This adds a function specialization pass to LLVM. Constant parameters
like function pointers and constant globals are propagated to the callee by
specializing the function.
This is a first version with a number of limitations:
- The pass is off by default, so needs to be enabled on the command line,
- It does not handle specialization of recursive functions,
- It does not yet handle constants and constant ranges,
- Only 1 argument per function is specialised,
- The cost-model could be further looked into, and perhaps related,
- We are not yet caching analysis results.
This is based on earlier work by Matthew Simpson (D36432) and Vinay Madhusudan.
More recently this was also discussed on the list, see:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-March/149380.html.
The motivation for this work is that function specialisation often comes up as
a reason for performance differences of generated code between LLVM and GCC,
which has this enabled by default from optimisation level -O3 and up. And while
this certainly helps a few cpu benchmark cases, this also triggers in real
world codes and is thus a generally useful transformation to have in LLVM.
Function specialisation has great potential to increase compile-times and
code-size. The summary from some investigations with this patch is:
- Compile-time increases for short compile jobs is high relatively, but the
increase in absolute numbers still low.
- For longer compile-jobs, the extra compile time is around 1%, and very much
in line with GCC.
- It is difficult to blame one thing for compile-time increases: it looks like
everywhere a little bit more time is spent processing more functions and
instructions.
- But the function specialisation pass itself is not very expensive; it doesn't
show up very high in the profile of the optimisation passes.
The goal of this work is to reach parity with GCC which means that eventually
we would like to get this enabled by default. But first we would like to address
some of the limitations before that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93838
SROA sometimes preserves MD_mem_parallel_loop_access and MD_access_group metadata on loads/stores, and sometimes fails to do so. This change adds copying of the MD after other CreateAlignedLoad/CreateAlignedStores. Also fix a case where the metadata was being copied from a load, rather than the store.
Added a LIT test to catch one case.
Patch by Mark Mendell
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103254
Essentially, the cover function simply combines the loop level check and the function level scope into one call. This simplifies several callers and is (subjectively) less error prone.
Upon encountering loads/stores on types whose size is not a multiple of 8 bits the SROA pass would either trip an assertion or use logic that was not meant to work with such irregularly-sized types.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99435
Upon encountering loads/stores on types whose size is not a multiple of 8 bits the SROA pass would either trip an assertion or use logic that was not meant to work with such irregularly-sized types.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99435
This patch changes LoopUnrollAndJamPass from FunctionPass to LoopNest pass.
The next patch will utilize LoopNest to effectively handle loop nests.
Also, a crash problem on legacy pass manager is fixed.
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99149
This is a modified version of a patch by tolziplohu with a style change, and most importantly, a revised commit message.
inttoptr for a non-integral address space is currently ill defined in the LangRef. Figuring out exactly what the dynamic semantics of such a cast would be is hard, and not yet settled. Despite that, we still need to go ahead and implement something in RS4GC for a couple of reasons.
First, as a simple consistency argument. We're apparently added support for constexpr inttoptrs a while back, and even have tests which exercised them. Having a lack of constant folding trigger a crash during lowering is non-ideal.
Second, and more fundementally, the optimizer is allowed to insert undefined constructs in unreachable code. At the same time, we can't assume that dynamically dead code is always pruned before lowering. As a result, we must assume that inttoptrs can occur (even if completely ill defined) along dead paths. We need the lowering to not crash. The stackmaps produced can be garbage (as the assumption is the code is dynamically dead), but the lowering itself can't crash.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103492
This pass transforms loops that contain a conditional branch with induction
variable. For example, it transforms left code to right code:
newbound = min(n, c)
while (iv < n) { while(iv < newbound) {
A A
if (iv < c) B
B C
C }
} if (iv != n) {
while (iv < n) {
A
C
}
}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102234
Loop peeling is currently performed as part of UnrollLoop().
Outside test scenarios, it is always performed with an unroll
count of 1. This means that unrolling doesn't actually do anything
apart from performing post-unroll simplification.
When testing, it's currently possible to specify both an explicit
peel count and an explicit unroll count. This doesn't perform any
sensible operation and may result in miscompiles, see
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45939.
This patch moves peeling from UnrollLoop() into tryToUnrollLoop(),
so that peeling does not also perform a susequent unroll. We only
run the post-unroll simplifications. Specifying both an explicit
peel count and unroll count is forbidden.
In the future, we may want to support both (non-PGO) peeling a
loop and unrolling it, but this needs to be done by first performing
the peel and then recalculating unrolling heuristics on a now
possibly analyzable loop.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103362
This builds on D103584. The change eliminates the coupling between unroll heuristic and implementation w.r.t. knowing when the passed in trip count is an exact trip count or a max trip count. In theory the new code is slightly less powerful (since it relies on exact computable trip counts), but in practice, it appears to cover all the same cases. It can also be extended if needed.
The test change shows what appears to be a bug in the existing code around the interaction of peeling and unrolling. The original loop only ran 8 iterations. The previous output had the loop peeled by 2, and then an exact unroll of 8. This meant the loop ran a total of 10 iterations which appears to have been a miscompile.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103620
This is a first step towards simplifying the transform interface to be less error prone. The basic idea is that querying SCEV is cheap (since it's cached) and we can just check for properties related to branch folding in the transform method instead of relying on the heuristic part to pass everything in correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103584
During Loop Strength Reduce, if the terminating condition for the loop
is not immediately adjacent to the terminating branch and it has more
than one use, a clone of the condition will be created just before the
terminating branch and will be used as the branch condition. Currently,
whether the instructions are "immediately adjacent" is determined by
checking whether the next instruction after the condition is the
terminating branch; this is incorrect however, as the presence of a
debug intrinsic between the two will result in a change to the output.
This is fixed by using getNextNonDebugInstruction() instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103033
The current loop or any of its sub-loops may be infinite. Unless the
function or the loops are marked as mustprogress, this in itself makes
the loop *not* dead.
This patch moves the logic to check whether the current loop is finite
or mustprogress to `isLoopDead` and also extends it to check the
sub-loops. This should fix PR50511.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103382
This patch fixes pr43326 and pr48212.
Currently when we move reduction phis to the right place,
loop interchange assumes the first phi in loop headers is
an induction phi, skips the first phi and assumes the rest
of phis are candidate reduction phis to move. However, it
may not always be the case.
This patch loops over all phis in loop headers and considers
a phi node as a candidate reduction phi to move only when it
is indeed a reduction phi across outer and inner loop.
