Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Peter Collingbourne 3d049bce98 hwasan: Support for outlined checks in the Linux kernel.
Add support for match-all tags and GOT-free runtime calls, which
are both required for the kernel to be able to support outlined
checks. This requires extending the access info to let the backend
know when to enable these features. To make the code easier to maintain
introduce an enum with the bit field positions for the access info.

Allow outlined checks to be enabled with -mllvm
-hwasan-inline-all-checks=0. Kernels that contain runtime support for
outlined checks may pass this flag. Kernels lacking runtime support
will continue to link because they do not pass the flag. Old versions
of LLVM will ignore the flag and continue to use inline checks.

With a separate kernel patch [1] I measured the code size of defconfig
+ tag-based KASAN, as well as boot time (i.e. time to init launch)
on a DragonBoard 845c with an Android arm64 GKI kernel. The results
are below:

         code size    boot time
before    92824064      6.18s
after     38822400      6.65s

[1] https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/I1a30036c70ab3c3ee78d75ed9b87ef7cdc3fdb76

Depends on D90425

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90426
2020-10-30 14:25:40 -07:00
Peter Collingbourne c9b1a2b41d AArch64: Use SBFX instead of UBFX to extract address granule in outlined HWASan checks.
In a kernel (or in general in environments where bit 55 of the address
is set) the shadow base needs to point to the end of the shadow region,
not the beginning. Bit 55 needs to be sign extended into bits 52-63
of the shadow base offset, otherwise we end up loading from an invalid
address. We can do this by using SBFX instead of UBFX.

Using SBFX should have no effect in the userspace case where bit 55
of the address is clear so we do so unconditionally. I don't think
we need a ABI version bump for this (but one will come anyway when
we switch to x20 for the shadow base register).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90424
2020-10-30 12:53:15 -07:00
Peter Collingbourne 3859fc653f AArch64: Switch to x20 as the shadow base register for outlined HWASan checks.
From a code size perspective it turns out to be better to use a
callee-saved register to pass the shadow base. For non-leaf functions
it avoids the need to reload the shadow base into x9 after each
function call, at the cost of an additional stack slot to save the
caller's x20. But with x9 there is also a stack size cost, either
as a result of copying x9 to a callee-saved register across calls or
by spilling it to stack, so for the non-leaf functions the change to
stack usage is largely neutral.

It is also code size (and stack size) neutral for many leaf functions.
Although they now need to save/restore x20 this can typically be
combined via LDP/STP into the x30 save/restore. In the case where
the function needs callee-saved registers or stack spills we end up
needing, on average, 8 more bytes of stack and 1 more instruction
but given the improvements to other functions this seems like the
right tradeoff.

Unfortunately we cannot change the register for the v1 (non short
granules) check because the runtime assumes that the shadow base
register is stored in x9, so the v1 check still uses x9.

Aside from that there is no change to the ABI because the choice
of shadow base register is a contract between the caller and the
outlined check function, both of which are compiler generated. We do
need to rename the v2 check functions though because the functions
are deduplicated based on their names, not on their contents, and we
need to make sure that when object files from old and new compilers
are linked together we don't end up with a function that uses x9
calling an outlined check that uses x20 or vice versa.

With this change code size of /system/lib64/*.so in an Android build
with HWASan goes from 200066976 bytes to 194085912 bytes, or a 3%
decrease.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90422
2020-10-30 12:51:30 -07:00
Peter Collingbourne c336557f02 hwasan: Compatibility fixes for short granules.
We can't use short granules with stack instrumentation when targeting older
API levels because the rest of the system won't understand the short granule
tags stored in shadow memory.

Moreover, we need to be able to let old binaries (which won't understand
short granule tags) run on a new system that supports short granule
tags. Such binaries will call the __hwasan_tag_mismatch function when their
outlined checks fail. We can compensate for the binary's lack of support
for short granules by implementing the short granule part of the check in
the __hwasan_tag_mismatch function. Unfortunately we can't do anything about
inline checks, but I don't believe that we can generate these by default on
aarch64, nor did we do so when the ABI was fixed.

A new function, __hwasan_tag_mismatch_v2, is introduced that lets code
targeting the new runtime avoid redoing the short granule check. Because tag
mismatches are rare this isn't important from a performance perspective; the
main benefit is that it introduces a symbol dependency that prevents binaries
targeting the new runtime from running on older (i.e. incompatible) runtimes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68059

llvm-svn: 373035
2019-09-27 01:02:10 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne 1366262b74 hwasan: Improve precision of checks using short granule tags.
A short granule is a granule of size between 1 and `TG-1` bytes. The size
of a short granule is stored at the location in shadow memory where the
granule's tag is normally stored, while the granule's actual tag is stored
in the last byte of the granule. This means that in order to verify that a
pointer tag matches a memory tag, HWASAN must check for two possibilities:

* the pointer tag is equal to the memory tag in shadow memory, or
* the shadow memory tag is actually a short granule size, the value being loaded
  is in bounds of the granule and the pointer tag is equal to the last byte of
  the granule.

Pointer tags between 1 to `TG-1` are possible and are as likely as any other
tag. This means that these tags in memory have two interpretations: the full
tag interpretation (where the pointer tag is between 1 and `TG-1` and the
last byte of the granule is ordinary data) and the short tag interpretation
(where the pointer tag is stored in the granule).

When HWASAN detects an error near a memory tag between 1 and `TG-1`, it
will show both the memory tag and the last byte of the granule. Currently,
it is up to the user to disambiguate the two possibilities.

Because this functionality obsoletes the right aligned heap feature of
the HWASAN memory allocator (and because we can no longer easily test
it), the feature is removed.

