This changes the lowering of saddsat and ssubsat so that instead of
using:
r,o = saddo x, y
c = setcc r < 0
s = c ? INTMAX : INTMIN
ret o ? s : r
into using asr and xor to materialize the INTMAX/INTMIN constants:
r,o = saddo x, y
s = ashr r, BW-1
x = xor s, INTMIN
ret o ? x : r
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/TYufgD
This seems to reduce the instruction count in most testcases across most
architectures. X86 has some custom lowering added to compensate for
cases where it can increase instruction count.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105853
Currently isReallyTriviallyReMaterializableGeneric() implementation
prevents rematerialization on any virtual register use on the grounds
that is not a trivial rematerialization and that we do not want to
extend liveranges.
It appears that LRE logic does not attempt to extend a liverange of
a source register for rematerialization so that is not an issue.
That is checked in the LiveRangeEdit::allUsesAvailableAt().
The only non-trivial aspect of it is accounting for tied-defs which
normally represent a read-modify-write operation and not rematerializable.
The test for a tied-def situation already exists in the
/CodeGen/AMDGPU/remat-vop.mir,
test_no_remat_v_cvt_f32_i32_sdwa_dst_unused_preserve.
The change has affected ARM/Thumb, Mips, RISCV, and x86. For the targets
where I more or less understand the asm it seems to reduce spilling
(as expected) or be neutral. However, it needs a review by all targets'
specialists.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106408
This test didn't include all test check lines, thanks to .'s in function
names. It also changed the triple to hard float to make a more
interesting test for NEON code generation.
Some of the Arm complex pattern functions call canExtractShiftFromMul,
which can modify the DAG in-place. For this to be valid and handled
successfully we need to define ComplexPatternFuncMutatesDAG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107476
D107068 fixed the same problem on aarch64 but the arm variant wasn't exposed in existing test coverage.
I've copied the arm64-neon-copy tests (and stripped the intrinsic test from it) for testing on arm neon builds as well.
This assert is intended to ensure that the high registers are not
selected when it is passed to one of the thumb UXT instructions. However
it was triggering even for 32 bit where no UXT instruction is emitted.
Fixes PR51313.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107363
Previously we would emit constant pool entries for ldr inline asm at the
very end of AsmPrinter::doFinalization(). However, if we're emitting
dwarf aranges, that would end all sections with aranges. Then if we have
constant pool entries to be emitted in those same sections, we'd hit an
assert that the section has already been ended.
We want to emit constant pool entries before emitting dwarf aranges.
This patch splits out arm32/64's constant pool entry emission into its
own MCTargetStreamer virtual method.
Fixes PR51208
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107314
Function findBestLoopTopHelper tries to find a new loop top block which can also
fall through to OldTop, but it's impossible if OldTop is not a chain header, so
it should exit immediately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106329
In mandatory tail calling conventions we might have to deallocate stack
space used by our arguments before return. This happens after popping
CSRs, so the pop cannot be turned into the return itself in this case.
The else branch here was already a nop, so removing it as a tidy-up.
This removes the promotion of NEON AND, OR and XOR nodes to v2i32/v4i32,
treating them the same as the AArch64 and MVE backends where we just add
the relevant patterns for each legal type. This prevents a lot of
bitcasts from being added to the DAG, which have the potential to make
optimizations more difficult. It does mean adding extra patterns, and
some codegen can change due to the types now being legal, not promoted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105588
Since we're still building on top of the MVT based infrastructure, we
need to track the pointer type/address space on the side so we can end
up with the correct pointer LLTs when interpreting CCValAssigns.
If we try to create a new GlobalVariable on each iteration, the Module will
detect the name collision and "helpfully" rename later iterations by appending
".1" etc. But "___udivsi3.1" doesn't exist and we definitely don't want to try
to call it.
So instead check whether there's already a global with the right name in the
module and use that if so.
This new MIR pass removes redundant DBG_VALUEs.
After the register allocator is done, more precisely, after
the Virtual Register Rewriter, we end up having duplicated
DBG_VALUEs, since some virtual registers are being rewritten
into the same physical register as some of existing DBG_VALUEs.
Each DBG_VALUE should indicate (at least before the LiveDebugValues)
variables assignment, but it is being clobbered for function
parameters during the SelectionDAG since it generates new DBG_VALUEs
after COPY instructions, even though the parameter has no assignment.
For example, if we had a DBG_VALUE $regX as an entry debug value
representing the parameter, and a COPY and after the COPY,
DBG_VALUE $virt_reg, and after the virtregrewrite the $virt_reg gets
rewritten into $regX, we'd end up having redundant DBG_VALUE.
