Previously we used the vector type, but we're loading/storing
invididual elements so I think only element alignment should matter.
Noticed while looking at the code for something else so I don't
have a test case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105220
GCC warning:
```
/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/ScalarizeMaskedMemIntrin.cpp: In function ‘void scalarizeMaskedStore(llvm::CallInst*, llvm::DomTreeUpdater*, bool&)’:
/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/ScalarizeMaskedMemIntrin.cpp:295:15: warning: variable ‘IfBlock’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
295 | BasicBlock *IfBlock = CI->getParent();
| ^~~~~~~
/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/ScalarizeMaskedMemIntrin.cpp: In function ‘void scalarizeMaskedScatter(llvm::CallInst*, llvm::DomTreeUpdater*, bool&)’:
/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/ScalarizeMaskedMemIntrin.cpp:555:15: warning: variable ‘IfBlock’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
555 | BasicBlock *IfBlock = CI->getParent();
| ^~~~~~~
```
This de-pessimizes the arguably more usual case of no masked mem intrinsics,
and gets rid of one more Dominator Tree recalculation.
As per llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/opt-pipeline.ll,
there's one more Dominator Tree recalculation left, we could get rid of.
The pass has dependency on 'TargetTransformInfoWrapperPass', but the
corresponding call to INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY was missing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94916
This patch adds new PM support for the pass and the pass can be now used
during middle-end transforms. The old pass is remamed to
ScalarizeMaskedMemIntrinLegacyPass.
Reviewed-By: skatkov, aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92743
ScalarizeMaskedMemIntrinsic is currently a codeGen level pass. The pass
is actually operating on IR level and does not use any code gen specific
passes. It is useful to move it into transforms directory so that it
can be more widely used as a mid-level transform as well (apart from
usage in codegen pipeline).
In particular, we have a usecase downstream where we would like to use
this pass in our mid-level pipeline which operates on IR level.
The next change will be to add support for new PM.
Reviewers: craig.topper, apilipenko, skatkov
Reviewed-By: skatkov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92407
Craig Topper