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102743
DSE will currently only remove stores in the same block unless they can
be guaranteed to be loop invariant. This expands that to any stores that
are in the same Loop, at the same loop level. This should still account
for where AA/MSSA will not handle aliasing between loops, but allow the
dead stores to be removed where they overlap in the same loop iteration.
It requires adding loop info to DSE, but that looks fairly harmless.
The test case this helps is from code like this, which can come up in
certain matrix operations:
for(i=..)
dst[i] = 0;
for(j=..)
dst[i] += src[i*n+j];
After LICM, this becomes:
for(i=..)
dst[i] = 0;
sum = 0;
for(j=..)
sum += src[i*n+j];
dst[i] = sum;
The first store is dead, and with this patch is now removed.
Differntial Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100464
When you try to define a new DEBUG_TYPE in a header file, DEBUG_TYPE
definition defined around the #includes in files include it could
result in redefinition warnings even compile errors.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102594
This patch changes LoopFlattenPass from FunctionPass to LoopNestPass.
Utilize LoopNest and let function 'Flatten' generate information from it.
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102904
This patch changes LoopFlattenPass from FunctionPass to LoopNestPass.
Utilize LoopNest and let function 'Flatten' generate information from it.
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102904
This patch changes LoopFlattenPass from FunctionPass to LoopNestPass.
Utilize LoopNest and let function 'Flatten' generate information from it.
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102904
This patch changes LoopUnrollAndJamPass from FunctionPass to LoopNest pass.
The next patch will utilize LoopNest to effectively handle loop nests.
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99149
There can be a need for some optimizations to get (base, offset)
for any GC pointer. The base can be calculated by generating
needed instructions as it is done by the
RewriteStatepointsForGC::findBasePointer() function. The offset
can be calculated in the same way. Though to not expose the base
calculation and to make the offset calculation as simple as
ptrtoint(derived_ptr) - ptrtoint(base_ptr), which is illegal
outside RS4GC, this patch introduces 2 intrinsics:
@llvm.experimental.gc.get.pointer.base(%derived_ptr)
@llvm.experimental.gc.get.pointer.offset(%derived_ptr)
These intrinsics are inlined by RS4GC along with generation of
statepoint sequences.
With these new intrinsics the GC parseable lowering for atomic
memcpy intrinsics (6ec2c5e402)
could be implemented as a separate pass.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100445
The current full unroll cost model does a symbolic evaluation of the loop up to a fixed limit. That symbolic evaluation currently simplifies to constants, but we can generalize to arbitrary Values using the InstructionSimplify infrastructure at very low cost.
By itself, this enables some simplifications, but it's mainly useful when combined with the branch simplification over in D102928.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102934
The patch was reverted due to compile time impact of contextual SCEV
queries. It also appeared that it introduced a miscompile on irreducible CFG.
Changes made:
1. isKnownPredicateAt is replaced with more lightweight isKnownPredicate;
2. Irreducible CFG in live code is now detected and excluded from processing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102615
The patch was reverted due to compile time impact of contextual SCEV
queries. It also appeared that it introduced a miscompile on irreducible CFG.
Changes made:
1. isKnownPredicateAt is replaced with more lightweight isKnownPredicate;
2. Irreducible CFG in live code is now detected and excluded from processing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102615
The common phi value transform replaces constants with values that
have the same value as the constant on a given edge. However, LVI
generally only provides information that is correct up to poison,
so this can end up replacing a well-defined value with poison.
D69442 addressed an instance of this problem by clearing poison
flags on the generating instruction, which was sufficient at the
time. rGa917fb89dc28 made LVI's edge value analysis slightly more
powerful, and clearing poison flags is no longer sufficient.
This patch changes the transform to instead explicitly guard against
a poison value instead. This should be satisfied for most cases due
to a prior branch on poison.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50399.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102966
Now that we can fold some transposes into multiplies (CM: A * B^t and RM:
A^t * B), we want to move them around to create the optimal expressions:
* fold away double transposes while still using them to assert the shape
* sink transposes hoping they cancel out
* lift transposes when both operands are transposed
This also modifies the matrix remarks to include the number of exposed
transposes (i.e. transposes that we couldn't fold into a multiply).
The adjustment to the test remarks-inlining is a bit subtle: I am changing the
double transpose to a single transpose so that we don't remove it completely.
More importantly this changes some of the total instruction count, most
notable stores because we can no longer use a vector store.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102733
Nowadays LLVM does not assume that all loops are finite,
so if we want to produce a finite loop from a potentially-infinite one,
we must ensure that the original loop is known to be a finite one.
For this transform, it only matters for arithmetic right-shifts.
For them, either the function or the loop must be known to
be `mustprogress`, or the original value being shifted must be known
to be non-negative (because iff the sign bit was set,
it will never become zero, but will become `-1` in the "end").
It would be really good for alive2 to actually complain about this,
but it currently does not: https://github.com/AliveToolkit/alive2/issues/726
This adds support for the "count active bits" pattern, i.e.:
```
int countBits(unsigned val) {
int cnt = 0;
for( ; (val << cnt) != 0; ++cnt)
;
return cnt;
}
```
but a somewhat more general one:
```
int countBits(unsigned val, int start, int off) {
int cnt;
for (cnt = start; val << (cnt + off); cnt++)
;
return cnt;
}
```
alive2 is happy with all the tests there.
Note that, again, much like with the right-shift cases,
we don't require the `val != 0` guard.
This is the last pattern that was supported by
`detectShiftUntilZeroIdiom()`, which now becomes obsolete.
This adds support for the "count active bits" pattern, i.e.:
```
int countActiveBits(signed val) {
int cnt = 0;
for( ; (val >> cnt) != 0; ++cnt)
;
return cnt;
}
```
but a somewhat more general one:
```
int countActiveBits(signed val, int start, int off) {
int cnt;
for (cnt = start; val >> (cnt + off); cnt++)
;
return cnt;
}
```
This directly matches the existing 'logical right-shift until zero' idiom.
alive2 is happy with all the tests there.
Note that, again, much like with the original unsigned case,
we don't require the `val != 0` guard.
The old `detectShiftUntilZeroIdiom()` already supports this pattern,
the idea here is that the `val` must be positive (have at least one
leading zero), because otherwise the loop is non-terminating,
but since it is not `while(1)`, that would have been UB.
The D82085 "allow TRE for non-capturing calls" caused failure during bootstrap.
This patch does the same as D82085 plus fixes bootstrap error.
The problem with D82085 is that it does not create copies for byval
operands, while replacing function call with a branch.