Also update the documentation to cover both short granule tags and
outlined checks.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63908

llvm-svn: 365551
2019-07-09 20:22:36 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne 2742eeb78e hwasan: Shrink outlined checks by 1 instruction.
Turns out that we can save an instruction by folding the right shift into
the compare.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63568

llvm-svn: 363874
2019-06-19 20:40:03 +00:00
Mitch Phillips 790edbc16e [HWASan] Save + print registers when tag mismatch occurs in AArch64.
Summary:
This change change the instrumentation to allow users to view the registers at the point at which tag mismatch occured. Most of the heavy lifting is done in the runtime library, where we save the registers to the stack and emit unwind information. This allows us to reduce the overhead, as very little additional work needs to be done in each __hwasan_check instance.

In this implementation, the fast path of __hwasan_check is unmodified. There are an additional 4 instructions (16B) emitted in the slow path in every __hwasan_check instance. This may increase binary size somewhat, but as most of the work is done in the runtime library, it's manageable.

The failure trace now contains a list of registers at the point of which the failure occured, in a format similar to that of Android's tombstones. It currently has the following format:

Registers where the failure occurred (pc 0x0055555561b4):
    x0  0000000000000014  x1  0000007ffffff6c0  x2  1100007ffffff6d0  x3  12000056ffffe025
    x4  0000007fff800000  x5  0000000000000014  x6  0000007fff800000  x7  0000000000000001
    x8  12000056ffffe020  x9  0200007700000000  x10 0200007700000000  x11 0000000000000000
    x12 0000007fffffdde0  x13 0000000000000000  x14 02b65b01f7a97490  x15 0000000000000000
    x16 0000007fb77376b8  x17 0000000000000012  x18 0000007fb7ed6000  x19 0000005555556078
    x20 0000007ffffff768  x21 0000007ffffff778  x22 0000000000000001  x23 0000000000000000
    x24 0000000000000000  x25 0000000000000000  x26 0000000000000000  x27 0000000000000000
    x28 0000000000000000  x29 0000007ffffff6f0  x30 00000055555561b4

... and prints after the dump of memory tags around the buggy address.

Every register is saved exactly as it was at the point where the tag mismatch occurs, with the exception of x16/x17. These registers are used in the tag mismatch calculation as scratch registers during __hwasan_check, and cannot be saved without affecting the fast path. As these registers are designated as scratch registers for linking, there should be no important information in them that could aid in debugging.

Reviewers: pcc, eugenis

Reviewed By: pcc, eugenis

Subscribers: srhines, kubamracek, mgorny, javed.absar, krytarowski, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, jdoerfert, llvm-commits, #sanitizers

Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58857

llvm-svn: 355738
2019-03-08 21:22:35 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne 73078ecd38 hwasan: Move memory access checks into small outlined functions on aarch64.
Each hwasan check requires emitting a small piece of code like this:
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/HardwareAssistedAddressSanitizerDesign.html#memory-accesses

The problem with this is that these code blocks typically bloat code
size significantly.

An obvious solution is to outline these blocks of code. In fact, this
has already been implemented under the -hwasan-instrument-with-calls
flag. However, as currently implemented this has a number of problems:
- The functions use the same calling convention as regular C functions.
  This means that the backend must spill all temporary registers as
  required by the platform's C calling convention, even though the
  check only needs two registers on the hot path.
- The functions take the address to be checked in a fixed register,
  which increases register pressure.
Both of these factors can diminish the code size effect and increase
the performance hit of -hwasan-instrument-with-calls.

The solution that this patch implements is to involve the aarch64
backend in outlining the checks. An intrinsic and pseudo-instruction
are created to represent a hwasan check. The pseudo-instruction
is register allocated like any other instruction, and we allow the
register allocator to select almost any register for the address to
check. A particular combination of (register selection, type of check)
triggers the creation in the backend of a function to handle the check
for specifically that pair. The resulting functions are deduplicated by
the linker. The pseudo-instruction (really the function) is specified
to preserve all registers except for the registers that the AAPCS
specifies may be clobbered by a call.

To measure the code size and performance effect of this change, I
took a number of measurements using Chromium for Android on aarch64,
comparing a browser with inlined checks (the baseline) against a
browser with outlined checks.

Code size: Size of .text decreases from 243897420 to 171619972 bytes,
or a 30% decrease.

Performance: Using Chromium's blink_perf.layout microbenchmarks I
measured a median performance regression of 6.24%.

The fact that a perf/size tradeoff is evident here suggests that
we might want to make the new behaviour conditional on -Os/-Oz.
But for now I've enabled it unconditionally, my reasoning being that
hwasan users typically expect a relatively large perf hit, and ~6%
isn't really adding much. We may want to revisit this decision in
the future, though.

I also tried experimenting with varying the number of registers
selectable by the hwasan check pseudo-instruction (which would result
in fewer variants being created), on the hypothesis that creating
fewer variants of the function would expose another perf/size tradeoff
by reducing icache pressure from the check functions at the cost of
register pressure. Although I did observe a code size increase with
fewer registers, I did not observe a strong correlation between the
number of registers and the performance of the resulting browser on the
microbenchmarks, so I conclude that we might as well use ~all registers
to get the maximum code size improvement. My results are below:

Regs | .text size | Perf hit
-----+------------+---------
~all | 171619972  | 6.24%
  16 | 171765192  | 7.03%
   8 | 172917788  | 5.82%
   4 | 177054016  | 6.89%

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56954

llvm-svn: 351920
2019-01-23 02:20:10 +00:00