the compilation time and there is no case for which we see any improvement in
performance. This patch removes this pass and its associated test cases from
the tree.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101313
Change-Id: I0599169a7609c19a887f8d847a71e664030cc141
Both ds_read_b128 and ds_read2_b64 are valid for 128bit 16-byte aligned
loads but the one that will be selected is determined either by the order in
tablegen or by the AddedComplexity attribute. Currently ds_read_b128 has
priority.
While ds_read2_b64 has lower alignment requirements, we cannot always
restrict ds_read_b128 to 16-byte alignment because of unaligned-access-mode
option. This was causing ds_read_b128 to be selected for 8-byte aligned
loads regardles of chosen access mode.
To resolve this we use two patterns for selecting ds_read_b128. One
requires alignment of 16-byte and the other requires
unaligned-access-mode option.
Same goes for ds_write2_b64 and ds_write_b128.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92767
This reverts commit ca907bfb57.
According to michel.daenzer,
> This completely broke the Mesa radeonsi driver on Navi 14. Xorg +
> xterm come up with major corruption & psychedelic colours.
When memory operations are outstanding on function calls, either the
caller or the callee can insert a waitcnt to ensure that all reads are
finished.
Calls need some time to be executed, so if the callee inserts the
waitcnt, filling the instruction buffer and waiting for memory will be
interleaved, hiding some latency. This comes at the cost of having a
waitcnt inside functions that may not be needed as no memory operations
are outstanding.
For function calls, this is already implemented. The same principal
applies to returns: If the caller inserts a waitcnt after the call, the
callee does not have to wait and the return and memory operation can be
run in parallel.
This commit implements waiting in the caller after returning from a
function call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87674
Alignment requirements for ds_read/write_b96/b128 for gfx9 and onward are
now the same as for other GCN subtargets. This way we can avoid any
unintentional use of these instructions on systems that do not support dword
alignment and instead require natural alignment.
This also makes 'SH_MEM_CONFIG.alignment_mode == STRICT' the default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87821
Fix local ds_read/write_b96/b128 so they can be selected if the alignment
allows. Otherwise, either pick appropriate ds_read2/write2 instructions or break
them down.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81638
Baptiste Saleil