Consider following example:
```
int zoo ( S p1 );
int foo ( int count, S p1 ) {
if ( count > 10 )
return zoo(p1);
// temporarily variable created for passing byvalue parameter
// p1 could be used when zoo(p1) is called(after TRE is done).
// lifetime.start p1.byvalue.temp
return foo(count+1, p1);
// lifetime.end p1.byvalue.temp
}
```
After recursive call to foo is replaced with a jump into
start of the function, its parameters could be passed to
zoo function. i.e. temporarily variable created for byvalue
parameter "p1" could be passed to zoo. Finally zoo receives
broken operand:
```
int foo ( int count, S p1 ) {
:tailrecurse
p1_tr = phi p1, p1.byvalue.temp
if ( count > 10 )
return zoo(p1_tr);
// temporarily variable created for passing byvalue parameter
// p1 could be used when zoo(p1) is called(after TRE is done).
lifetime.start p1.byvalue.temp
memcpy (p1.byvalue.temp, p1_tr)
count = count + 1
lifetime.end p1.byvalue.temp
br tailrecurse
}
```
To prevent using p1.byvalue.temp after its scope finished by
lifetime.end marker this patch copies value from p1.byvalue.temp
into another temporarily variable and then copies this variable
into the input parameter for next iteration.
This patch passes bootstrap build and bootstrap build with AddressSanitizer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85614
This patch handles one particular case of one-iteration loops for which SCEV
cannot straightforwardly prove BECount = 1. The idea of the optimization is to
symbolically execute conditional branches on the 1st iteration, moving in topoligical
order, and only visiting blocks that may be reached on the first iteration. If we find out
that we never reach header via the latch, then the backedge can be broken.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102615
Reviewed By: reames
This patch changes LoopUnrollAndJamPass from FunctionPass to LoopNest pass.
The next patch will utilize LoopNest to effectively handle loop nests.
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99149
If there are no matrix intrinsics in a function, we can directly bail
out, as there's nothing left to do.
Reviewed By: anemet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102931
The option was used during the initial bringup, but it does not add any
value at this point. Remove it.
Reviewed By: anemet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102930
This patch changes LoopUnrollAndJamPass from FunctionPass to LoopNest pass.
The next patch will utilize LoopNest to effectively handle loop nests.
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99149
EarlyCSE cannot distinguish between floating point instructions and
constrained floating point intrinsics that are marked as running in the
default FP environment. Said intrinsics are supposed to behave exactly the
same as the regular FP instructions. Teach EarlyCSE to handle them in that
case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99962
In this case, it does the same thing as the original pattern does.
SimplifyCFG has a few lurking miscompilations about deleting blocks that
have their address taken, and consistently using DeleteDeadBlocks() instead
of a hand-rolled pattern will allow to weed those cases out easierly.
Currently all AA analyses marked as preserved are stateless, not taking
into account their dependent analyses. So there's no need to mark them
as preserved, they won't be invalidated unless their analyses are.
SCEVAAResults was the one exception to this, it was treated like a
typical analysis result. Make it like the others and don't invalidate
unless SCEV is invalidated.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102032
The MaybePromotable set keeps track of loads/stores for which
promotion was not attempted yet. Normally, any load/stores that
are promoted in the current iteration will be removed from this
set, because they naturally MustAlias with the promoted value.
However, if the source program has UB with metadata claiming that
a store is NoAlias, while it is actually MustAlias, and multiple
different pointers are promoted in the same iteration, it can
happen that a store is removed that is still in the MaybePromotable
set, causing a use-after-free.
While this could be fixed by explicitly invalidating values in
MaybePromotable in the LoopPromoter, I'm going with the more
radical option of dropping the set entirely here and check all
load/stores on each promotion iteration. As promotion, and especially
repeated promotion, are quite rare, this doesn't seem to have any
impact on compile-time.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50367.
This change tries to handle multiple dominating users of the pointer operand
by choosing the most immediately dominating one, if possible. While making
this change I also found that the previous implementation had a missing break
statement, making all loads with an odd number of dominating users emit an
OtherAccess value, so that has also been fixed.
Patch by Henrik G Olsson!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79097
I think i've added exhaustive test coverage, and i have verified that alive2 is happy with all the tests,
so in principle i'm fine with landing this without review, but just in case..
This adds support for the "count active bits" pattern, i.e.:
```
int countActiveBits(unsigned val) {
int cnt = 0;
for( ; (val >> cnt) != 0; ++cnt)
;
return cnt;
}
```
but a somewhat more general one, since that is what i need:
```
int countActiveBits(unsigned val, int start, int off) {
int cnt;
for (cnt = start; val >> (cnt + off); cnt++)
;
return cnt;
}
```
I've followed in footstep of 'left-shift until bittest' idiom (D91038),
in the sense that iff the `ctlz` intrinsic is cheap, we'll transform,
regardless of all other factors.
