be triggered while compiling C files with the standard LLVM setup. Yet, for correctness and to prevent issues in future changes, the compiler should prevent the such scheduling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84862
Wang, Pengfei