This breaks the definition of the DBG_VALUE since some analysis passes
might be built on top of that premise..., and this patch tries to fix
the MIR with the respect to that.
This first patch performs bacward scan, by trying to detect a sequence of
consecutive DBG_VALUEs, and to remove all DBG_VALUEs describing one
variable but the last one:
For example:
(1) DBG_VALUE $edi, !"var1", ...
(2) DBG_VALUE $esi, !"var2", ...
(3) DBG_VALUE $edi, !"var1", ...
...
in this case, we can remove (1).
By combining the forward scan that will be introduced in the next patch
(from this stack), by inspecting the statistics, the RemoveRedundantDebugValues
removes 15032 instructions by using gdb-7.11 as a testbed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105279
The test case here hits machine verifier problems. There are volatile
long loads that the results of do not get used, loading into two dead
registers. IfCvt will predicate them and as it does will add implicit
uses of the predicating registers due to thinking they are live in. As
nothing has used the register, the machine verifier disagrees that they
are really live and we end up with a failure.
The registers come from Pristine regs that LivePhysRegs counts as live.
This patch adds a addLiveInsNoPristines method to be used instead in
IfCvt, so that only really live in regs need to be added as implicit
operands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90965
We already have reassociation code for Adds and Ors separately in DAG
combiner, this adds it for the combination of the two where Ors act like
Adds. It reassociates (add (or (x, c), y) -> (add (add (x, y), c)) where
we know that the Ors operands have no common bits set, and the Or has
one use.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104765
As part of making ScalarEvolution's handling of pointers consistent, we
want to forbid multiplying a pointer by -1 (or any other value). This
means we can't blindly subtract pointers.
There are a few ways we could deal with this:
1. We could completely forbid subtracting pointers in getMinusSCEV()
2. We could forbid subracting pointers with different pointer bases
(this patch).
3. We could try to ptrtoint pointer operands.
The option in this patch is more friendly to non-integral pointers: code
that works with normal pointers will also work with non-integral
pointers. And it seems like there are very few places that actually
benefit from the third option.
As a minimal patch, the ScalarEvolution implementation of getMinusSCEV
still ends up subtracting pointers if they have the same base. This
should eliminate the shared pointer base, but eventually we'll need to
rewrite it to avoid negating the pointer base. I plan to do this as a
separate step to allow measuring the compile-time impact.
This doesn't cause obvious functional changes in most cases; the one
case that is significantly affected is ICmpZero handling in LSR (which
is the source of almost all the test changes). The resulting changes
seem okay to me, but suggestions welcome. As an alternative, I tried
explicitly ptrtoint'ing the operands, but the result doesn't seem
obviously better.
I deleted the test lsr-undef-in-binop.ll becuase I couldn't figure out
how to repair it to test what it was actually trying to test.
Recommitting with fix to MemoryDepChecker::isDependent.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104806
As part of making ScalarEvolution's handling of pointers consistent, we
want to forbid multiplying a pointer by -1 (or any other value). This
means we can't blindly subtract pointers.
There are a few ways we could deal with this:
1. We could completely forbid subtracting pointers in getMinusSCEV()
2. We could forbid subracting pointers with different pointer bases
(this patch).
3. We could try to ptrtoint pointer operands.
The option in this patch is more friendly to non-integral pointers: code
that works with normal pointers will also work with non-integral
pointers. And it seems like there are very few places that actually
benefit from the third option.
As a minimal patch, the ScalarEvolution implementation of getMinusSCEV
still ends up subtracting pointers if they have the same base. This
should eliminate the shared pointer base, but eventually we'll need to
rewrite it to avoid negating the pointer base. I plan to do this as a
separate step to allow measuring the compile-time impact.
This doesn't cause obvious functional changes in most cases; the one
case that is significantly affected is ICmpZero handling in LSR (which
is the source of almost all the test changes). The resulting changes
seem okay to me, but suggestions welcome. As an alternative, I tried
explicitly ptrtoint'ing the operands, but the result doesn't seem
obviously better.
I deleted the test lsr-undef-in-binop.ll becuase I couldn't figure out
how to repair it to test what it was actually trying to test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104806
D104868 removed an (incorrect) fold for distributing BFI instructions in
a chain, combining them into a single instruction. BFIs like that are
hard to test, as the patterns are often destroyed before they become
BFIs. But it can come up in places, with chains of BFIs that can be
combined.
This patch adds a replacement, which reassociates BFI instructions with
non-overlapping insertion masks so that low bits are inserted first.
This can end up sorting the nodes so that adjacent inserts are next to
one another, allowing the existing folds to combine into a single BFI.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105096
This enables proper lowering of non-byte sized loads. We still aren't
faithfully preserving memory types everywhere, so the legality checks
still only consider the size.