This can have a shocking effect on certain benchmarks:
```
raw.pixls.us-unique/Olympus/XZ-1$ /repositories/googlebenchmark/tools/compare.py -a benchmarks ~/rawspeed/build-{old,new}/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench --benchmark_counters_tabular=true --benchmark_min_time=0.00000001 --benchmark_repetitions=128 p1319978.orf
RUNNING: /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench --benchmark_counters_tabular=true --benchmark_min_time=0.00000001 --benchmark_repetitions=128 p1319978.orf --benchmark_display_aggregates_only=true --benchmark_out=/tmp/tmp49_28zcm
2021-05-09T01:06:05+03:00
Running /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Run on (32 X 3600.24 MHz CPU s)
CPU Caches:
L1 Data 32 KiB (x16)
L1 Instruction 32 KiB (x16)
L2 Unified 512 KiB (x16)
L3 Unified 32768 KiB (x2)
Load Average: 5.26, 6.29, 3.49
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Time CPU Iterations CPUTime,s CPUTime/WallTime Pixels Pixels/CPUTime Pixels/WallTime Raws/CPUTime Raws/WallTime WallTime,s
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
p1319978.orf/threads:32/process_time/real_time_mean 145 ms 145 ms 128 0.145319 0.999981 10.1568M 69.8949M 69.8936M 6.88159 6.88146 0.145322
p1319978.orf/threads:32/process_time/real_time_median 145 ms 145 ms 128 0.145317 0.999986 10.1568M 69.8941M 69.8931M 6.88151 6.88141 0.145319
p1319978.orf/threads:32/process_time/real_time_stddev 0.766 ms 0.766 ms 128 766.586u 15.1302u 0 354.167k 354.098k 0.0348699 0.0348631 766.469u
RUNNING: /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench --benchmark_counters_tabular=true --benchmark_min_time=0.00000001 --benchmark_repetitions=128 p1319978.orf --benchmark_display_aggregates_only=true --benchmark_out=/tmp/tmpwb9sw2x0
2021-05-09T01:06:24+03:00
Running /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Run on (32 X 3599.95 MHz CPU s)
CPU Caches:
L1 Data 32 KiB (x16)
L1 Instruction 32 KiB (x16)
L2 Unified 512 KiB (x16)
L3 Unified 32768 KiB (x2)
Load Average: 4.05, 5.95, 3.43
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Time CPU Iterations CPUTime,s CPUTime/WallTime Pixels Pixels/CPUTime Pixels/WallTime Raws/CPUTime Raws/WallTime WallTime,s
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
p1319978.orf/threads:32/process_time/real_time_mean 99.8 ms 99.8 ms 128 0.0997758 0.999972 10.1568M 101.797M 101.794M 10.0225 10.0222 0.0997786
p1319978.orf/threads:32/process_time/real_time_median 99.7 ms 99.7 ms 128 0.0997165 0.999985 10.1568M 101.857M 101.854M 10.0284 10.0281 0.0997195
p1319978.orf/threads:32/process_time/real_time_stddev 0.224 ms 0.224 ms 128 224.166u 34.345u 0 226.81k 227.231k 0.0223309 0.0223723 224.586u
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
p1319978.orf/threads:32/process_time/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 128 vs 128
p1319978.orf/threads:32/process_time/real_time_mean -0.3134 -0.3134 145 100 145 100
p1319978.orf/threads:32/process_time/real_time_median -0.3138 -0.3138 145 100 145 100
p1319978.orf/threads:32/process_time/real_time_stddev -0.7073 -0.7078 1 0 1 0
```
Reviewed By: craig.topper, zhuhan0
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102116
GlobalVariables are Constants, yet should not unconditionally be
considered true for __builtin_constant_p.
Via the LangRef
https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#llvm-is-constant-intrinsic:
This intrinsic generates no code. If its argument is known to be a
manifest compile-time constant value, then the intrinsic will be
converted to a constant true value. Otherwise, it will be converted
to a constant false value.
In particular, note that if the argument is a constant expression
which refers to a global (the address of which _is_ a constant, but
not manifest during the compile), then the intrinsic evaluates to
false.
Move isManifestConstant from ConstantFolding to be a method of
Constant so that we can reuse the same logic in
LowerConstantIntrinsics.
pr/41459
Reviewed By: rsmith, george.burgess.iv
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102367
I noticed that rs4gc is not stripping a number of memory aliasing related attributes. We do strip some from call sites, but don't strip the same ones from declarations or parameters.
Why do we need to strip these? Two answers:
Safepoints conceptually read and write to the entire garbage collected heap in the physical model. We need this to preserve ordering of all loads and stores with respect to possible relocation.
We can infer other attributes from these. For instance, readnone can imply both nofree and nosync. Both of which don't hold after physical rewriting.
Note: This exposed a latent issue which was fixed a couple weeks back in 01801d5274.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99802
This moves the isOverwrite function into the DSEState so that it can
share the analyses and members from the state.
A few extra loop tests were also added to test stores in and around
multi block loops for D100464.
The loop flattening pass requires loops to be in simplified form. If the
loops are not in simplified form, the pass cannot operate. This patch
simplifies all loops before flattening. As a result, all loops will be
simplified regardless of whether anything ends up being flattened.
This change was inspired by observing a certain loop that was not flatten
because the loops were not in simplified form. This loop is added as a
test to verify that it is now flattened.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102249
Change-Id: I45bcabe70fb99b0d89f0effafc82eb9e0585ec30
This is a bugfix in the transformation phase.
If the original outer loop header branches to both the inner loop
(header) and the outer loop latch, and if there is an lcssa PHI
node outside the loop nest, then after interchange the new outer latch
will have an lcssa PHI node inserted which has two predecessors, i.e.,
the original outer header and the original outer latch. Currently
the transformation assumes it has only one predecessor (the original
outer latch) and crashes, since the inserted lcssa PHI node does
not take both predecessors as incoming BBs.
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100792
This is a bug fix in legality check.
When we encounter triangular loops such as the following form:
for (int i = 0; i < m; i++)
for (int j = 0; j < i; j++), or
for (int i = 0; i < m; i++)
for (int j = 0; j*i < n; j++),
we should not perform interchange since the number of executions
of the loop body will be different before and after interchange,
resulting in incorrect results.
Reviewed By: bmahjour
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101305
This is a bug fix in legality check.
When we encounter triangular loops such as the following form:
for (int i = 0; i < m; i++)
for (int j = 0; j < i; j++), or
for (int i = 0; i < m; i++)
for (int j = 0; j*i < n; j++),
we should not perform interchange since the number of executions of the loop body
will be different before and after interchange, resulting in incorrect results.
Reviewed By: bmahjour
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101305
This appears to miscompile google benchmark's GetCacheSizesFromKVFS()
when compiling with -fstrict-vtable-pointers.
Runnable reproducer: https://godbolt.org/z/f9ovKqTzb
The "f.fail()" crashes with BUS error, it is compiled into testb,
and the adress it is testing is non-sensical.
This reverts commit 4c89bcadf6.
Printing pass manager invocations is fairly verbose and not super
useful.
This allows us to remove DebugLogging from pass managers and PassBuilder
since all logging (aside from analysis managers) goes through
instrumentation now.
This has the downside of never being able to print the top level pass
manager via instrumentation, but that seems like a minor downside.
Reviewed By: ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101797
Instruction has mayHaveSideEffects method that returns true if mayThrow return true because this is called internally in the first method. As such, the call being removed is redundant.
Patch By: vdsered (Daniil Seredkin)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101685
Previous attempt to fix infinite recursion in min/max reassociation was not fully successful (D100170). Newly discovered failing case is due to not properly handled when there is a single use. It should be processed separately from 2 uses case.
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101359
Solves PR11896
As noted, this can be improved futher (calloc -> malloc) in some cases. But for know, this is the first step.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101391
The test is a crasher reduced from:
https://llvm.org/PR49993
linearFunctionTestReplace() assumes that we have an add recurrence,
so check for that as a condition of matching a loop counter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101291
LLVM does not have valid assembly backends for atomicrmw on local memory. However, as this memory is thread local, we should be able to lower this to the relevant load/store.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98650
As a follow-up to D95982, this patch continues unblocking optimizations that are blocked by pseudu probe instrumention.
