Support for XNACK and SRAMECC is not static on some GPUs. We must be able
to differentiate between different scenarios for these dynamic subtarget
features.
The possible settings are:
- Unsupported: The GPU has no support for XNACK/SRAMECC.
- Any: Preference is unspecified. Use conservative settings that can run anywhere.
- Off: Request support for XNACK/SRAMECC Off
- On: Request support for XNACK/SRAMECC On
GCNSubtarget will track the four options based on the following criteria. If
the subtarget does not support XNACK/SRAMECC we say the setting is
"Unsupported". If no subtarget features for XNACK/SRAMECC are requested we
must support "Any" mode. If the subtarget features XNACK/SRAMECC exist in the
feature string when initializing the subtarget, the settings are "On/Off".
The defaults are updated to be conservatively correct, meaning if no setting
for XNACK or SRAMECC is explicitly requested, defaults will be used which
generate code that can be run anywhere. This corresponds to the "Any" setting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85882
Treat a non-atomic volatile load and store as a relaxed atomic at
system scope for the address spaces accessed. This will ensure all
relevant caches will be bypassed.
A volatile atomic is not changed and still only bypasses caches upto
the level specified by the SyncScope operand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94214
We have a single noret intrinsic an a lot of special handling
around it. Declare it just as any other but do not define rtn
instructions itself instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87719
Austin Kerbow