This will currently accept the old number of bytes syntax, and convert
it to a scalar. This should be removed in the near future (I think I
converted all of the tests already, but likely missed a few).
Not sure what the exact syntax and policy should be. We can continue
printing the number of bytes for non-generic instructions to avoid
test churn and only allow non-scalar types for generic instructions.
This will currently print the LLT in parentheses, but accept parsing
the existing integers and implicitly converting to scalar. The
parentheses are a bit ugly, but the parser logic seems unable to deal
without either parentheses or some keyword to indicate the start of a
type.
This prevents constant gep operands from being hoisted by the Constant
Hoisting pass, leaving them to CodegenPrepare which can usually do a
better job at splitting large offsets. This can, in general, improve
performance and decrease codesize, especially for v6m where many
constants have a high cost.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104877
This adds a small fold for extract (ARM_BUILD_VECTOR) to fold to the
original node. This can help simplify the resulting codegen in some
cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104860
For a bfi chain like:
a = bfi input, x, y
b = bfi a, x', y'
The previous code was RAUW'ing a with x, mutating the second 'b' bfi, and when
SelectionDAG's CSE code ended up deleting it unexpectedly, bad things happend.
There's no need to RAUW in this case because we can just return our newly
created replacement BFI node. It also looked incorrect because it didn't account
for other users of the 'a' bfi.
Since it seems that chains of more than 2 BFI nodes are hard/impossible to
produce without this combine kicking in at some point, I've removed that
functionality since it had no test coverage.
rdar://79095399
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104868
We don't constant fold based on demanded bits elsewhere in
SimplifyDemandedBits, so I don't think we should shrink them either.
The affected ARM test changes because a constant become non-opaque
and eventually enabled some constant folding. This no longer happens.
I checked and InstCombine is able to simplify this test. I'm not sure exactly
what it was trying to test.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri, dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104832
Based ontop of D104598, which is a NFCI-ish refactoring.
Here, a restriction, that only empty blocks can be merged, is lifted.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104597
This changes the approach taken to tail-merge the blocks
to always create a new block instead of trying to reuse some block,
and generalizes it to support dealing not with just the `ret` in the future.
This effectively lifts the CallBr restriction, although this isn't really intentional.
That is the only non-NFC change here, i'm not sure if it's reasonable/feasible to temporarily retain it.
Other restrictions of the transform remain.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104598
These all (and some others) are being affected by D104597,
but they are manually-written, which rather complicates
checking the effect that change has on them.
This can be seen as a follow up to commit 0ee439b705,
that changed the second argument of __powidf2, __powisf2 and
__powitf2 in compiler-rt from si_int to int. That was to align with
how those runtimes are defined in libgcc.
One thing that seem to have been missing in that patch was to make
sure that the rest of LLVM also handle that the argument now depends
on the size of int (not using the si_int machine mode for 32-bit).
When using __builtin_powi for a target with 16-bit int clang crashed.
And when emitting libcalls to those rtlib functions, typically when
lowering @llvm.powi), the backend would always prepare the exponent
argument as an i32 which caused miscompiles when the rtlib was
compiled with 16-bit int.
The solution used here is to use an overloaded type for the second
argument in @llvm.powi. This way clang can use the "correct" type
when lowering __builtin_powi, and then later when emitting the libcall
it is assumed that the type used in @llvm.powi matches the rtlib
function.
One thing that needed some extra attention was that when vectorizing
calls several passes did not support that several arguments could
be overloaded in the intrinsics. This patch allows overload of a
scalar operand by adding hasVectorInstrinsicOverloadedScalarOpd, with
an entry for powi.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99439
Re-applying this patch after bots failures. Should be fine now.
The function __multi3() is undefined on 32-bit ARM, so a call to it should
never be emitted. Instead, plain instructions need to be generated to
perform 128-bit multiplications.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103906
-Wframe-larger-than= is an interesting warning; we can't know the frame
size until PrologueEpilogueInsertion (PEI); very late in the compilation
pipeline.
-Wframe-larger-than= was propagated through CC1 as an -mllvm flag, then
was a cl::opt in LLVM's PEI pass; this meant it was dropped during LTO
and needed to be re-specified via -plugin-opt.
Instead, make it part of the IR proper as a module level attribute,
similar to D103048. Introduce -fwarn-stack-size CC1 option.
Reviewed By: rsmith, qcolombet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103928
The function __multi3() is undefined on 32-bit ARM, so a call to it
should never be emitted. Instead, plain instructions need to be
generated to perform 128-bit multiplications.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103906
David Green