The optimizations unblocked are:
- In-block load propagation.
- In-block dead store elimination
- Memory copy optimization that turns stores to consecutive memories into a memset.
These optimizations are local to a block, so they shouldn't affect the profile quality.
Reviewed By: wmi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100075
In LLVM_ENABLE_STATS=0 builds, `llvm::Statistic` maps to `llvm::NoopStatistic`
but has 3 mostly unused pointers. GlobalOpt considers that the pointers can
potentially retain allocated objects, so GlobalOpt cannot optimize out the
`NoopStatistic` variables (see D69428 for more context), wasting 23KiB for stage
2 clang.
This patch makes `NoopStatistic` empty and thus reclaims the wasted space. The
clang size is even smaller than applying D69428 (slightly smaller in both .bss and
.text).
```
# This means the D69428 optimization on clang is mostly nullified by this patch.
HEAD+D69428: size(.bss) = 0x0725a8
HEAD+D101211: size(.bss) = 0x072238
# bloaty - HEAD+D69428 vs HEAD+D101211
# With D101211, we also save a lot of string table space (.rodata).
FILE SIZE VM SIZE
-------------- --------------
-0.0% -32 -0.0% -24 .eh_frame
-0.0% -336 [ = ] 0 .symtab
-0.0% -360 [ = ] 0 .strtab
[ = ] 0 -0.2% -880 .bss
-0.0% -2.11Ki -0.0% -2.11Ki .rodata
-0.0% -2.89Ki -0.0% -2.89Ki .text
-0.0% -5.71Ki -0.0% -5.88Ki TOTAL
```
Note: LoopFuse is a disabled pass. For now this patch adds
`#if LLVM_ENABLE_STATS` so `OptimizationRemarkMissed` is skipped in
LLVM_ENABLE_STATS==0 builds. If these `OptimizationRemarkMissed` are useful in
LLVM_ENABLE_STATS==0 builds, we can replace `llvm::Statistic` with
`llvm::TrackingStatistic`, or use a different abstraction to keep track of the strings.
Similarly, skip the code in `mlir/lib/Pass/PassStatistics.cpp` which
calls `getName`/`getDesc`/`getValue`.
Reviewed By: lattner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101211
LLVM does not have valid assembly backends for atomicrmw on local memory. However, as this memory is thread local, we should be able to lower this to the relevant load/store.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98650
In LLVM_ENABLE_STATS=0 builds, `llvm::Statistic` maps to `llvm::NoopStatistic`
but has 3 unused pointers. GlobalOpt considers that the pointers can potentially
retain allocated objects, so GlobalOpt cannot optimize out the `NoopStatistic`
variables (see D69428 for more context), wasting 23KiB for stage 2 clang.
This patch makes `NoopStatistic` empty and thus reclaims the wasted space. The
clang size is even smaller than applying D69428 (slightly smaller in both .bss and
.text).
```
# This means the D69428 optimization on clang is mostly nullified by this patch.
HEAD+D69428: size(.bss) = 0x0725a8
HEAD+D101211: size(.bss) = 0x072238
# bloaty - HEAD+D69428 vs HEAD+D101211
# With D101211, we also save a lot of string table space (.rodata).
FILE SIZE VM SIZE
-------------- --------------
-0.0% -32 -0.0% -24 .eh_frame
-0.0% -336 [ = ] 0 .symtab
-0.0% -360 [ = ] 0 .strtab
[ = ] 0 -0.2% -880 .bss
-0.0% -2.11Ki -0.0% -2.11Ki .rodata
-0.0% -2.89Ki -0.0% -2.89Ki .text
-0.0% -5.71Ki -0.0% -5.88Ki TOTAL
```
Note: LoopFuse is a disabled pass. This patch adds `#if LLVM_ENABLE_STATS` so
`OptimizationRemarkMissed` is skipped in LLVM_ENABLE_STATS==0 builds. If these
`OptimizationRemarkMissed` are useful and not noisy, we can replace
`llvm::Statistic` with `llvm::TrackingStatistic` in the future.
Reviewed By: lattner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101211
When transforming a loop terminating condition into a "max" comparison,
the DebugLoc from the old condition should be set on the newly created
comparison. They are the same operation, just optimized. Fixes PR48067.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98218
This patch updates performSymbolicPredicateInfoEvaluation to manage
registering additional dependencies using ExprResult. Similar to D99987,
this fixes an issues where we failed to track the correct dependency for
a phi-of-ops value, which is marked as temporary.
Fixes PR49873.
Reviewed By: asbirlea, ruiling
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100560
performSymbolicEvaluation is used to obtain the symbolic expression when
visiting instructions and this is used to determine their congruence
class.
performSymbolicEvaluation only creates expressions for certain
instructions (via createExpression). For unsupported instructions,
'unknown' expression are created.
The use of createExpression in processOutgoingEdges means we may
simplify the condition in processOutgoingEdges to a constant in the
initial round of processing, but we use Unknown(I) for the congruence
class. If an operand of I changes the expression Unknown(I) stays the
same, so there is no update of the congruence class of I. Hence it
won't get re-visited. So if an operand of I changes in a way that causes
createExpression to return different result, this update is missed.
This patch updates the code to use performSymbolicEvaluation, to be
symmetric with the congruence class updating code.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99990
This recommits 4f5da356ff, including
explicit implementations of move a constructor and deleted copy
constructors/assignment operators, to fix failures with some compilers.
This reverts the revert 74854d00e8.
If we are using a simplified value, we need to add an extra
dependency this value , because changes to the class of the
simplified value may require us to invalidate any decision based on
that value.
This is done by adding such values as additional users, however the
current code does not excludes temporary instructions.
At the moment, this means that we miss those dependencies for
phi-of-ops, because they are temporary instructions at this point. We
instead need to add the extra dependencies to the root instruction of
the phi-of-ops.
This patch pushes the responsibility of adding extra users to the
callers of createExpression & performSymbolicEvaluation. At those
points, it is clearer which real instruction to pick.
Alternatively we could either pass the 'real' instruction as additional
argument or use another map, but I think the approach in the patch makes
things a bit easier to follow.
Fixes PR35074.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99987
Fixes PR47627
This fix suppresses rerolling a loop which has an unrerollable
instruction.
Sample IR for the explanation below:
```
define void @foo([2 x i32]* nocapture %a) {
entry:
br label %loop
loop:
; base instruction
%indvar = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvar.next, %loop ]
; unrerollable instructions
%stptrx = getelementptr inbounds [2 x i32], [2 x i32]* %a, i64 %indvar, i64 0
store i32 999, i32* %stptrx, align 4
; extra simple arithmetic operations, used by root instructions
%plus20 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvar, 20
%plus10 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvar, 10
; root instruction 0
%ldptr0 = getelementptr inbounds [2 x i32], [2 x i32]* %a, i64 %plus20, i64 0
%value0 = load i32, i32* %ldptr0, align 4
%stptr0 = getelementptr inbounds [2 x i32], [2 x i32]* %a, i64 %plus10, i64 0
store i32 %value0, i32* %stptr0, align 4
; root instruction 1
%ldptr1 = getelementptr inbounds [2 x i32], [2 x i32]* %a, i64 %plus20, i64 1
%value1 = load i32, i32* %ldptr1, align 4
%stptr1 = getelementptr inbounds [2 x i32], [2 x i32]* %a, i64 %plus10, i64 1
store i32 %value1, i32* %stptr1, align 4
; loop-increment and latch
%indvar.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvar, 1
%exitcond = icmp eq i64 %indvar.next, 5
br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop
exit:
ret void
}
```
In the loop rerolling pass, `%indvar` and `%indvar.next` are appended
to the `LoopIncs` vector in the `LoopReroll::DAGRootTracker::findRoots`
function.
Before this fix, two instructions with `unrerollable instructions`
comment above are marked as `IL_All` at the end of the
`LoopReroll::DAGRootTracker::collectUsedInstructions` function,
as well as instructions with `extra simple arithmetic operations`
comment and `loop-increment and latch` comment. It is incorrect
because `IL_All` means that the instruction should be executed in all
iterations of the rerolled loop but the `store` instruction should
not.
This fix rejects instructions which may have side effects and don't
belong to def-use chains of any root instructions and reductions.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47627 for more information.
This patch allows PRE of the following type of loads:
```
preheader:
br label %loop
loop:
br i1 ..., label %merge, label %clobber
clobber:
call foo() // Clobbers %p
br label %merge
merge:
...
br i1 ..., label %loop, label %exit
```
Into
```
preheader:
%x0 = load %p
br label %loop
loop:
%x.pre = phi(x0, x2)
br i1 ..., label %merge, label %clobber
clobber:
call foo() // Clobbers %p
%x1 = load %p
br label %merge
merge:
x2 = phi(x.pre, x1)
...
br i1 ..., label %loop, label %exit
```
So instead of loading from %p on every iteration, we load only when the actual clobber happens.
The typical pattern which it is trying to address is: hot loop, with all code inlined and
provably having no side effects, and some side-effecting calls on cold path.
The worst overhead from it is, if we always take clobber block, we make 1 more load
overall (in preheader). It only matters if loop has very few iteration. If clobber block is not taken
at least once, the transform is neutral or profitable.
There are several improvements prospect open up:
- We can sometimes be smarter in loop-exiting blocks via split of critical edges;
- If we have block frequency info, we can handle multiple clobbers. The only obstacle now is that
we don't know if their sum is colder than the header.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99926
Reviewed By: reames
This makes the memcpy-memcpy and memcpy-memset optimizations work for
variable sizes as long as they are equal, relaxing the old restriction
that they are constant integers. If they're not equal, the old
requirement that they are constant integers with certain size
restrictions is used.
The implementation works by pushing the length tests further down in the
code, which reveals some places where it's enough that the lengths are
equal (but not necessarily constant).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100870
This change fixes a latent bug which was exposed by a change currently in review (https://reviews.llvm.org/D99802#2685032).
The story on this is a bit involved. Without this change, what ended up happening with the pending review was that we'd strip attributes off intrinsics, and then selectiondag would fail to lower the intrinsic. Why? Because the lowering of the intrinsic relies on the presence of the readonly attribute. We don't have a matcher to select the case where there's a glue node needed.
Now, on the surface, this still seems like a codegen bug. However, here it gets fun. I was unable to reproduce this with a standalone test at all, and was pretty much struck until skatkov provided the critical detail. This reproduces only when RS4GC and codegen are run in the same process and context. Why? Because it turns out we can't roundtrip the stripped attribute through serialized IR!
We'll happily print out the missing attribute, but when we parse it back, the auto-upgrade logic has a side effect of blindly overwriting attributes on intrinsics with those specified in Intrinsics.td. This makes it impossible to exercise SelectionDAG from a standalone test case.
At this point, I decided to treat this an RS4GC bug as a) we don't need to strip in this case, and b) I could write a test which shows the correct behavior to ensure this doesn't break again in the future.
As an aside, I'd originally set out to handle libfuncs too - since in theory they might have the same issues - but backed away quickly when I realized how the semantics of builtin, nobuiltin, and no-builtin-x all interacted. I'm utterly convinced that no part of the optimizer handles that correctly, and decided not to open that can of worms here.
During store promotion, we check whether the pointer was captured
to exclude potential reads from other threads. However, we're only
interested in captures before or inside the loop. Check this using
PointerMayBeCapturedBefore against the loop header.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100706
Recently processMinMaxIntrinsic has been added and we started to observe a number of analysis get invalidated after CVP. The problem is CVP conservatively returns 'true' even if there were no modifications to IR. I found one more place besides processMinMaxIntrinsic which has the same problem. I think processMinMaxIntrinsic and similar should better have boolean return status to prevent similar issue reappear in future.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100538
Such attributes can either be unset, or set to "true" or "false" (as string).
throughout the codebase, this led to inelegant checks ranging from
if (Fn->getFnAttribute("no-jump-tables").getValueAsString() == "true")
to
if (Fn->hasAttribute("no-jump-tables") && Fn->getFnAttribute("no-jump-tables").getValueAsString() == "true")
Introduce a getValueAsBool that normalize the check, with the following
behavior:
no attributes or attribute set to "false" => return false
attribute set to "true" => return true
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99299
These were misleading, they're more of a "clear" than an "invalidate".
We shouldn't be individually clearing analysis results. Either we clear
all analyses when some IR becomes invalid, or we properly go through
invalidation.
There was only one use of this, which can be simulated with
AM.invalidate(F, PA).
Reviewed By: mtrofin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100519
This patch changed the isLegalUse check to ensure that
LSRInstance::GenerateConstantOffsetsImpl generates an
offset that results in a legal addressing mode and
formula. The check is changed to look similar to the
assert check used for illegal formulas.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100383
Change-Id: Iffb9e32d59df96b8f072c00f6c339108159a009a
If the PHI-of-ops simplifies to an existing value, no real PHI is
created, which means the dependencies between the
PHI-of-ops and its operands is not materialized in IR. At the
moment, we fail to create a real PHI node for the PHI-of-ops,
because the PHI-of-ops root instruction is not re-visited if
one of the PHI-of-ops operands changes. We need to add the
operands as additional users in this case.
Even with this patch, there are still some dependencies
missing. I will continue tackling the outstanding
reporeted crashes in this area.
Fixes PR36501, PR42422, PR42557.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66924
This refactors SCCP and creates a SCCPSolver interface and class so that it can
be used by other passes and transformations. We will use this in D93838, which
adds a function specialisation pass.
This is based on an early version by Vinay Madhusudan.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93762
Jump threading can replace select then unconditional branch with
conditional branch, but when doing so loses debug info.
This destructive transform is eventually leading to a failed Verifier
run during full LTO builds of the Linux kernel with CFI and KCOV
enabled, as reported in PR39531.
ModuleSanitizerCoveragePass will insert calls to
__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc, and sometimes split critical edges,
using whatever debug info may or may not exist for the branch for
the added libcall. Since we can inline calls to
__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc due to LTO, this can lead to the error
observed in PR39531 when the debug info isn't propagated to
the libcall, because of prior destructive transforms that failed to
retain debug info.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100137
Say we have
%1=min(%a,%b)
%2=min(%b,%c)
%3=min(%2,%a)
The optimization will try to reassociate the later one so that we can rewrite it to %3=min(%1, %c) and remove %2.
But if %2 has another uses outside of %3 then we can't remove %2 and end up with:
%1=min(%a,%b)
%2=min(%b,%c)
%3=min(%1, %c)
This doesn't harm by itself except it is not profitable and changes IR for no good reason.
What is bad it triggers next iteration which finds out that optimization is applicable to %2 and %3 and generates:
%1=min(%a,%b)
%2=min(%b,%c)
%3=min(%1,%c)
%4=min(%2,%a)
and so on...
The solution is to prevent optimization in the first place if intermediate result (%2) has side uses and
known to be not removed.
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100170
The default is likely wrong.
Out of all the callees, only a single one needs to pass-in false (JumpThread),
everything else either already passes true, or should pass true.
Until the default is flipped, at least make it harder to unintentionally
add new callees with UseBlockValue=false.
Add an ability to store `Offset` between partially aliased location. Use this
storage within returned `ResultAlias` instead of caching it in `AAQueryInfo`.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98718
Main reason is preparation to transform AliasResult to class that contains
offset for PartialAlias case.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98027
Previously loading the vtable used in calling a virtual method in a loop
was not hoisted out of the loop. This fixes that.
canSinkOrHoistInst() itself doesn't check that the load operands are
loop invariant, callers also check that separately.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99784
meetBDVState looks pretty difficult to read and follow.
This is purely NFC but doing several things:
1) Combine meet and meetBDVState
2) Move the function to be a member of BDVState
3) Make BDVState be a mutable object
4) Convert switch to sequence of ifs
5) Adds comments.
Reviewers: reames, dantrushin
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99064
This fixes a "Cached first special instruction is wrong!" assert.
The assert fires because replacing a value with another can cause an
instruction to no longer be "special" to ICF. In this case,
devirtualization happened, turning an indirect call to a
call to a willreturn function which is no longer special.
Reviewed By: nikic, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99977
After D99249 we use three different loop pass managers for LICM,
LoopRotate and LICM+LoopUnswitch. This happens because LazyBFI
and LazyBPI are not preserved by LoopRotate (note that D74640
is no longer needed). Avoid this by marking them as preserved.
My understanding of D86156 is that it is okay to simply preserve
them (which LoopUnswitch already does for the same reason) and
rely on callbacks to deal with deleted blocks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99843
After loop interchange, the (old) outer loop header should not jump to
the `LoopExit`. Note that the old outer loop becomes the new inner loop
after interchange. If we branched to `LoopExit` then after interchange
we would jump directly from the (new) inner loop header to `LoopExit`
without executing the rest of outer loop.
This patch modifies adjustLoopBranches() such that the old outer
loop header (which becomes the new inner loop header) jumps to the
old inner loop latch which becomes the new outer loop latch after
interchange.
Reviewed By: bmahjour
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98475
During LoopStrengthReduce, some of the SSA values that are used by debug values
may be lost and/or salvaged. After LSR we attempt to recover any undef debug
values, including any that were salvaged but then lost their values afterwards,
by replacing the lost values with any live equal values (plus a possible
constant offset) that have been gathered prior to running LSR. When we do this
we restore the debug value's original DIExpression, to undo any salvaging (as we
have gone back to using the original debug value).
This process can currently produce invalid debug info if the number of operands
has changed by salvaging during LSR. Replacing old values during the
applyEqualValues step does not change the number of location operands, which
means that when we restore the old DIExpression we may have a mismatch between
the number of operands used by the debug value and the number of operands
referenced by the DIExpression. This patch fixes this by restoring the full
original location metadata at the start of the applyEqualValues step, so that
there is no mismatch in operand count between the debug value and its
DIExpression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98644
After loop interchange, the (old) outer loop header should not jump to
`LoopExit`. Note that the old outer loop becomes the new inner loop
after interchange. If we branched to `LoopExit` then after interchange
we would jump directly from the (new) inner loop header to `LoopExit`
without executing the rest of (new) outer loop.
This patch modifies adjustLoopBranches() such that the old outer
loop header (which becomes the new inner loop header) jumps to the
old inner loop latch which becomes the new outer loop latch after
interchange.
Reviewed By: bmahjour
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98475
-Make sure of the CreateShl/LShr/AShr methods that take a uint64_t
instead of creating a ConstantInt for 1 ourselves.
-Use Builder.getInt1 or ConstantInt::getBool instead of a conditional.
-Pull out repeated calls to getType.
Follow up to a6d2a8d6f5. These were found by simply grepping for "::assume", and are the subset of that result which looked cleaner to me using the isa/dyn_cast patterns.
Follow up to a6d2a8d6f5. This covers all the public interfaces of the bundle related code. I tried to cleanup the internals where the changes were obvious, but there's definitely more room for improvement.
Add the subclass, update a few places which check for the intrinsic to use idiomatic dyn_cast, and update the public interface of AssumptionCache to use the new class. A follow up change will do the same for the newer assumption query/bundle mechanisms.
performScalarPREInsertion() inserts instructions into blocks that we
need to tell ImplicitControlFlowTracking about, otherwise the ICF cache
may be invalid.
Fixes PR49193.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99909
The key change (4f5e92c) to switch gc.result and gc.relocate to being readnone landed nearly two weeks ago, and we haven't seen any fallout. Time to remove the code added to make reverting easy.
When we are able to SROA an alloca, we know all uses of it, meaning we
don't have to preserve the invariant group intrinsics and metadata.
It's possible that we could lose information regarding redundant
loads/stores, but that's unlikely to have any real impact since right
now the only user is Clang and vtables.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99760
When run under valgrind, or with a malloc that poisons freed memory,
this can lead to segfaults or other problems.
To avoid modifying the AdditionalUsers DenseMap while still iterating,
save the instructions to be notified in a separate SmallPtrSet, and use
this to later call OperandChangedState on each instruction.
Fixes PR49582.
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98602
The safepoints being inserted exists to free memory, or coordinate with another thread to do so. Thus, we must strip any inferred attributes and reinfer them after the lowering.
I'm not aware of any active miscompiles caused by this, but since I'm working on strengthening inference of both and leveraging them in the optimization decisions, I figured a bit of future proofing was warranted.
Support reassociation for min/max. With that we should be able to transform min(min(a, b), c) -> min(min(a, c), b) if min(a, c) is already available.
Reviewed By: mkazantsev, lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88287
This is a patch to fix the bug in alignment calculation (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D90529#2619492).
Consider this code:
```
call void @llvm.assume(i1 true) ["align"(i32* %a, i32 32, i32 28)]
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %a, i64 -1
; aligment of %arrayidx?
```
The llvm.assume guarantees that `%a - 28` is 32-bytes aligned, meaning that `%a` is 32k + 28 for some k.
Therefore `a - 4` cannot be 32-bytes aligned but the existing code was calculating the pointer as 32-bytes aligned.
The reason why this happened is as follows.
`DiffSCEV` stores `%arrayidx - %a` which is -4.
`OffSCEV` stores the offset value of “align”, which is 28.
`DiffSCEV` + `OffSCEV` = 24 should be used for `a - 4`'s offset from 32k, but `DiffSCEV` - `OffSCEV` = 32 was being used instead.
Reviewed By: Tyker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98759
The code is assuming that having an exact exit count for the loop implies that exit counts for every exit are known. This used to be true, but when we added handling for dead exits we broke this invariant. The new invariant is that an exact loop count implies that any exits non trivially dead have exit counts.
We could have fixed this by either a) explicitly checking for a dead exit, or b) just testing for SCEVCouldNotCompute. I chose the second as it was simpler.
(Debugging this took longer than it should have since I'd mistyped the original assert and it wasn't checking what it was meant to...)
p.s. Sorry for the lack of test case. Getting things into a state to actually hit this is difficult and fragile. The original repro involves loop-deletion leaving SCEV in a slightly inprecise state which lets us bypass other transforms in IndVarSimplify on the way to this one. All of my attempts to separate it into a standalone test failed.
Removes CFGAnalyses from the preserved analyses set
returned by LoopFlattenPass::run().
Reviewed By: Dave Green, Ta-Wei Tu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99700
Name GVN uses name 'LI' for two different unrelated things:
LoadInst and LoopInfo. This patch relates the variables with
former meaning into 'Load' to disambiguate the code.
Before this change, the `llvm.access.group` metadata was dropped
when moving a load instruction in GVN. This prevents vectorizing
a C/C++ loop with `#pragma clang loop vectorize(assume_safety)`.
This change propagates the metadata as well as other metadata if
it is safe (the move-destination basic block and source basic
block belong to the same loop).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93503
This fixes the miscompilation reported in https://reviews.llvm.org/rG5bb38e84d3d0#986154 .
`select _, true, false` matches both m_LogicalAnd and m_LogicalOr, making later
transformations confused.
Simplify the branch condition to not have the form.
Unswitching a loop on a non-trivial divergent branch is expensive
since it serializes the execution of both version of the
loop. But identifying a divergent branch needs divergence analysis,
which is a function level analysis.
The legacy pass manager handles this dependency by isolating such a
loop transform and rerunning the required function analyses. This
functionality is currently missing in the new pass manager, and there
is no safe way for the SimpleLoopUnswitch pass to depend on
DivergenceAnalysis. So we conservatively assume that all non-trivial
branches are divergent if the target has divergence.
Reviewed By: tra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98958
This is yet another attempt to fix tightlyNested().
Add checks in tightlyNested() for the inner loop exit block,
such that 1) if there is control-flow divergence in between the inner
loop exit block and the outer loop latch, or 2) if the inner loop exit
block contains unsafe instructions, tightlyNested() returns false.
The reasoning behind is that after interchange, the original inner loop
exit block, which was part of the outer loop, would be put into the new
inner loop, and will be executed different number of times before and
after interchange. Thus it should be dealt with appropriately.
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98263
LICM can sink instructions that have uses inside the loop, as
long as these uses are considered "free". However, if there were
only free uses inside the loop, and no uses outside the loop at
all, the instruction would still count towards the NumSunk
statistic. This resulted in a wild inflation of the NumSunk metric.
After this patch it drops down from 1141787 to 5852 on test-suite O3.
FindAvailableLoadedValue() relies on FindAvailablePtrLoadStore() to run
the alias analysis when searching for an equivalent value. However,
FindAvailablePtrLoadStore() calls the alias analysis framework with a
memory location for the load constructed from an address and a size,
which thus lacks TBAA metadata info. This commit modifies
FindAvailablePtrLoadStore() to accept an optional memory location as
parameter to allow FindAvailableLoadedValue() to create it based on the
load instruction, which would then have TBAA metadata info attached.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99206
This patch changes the interface to take a RegisterKind, to indicate
whether the register bitwidth of a scalar register, fixed-width vector
register, or scalable vector register must be returned.
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98874
The `InductionPHI` is not necessarily the increment instruction, as
demonstrated in pr49571.ll.
This patch removes the assertion and instead bails out from the
`LoopFlatten` pass if that happens.
This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49571
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99252
The summary remarks are generated on a per-function basis. Using the
first instruction's location is sub-optimal for 2 reasons:
1. Sometimes the first instruction is missing !dbg
2. The location of the first instruction may be mis-leading.
Instead, just use the location of the function directly.
Simon Pilgrim